Post from Truth Social

Video transcript 5:21

Mike Sorelli is a retired Navy SEAL officer. All right, Mike, you just heard Chuck say that there could be a little bit of a problem between the guys doing the negotiating and the Army back home. There could be some throat slit when they get back from Pakistan. The Army could cheat on the deal. I mean, it's a little haywire. How do you see it? You're mayhem and if anyone from the IRGC is stabbed, they're not going to get any tears from myself or a lot of Americans. This is complete turmoil. Jesse, this is what I'll say. How can you not be proud of our president and to be an American right now? I mean, even this cabinet, Scott Besset was waging economic fury, Pete, epic fury, Rubio verbal fury. I mean, this has been fifth generation warfare, Trump style. The world is watching. But what's even more impressive is Trump has dismantled the financial institutions and systems that have propped up Iran for 47 years to include other belligerents. And the EU, I'm sorry, the economic I'm sorry, the European Globalist Union formerly known as the EU and even Lloyd's of London are watching the very system that they've profited off of for the last decades be destroyed. This is a great thing. And yes, there will be some back and forth on this deal and getting Iran to totally agree to the non-negotiable terms. Yeah, I mean, it's a it's a full spectrum takedown of this regime, the proxies and the banking system that propped it up. The blockade, it's pretty effective to leave it on during the negotiation because we don't have to rush, they're the ones losing billions of dollars every week and they have a gun to their head. I don't see how they don't sign where we tell them to sign. And this was right. This was not a negotiation. This was a disciplinary meeting or even worse a sentencing, you know, after after 47 years of belligerent behavior, it's on Tehran to prove through verification, not Washington to trust them. There is no such thing as Iranian goodwill or trust. That's what we refer to as a purple squirrel. It doesn't exist. So verification is going to be the key word here. And I wouldn't stop the blockade even after they sign, put a time clock, put pressure on them to transfer that uranium back over to us, ensure that they're following all the conditional terms of this this agreement and hold them to account. That's a brilliant idea. Make it conditions based. You know, you can maybe let every other Iranian tanker through until you get every single ounce of uranium. I would absolutely do the same thing when you hear the bluster. You know, I look online and it looks looks like this thing's coming to an end. And then you see these Iranian accounts pop up and it's translated from Farsi. And they're like, we just sunk your battleship and the straights still closed and the president's lying through his teeth. How do you how do you comprehend that? It's it's lunacy. I don't know what reality they're living in. This is this fanatical theology. They live in their own world and they're not in touch with reality. It's tough, tough talk or what we call saber-rabbling. And that's all it is. They're trying to save face, but they know they've lost. And the the Chinese, the president's going to be flying to Beijing in a couple of weeks after wrapping up this brief excursion, as you said, a pretty beautiful demonstration of American military prowess and technology. What kind of clout do you think he's going to descend off the steps of Air Force One with? Oh, China is isolated right now. They've lost Venezuela. They've lost Iran. They've lost all oil on the black market. And now they're going to have to pay market price. China is hurting. They need their energy, their oil production back because they can't produce. They can't manufacture. So China is not in a great negotiating leverage standpoint, either. Trump has changed the global chessboard and, you know, America. And even though the world can't recognize it, it's going to be stronger from this. And I think the Middle East, we're going to see an Abraham's Accord 2.0. And I think we may see a stable, peaceful, economically prosperous Middle East in the next five to ten years. Yeah. You know, if he brings peace to the Middle East, he still won't get the Nobel Peace for us, they're never going to give it to him, especially after this war. You can kiss that goodbye. He deserves it. But you can kiss it goodbye. You think Cuba is next? I think Cuba is, is again in a box by themselves. And Jesse, to your point, the left, the left is never going to get over their their moral superiority. You know, even if I dislike somebody, I'm going to give him credit for the things they're good at. And Trump has been more effective than any any president in our lifetime on the global stage. This is pure strategic execution. And the left will never give him the credit he deserves. America is going to be stronger for this and they can't even realize it. Well said. I mean, I don't like Gutfeld, but I laugh at his jokes when they're funny. Have a great weekend. Thank you for your service.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-09-09. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level
Elevated
Narcissistic State
Grandiose
Authorship
Uncertain
Intensity
55%

This post is media-only: a Fox-style segment lavishing praise on the administration's Iran strategy, including a guest's approving remark that IRGC personnel being "stabbed" would draw no sympathy. The behavior under analysis is selection, not authorship. It fits a pattern of outsourcing grandiose claims to sympathetic third-party voices — supply-seeking/maintenance amplification during a week when aides were privately warning that the subject's own Iran posts were undermining negotiations, amid friction with the Pope and NATO allies. Clinically, the selection is consistent with grandiose self-state maintenance and splitting (total winners vs. humiliated losers) mediated through proxy voices rather than his own language. The unmoderated inclusion of violence-endorsing rhetoric toward a named adversary group, broadcast to a mass following during an active military standoff, is a genuine if moderate danger indicator, though it falls short of direct incitement since the words originate with a guest, not the subject. No text exists to assess cognitive status, trait language, or stylometric authorship; timing evidence (early evening at the White House) is ambiguous and insufficient to confidently attribute posting choice to the subject personally, so authorship confidence is low. No verifiable factual claims are attributable to the subject himself in this post.

Authorship Analysis
Uncertain
Indicators:
  • No original text — no stylometric evidence available
  • Timing (~8:41 PM Eastern at the White House) is ambiguous: not classic late-night, not standard business hours either
  • Content matches known pattern of amplifying flattering media coverage
  • Cannot distinguish self-selection from aide curation without textual markers
Psychological Profile
▶ State
Grandiose State

Trigger: Supply Seeking (Concurrent frictions (aide warnings about counterproductive Iran posts, Pope feud, NATO tensions) plausibly motivating a shift toward triumphant, ego-reinforcing content)

Sentiment
+0.50
Mildly Hypomanic
Selection of an unusually triumphant, high-energy media segment amid a week of concurrent political frictions
▶ Clinical
Malignant Narcissism:
Narcissistic
55%
Antisocial
25%
Paranoid
10%
Sadism
30%
Defense Mechanisms:
idealizationsplitting
Cognitive Complexity:
Complexity
0%
Parasocial Techniques:
Outsourcing self-praise to a seemingly independent broadcast voicePlatforming flattering commentary to reinforce audience perception of dominance
Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:
  • Unmoderated inclusion of a guest's approving remark that IRGC personnel being 'stabbed' would draw no sympathy, broadcast to a mass following during an active military/negotiation standoff
  • Framing of an active adversary population in terms that normalize violence without editorial distance

Dehumanizing Language Present

Violent Imagery Present

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Daily Digest A Saturday that ended with "FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT" back on his feed, in someone else's handwriting

He spent Friday night and the early hours letting other people do his talking: Fox-style clips declaring the Iran campaign an unconditional surrender, supporter videos calling him divinely protected, and a rapid run of friendly headlines about tax refunds and a Texas refinery. Only four posts all da...

Analyzed
29
Rage Level
8%
Max Danger
Elevated
View full day analysis →