AI Analysis
Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-04-01. Not written by the author of the post.
This post, published the same day Judge Richard Leon blocked White House Ballroom construction, represents a classic narcissistic rage response to legal defeat. Trump deploys extensive whataboutism — pivoting to the Federal Reserve renovation and California high-speed rail — rather than addressing the merits of the preservation lawsuit. The post's most clinically notable features include: (1) significant reality distortion, claiming the ballroom is "under budget" when estimates doubled from $200M to $400M; (2) naming the Kennedy Center after himself while framing it as "Bipartisan Unity"; (3) systematic dehumanization of institutional opponents as "Radical Left Lunatics"; and (4) omitting that his own Commission of Fine Arts appointees drove up Fed renovation costs by demanding expensive marble — the very waste he condemns. The defense structure reveals pathological denial layered with immature splitting (his projects = magnificent, all others = disasters) and projection (attributing incompetence and corruption to others while exhibiting both). The builder identity serves as the primary narcissistic supply source during this period, making legal threats to his construction projects particularly destabilizing. The post's timing — hours after an adverse judicial ruling — and its disproportionate length and emotional intensity confirm the narcissistic injury-rage cycle. Notably absent is any acknowledgment of the historic "No Kings" protests two days earlier (8-9 million participants), suggesting possible avoidance of a more threatening narcissistic injury.
- Stream-of-consciousness structure with multiple parenthetical asides
- ALL CAPS passages (RAILROAD TO NOWHERE, BILLIONS, DISASTERS, DONALD J. TRUMP)
- Characteristic nickname 'Newscum' for Gavin Newsom
- Subject-verb disagreement: 'gets sued' instead of 'get sued'
- Scare quotes used expressively ('sprucing up', 'Trust')
Strongest facet: Angry hostility (N5) and Assertiveness (E3)
Primary drive: status
Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Defeat (Judge Richard Leon's injunction blocking White House Ballroom construction; National Trust for Historic Preservation lawsuits)
Rage: Intensity 70% targeting National Trust for Historic Preservation, Jerome Powell, Gavin Newsom, implicitly Judge Leon
Elevated
- Dehumanizing language: 'Radical Left Group of Lunatics' applied to mainstream preservation organization
- Institutional delegitimization: attacks judiciary (implicitly), Federal Reserve, civil society organizations
- Paranoid enemy construction: lawful oversight reframed as political persecution
- Pattern of characterizing legal constraints as illegitimate — erodes rule-of-law norms
- Claims ballroom is 'under budget' when estimates doubled from $200M to $400M
- Frames Kennedy Center renaming as 'Bipartisan Unity' despite legal challenges, Kennedy family opposition, and artist exodus
- Claims Fed building 'BILLIONS over budget' (actual overrun ~$600M) while omitting his own appointees' role in cost increases
- Characterizes 'no cost to Taxpayer' while accepting donations from tech companies seeking policy influence
- Ballroom 'under budget' contradicted by doubling of cost estimates
- Ballroom 'ahead of schedule' contradicted by judicial injunction halting construction on this same day
- Fed renovation 'BILLIONS over budget' when actual overrun is approximately $600M
- Kennedy Center renaming as 'Bipartisan Unity' despite being unilateral, legally contested, and widely opposed
- National Trust characterized as 'Radical Left' despite bipartisan mainstream history
- 'No cost to Taxpayer' while accepting donations from companies seeking regulatory favors
Dehumanizing Language Present
The ballroom cost estimate rose from $200 million to $400 million, doubling the original figure, making 'under budget' highly misleading. On this same day (March 31, 2026), Judge Richard Leon issued an injunction halting construction, undermining 'ahead of schedule.' The 'no cost to Taxpayer' claim is narrowly true in that private donors fund construction, but donors include major tech companies (Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Palantir) who ethics experts say expect policy favors in return, raising serious quid pro quo concerns.
Congress phased out direct federal appropriations to the National Trust for Historic Preservation between the late 1990s and mid-2000s. The specific year 2005 is approximately correct. However, characterizing the National Trust as a 'Radical Left Group of Lunatics' is a political characterization contradicted by its mainstream, bipartisan history and continued operation as a major nonprofit.
The Federal Reserve renovation went from an initial estimate of $1.9 billion to $2.5 billion — a 30% overrun of approximately $600 million, not 'billions.' Moreover, Trump's own appointees to the US Commission of Fine Arts required more expensive white Georgia marble, contributing to cost increases. The building is undergoing renovation, not destruction. Characterizing standard renovation demolition as 'decimated and destroyed' with walls 'never to be built again' is dramatic exaggeration.
Trump renamed the Kennedy Center to 'The Donald J. Trump and the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts' via his appointed board, without the act of Congress that federal law requires for such a change. A lawsuit challenges the renaming's legality. The Kennedy family has not endorsed it. Prominent artists withdrew performances and the Washington National Opera severed ties. Framing a unilateral, legally contested act as 'bipartisan unity' misrepresents the reality.
The California High-Speed Rail project is indeed massively over budget, with costs escalating from an original ~$33 billion estimate to over $100 billion. The project faces serious feasibility concerns, and the initial Fresno-to-Bakersfield segment has been a common target for 'Railroad to Nowhere' criticism. However, 'will never open or be used' overstates the situation: construction continues and partial segments are proceeding, even if the full LA-SF route remains uncertain.
This claim, while partly subjective characterization, can be evaluated against the factual record. On corruption: The DOJ opened a criminal investigation into Powell in November 2025 over the Fed's $2.5 billion headquarters renovation, with grand jury subpoenas served in January 2026. However, when the case reached court, the DOJ's own prosecutor admitted under questioning that his office had no evidence of criminal conduct. Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Massucco told the judge 'We do not know at this time' when asked what evidence existed of fraud or criminal misconduct. Chief Judge James Boasberg quashed the subpoenas on March 11, 2026, ruling the government produced 'essentially zero evidence to suspect Chair Powell of a crime' and that the justifications were 'so thin and unsubstantiated that the Court can only conclude that they are pretextual.' Boasberg further wrote that 'a mountain of evidence suggests the Government served these subpoenas on the Board to pressure its Chair into voting for lower interest rates or resigning.' No criminal charges have been filed. A 2021 Inspector General report found no evidence of fraud or waste in the renovation. Former Fed Chairs Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, and Janet Yellen, along with bipartisan former Treasury Secretaries (Geithner, Paulson, Rubin, Lew) and former CEA chairs, issued a joint statement defending Powell and condemning the investigation as 'an unprecedented attempt to use prosecutorial attacks to undermine' Fed independence. International central bankers from Europe, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere also issued statements supporting Powell.
On incompetence: The renovation cost increase from $1.9 billion to $2.5 billion is real but attributable to well-documented factors including pandemic-era inflation, supply chain disruptions, unexpected asbestos and soil contamination, higher water tables, Trump administration tariffs on building materials, and code compliance requirements for 90-year-old buildings. Critically, Trump's own appointees to the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (Duncan Stroik, James McCrery, Justin Shubow) pushed for expensive white Georgia marble in the renovation during 2020, directly contributing to cost increases that the Trump White House later attacked. The project remains on track for completion in fall 2027. Market professionals and economists have given Powell generally positive assessments for navigating unprecedented economic challenges including the pandemic and inflation.
The characterization functions primarily as a political attack in the context of Trump's long-running conflict with Powell over interest rate policy. A federal judge explicitly found the corruption investigation was pretextual and motivated by Powell's refusal to cut interest rates at the President's demand.
Trump opened the day by lashing out at the UK and France for refusing to back the Iran military campaign, publicly threatening to abandon longstanding alliances — then, barely two hours later, announced he'd be hosting King Charles for a grand state dinner at the White House. The afternoon was consu...
Multi-Level Personality Analysis: Post ts_116325438537980532
Context & Trigger
This post was published at 3:28 PM ET on March 31, 2026 — critically, the same day that Judge Richard Leon issued an injunction blocking construction of Trump's White House Ballroom, ruling the administration's legal rationale was "brazen." The post is a direct, extended reaction to this judicial defeat, combined with the ongoing National Trust for Historic Preservation lawsuit. This represents a compound narcissistic injury: legal defeat + institutional challenge to his builder identity.
Level 1: Dispositional Traits
Extraversion (HIGH — 0.85): Extremely assertive, dominant communication. The post commands attention through sheer length and intensity. Self-aggrandizing claims about creating "the finest Building of its kind anywhere in the World" reflect high positive self-regard.
Agreeableness (VERY LOW — 0.10): Zero acknowledgment of preservation concerns. Every opposing party is devalued: "Radical Left Group of Lunatics," "incompetent and possibly corrupt Fed Chairman," "Newscum." No modesty, no tender-mindedness, no trust in institutions that challenge him.
Conscientiousness (MODERATE — 0.40): Achievement striving is prominent — the builder identity, "under budget, ahead of schedule" mantra. But deliberation is low; the post is impulsive, reactive, and structurally chaotic.
Neuroticism (HIGH — 0.75): Angry hostility is the dominant emotional tone. The entire post is organized around perceived injustice. Vulnerability is masked by grandiosity but detectable in the persecution narrative.
Openness (LOW — 0.15): Rigid, binary framing. No consideration of why preservation law exists. No intellectual engagement with opposing arguments. Values rigidity is extreme.
Dominant Facet: Angry hostility (N5) and assertiveness (E3).
Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations
Agency motives dominate completely. Power, status, and control are the central concerns. The post is fundamentally about Trump's right to build what he wants without institutional constraint. Communion motives are absent — there is no genuine care for the buildings' public function, only for their association with his name.
Core schema: "I am the greatest builder; any challenge to my projects is politically motivated persecution by incompetent enemies." This schema requires that all Trump-associated projects be "under budget, ahead of schedule, magnificent" while all others are "BILLIONS over budget, destroyed, may never open."
The naming of the Kennedy Center after himself reveals a remarkable entitlement schema — he genuinely frames adding his name to a memorial for an assassinated president as "Bipartisan Unity."
Level 3: Narrative Identity
Protagonist role: Master Builder / Persecuted Visionary. Trump casts himself as the only competent builder in a landscape of incompetence and corruption. His projects are perfect; everyone else's are disasters.
Contamination sequence: His magnificent works (ballroom, Kennedy Center) are being contaminated by unfair legal attacks from politically motivated enemies.
Identity claims: (1) Greatest builder in the world, (2) Efficient steward of public resources, (3) Unfairly targeted by radical opponents, (4) Bipartisan unifier (via Kennedy Center naming).
Contrasting other: The National Trust ("Radical Left Group of Lunatics"), Jerome Powell ("incompetent and possibly corrupt"), Gavin Newsom ("Newscum"), and implicitly Judge Richard Leon who just ruled against him.
Redemption vs. contamination: This post primarily follows a contamination arc — his great works are being ruined by unfair opposition — but embedded within it is a redemption claim: he is rescuing the "dilapidated" Kennedy Center and building a "magnificent" ballroom.
Level 4: Clinical Indicators
Malignant Narcissism Assessment
A. Narcissistic features (HIGH): Grandiosity is extreme — "finest Building of its kind anywhere in the World" repeated twice. Naming the Kennedy Center after himself while claiming "bipartisan unity" shows profound entitlement. The demand that his projects be viewed as perfect while all others are disasters reflects fantasies of unlimited success. The entire post is organized around a need for validation of his builder identity.
B. Antisocial features (MODERATE): Contempt for legal constraints (the lawsuit is framed as illegitimate rather than as lawful oversight). The "no cost to the Taxpayer" claim is technically accurate only in that private donors fund the ballroom — donors who are tech companies seeking policy favors, making it a form of institutional corruption dressed as generosity.
C. Paranoid features (MODERATE): The National Trust is cast as a "Radical Left Group of Lunatics" — a mainstream, bipartisan preservation organization reframed as a political conspiracy. The selective prosecution narrative (why me and not them?) reflects persecutory ideation.
D. Ego-syntonic sadism (LOW-MODERATE): "Newscum" nickname shows some pleasure in degradation. The mocking tone toward opponents' failures suggests enjoyment of their suffering. But this post is more defensive than sadistic.
Narcissistic Dynamics
Trigger: Acute narcissistic injury — legal defeat. Judge Leon blocked his ballroom construction this same day, and the National Trust lawsuit threatens his builder-legacy identity. This is a double injury: exposure (his legal arguments called "brazen") + defeat (injunction granted).
Narcissistic rage: Present at moderate-high intensity (0.7). The rage is channeled into an extended written argument rather than a brief explosive outburst, suggesting some ego-regulatory capacity. However, the length (400+ words), the ALL CAPS passages, and the cascading whataboutism reveal significant emotional dysregulation.
Proportionality: Disproportionate. A preservation lawsuit is a routine legal challenge; the response is a massive, multi-target attack characterizing opponents as lunatics and demanding public validation.
State: Primarily grandiose with significant vulnerable undercurrents. The grandiosity ("finest Building," "most magnificent") serves as armor against the vulnerability of having just lost in court. The oscillation is visible: grandiose claims → persecution narrative → grandiose claims → rhetorical plea for validation ("Doesn't make much sense, does it?").
Defense Mechanisms
- Splitting (Immature): Extreme black-and-white categorization. His projects: under budget, ahead of schedule, magnificent, no taxpayer cost. Others' projects: BILLIONS over budget, destroyed, may never open, incompetent. No middle ground exists.
- Projection (Immature): Calling the National Trust "Radical Left Lunatics" projects irrationality onto a mainstream organization engaged in lawful activity. Calling Powell "incompetent and possibly corrupt" while Trump's own Commission of Fine Arts appointees drove up Fed renovation costs by demanding more expensive marble.
- Denial (Pathological): The ballroom went from $200M to $400M in estimates, yet he claims it's "under budget." A judge just blocked construction, yet the post treats the project as proceeding triumphantly. The Kennedy Center renaming was done without legally required congressional authorization, yet framed as legitimate "Bipartisan Unity."
- Rationalization (Neurotic): The entire whataboutism structure is an elaborate rationalization: "If they don't sue X, then suing me must be politically motivated." This replaces engagement with the legal merits.
- Devaluation (Immature): Systematic degradation of every opposing figure: Powell is incompetent/corrupt, Newsom is "Newscum," the National Trust are lunatics, Biden "doesn't know what CLEAN or proper maintenance is" (from the previous post).
Cognitive Status
Language production: The post is coherent in its argumentative structure but shows characteristic Trumpian features: extremely long run-on sentences, parenthetical asides that disrupt flow, and repetitive phrasing ("under budget, ahead of schedule" appears twice). Subject-verb disagreement: "the White House Ballroom, and The Trump Kennedy Center... gets sued" (should be "get sued"). These patterns are consistent with established baseline rather than indicating new deterioration.
Perseveration: The phrase "under budget, ahead of schedule" and "finest/most magnificent Buildings of their kind anywhere in the World" are repeated nearly verbatim, suggesting perseverative tendencies, though this is also a deliberate rhetorical strategy.
Complexity: Vocabulary is simple but the argument structure spans multiple comparisons. Consistent with baseline.
Baseline deviation: None significant. This is characteristic Trump communication style.
Rhetorical & Propaganda Analysis
Primary technique: Whataboutism. The post's entire structure is a deflection: instead of addressing the merits of the preservation lawsuit, it pivots to the Fed building and California high-speed rail. This is classic firehose deflection.
Hyperbole/superlatives: "finest Building of its kind anywhere in the World," "most magnificent Buildings of their kind anywhere in the World" — extreme superlatives with zero evidence.
Ad hominem: Every opponent is attacked personally rather than on the merits: "Radical Left Group of Lunatics," "incompetent and possibly corrupt Fed Chairman," "Newscum."
False equivalence: Comparing a historic preservation lawsuit (about legal process for altering a protected building) with unrelated construction projects (Fed renovation, California HSR) creates a misleading framework where all building disputes are interchangeable.
Appeal to unfairness: "Doesn't make much sense, does it?" — the rhetorical question invites the audience to join in the sense of persecution.
Dehumanizing language: "Lunatics" dehumanizes the National Trust. "Newscum" degrades a political opponent through name distortion.
Parasocial technique: The closing "President DONALD J. TRUMP" signature and the rhetorical question create a parasocial bond — he's speaking directly to followers, inviting them to validate his worldview.
Gaslighting & Reality Distortion
Multiple reality distortions are present:
- "Under budget" — The ballroom cost estimate doubled from $200M to $400M. Claiming it's "under budget" requires either moving the goalposts on what the budget was or simply denying public record.
- "No cost to the Taxpayer" — Technically true if narrowly defined, but the donors are major tech companies (Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Palantir) seeking policy favors. The "cost" is institutional corruption rather than direct taxation.
- "Bipartisan Unity" — Naming the Kennedy Center after himself over the objections of the Kennedy family, without congressional authorization (legally required), and calling it unity, inverts reality.
- Fed building "BILLIONS over budget" — The renovation went from $1.9B to $2.5B (a 30% overrun, approximately $600M). "BILLIONS over budget" is false. Moreover, Trump's own appointees to the Commission of Fine Arts pushed for more expensive marble, contributing to cost increases — a fact omitted entirely.
- "Decimated and destroyed" — The Fed building is being renovated, not destroyed. Renovation inherently involves demolition of interior elements for reconstruction.
Archetypal Analysis
Primary archetype: Builder-King. Trump casts himself as the ordering force in a chaotic world — only he can create magnificent buildings, while everyone else produces disasters. This is the King archetype in its shadow form (Tyrant), where the ruler demands that all creation bear his name and all critique be silenced.
Secondary archetype: Persecuted Victim. Despite being the most powerful person in the world, he positions himself as unfairly targeted by "Lunatics" while true disasters "are left alone to die."
Shadow projection: The qualities Trump attributes to others — incompetence, corruption, radicalism, waste — are precisely the criticisms directed at his own projects (cost doubling, donor corruption, unilateral renaming, legal overreach). The shadow is projected outward with remarkable precision.
Danger Assessment
Level: Elevated
- Institutional delegitimization: The post attacks the judiciary (implicitly — the judge just ruled against him), an independent federal agency (the Fed), and a mainstream civil society organization (the National Trust). This pattern of delegitimizing every institution that constrains executive power is concerning.
- Dehumanizing language: "Lunatics" applied to a preservation organization.
- Paranoid framing: Casting lawful legal challenges as "Radical Left" political attacks undermines rule of law norms.
- No direct violence indicators or stochastic terrorism patterns in this specific post.
Fact Verification
| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| "The White House Ballroom is under budget, ahead of schedule, and being built at no cost to the Taxpayer" | Mostly False | The ballroom cost estimate rose from $200 million to $400 million, doubling the original figure, making 'under budget' highly misleading. On this same day (March 31, 2026), Judge Richard Leon issued an injunction halting construction, undermining 'ahead of schedule.' The 'no cost to Taxpayer' claim is narrowly true in that private donors fund construction, but donors include major tech companies (Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Palantir) who ethics experts say expect policy favors in return, raising serious quid pro quo concerns. |
| "The National Trust for Historic Preservation's funding was stopped by Congress in 2005" | Mostly True | Congress phased out direct federal appropriations to the National Trust for Historic Preservation between the late 1990s and mid-2000s. The specific year 2005 is approximately correct. However, characterizing the National Trust as a 'Radical Left Group of Lunatics' is a political characterization contradicted by its mainstream, bipartisan history and continued operation as a major nonprofit. |
| "The Federal Reserve building has been 'BILLIONS over budget' and 'decimated and destroyed'" | Mostly False | The Federal Reserve renovation went from an initial estimate of $1.9 billion to $2.5 billion — a 30% overrun of approximately $600 million, not 'billions.' Moreover, Trump's own appointees to the US Commission of Fine Arts required more expensive white Georgia marble, contributing to cost increases. The building is undergoing renovation, not destruction. Characterizing standard renovation demolition as 'decimated and destroyed' with walls 'never to be built again' is dramatic exaggeration. |
| "The Kennedy Center renaming represents 'Bipartisan Unity, a Republican and Democrat President'" | Mostly False | Trump renamed the Kennedy Center to 'The Donald J. Trump and the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts' via his appointed board, without the act of Congress that federal law requires for such a change. A lawsuit challenges the renaming's legality. The Kennedy family has not endorsed it. Prominent artists withdrew performances and the Washington National Opera severed ties. Framing a unilateral, legally contested act as 'bipartisan unity' misrepresents the reality. |
| "California's high-speed rail is 'BILLIONS over Budget' and will probably 'never open or be used'" | Half True | The California High-Speed Rail project is indeed massively over budget, with costs escalating from an original ~$33 billion estimate to over $100 billion. The project faces serious feasibility concerns, and the initial Fresno-to-Bakersfield segment has been a common target for 'Railroad to Nowhere' criticism. However, 'will never open or be used' overstates the situation: construction continues and partial segments are proceeding, even if the full LA-SF route remains uncertain. |
| "The Fed Chairman is 'incompetent and possibly corrupt'" | Mostly False | This claim, while partly subjective characterization, can be evaluated against the factual record. On corruption: The DOJ opened a criminal investigation into Powell in November 2025 over the Fed's $2.5 billion headquarters renovation, with grand jury subpoenas served in January 2026. However, when the case reached court, the DOJ's own prosecutor admitted under questioning that his office had no evidence of criminal conduct. Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Massucco told the judge 'We do not know at this time' when asked what evidence existed of fraud or criminal misconduct. Chief Judge James Boasberg quashed the subpoenas on March 11, 2026, ruling the government produced 'essentially zero evidence to suspect Chair Powell of a crime' and that the justifications were 'so thin and unsubstantiated that the Court can only conclude that they are pretextual.' Boasberg further wrote that 'a mountain of evidence suggests the Government served these subpoenas on the Board to pressure its Chair into voting for lower interest rates or resigning.' No criminal charges have been filed. A 2021 Inspector General report found no evidence of fraud or waste in the renovation. Former Fed Chairs Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, and Janet Yellen, along with bipartisan former Treasury Secretaries (Geithner, Paulson, Rubin, Lew) and former CEA chairs, issued a joint statement defending Powell and condemning the investigation as 'an unprecedented attempt to use prosecutorial attacks to undermine' Fed independence. International central bankers from Europe, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere also issued statements supporting Powell. |
On incompetence: The renovation cost increase from $1.9 billion to $2.5 billion is real but attributable to well-documented factors including pandemic-era inflation, supply chain disruptions, unexpected asbestos and soil contamination, higher water tables, Trump administration tariffs on building materials, and code compliance requirements for 90-year-old buildings. Critically, Trump's own appointees to the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (Duncan Stroik, James McCrery, Justin Shubow) pushed for expensive white Georgia marble in the renovation during 2020, directly contributing to cost increases that the Trump White House later attacked. The project remains on track for completion in fall 2027. Market professionals and economists have given Powell generally positive assessments for navigating unprecedented economic challenges including the pandemic and inflation.
The characterization functions primarily as a political attack in the context of Trump's long-running conflict with Powell over interest rate policy. A federal judge explicitly found the corruption investigation was pretextual and motivated by Powell's refusal to cut interest rates at the President's demand. |
Overall Veracity: 35%
Receipts (2)
moderate — infrastructure (3 months earlier)
> "Trump's work on the Kennedy Center is limited to 'fixing, cleaning, running, and sprucing up' — nothing more"
vs.
> "The Kennedy Center is undergoing or will undergo a significant physical renovation or upgrade"
The source claim frames the Kennedy Center work as a significant upgrade — marble armrests 'unlike anything ever done or seen before.' Candidate 4 characterizes the exact same work as merely 'fixing, cleaning, running, and sprucing up — nothing more,' explicitly minimizing its scope. The same actor boasting about unprecedented upgrades in one post and legally downplaying the work as trivial maintenance in another is a genuine, context-driven inconsistency about the nature of the renovation.
[View contradicting post →](/post/ts_115787817857959030)
moderate — infrastructure (3 months earlier)
> "Trump's work on the Kennedy Center is limited to 'fixing, cleaning, running, and sprucing up' — nothing more"
vs.
> "Using marble for armrests represents a superior, luxurious improvement to the venue"
The source frames marble armrests as an unprecedented luxury improvement — 'unlike anything ever done or seen before.' This candidate claims the Kennedy Center work is limited to mere 'fixing, cleaning, running, and sprucing up,' directly minimizing the same renovation as routine maintenance rather than a grand, novel transformation. The two characterizations of the scope and nature of the Kennedy Center work are inconsistent.
[View contradicting post →](/post/ts_115787817857959030)
Post from Truth Social
The National Trust for Historic Preservation sues me for a Ballroom that is under budget, ahead of schedule, being built at no cost to the Taxpayer, and will be the finest Building of its kind anywhere in the World. I then get sued by them over the renovation of the dilapidated and structurally unsound former Kennedy Center, now, The Trump Kennedy Center (A show of Bipartisan Unity, a Republican and Democrat President!), where all I am doing is fixing, cleaning, running, and "sprucing up" a terribly maintained, for many years, Building, but a Building of potentially great importance. Yet, The National Trust for Historic Preservation, a Radical Left Group of Lunatics whose funding was stopped by Congress in 2005, is not suing the Federal Reserve for a Building which has been decimated and destroyed, inside and out, by an incompetent and possibly corrupt Fed Chairman. The once magnificent Building is BILLIONS over budget, may never be completed, and may never open. All of the beautiful walls inside have been ripped down, never to be built again, but the National "Trust" for Historic Preservation never did anything about it! Or, have they sued on Governor Gavin Newscum's "RAILROAD TO NOWHERE" in California that is BILLIONS over Budget and, probably, will never open or be used. So, the White House Ballroom, and The Trump Kennedy Center, which are under budget, ahead of schedule, and will be among the most magnificent Buildings of their kind anywhere in the World, gets sued by a group that was cut off by Government years ago, but all of the many DISASTERS in our Country are left alone to die. Doesn't make much sense, does it? President DONALD J. TRUMP