Analysis: A MUST SEE ON THE CLIMATE HOAX. President DJT

1d ago Sep 26, 2026 at 12:15 PM

A MUST SEE ON THE CLIMATE HOAX. President DJT

Video transcript 5:17

Oh boy, it's a climate week clash as world leaders gather in New York to celebrate their sustainability accomplishments. Climate activists crash an AI event accusing tech companies of fueling climate change watch. All right, joining me now is Mark Morano from climate depot dot com. We love that site executive editor there. And he was featured as a speaker during climate week. Okay. So let me get this straight. Yeah. You were the speaker at the climate conference. Yes. My organization, Steve act, we actually signed me up to be a speaker and the group allowed it. Then about three weeks later they realized, wait a minute, this guy doesn't fit in here and they didn't cancel me. They actually said we're committed to free speech. So I was able to speak at a panel and I mentioned explicitly that they have to stop. It was about instilling climate action into the youth. I said, you need to stop scaring kids. I use their words. We need diversity, tolerance. We need dissent. We need to allow professors to dissent on this. I talked to him about offshore wind whales. I talked to him about how EVs aren't green. We went to, I went to the entire thing and amazingly the audience agreed. It's hard to think back, you know, so many years ago when literally any professor who opposed the idea of climate change was, you know, basically thrown out of the profession. I mean, it was, we really, there really was a tyranny around this ideology. So explain to me this clash now, because you have Bill Gates in a fight with Al Gore. Bill Gates, who was a big climate guy and now he's not because of AI. Yeah. Well, these students are seeing protests. They know instinctively that AI is killing the climate hoax. Bill Gates came out right before the last UN climate summit and said, climate is not a catastrophe. We need human flourishing. This made heads explode. Al Gore shows up at a UN climate summit attacking Bill Gates as being wrong, as being bullied by Donald Trump. And these activists know that Larry Fink, ground zero for the whole financial scam of climate change from BlackRock, has publicly announced that AI cannot be powered by solar and wind. You need dispatchable power like fossil fuels, coal, oil, gas, nuclear. And so. That's so interesting because Larry Fink was pushing all the climate stuff. All of it. But now that it interferes with AI now. Okay. So that's very revealing. So the students are correct that their agenda's being ripped out by their fellow activists. You know, they're right. So AI just means that it's doomed for them. Yeah. In a lot of ways. Okay. So let's talk about affordability because it's interesting. They're at the climate conference. They see this vulnerability of affordability. They think it will hurt the right. So they're, they're like fighting for affordability. But how do you get affordability if you're not for fossil fuels? Because you need cheap fossil fuels if you want prices to come down. Well, they get it very simply through a fantasy engineering. They say solar and wind are coming on. All we have to do is basically ban fossil fuels and solar and wind will just take over because of this magical like how Al Gore always says like, yeah, there'll be an explosion of technology. Same thing they did with cars. They wanted to ban the gas powered car and they thought EVs would just overtake. EVs never got higher than 7%. And even the Toyota CEO said, I think we're about at max, you know, max. So what we're seeing is the implosion of the whole, as you said, climate hoax. How much of this has to do with president Trump? I don't think he gets enough credit for having destroyed this movement. We have to say this in the last 50 years, this was FDR Ronald Reagan style action. Just look at what Donald Trump did on the climate event over 300 actions as president to unleash American energy. And here's the key thing that Donald Trump did. Permanence. He's pulling us out of the 1992 Rio earth summit treaty that George H. W. Bush got us into. That's unprecedented. We're officially out in February, makes it much harder for a future president AOC and or Gavin Newsom to get us back in. And he's also ending this endangerment finding, which is, which is essentially regulating carbon dioxide. We inhale oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide as humans. That exhale is regulated as a pollutant under the clean air act. And even though the clean air act never mentioned it, so he's trying to get unelected bureaucrats to no longer have the power to regulate all aspects of our economy from meat eating to gas stoves, etc. So, so he's doing a level of permanence that even Trump 1.0 didn't go after. Oh, yeah. I don't think he gets enough credit for what he's done in that space. I'm really glad you're bringing that up. And I think it's an important topic for people to consider as we move into this midterm election. He is absolutely transformational and it was a tyranny. It's, it's hard to think back on how things were. Mark, you've always been on the forefront of this and we thank you for, for, for doing the, the good work of going into the climate conference and facing those people. Thank you so much for joining. Thank you, Rachel. You got it.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-09-26. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Grandiose

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

40%

An eight-word caption — "A MUST SEE ON THE CLIMATE HOAX. President DJT" — fronts a twelve-minute interview whose closing minutes credit him with having "destroyed this movement," rank his energy actions as "FDR Ronald Reagan style," and praise their "Permanence." He asserts none of that himself. Publishing it puts historical-legacy praise before his audience while leaving no grandiose sentence in his own hand, a validation route that stays deniable. His one contribution is the label. "THE CLIMATE HOAX," capitalized and definite, treats the temperature record as a known fraud and converts an empirical question into an accusation of bad faith; the clip then names the alleged perpetrators, including "the whole financial scam of climate change from BlackRock." Agreement is offered as a membership condition rather than argued, which is the epistemic-closure pattern rather than a factual dispute. Splitting is visible in the amplified material: dispatchable fuel against "fantasy engineering," dissent against "a tyranny around this ideology." The narrative shape is vindication. Insiders are shown abandoning their own project — Gates "was a big climate guy and now he's not" — with him named as the pressure that did it, so past accusations of denialism resolve into having been right first. Posted at 8:15 a.m. Eastern in his morning-television window, with his own signature and verbless caps, the post is his. No named individual is attacked in his words, and nothing implies action against anyone.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

"President DJT" sign-off, his established personal signature rather than an aide's "President Trump" third-person narration
verbless all-caps fragment ("A MUST SEE ON THE CLIMATE HOAX") with no link text or framing
8:15 a.m. Eastern — his morning-television reaction window, not a scheduled announcement slot
epithet form ("THE CLIMATE HOAX") rather than the policy-precise phrasing of staff posts
same-day account activity includes an unmistakably first-person post ("Despite my big Election Win")

Psychological Profile

▶ Traits

Big Five:

Extraversion

65%

Agreeableness

20%

Conscientiousness

35%

Neuroticism

35%

Openness

20%

Strongest facet: values rigidity (closure against disconfirming information)

Agency

80%

Communion

25%

Primary drive: validation

▶ Narrative

Role: vindicated heretic — the one who called it a hoax before the insiders quit on it · Arc: redemption · Contrasting: the climate establishment as apostate insiders: Al Gore "attacking Bill Gates," Larry Fink and BlackRock as "the whole financial scam," activists whose "agenda's being ripped out by their fellow activists"

"President DJT" — the office and the initials as a single signaturearbiter of what the audience must seeauthor of a permanent reversal, per the clip he endorses

▶ State

Grandiose State

Trigger: Supply Seeking (broadcast segment crediting him with destroying the climate movement, aired during New York Climate Week)

Sentiment

-0.20

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

60%

Antisocial

20%

Paranoid

35%

Sadism

10%

Defense Mechanisms:

denialsplittingidealizationrationalization

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

20%

Parasocial Techniques:

direct imperative to the audience ("A MUST SEE") with no explanation, positioning the viewer as an insider who will understandthe personal signature "President DJT", which frames a broadcast clip as a recommendation passed hand to handoutsourcing his own praise to a guest so the audience, not he, draws the conclusion about his legacy

Danger Assessment

None

Gaslighting Detected:

"THE CLIMATE HOAX" presents a contested-by-nobody-serious empirical record as a known fraud, with the definite article doing the asserting
amplifies "the whole financial scam of climate change" — reframing institutional climate finance as deliberate deception
the caption asks for assent to the label without offering any evidence, making agreement a marker of in-group standing

Reality Distortions:

treats anthropogenic climate change as an established hoax rather than a scientific finding

Fact Checks (1)

"Climate change is a hoax ("THE CLIMATE HOAX")"

False

The warming trend and its principal human cause are established by independent instrumental records (NASA GISS, NOAA, HadCRUT, Berkeley Earth), satellite measurement, ocean heat content, and sea-level data, and assessed with high confidence in IPCC AR6. "Hoax" asserts coordinated fabrication, for which no evidence exists; disagreement over policy cost or projection ranges is a separate question from whether the underlying measurements are fraudulent.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Eight words of his own, twelve minutes of someone else's

The caption is a fragment with no verb — "A MUST SEE ON THE CLIMATE HOAX" — followed by the signature "President DJT." What he wrote establishes two things: a directive to watch, and the title he wants attached to the directive. Everything argumentative in the post is spoken by other people.

The segment is a business-news interview with Marc Morano of Climate Depot, hung on Climate Week in New York. Its last movement is the reason to publish it. The host asks, "How much of this has to do with president Trump?" and the guest answers: "I don't think he gets enough credit for having destroyed this movement... this was FDR Ronald Reagan style action... over 300 actions as president to unleash American energy. And here's the key thing that Donald Trump did. Permanence." A caption that says only "MUST SEE" puts that assessment — destroyer of a movement, ranked with two presidents, author of something permanent — in front of the audience without him having to assert it himself. The praise arrives pre-laundered through a third party, which is the form of validation-seeking that leaves no grandiose sentence in his own handwriting.

"Hoax" doing work that "wrong" would not

He does not write that climate policy is costly or that the movement overreached. He writes "THE CLIMATE HOAX" — capitalized, definite article, treated as a settled name for a known thing. A hoax requires perpetrators and dupes, so the label carries an accusation of bad faith and converts a scientific question into a question of who is lying. The clip supplies the perpetrators the label implies: "Larry Fink, ground zero for the whole financial scam of climate change from BlackRock," Al Gore's "magical" faith in an "explosion of technology," professors who once faced "a tyranny around this ideology."

Denial at this level is not a slip of emphasis; the distortion is structural, because accepting the caption requires rejecting the instrumental temperature record wholesale. Published four days after his UNGA remarks reprised the same theme, it reads as maintenance of a position rather than a fresh reaction, and the audience's assent to "hoax" functions as the price of in-group standing — the same epistemic sorting the clip itself performs when it says activists "know instinctively that AI is killing the climate hoax."

The defection story

The segment's structure is a contamination narrative aimed at the other side, and that is what makes it flattering rather than merely congenial. Bill Gates "was a big climate guy and now he's not," Fink "was pushing all the climate stuff. All of it," and Gore is reduced to "attacking Bill Gates as being wrong, as being bullied by Donald Trump." The insiders are shown abandoning their own project, with him named as the pressure that did it. He is cast as the vindicated outsider whose position held while its opponents' collapsed — a setback-to-comeback arc where the comeback is other people's surrender, and where being called a denier converts retroactively into having been right first.

Splitting runs throughout: cheap dispatchable fuel against "fantasy engineering," dissenters against "tyranny," with nothing in between. The self-schema is the man who said the unsayable and outlasted the consensus; the other is a financial-ideological complex that never believed its own claims.

Timing, signature, and what the caption can't tell us

12:15 UTC is 8:15 a.m. Eastern, and he had been in the New York–Washington corridor through UNGA week and the Xi state visit. That is his morning-television window, and the post has the shape of a reaction to a segment just watched: a shouted imperative, no context, no link text, the video doing the work. The "President DJT" sign-off and the unpunctuated all-caps fragment are his own habits, not the polished third-person framing an aide produces; the day's earlier posts include one in unmistakable first person ("Despite my big Election Win"), so the account was in his hands.

Eight words is too small a sample for anything about language production, and none of the interview's wording is his. Nothing here derogates a person by name in his own voice, and nothing identifies a target or implies action — the post asks the audience to watch and to believe, and stops there.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Climate change is a hoax ("THE CLIMATE HOAX")"	False	The warming trend and its principal human cause are established by independent instrumental records (NASA GISS, NOAA, HadCRUT, Berkeley Earth), satellite measurement, ocean heat content, and sea-level data, and assessed with high confidence in IPCC AR6. "Hoax" asserts coordinated fabrication, for which no evidence exists; disagreement over policy cost or projection ranges is a separate question from whether the underlying measurements are fraudulent.

Overall Veracity: 0%