Post from Truth Social

Video transcript 1:47

We've proved now that there was direct access to the Antrim County Election Management System because we show on November 5th, we can see it in the forensic images, that an anonymous user logged onto the EMS remotely with escalated privileges and made changes to the the database when they were trying to re-tabulate the election. So that's one huge, huge development because now we prove that the machines were remotely accessed and more importantly they were remotely accessed by an anonymous user who had elevated privileges in the system. That is pretty damning for the the non forensic reviewers out there, people who do not want a forensic audit. And the other thing probably is equally explosive. Everyone's seen ballots before like these ballots here. On the side of the ballot there's these black boxes, there's 59 black boxes on the side of the ballot. We now see within the forensic images that in Antrim County those blocks, blocks 15, 18, 28, 41 and 44 were all intentionally modified. The height and the width, the shape of those blocks were intentionally modified in order to generate errors. What does an error do? In this case by modifying those specific blocks they were able to cause rejections for Republican ballots. Meaning if you voted for Donald Trump and then put your ballot in the machine your ballot was rejected at a rate of 20% more than Joe Biden ballots.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-09-09. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level
Elevated
Narcissistic State
Vulnerable
Authorship
Uncertain
Intensity
30%

This textless repost amplifies a video reasserting long-rejected 2020 Antrim County, Michigan election-fraud claims — remote EMS access and deliberately resized ballot-scan fields — nearly six years after courts and audits found no fraud and traced the original error to a corrected clerical mistake. The subject adds no words of his own; the analyzable act is selection and amplification during an active presidency, not authorship of the claims. Posting falls in the late-night window (~10:48 PM EDT) historically associated with personal engagement, in a week that also included a genuine legal defeat (the Court of International Trade's tariff ruling) — a juxtaposition consistent with, though not proof of, displacement toward a familiar, favorable grievance narrative. The pattern most plausibly reflects maintenance of a stable persecution/legitimacy schema rather than a sharp new injury. No grandiosity, dehumanizing language, or explicit incitement is present, so danger is rated elevated rather than high: the primary risk is continued institutional-trust erosion from a sitting president recirculating adjudicated-false fraud claims to a receptive base, not an imminent violence signal. Authorship attribution rests entirely on timing, not text, and is capped at low confidence. Longitudinal tracking of similar 2020-relitigation reposts would clarify whether this reflects routine grievance maintenance or responds to an unlisted proximate trigger (e.g., renewed audit litigation) not captured in the provided event window.

Authorship Analysis
Uncertain
Indicators:
  • Late-night posting time (~10:48 PM EDT) consistent with personal engagement window
  • No original text, so no stylometric markers of authorship are available
  • Falls within a week of historian-documented unusually heavy, erratic personal posting activity
  • Attribution here concerns who selected/posted the clip, not who narrated or wrote it
Psychological Profile
▶ Traits
Big Five:
Extraversion
40%
Agreeableness
25%
Conscientiousness
30%
Neuroticism
50%
Openness
30%

Strongest facet: Neuroticism (angry hostility/suspiciousness, inferred from selection choice, not language)

Agency
55%
Communion
15%

Primary drive: validation

▶ Narrative
Role: wronged victor / vindicated-in-waiting · Arc: contamination · Contrasting: election officials / 'non-forensic reviewers'
Implicit: election outcome was fraudulently obtained against him and his voters
▶ State
Vulnerable State

Trigger: Maintenance (Periodic reinforcement of 2020 election-fraud grievance narrative for the base; possibly incidental to unrelated legal defeat on tariffs the same week)

Sentiment
-0.30
▶ Clinical
Malignant Narcissism:
Narcissistic
20%
Antisocial
10%
Paranoid
55%
Sadism
5%
Defense Mechanisms:
denialdisplacement
Cognitive Complexity:
Complexity
0%
Parasocial Techniques:
Implicit platform endorsement via silent amplification without commentaryAppeal to insider/suppressed 'forensic' knowledgeIn-group vindication narrative for base audience
Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:
  • Sustained amplification of debunked election-fraud claims by a sitting president, which carries institutional-trust-erosion risk even absent explicit incitement language in this specific post
Reality Distortions:
  • Re-amplification of Antrim County 'remote access'/'intentionally modified ballot blocks' claims that Michigan courts and independent audits found unsupported, with the actual documented cause being a corrected clerical ballot-definition error

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Daily Digest On the day he left for Beijing, Trump called reporting on Iran's military strength "virtual TREASON"

The day started in the middle of a late-night posting binge before his trip to China. In under an hour he pushed out a stream of video clips about Obama, the Russia investigation and the 2020 election, many of them reposts of his own earlier material. After a short night he went after the New York T...

Analyzed
31
Rage Level
35%
Max Danger
Elevated
View full day analysis →