Post from Truth Social

One week after Trump was convicted on all 34 bogus felony counts in New York's kangaroo court, the former president has now emerged more resolute than ever before. Take a look. I say it and it sounds beautiful, right? You know, my revenge will be success and I mean that. But it's awfully hard when you see what they've done. These people are so evil. And at the same time, the country can come together. People also say, can you bring the country together? And the answer is, yes, success will bring the country together because I had it together. Now, the momentum is certainly building for Donald Trump. Americans on both sides of the aisle, including commentators, even on fake news, CNN, they're speaking out against what was a gross abuse of power from both Alvin Bragg and Juan Mershon, everyone else involved in this political witch hunt. And now Trump's very own fundraising numbers are through the roof. In May, the Trump campaign and the RNC hauled in a whopping one hundred and forty one million dollars, nearly double April's numbers. The campaign says 53 million was collected in the first 24 hours after Trump's conviction. Twenty five percent of those donors, first time contributors. And while Biden only leaves home for tiny, barely attended, short, heavily scripted events, his twenty twenty four opponent, Donald Trump, just attended a UFC fight in New Jersey. He was warmly greeted. The place was jamming, packed, having fun, clapping. Very happy he was there. Anyway, this is in the Prudential Center. By the way, anybody want to see Joe Biden go to a major sporting event? Probably get booed right out of the stadium. Few Americans actually even really like Joe Biden. They know he's been a complete failure as your president. And that's why Democrats are now resorting to law fair weaponized in the DOJ. That's why they're in a full fledged panic. Trump is now calling on the Supreme Court to act before his sentencing. Otherwise, Albin Braggs political con job. All that will need to slowly work its way through a variety of liberal New York courts filled with partisan judges who ate Donald Trump. This law fair deserves to be rectified before the election. These questions must be answered. Did Alvin Bragg withhold exculpatory evidence from the indicting grand jury? Was Biden donor Judge Mershawn obligated to recuse himself? What about the family conflicts? Were Donald Trump's Sixth Amendment rights violated by not telling him the crime that he was even being charged with? We didn't know to the end of the trial if we even know at this point. Did the judge allow prejudicial information during the trial? Did New York even have jurisdiction on a federal election law? Did the judge violate not one but two Supreme Court decisions, the latest in 2020, Ramos versus Louisiana in his jury instructions that very clearly mandated unanimity of the jury on all issues. You can't have four, four and four, as we have described. This law fair blatant abuse of power, it cannot stand. And meanwhile, we are monitoring yet another legal case. This one out of Delaware, Joe Biden loves to say nobody's above the law, but he might be soon singing a very different tune now that his very own son is facing the possibility of real prison time. Now this morning, Hunter Biden's felony gun trial finally got underway. He's accused of lying on a gun application. Why? In order to purchase a firearm, despite his ongoing drug abuse, now this very same firearm in question was ultimately recovered in a dumpster near a school. It was put there by his brother's former wife, his girlfriend at the time. And unlike the law fair in New York, well, there are no cooked up charges or aggressive prosecutors campaigning on we're going to get Hunter Biden. No, to the contrary, just the opposite of what you saw in New York. This trial features actual evidence, numerous credible witnesses. And if I'd argue anything, I'd probably say the deck is stacked in his favor. He's a Biden in Delaware. Take a look. The witnesses is brutal for Hunter Biden. It includes his ex-wife. It includes the wife of the late Beau Biden with whom Hunter had a relationship after Beau's death. It includes, I believe, another even woman that has an issue with Hunter Biden here. I mean, that's tough stuff for Hunter here. Why would you want to go through that? I don't think he would. And I think everything here that's going to be presented is very damaging. All right. Despite the evidence for a while, Hunter Biden appeared above the law. This is a trial that was never supposed to happen. Remember, according to the New York Times, the DOJ's original plan was to charge Hunter with nothing, sweep all of these misdeeds under the rug. And for a while, it was all going along. According to plan, federal prosecutor David Weiss dragged on what appeared to be a fake investigation for years. Remember, he allowed the statute of limitations to run out on several serious tax crimes. Conveniently, we call them the Burisma years. He then reportedly seemed content to wrap up the probe without any charges. Then a little problem happened. Whistleblowers at the IRS, they sounded the alarm. Weiss, the DOJ, had to move to plan B. What was plan B? That was the sweetheart Weiss deal masquerading as justice. Never before in the history of the country has a deal ever been that sweet. Even the defense being asked by the judge in the courtroom, did you ever see anything like a deal like this ever before? And they had to admit, no, no felony tax charges, no jail time, a deferred meaningless gun charge and nothing else. But unfortunately for Hunter, the plea deal collapsed after the federal judge starting actually started to actually ask real questions in a statement Biden referred to his son as inspiring. By the way, I'm glad that he did get off drugs. I hope he stays off them. You don't want that for anybody. But of course we want Hunter to get a fair trial and we trust that, well, Delaware might lean his way. No American, whether your name is Biden or Trump, should have to face a partisan witch hunt. And of course no one in the Biden White House has the decency to call out the law fair against Trump. Quite the contrary. We hear they were celebrating in Biden headquarters and the White House. And by the way, why did the third highest ranking person at Joe Biden's DOJ, why would they ever leave that prestigious position to prosecute a local case against Donald Trump in New York? Clearly with a deeply involved and incompetent unpopular president, well, the Democrats, they need all the political help they can get. And this appears to be their number one strategy here with reaction. Fox News contributor, Jonathan Turley, well, I labeled a few of the areas that I've I'd identified that president Trump should appeal. I think because of the circumstances and the circumstances that I've identified, I think because of the circumstances that I've identified that president Trump should appeal, I think because of the circumstances and the circumstances that I've identified that president Trump should appeal. I think because of the circumstances and the severity of the conflicts in this case and constitutional issues that are at hand here, it should be expedited. I think the American people have a right to know if it's going to be overturned before the election. I would urge Trump's attorneys to pursue every avenue to get there. What would you advise them? Well, I think they are going to pursue every avenue. I must say I do not hold out much hope that the Supreme Court will allow them to go directly to the highest court for review. The reason is that the Supreme Court previously turned down Jack Smith, who wanted to expedite his own prosecution of Trump. And I think that some of the justices are going to want to stay within that same lane. Now that means it goes through the New York criminal system. And many of us don't have a lot of faith after this trial in that system. I think that initially, at least, he may have some tough going. But I have to tell you, I think that these errors are rather glaring and obvious. I can't imagine this verdict being sustained on review. It just may take a while. It may occur later. In fact, it may not occur until they get to the Supreme Court. But I think the Trump campaign has to assume that it will not get a final review before the election. Yeah. All right. So we have July 11 sentencing, somebody, it's a class, what, Evie felony. We had the upcharge, of course, the novel legal theory, the theory that we spoke so often about. You have somebody that's never been convicted before. Usually, I would think that somebody would be released on their own recognizance pending appeal. I suspect anything's possible with Judge Mershawn. Will he try to put him in jail and have him miss his own Republican convention? Is he going to have home confinement as part of this? How far does he go? Well, before I said in that courtroom, I would have said that all of these options were almost fanciful. I was really surprised in what I saw in that courtroom. I felt that the judge was dead wrong on a number of his decisions. He ruled very heavily towards the prosecution. Even liberal legal analysts have admitted to that. First of all, to sentence him to jail ultimately as an elderly first offender in a nonviolent crime would be just such a huge departure from the norm in Manhattan and other courts that I think that even many liberals would object, that they would say that you're adding to this notion of a special criminal system just for Trump. It's bad enough that they effectively created a crime for him, zapping a dead misdemeanor into life and coming up with this rather novel theory. In terms of any sentence being imposed before appeal, I would hope that Judge Mershawn would suspend it or allow the appeal to go forward. There are a lot of options here. If he doesn't go with a jail sentence, which I think would be absurd, there's community service, there's home confinement. In most of these cases, I think you would have a conditional dismissal, the type of go out and sin no more. You're on probation or parole and you're under court review. I think that's what most judges would view a case of this kind, but nothing that has happened in this case is how things are usually done in the criminal justice system in my view. >> Yeah. All right, Jonathan.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.