Search Posts

A screenshot of a tweet/post by Eric Burlison (@EricBurlison, verified account, profile photo of a smiling bearded man), posted at 8:32 AM · Jun 17, 2026 with 994 views. The tweet contains a link preview to slate.com and an embedded political meme image. The meme uses a two-panel "Democrat / Also Democrats" format with a cartoon illustration of the same red-haired man in a blue shirt shown twice: in the top panel he has a shocked, outraged expression with a speech bubble outlined in blue; in the bottom panel he has a smug, satisfied grin with a speech bubble outlined in red.

Text in image: Eric Burlison ✓ @EricBurlison slate.com/news-and-polit... Democrat How dare president Trump waste 14 million dollars cleaning up our nation's reflecting pool Also Democrats Spending $21 million on a park and playground in El Salvador is a great deal 8:32 AM · Jun 17, 2026 · 994 Views

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A four-panel meme using the "Disaster Girl"-style "Reject/Approve" format with Barack Obama. Top-left panel shows Obama in a dark suit and red tie, grimacing with his eyes closed and one hand raised dismissively as if refusing something, with a small "X @PlanetOfMemes" watermark near his hand. Top-right panel shows a red-and-tan political/electoral map of the southeastern United States (states resembling the Deep South region, including Louisiana's coastline), with red covering most of the area and labeled "JIM CROW 2.0" in bold white text with a black outline. Bottom-left panel shows Obama again, this time smiling with eyes closed, pointing forward approvingly with his index finger. Bottom-right panel shows a blue-and-red map of the northeastern United States (New England states labeled ME, VT, NH, MA), mostly blue with a small red sliver on the west side, labeled "DEMOCRACY" in bold white text with a black outline. The meme implies a contrast between how Republican-leaning southern voting/redistricting maps are characterized versus Democratic-leaning northeastern ones.

Text in image: X @PlanetOfMemes JIM CROW 2.0 ME VT NH MA DEMOCRACY

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A newly released FBI file showed President Obama used a pseudonym to exchange emails with then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Political advisers worried pay-to-play allegations could overshadow the beginning of her White House bid. And while he downplayed all of this on Sunday, Mook wrote a February 2015 email marked Foundation vulnerability points, which listed out two pages of problems that could hamper the campaign, including donations from foreign governments like Morocco, private jets and pricey hotels. These are stolen documents. And then there's a new email dragging President Obama deeper into the controversy over Clinton's private email account and server. Mr. President, when did you first learn that Hillary Clinton used an email system outside the U.S. government for official business while she was Secretary of State? At the same time, everybody else learned it through news reports. That comment triggered immediate alarm from Clinton's top advisers. Cheryl Mills writing, "We need to clean this up. He has emails from her. They do not say State.gov." White House spokesman Josh Earnest tonight is stressing the president never said he did not trade emails with Clinton. He just didn't know the details about her server. President Obama has a highly secured Blackberry that he uses to get emails, and it has two functions. One is to mask his physical location when he's using it, and the second is to make sure every email, every text message, every phone call has been vetted and preapproved for him to receive. It's called whitelisting. So if you or I had the president's email, if we sent him a message, it would be blocked and it would bounce back. So the question is, did he receive the Clinton emails on the Blackberry? And if so, when did his team direct the White House Communications Office to accept that email and whitelist it? Because it's a very deliberate act, it doesn't happen by accident. Yeah, you've got to get cleared in, right? Correct. Just like you've got to get cleared into the White House, you've got to get it cleared into the president's email list. Now we know that he did exchange emails with her when she was writing emails from her private server. Correct. Now the question, I guess, is whether he received those emails on a computer somewhere or whether he computed on his little Blackberry, which requires the extra step of getting it cleared, right? That's right. And the question here is whether his staff asked for her address to be added to that Blackberry before March of 2015. That's when he said, "I first learned about the server from news reports." That's when the New York Times reported the story. But everything that we see suggests that he was receiving emails from her on the Blackberry prior to that period. Right. And we know, of course, that those emails from her did not say Hillary Clinton at state got gov, right? That's right, exactly. Which would have been the normal internal system. That's right. But it's also understandable to me, however, that if she was in his address book, she would have been there under the name. And if I send you an email on the Fox system, I look up your name and I don't know the particulars of the address. I just know that it goes to you. I looked at it. I could find it. But you might not notice that. That's right. But someone, I was told, either the chief of staff or deputy chief of staff would have to take a directive from the president to add an address. And if you just look at that simple address, even if you're not an IT wizard, you see that it's not a government address. If you know it at state.gov, right? That's right. You see clintonemail.com. And that tells you that there is a registered domain for that address. And it was being used for government business. So either a staffer or the president himself must have done this. It would likely be the chief of staff. If he received them on his black brand, we don't know that, correct? Everything suggests that these emails were received on the black brand. It would make sense that they would be on the black brand. Because they had so many in-person meetings, it wasn't a situation where emails were being received routinely on a desktop computer in the Oval Office. At that particular time, I guess the blackberry was a thing, especially for Mr. Obama, who had gotten accustomed to using one before he took office. That's correct. And she wanted, remember, in the emails we saw released by the State Department, Cheryl Mills, her principal chief of staff at the State Department, wanted to see whether Hillary Clinton could also get one of these sort of Brinks truck type blackberries, like what the president had, so that she could communicate. But again, it goes back to when she was whitelisted. When did that email get approved to be received? And it takes us to the age-old question, what did the president know, and when did he know it?

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

It has been nearly a decade since Barack Hussein Obama left office nearly 18 years since he was first elected as president. And yet Barack is still refusing to write off into the sunset with grace and something called dignity. Nope. Instead, he's now desperate for validation, but his most recent sit down with failed soon to be out of work, so-called comedian Stephen Colbert was an important reminder about the constant deception, gaslighting, pious lectures that divided a nation. Take a look. The White House shouldn't be able to direct the attorney general to go around prosecuting the president. Just technically, it's under the executive branch, but the norm is that it's independent. The idea is that the attorney general is the people's lawyer. It's not the president's consigliere. He can't overcome the politicization of the criminal justice system. The awesome power of the state. You can't have a situation in which whoever's in charge of the government starts using that to go after their political enemies or reward their friends. We will address that directly in a second, but remember, we're just a bunch of bitter, angry Americans that cling to our God, our guns, our Bibles, our religion. He of course was hanging out the church of G.D. America with Reverend Wright, palling around with admitted domestic terrorists, Bernadine Dorn, Bill Ayers. Obama wrote the book on weaponization and politicizing justice. Members Attorney General Eric Holder bragging about being Obama's wingman, and for years, with the help of his wingman, Obama routinely targeted his political enemies, journalists that ran negative stories. They were wiretapped, classified as traitors, business leaders with the wrong views. They were targeted. Some were even jailed. The GOP's rising star at the time, Virginia Governor Bob McDonald. Remember, he was utterly destroyed by Jack Smith over a series of cooked up convictions that were all unanimously overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court. And here's the big one. The 2016 Republican nominee for president, Donald J. Trump, and his campaign, his transition team and his presidency, remember they were spied on by Obama loyalists that were gaming the FISA court system? But it wasn't just the courts. Remember, it was Obama who weaponized nearly every powerful lever of government against political opponents. And of course, that includes the IRS. Remember that little scandal? The FBI, even the intel community. And for the record, remember how the Russia collusion hoax began? It began, according to a 2025 report from the director of national intelligence. We now know, quote, "New evidence uncovers Obama-directed creation of false intelligence reports used to launch years-long coup to undermine President Trump and the American people." Now, remember, Obama personally, they had an intelligence at I.C.A. report that career senior intel officials, no, Russia did not impact the 2016 election. Well, he didn't like that conclusion. So he had a meeting in December of 2016 in his Oval Office at the time. And guess what? They came up with a new one to fit his narrative to go after Donald Trump. Ultimately, this weaponization of government resulted in 88 cooked up felony charges against the Democrats' chief political rival and a famous mugshot seen around the world. But Obama is now deeply worried about Republicans because the GOP just doesn't act in good faith, doesn't care about the rule of law. Really? This is the same Barack Obama that set Trump up for a phony hoax. Take a look. I'm worried about the Republican Party, not just the Democratic Party. When I was president, people would ask me, "What change would you like to see in Washington?" I'd say, "I'd love a loyal opposition. I'd love a Republican Party that was conservative in some ways, that didn't agree with me on a whole bunch of stuff, but believed in rule of law and judicial independence and empirical evidence and science and wasn't constantly tapping into our worst impulses." Now, talk about worst impulses. You mean Obama, his party that opened the border, 12-plus unvetted illegal immigrants from over 200 countries, known terrorists, murderers, rapists, child molesters, other violent criminals, cartel members, gang members. They eliminated bail, reduced prison sentences from violent offenders. They blocked deportations for even rapists and murderers, wiretapped journalists, tried to throw an opposing presidential candidate in prison for the rest of his life on fake victimless crimes that no one can even recall without an extensive Google search. The guy that gave billions to Iran, what did Iran do with that money? Oh, that's right. They built out their nuclear program, their ballistic missile program. They fomented terror around the world. That's the party that cares about the rule of law. High from his ivory tower at one of his multimillion dollar estates across the country, Obama has not only lost touch with reality, but it appears the former president has lost the ability to even tell a decent lie. But the good news tonight, Obama is now forced to witness his entire legacy go completely down the drain, compliments of the man that he tried to destroy. Continue with reaction, Fox News legal analyst, Greg Jarrett, Fox News contributor Jason Chaffetz. Good to see you both. Greg, start with you on the legal side. That I.C.A. change, remember, career senior intelligence officials determined there was no Russian interference. Barack Obama had a meeting in his office, if I recall, in December of 2016, and he demanded they change that accurate assessment, correct? Oh, absolutely. This helps Trump. So we've got to change it. And so he had John Brennan at the CIA have the I.C.A. say the exact opposite. And people in the intelligence community warned Brennan, you can't do this. You're basing it on a bogus dossier that's already been disproven. Well, Brennan didn't care and he went ahead and did it anyway on the orders of Barack Obama. So, you know, it's it's comical for Obama to preach that an attorney general or CIA director is not the president's conciliary, since, you know, that's how he treated the people who worked for him. As you pointed out, you know, Holder was famously Obama's wingman. But the ex-president, you know, has always been sanctimonious, a hypocrite secretly engaging in worse behavior than that which he condemns. In the Colbert interview, he implies Trump is weaponizing the justice system against political opponents when, as you point out, Sean, in fact, that is precisely what Obama did to Trump in 2016, the Russia hoax, you know, and I really don't want to get lectured by a guy that sat 20 years in the pews of Reverend Wright the Sunday after 9/11 or 125 years ago, took to the pulpit and said, no, no, God bless America, G.D., America. It's in the Bible. The same Barack Obama we learned did have a picture with Louis Farrakhan, the same Barack Obama that was friends with Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dorn. Bill admitted of all days 9/11 or one in The New York Times, we wish we I wish we did more, Bill Ayers said, in terms of the activities that the weather underground was involved in. Really? I don't want to get lectured by that guy because that guy was the most radical guy to ever sit in the White House. And for him to pretend, Sean, that they were a scandal free administration. Look, I was in the room. I was part of the team that went after him on Fast and Furious, where they knowingly and willingly gave nearly a thousand weapons to the drug cartels and then tried to do some very nefarious things to law enforcement. And somebody actually ended up getting killed. I remember when Big Gazi happened and four of our Americans, including the ambassador, were killed and they tried to cover that up and snooker the American people and tell them that those things hadn't happened. I was the chairman of the oversight committee. I issued dozens of subpoenas, Mr. Rule of Law there, President Obama, guess what? You didn't fulfill any one of those duly issued subpoenas. You fought me every single time. You did everything you could to get around it. You never complied with that. And then you throw that thing to Stephen Colbert. I remember when you went after 300 of those good conservatives that were trying to just participate and you had the IRS target them and not allow them to participate. And then you had documents that were under subpoena that I issued. And then you destroyed those documents. I remember that Obama. I remember the Obama who went after the reporters and spied on them. That's the Barack Obama that I remember. Don't try to tell us that, "Oh, Donald Trump's the bad guy." Donald Trump is the most ethical down the line. I will play it straight. You just got to be able to prove your case person that I know. And I had that experience. I didn't start that way, but I can tell you, having watched two of them side by side, Donald Trump shoots straight. And Barack Obama just put that smiley, happy face on and lies through his teeth. And by the way, Greg, how ironic is it that if it were not for the immunity case of Donald J. Trump, I wonder if he could be looked into as part of the grand conspiracy investigation. Well, a lot of his actions are not in the course and scope of, you know, his duties as president of the United States. So arguably no immunity. For example, there are handwritten notes, Sean, that show that Obama was told how Hillary Clinton approved a plan to falsely smear her opponent as a Russian asset. Totally made up, of course, instead of telling the truth to the American people, what did Obama do? He concealed it and he allowed the FBI to use the lie as a pretext to pursue Trump and leak it to the media. And at the same time, there's solid evidence that Obama ordered the DOJ to drop its investigation of Hillary for influence peddling with Russia of all countries. So Obama flipped the script and he did so corruptly. Hillary walked while Trump was framed. So I'm not sure that immunity would cover all of his actions here. As you point out, he played such a key role in altering that important intelligence document that would have helped exonerate Trump. Instead it did the opposite. So, you know, all of this self-righteous virtue signaling by Obama is utterly phony. He pretends to be morally pious. He's not. It's a charade. By the way, Greg, thanks for the analysis. And Jason, you don't get enough credit. You, your committees at the time, you did your job. They were able to obfuscate what your committee had found. But what they pulled off, they did so with the help of the legacy media mob. Appreciate you both. Greg Jarrett, Jason Chaffetz, thank you.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Screenshot of a social media post (X/Twitter) from an account named "Toxic Cowboy" (@toxiccowboy1), whose avatar shows a person in a cowboy hat and jacket, with a verified checkmark badge. The post's text is "Yep." above an attached graphic. The graphic is a political comparison meme titled "GAS PRICE FACT CHECK," contrasting gas prices attributed to Trump versus Biden, with a photo of Joe Biden standing arms-crossed next to a gas station price sign showing $5.39 and $5.57 per gallon. The post shows a timestamp of 8:52 PM, Apr 17, 2026, and 6,960 views.

Text in image: Toxic Cowboy @toxiccowboy1 Yep. TRUMP GAS PRICES ROSE TO $3.96 DUE TO HIS ATTACK ON IRAN. BIDEN GAS PRICES ROSE TO $5.02 DUE TO HIS ATTACK ON AMERICANS! 5.39 9/10 Plus 5.57 9/10 Premium GAS PRICE FACT CHECK: TRUMP: $3.96 | BIDEN: $5.02 8:52 PM · Apr 17, 2026 · 6,960 Views

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A screenshot of a social media post (appears to be from X/Twitter) by a verified user "Anne Marie Labadie" (@AnneMarieLabad1), captioned "Nobody had problems with this:", quote-tweeting/embedding another verified post by an account with a partially visible name "AwakenedOutlaw..." whose profile picture shows a black-and-white photo of a man in a cowboy hat. The embedded post argues the media portrayed Barack Obama as a messianic/angelic figure with no outrage from Democrats or the left, citing two magazine covers (checked off with green checkmarks): The New Republic (Jan 2008) and Newsweek (May 2012). Below the text are two magazine cover images side by side: the left cover, "The New Republic," titled "The Trials of Barack Obama," shows a stylized painted portrait of Obama superimposed on an American flag design; the right cover is "Newsweek" showing a photo of Obama with a rainbow-colored halo/ring above his head and the headline "THE FIRST GAY PRESIDENT" with a byline "Andrew Sullivan." The post shows a timestamp of 4:28 PM · Apr 14, 2026 and 951 Views.

Text in image: Anne Marie Labadie @AnneMarieLabad1 Nobody had problems with this: AwakenedOutlaw... · 12h The media themselves had an affinity for portraying Barack Obama as a messianic/angelic figure. Zero outrage from Democrats or the left. ✅ The New Republic (Jan 2008) ✅ Newsweek (May 2012) The New Republic THE TRIALS OF BARACK OBAMA Newsweek ARE YOU READY FOR A FEMINIST NEW TERROR PLOT? JOHN POWELL'S RULES TO LIVE BY ARTICLE BASED ON HOLLYWOOD THE FIRST GAY PRESIDENT Andrew Sullivan 4:28 PM · Apr 14, 2026 · 951 Views

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A screenshot of a social media post (X/Twitter-style) from user "Emme Summerlin" (@EmmeSummerlin), posted 4:03 PM, Apr 14, 2026, with 977 Views. The post's caption criticizes Democrats for not commenting on "kids in cages" during Obama's presidency. Below it is an embedded meme image: a photo from inside a U.S. Border Patrol detention facility with chain-link fence enclosures, people lying on mats on the floor, and a group of officials in suits and Border Patrol agents in green uniforms walking through the facility. A sign reading "Males 16-17" is visible on the left. Red circles and arrows point to a fenced enclosure (labeled "Children in cages") and to a man in the walking group (labeled "Obama DHS Sec Jeh Johnson"). Text above the photo addresses "Desperately Delusional Democrats" claiming to show which party built the facilities and stating it wasn't Trump.

Text in image: Emme Summerlin @EmmeSummerlin But not a word about the "kids in cages" while Obama was President. Dear Desperately Delusional Democrats: Please enjoy this optical memory refresher of just which party it was exactly, who put Children in Cages. It wasn't Trump. Males 16-17 Children in cages Obama DHS Sec Jeh Johnson 4:03 PM · Apr 14, 2026 · 977 Views

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

Epstein. The journal reports that a spa worker from Mar-a-Lago often made house calls to Jeffrey Epstein's home, two miles away. But those house calls "came to a halt" in 2003 after an 18-year-old beautician returned to the club from a house call to Epstein and reported to managers that he had pressured her for sex. The HR manager faxed Trump a letter suggesting that the club ban Epstein, and Trump agreed, which does mirror the president's own public comments about why he cut ties with Epstein. The White House is responding to the Wall Street Journal, writing, "No matter how many times this story is told and retold, the truth remains President Trump did nothing wrong and he kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago for being a creep." He cut ties with Jeffrey Epstein long before Epstein became a convicted sex offender, a lot of Democrats didn't, and it is corroborated by the Wall Street Journal tonight.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

The Republican Party was not an accident of history, it was founded in 1854 for one primary but moral reason, and that reason was to stop the expansion of slavery. This was an institution created, defended, and even protected by the Democratic Party, which at the time was the party of the slave-owning class. The Republican Party was the party of Abraham Lincoln, the party that fought and won the Civil War, and the party that pushed for the Emancipation Proclamation. After Lincoln's death, it was the radical Republicans in Congress who truly secured our rights. They passed the 13th Amendment, abolishing slavery. They passed the 14th Amendment, granting us citizenship. And they passed the 15th Amendment, securing the right to vote for black men. The Democrats in the South refused to accept this new reality. They created the black codes to mimic slavery, and when those were struck down, they unleashed the Karen Karen Karens, what I like to call them. To terrorize black citizens and strip them of their new rights to violence. And what was the Republican response? They didn't give up. They passed more civil rights legislation known as the Enforcement Acts, the most famous of which was the Karen Karen Karen Act of 1871. This act, signed by Republican President Ulysses S. Grant, gave the federal government the power to use the U.S. Army to crush the Karens and enforce the 14th Amendment. Republicans had to keep passing new laws specifically to combat the violence and illegal resistance of the Democratic Party. The result of this Republican protection was a political explosion. For the first time, black men were elected to the highest offices in the country. The first black U.S. senators in Hiram Rebels and Blanche K. Bruce, also the first black congressman like Joseph Rainey, they weren't just politicians, they were proud black Republicans. Now building a new South. When Reconstruction was betrayed and the Democrats reestablished control of the South through intimidation and terror, the strategy for black progress shifted from political power to economic power. This new era was championed by the great Republican leader, Booker T. Washington. He preached a powerful yet conservative philosophy of self-reliance, capitalism, and education, urging the community to build its own economic kingdom from the ground up. This philosophy created real world results. It was the era of the black Wall Street in places like Tulsa, Oklahoma and Durham, North Carolina. These were driving self-sufficient hubs of black capitalism built on the Republican principles of free enterprise and community. They had their own banks, insurance companies, businesses, schools. Amongst the community were your doctors, lawyers, and very successful middle and upper class. This was the era of titans like Madam C.J. Walker, a daughter of former slaves who through sheer grit and business genius became America's first self-made female millionaire. This was the fruit of philosophy that said we will build our own. But as these economic successes were being built, the political reality on the ground was brutal. Under the Democrats' solid self, the penalties for being a black Republican were severe. The fist of violence was present. Any known black Republican activist risked being a target by the Karens. The pen of the law was used to create Jim Crow, poll taxes, and literacy tests to still devote. And the chain of economic coercion was the most common threat of all. A black sharecropper who was discovered to be voting Republican could be fired from his job, evicted from his home, and blacklisted, ensuring his family will starve. This coercion could be extremely and deeply humiliating. Under the Apollosus Massacre in Louisiana, the victorious Democratic mobs forced every surviving black resident to obtain protection papers or even to wear a red band around their arm signed by a white Democrat. They had to do this just to prove their allegiance and avoid being beaten or their lives being taken away. You didn't just have to be silent. You had to publicly pledge loyalty to the party that oppressed you, simply to survive. The 20th century saw a great political change, as the Democratic Party for its own political survival began to court the black vote, but even as the party's faces changed, the core principles of the black Republican tradition endured. The modern conservative movement and the black Republicans within it are the direct intellectual heirs of this powerful legacy. It is a legacy that believes in individual responsibility over group identity. It believes in free markets as the greatest tool for uplift ever created. It believes in a strong constitution that guarantees our God given rights, and it believes above all that we are not victims, but we are the masters of our own destiny. So, when people question your interests in the Republican party, just know your history. You are not walking a new path. You are rejoining a path forged by giants, a path blazed by Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, and by Booker T. Washington. Your principles are your inheritance.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

So you're telling this committee that the Biden administration, while they were letting all of these unaccompanied minors into the country, and as we've talked about today, they weren't keeping track of them. They issued these kids a hotline that they could call if they had trouble with the sponsor family that they were put with. And you're saying that 65,000 calls to this hotline designated to protect these kids went unanswered? Is that what you're telling this committee? Yes, sir. Wow. That is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Do you know how many staffers the administration assigned to answering these phones and helping these kids? One. One staffer? Any idea how many hours a day this staffer was working? No. Maybe that's why there were 65,000 calls that weren't answered from these little kids, huh?

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

ClimateDepot.com executive editor Mark Moreno is in Brazil for the summit and he joins us now. Great to see you this morning. Wow. Thank you. You can't, you can't lay out more clearly these people's priorities than that right there. No, you can't. In fact, the Brazilian environmental minister actually bragged the reason they had to clear cut tens of thousands of acres for this four lane highway for this UN climate summit was so they could cram as many people here as possible to showcase how Brazil has been saving the rainforest. So this has been an amazing thing because this highway went through the rainforest that they've been trying deck. We've got to save the rainforest. We need climate trees and here they just cut it down so you could have all the limousines and SUVs and all the private jets come in and people can move freely at this summit, which is turning into a disaster here for them. Yeah, so so this is a conference that they do every year and you said that this is the first time since this started back in 1992 that the United States is not involved, that you're actually our U.S. envoy to which I'm very grateful to, by the way, for that. But that even a lot of European countries are pulling back from all of this. Yeah, I call it the Trump effect there since since George H.W. Bush signed the Rio Earth Summit Treaty, United Nations Framework Convention in 1992 to appear green to try to beat Bill Clinton. It didn't work. We've been in this mess and this is the first time there's been no U.S. delegation. God bless the Trump administration. So I've self declared myself the U.S. delegation here at the U.N. conference. I don't think that comes with any perks, we'll see. But this whole summit has had, as you mentioned, over 100 nations fail to even submit their targets. There's no interest in this. No interest in zeroing out their carbon tax throughout Europe. They're walking away from net zero because reality hits. And our message here, by the way, to the Trump administration is simple. Get us out of this 1992 treaty, which was ratified by the Senate. If we can get out of that, it makes it harder for a future president, AOC or Gavin Newsom, to get us back into this U.N. climate mess. Mr. President, tear up that treaty from 1992. That's what we're imploring the Trump administration to do. Well, I would just like to go on the record as saying that I trust you with the science more than I do a bunch of kleptocrats around the world who just want to be in control of every aspect of our lives. So speaking of all of that, over the past two years, Ford has lost some 13 billion dollars on this big EV scam. And there's even talked the Wall Street Journal is reporting that they're talking about scrapping their the F-1, the electric F-150. Is it are you surprised that we've come to this? No. I mean, once you pull the plug on the subsidies, the gas powered car bans on all the tax credits, it's like we're watching an implosion. The Ford CEO recently said he expects half of the C of the EV sales to tank after the cut has been pulled. Rivian is facing this, even with all those subsidies, even with banning the competition of gas powered cars. They were only to get fully electric cars to about seven percent of sales, and it was going to decline. And a lot of that was people buying second cars, a very small market. So the idea that an F-150 truck was going to take America by storm was absurd, even under the Biden regulations without once you pull the plug, it's going under. And no, this is not a surprising move. There is no future under the current technology of EVs to do it. Plus, it makes us rely on China, which, by the way, China is the hero here at this conference because as the Trump administration walked away from these pledges, China's doubling down even though they're building two coal plants a week. They're now being praised by the Greens here at the U.N. They're the new environmental heroes here, but we don't want these EVs anyway because right now they empower China. Well, we're very relieved to have you as our carbon envoy there in Brazil. Mark Marana, thank you so much for joining us this morning. Thank you, Charlie.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

We're just uprooting the, you know, this is an iconic building. I will just say this, I made this point yesterday that I hear all of a sudden from my liberal friends that they're very concerned about our history. Really, these are the same people who tore down every statue they could get their hands on in the last four years. Christopher Columbus, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt. They didn't have any concern for history then. Now, all of a sudden, the facade of the east wing is iconic. Oh, give me a break. I mean, give me a break.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

And this may be the biggest irony I've ever seen in American politics, that she's now — it looks like she's engaged in the same thing she charged President Trump with. I mean, turns out you can't have your principal residence in Virginia and be the attorney general of New York. Turns out you can't own a mortgage form, say that your dad is actually your husband. And you also can't say that you got a four-unit property that's actually five units. Those are the three things that it looks like she did over a long period of time, and yet she had the gall to go after President Trump. You got to be kidding me. So, yeah, I think this is real. We'll see. Her comments so far, she's been kind of quiet. Of course, she does the typical thing the left always does. The left will — you know, they'll be — they'll always accuse us of what they're doing. And the other thing you always do, the left will tell a lie. Trump did something wrong. Big media will report it. Big tech will amplify it. And then if you tell the truth, they call you names. And that's exactly what she did. I think she called President Trump and his administration bullies for simply pointing out that it looks like she lied on these forms, and she did it to get better terms and a better rate on the loans. So she was doing it for personal gain, and you're not supposed to do those kind of things.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Crooked Joe Biden got us into a real mess with Russia and everything else he did, frankly, but he didn't know about it. And he, generally speaking, signed it with auto pen. So how would he know that auto pen is a big deal? I don't know. You know, they're having who's who's doing this? So when my people come up, Will and all of the people, Steve, they come up and serve. This is an executive order. They explain it to me. And, you know, 90 percent of the time I sign it, 99 percent of the time I say do it, but they come up and I sign it. But you don't use auto pen. It's number one, it's disrespectful to the office. Number two, maybe it's not even valid because, you know, who's getting him to sign? He had no idea what the hell he was doing. If he did, all of these bad things wouldn't be happening right now. But we're going to get you back into a great position. And we've already started

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.