Post from Truth Social

Video transcript 14:57

Here's the attitude the Democrat Party started the week with. The White House shouldn't be able to direct the attorney general to go around prosecuting if he ever we're not. We can't overcome the politicization of the criminal justice system. The awesome power of the state. You can't have a situation where whoever's in charge of the government starts using that to go after their political enemies or reward their friends, right? When I saw this clip, I had to ask, what is he smoking? This is the guy who led the 2016 coup against the duly elected president, Donald Trump. Obama weaponized his Justice Department as the shock troops of the operation. Not only that, he kept that operation running for almost a decade. Now he's confessing he knows the republic can't survive what he did. So why is he smiling? By the end of the week, that smile got wiped off his face, and I'm going to show you why. I'm Barbara Boyd, and I've documented this coup since it began in 2016. It was a British intelligence instigated coup. Today I'm going to show you the three blows that wipe that smile off Barack Obama's face. First, how his hand-picked puppet Q Starmer just got buried in a Labour Party bloodbath. Second, the Virginia Supreme Court bombshell that blew up Obama's most aggressive gerrymander in the country and reset the entire 2026 midterm map. And third, how JD Vance in Iowa and an outsider candidate in LA just exposed the one thing Obama's manufactured Democrats can never face. But before we dig in, hit the like button and share this video. It increases our reach on YouTube. Let's start across the pond where the British Labour Party, the brain for the Democrats here, got schlacked in local elections, losing some 1,800 local races, control of the parliament in Wales, and further loss of control over the parliament in Scotland. Leonid Morgan, Wales's leader who lost her seat, said it was time for Labour to get back to being the party of the working class. Like Democrats here, Labour has totally abandoned that mission. Now Obama had tried to turn Starmer into an actual personality, even taking credit for Starmer's 2024 victory. He counseled him and told him to be authentic. That mentorship produced what British commentator Jonathan Cook called the UK's first totally synthetic laboratory grown prime minister. Starmer continued London's disastrous green energy crusade, open border immigration policies, including protection of rape gangs and permanent war against Russia and Ukraine while raising taxes and cutting welfare. He jailed anti-immigrant protesters for their speech. But most of all, he kept scheming against Trump and Trump's destruction of the rotten globalist order that give people like him and Obama political power. Starmer called the Iran war a violation of international law, initially denying the US the use of British bases, the same in your face strategy the UK led in sabotaging Trump's quest for peace between Russia and Ukraine. But when Trump moved to deny Iran a nuclear weapon, the resulting energy disruption consigned the Labour Party and probably Starmer himself to the dustbin of history. Nigel Farage's reform party surged and now controls many local councils. It campaigned on ending open borders and ending net zero, correctly attributing the UK's cost of living increases made even worse by the Iran war to the insane net zero energy policy. That's the same deadly energy policy Obama and Joe Biden imposed on the United States. As of this morning, Obama has been meeting with candidates Mark Carney along with Alex Soros to see what can be salvaged in the UK and to map new fronts in the war against our country. Now, if what I just told you about the marriage of the UK, Canada, and Europe's globalists with America's Democrats is a surprise, you need to subscribe to our free newsletter at PrometheanAction.com. We'll put you on the real battlefield between sovereign nations like the world Donald Trump is now creating and the imperial financiers who have been this nation's enemies for 250 years. The link is in the description. That brings us back home to a ruling that came down yesterday morning that the Democratic Party is still reeling from. The Supreme Court of Virginia in a 4-3 decision struck down the congressional redistricting referendum the Democrats ran through last month. The map is dead. Virginia runs its 2026 midterms under the existing districts, and here's what's actually going on because the press is as usual lying and covering it up. After President Trump encouraged Republican-led states like Texas to redraw their maps to reflect the actual electorate, the Democratic Party under the personal direction of Barack Obama, who has run the redistricting operation for years through his all-on-the-line group, decided to retaliate. California redo its maps. Virginia attempted the most aggressive partisan gerrymander in the country, turning a 6-5 Democratic map into a 10-1 Democratic map. Wiping out four Republican seats in a state, Trump nearly lost by 5%. They thought this would win them the house and secure Barack Obama's political future. That's why he was so cocky in the interview we just played. To do it, they bypassed the bipartisan redistricting commission Virginia voters had approved by constitutional amendment in 2020. They rammed a new amendment through the legislature on an illegal fast-track and put it on a special ballot in April, spending over $5 million in taxpayer money with outside groups spending nearly $100 million more. The referendum language was deliberately misleading. Congress called it a temporary measure, restoring fairness, when the rigged maps were supposed to guarantee the House in 2026, secure the presidency in 2028, and secure Democratic majorities through the 2030 midterms. Their map ate or consolidated the districts Trump won, making the whole election Northern Virginia dependent where Trump lost. The Supreme Court of Virginia threw the whole thing out, laying out in painstaking detail how the Democrats violated the Virginia constitution by using that illegal fast-track. The vote, the court said, had been fatally poisoned. But Obama's redistricting fantasies didn't just blow up here. The Supreme Court's April 29th decision in Louisiana versus Kelly's outlawed race-based gerrymandering nationwide, setting off a redistricting scramble throughout the red state South and calling into question California's map, which was explicitly based on race. And the Colette's decision laid out why Texas' redistricting was not a political whim of Donald Trump. The redistricting there eliminated racially gerrymandered districts. In an instant, the midterm map shifted from Democratic certainty to wins for Trump's Republicans. That's why Democrats are engaged this Saturday in what George Washington law professor Jonathan Duterte aptly called a prolonged primal scream. Because of the Iran war, we've missed big parts of the actual dynamic shaping the midterms. We've got momentum on redistricting because the Virginia court had the stones to call theft what it was, pure theft. But what about communicating the policies that will actually destroy Obama's insurrection against the republic, the president's policies? The answer isn't more polished messaging, it's real authenticity, not the fake kind. Two examples this week show you what that looks like. First, watch Vice President JD Vance's red meat speech to Iowa Republicans at a factory that makes steel grills for big trucks. Here's one part just for the flavor. So what happened for 41 years? We all know the story. The factories closed down. My hometown. This is the story of my hometown where I grew up in a community that was proud where people built things, where new homes were being made. And by the time I graduated from high school, the manufacturers were laying people off. Those big, beautiful factories were shuttering their doors. And we never had a political movement that said enough is enough until Donald J. Trump and Zach Nunn came along. There was all sorts of stuff about national prosecutions of the Democrats' entitlement fraud schemes, barring foreign ownership of farmland, and doing more for our nation's farmers. Listen to the whole speech and you'll see that. But when Vance reached for the souls of his audience, he did it the way only authentic people came. He talked about the emotions he would encounter if his six-year-old son later decided to follow him into the military and what it means to give your life for this country. Here's the last part. And it hit me that every time we lose somebody, every time somebody goes overseas and sacrifices their life, every time that a person gives the ultimate sacrifice to the United States of America, we often read about it as a line on a newspaper or online. But there's a father and there's a mother and there's a grandma and aunts and uncles and a whole crew of people who love them the same way that we all love every single member of our family. And you take that love and you set that on one side, and you consider the balance that all of us owe, because on the other side is we have to meet their sacrifice by carrying something forward that they can't carry forward. We have to make this country worthy of that sacrifice. You remember that movie, Saving Private Ryan, it's one of my favorite movies. And at the very end, right before one of the soldiers takes his last breath, he looks up and he says, "earn this." That's what is at stake in these midterms, just like it was at Gettysburg when Abe Lincoln struck a similar theme. You might have also seen this week the AI videos going viral on social media for the outsider candidate Spencer Pratt in the L.A. mayor's race. Pratt lost his home in the Pacific Palisades Fire and has been waging a relentless campaign on the failure of California's democratic leadership ever since. A filmmaker named Charles Curran produced an AI-generated ad supporting Pratt. Here's part of how it goes. Please, I'm begging you. There's homeless drug addicts in front of the schools. My children aren't safe. Look, if you were a transgender migrant, I could get you a free pussy. Let's move the drug addicts closer. Bass already solved a crime. I endorse her. The DSA agents you see in that flick, dragging people into the aristocracy's feast, are democratic socialists of America, the Jacobin Democrats who have taken over that party. The Pratt campaign itself is producing similar short videos, dramatizing the destruction of the once golden state in ways words alone cannot. Recent polling shows Pratt tied with Mayor Karen Bass in second place, and his videos are catching fire all over the country. That's the point. A guy who lost his house in a fire with a filmmaker friend and an AI tool is doing more damage to the LA democratic machine than $100 million of consultants ever could. Because what he's saying is true, and people can feel it. That's the asymmetric power of authentic outsider messaging against a manufactured aristocracy. Donald Trump, J.D. Vance, this guy Pratt, authentic patriotic Americans talking straight to the people in a way manufactured politicians like Obama, Starmer, and the Jacobin Democrats can never do. So here's where we are this Saturday. Across the pond, Obama's hand-picked synthetic prime minister just got buried by working-class British voters who's had enough of green energy fantasies, open borders, and permanent war. Here at home, the Virginia Supreme Court called Obama's gerrymandering operation what it is, theft. Louisiana ruling means race-based mapper being as finished as a national strategy. And on the campaign trail, J.D. Vance is talking to Iowans about what it means to give your life for this country, while a guy who lost his house in the Pacific Palisades fire is running circles around the LA democratic machine with 30-second AI videos. Manufactured politicians lose to truth tellers. Like the social media cyborg gets buried by addressing the realities people face from the heart. That's the lesson of the entire Trump era, and it's why Obama smiles the way he does. He fears his project is done, and the only thing left for him to do is to pretend otherwise. The midterm map just shifted. The British operation is being rolled up. The people are waking up, but we're not there yet. If you want to be on the real battlefield, not the one legacy media or social media cyborg shows you, but the actual fight between empire and sovereign nations that has shaped American politics for 250 years, then join us. This battle for the midterms has just been joined, although the doom scrollers and the media will try to convince you to stay out because the country's lost. That's the cyborg we fight here every single day. We need to expand to win, become a supporting member or contributor. Losing is really not an option. This is when you're shouting to me, "Wrap, thanks for listening." Please take a moment and subscribe to our free newsletter at PrometheanAction.com.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-09-09. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level
Elevated
Narcissistic State
Mixed
Authorship
Uncertain
Intensity
45%

This post amplifies, without added commentary, a ~8-minute partisan video alleging Barack Obama orchestrated a "British intelligence instigated coup" against the subject in 2016, framing UK Labour Party losses, a Virginia redistricting ruling, and midterm dynamics as evidence of Obama's downfall. No original text accompanies the post, so authorship attribution rests solely on timing (~11 PM Eastern, within a documented late-night personal-posting window) and is capped at low confidence -- this concerns clip selection, not authorship of words.\n\nThe amplified content is clinically notable for its paranoid structure: a cross-national conspiracy (Obama, British intelligence, Starmer, Soros, Carney) is presented as coordinated action against the subject and allies, consistent with a long-documented pattern of persecution narratives centered on the 2016 investigation. The content also exhibits a DARVO/projection structure, accusing Obama's DOJ of "weaponization" -- an accusation structurally mirroring scrutiny of the subject's own DOJ conduct -- and splits political actors into a corrupt globalist axis versus a legitimate nationalist camp with no middle ground.\n\nThe post's timing, shortly after a May 7 adverse court ruling invalidating the subject's tariffs, raises a plausible but unconfirmed hypothesis of distraction/displacement toward a safer, familiar antagonist (Obama) rather than the immediate legal setback. No direct calls to violence appear; danger is rated elevated due to existential and militarized framing ("coup," "shock troops," "the republic can't survive") rather than explicit incitement. Longitudinal comparison would likely show this fits an established pattern rather than a deviation.

Authorship Analysis
Uncertain
Indicators:
  • Post time converts to approximately 11:00 PM Eastern, within the late-night window associated with personal, unstaged content engagement
  • No written text accompanies the post, so no stylometric evidence (typos, grammar, syntax) is available to assess
  • Content matches a documented longitudinal pattern of the subject amplifying Obama-centered conspiracy/persecution narratives, which could reflect either personal selection or staff curation of known-favorite themes
  • Video-only posts with no caption are ambiguous between personal late-night browsing behavior and pre-scheduled staff amplification
Psychological Profile
▶ State
Mixed State

Trigger: Unknown (Ambiguous between routine grievance-content consumption (maintenance) and possible distraction from the May 7 adverse tariff ruling (preemptive/defensive))

Sentiment
-0.40
▶ Clinical
Malignant Narcissism:
Narcissistic
30%
Antisocial
10%
Paranoid
55%
Sadism
20%
Defense Mechanisms:
projectionsplittingdisplacement
Cognitive Complexity:
Complexity
0%
Parasocial Techniques:
Invocation of a shared persecution narrative ('the republic can't survive what he did') to bond audience against a common conspiratorial enemyFraming distant foreign elections (UK Labour losses) as direct vindication for the subject's domestic political struggle
Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:
  • Existential framing of political conflict ('the republic can't survive what he did')
  • Militarized language describing domestic institutions ('shock troops,' 'coup')
  • No explicit calls to violence or mobilization present in this specific clip
Gaslighting Detected:
  • DARVO-structured narrative reversing accusations of DOJ weaponization onto the party more commonly leveling that accusation at the subject's own administration
  • Reframing a well-documented investigation into the subject's 2016 campaign as an unproven 'coup' orchestrated by adversaries
Reality Distortions:
  • Characterization of the 2016 Russia investigation as a 'coup' led by Obama and 'British intelligence' presented as established fact by the amplified content

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Daily Digest On the day he left for Beijing, Trump called reporting on Iran's military strength "virtual TREASON"

The day started in the middle of a late-night posting binge before his trip to China. In under an hour he pushed out a stream of video clips about Obama, the Russia investigation and the 2020 election, many of them reposts of his own earlier material. After a short night he went after the New York T...

Analyzed
31
Rage Level
35%
Max Danger
Elevated
View full day analysis →