Search Posts

You know, President Trump takes a lot of heat. They claim he's doing these horrendous things. Horrendous things to government, to the culture, horrendous things to the Constitution. All lies. I tell you this from a historical and legal perspective. In fact, it is they, his opposition, the abuse of power, the Department of Justice, the prosecutors, the indictments, the different jurisdictions, the abuse of the 14th Amendment to keep them off the ballot and over and over and on and on. Two unconstitutional impeachments, already plotting another impeachment, already plotting to destroy the independence of the Supreme Court and the judiciary, to stack the Senate, to stack the House of Representatives, and God knows what else they have in store for us. How dare they point a finger at him or any of us, what it is they who are tyrannical and have a totalitarian mindset. And look what they're doing in New York City, destroying it, absolutely destroying it. And in fact, the blue states are depopulating. People are trying to get out of there if they can get new jobs. Many people, they feel they can't leave. They have a generational attachment. But the only states that are actually growing, and I don't mean with illegal aliens, I mean with American citizens and naturalized citizens, are red states. Are red states. And there's a reason for that. There's a reason why the Democrats want to take over the whole country. So there's no escape. No matter what state you go to, the iron fist of centralized big government will be thrown at you. President Trump has a very small, small majority in the House and the Senate, and he's trying to get things done as fast as he can because he knows that there's a midterm election. We pray that we win, but we don't know. And he knows he has less than three years left in his presidency, and he's a doer, and he wants to get things done, and he's reaching into the culture, not just politics, to try and reform and protect and defend this nation. And people say, "Look at this. He knocked off a senator from Louisiana. He knocked off a senator from Texas. He knocked off this crazy congressman from Kentucky. Who does that?" A little bit of history. FDR tried to do that. The great FDR, according to the Democrats, greater than George Washington, greater than Abraham Lincoln combined. Nobody liked FDR. Why? Because he was a big socialist. That's why. But that for another day. Our friends at TeachingAmericanHistory.org, frustrated by the setbacks that his administration encountered in its second term, President Franklin Roosevelt took the bold step of intervening in the 1938 Democratic primaries. His targets were conservative Democrats, mostly Southerners, who had joined Republicans in opposing New Deal measures. In races across the country, he stumped from liberal candidates and denounced conservative incumbents as traitors to the cause of his reform. He explained his efforts in a speech, a fireside speech, that he gave on June 24, 1938. I'm not going to read the whole thing, but let me give you a taste of it. He said, "After the election of 1936, I was told, and Congress was told by an increasing number of politically and worldly-wise people, that I should coast along and join easy presidency for four years and not take the Democratic platform too seriously. They told me that the people were getting weary of reform through political effort and would no longer oppose that small minority which, in spite of its own disastrous leadership in 1929, is always eager to resume its control over the government of the United States. Never in our lifetime has such a concerted campaign of defeatism been thrown at the heads of the President and the Senators and Congressmen as in the case of this 75th Congress." He had gotten a lot of his new deal through, once he threatened the Supreme Court and many of the senior members started retiring, replaced with his appointees, but he was now being blocked by several of the more moderate Senators, Democrats in Congress, who said, "We understand why you're trying to address the Depression, but we're not all in for this socialist stuff." He says, "Never before have so many copperheads." That's a copperhead. During the Civil War, these were Northern Democrats who sided with, not the South, but with bringing the Civil War to a quick conclusion. They opposed war. They were anti-war. They opposed the warmongers who were trying to win the Civil War, and they turned on Lincoln, and they wanted to negotiate peace with the confederacy. See, we've been through a lot of these things before, whether it's World War II, the Civil War, and now the war with Iran. We've had the so-called anti-war types who don't want victory, and so you don't get victory. He complains about them. He says, "This Congress has ended on the side of the people. My faith in the American people and their faith in themselves have been justified, and I congratulate the Congress and the leadership thereof, and I congratulate the American people on their own staying power." So he slaps them around and then pats them on the head. He does this in a lot of his speeches. He goes on, "Following out this line of thought, I want to say a few words about the coming political primaries." Here we get to the gist of it. "Fifty years ago, party nominations were generally made in conventions, a system typified in the public imagination by a little group in smoke-filled room who made out the party states. The direct primary was invented to make the nominating process a more democratic one, to give the party voters themselves a chance to pick their party candidates." He goes on, "An election cannot give the country a firm sense of direction if it has two or more national parties which merely have different names but are as alike in their principles and names as peas in the same pod." In other words, the UNI party. The radicals always talk about the UNI party, whether they're the Woke Right, REICH, the Islamists or the Marxists, or Jess Kooks. "In the coming primaries, all parties, there will be many clashes between two schools of thought, generally classified as liberal and conservative. Roughly speaking, the liberal school of thought recognizes the new conditions throughout the world and they call for new remedies." And of course, the conservatives, Jess, the old school, you know, big business, big government, all the Bernie Sanders claptrap. But he says later, "With the head of the Democrat party charged with the responsibility of carrying out the definitely liberal declaration of principles set forth in the 1936 Democratic platform, I feel that I have every right to speak in those few instances where there may be a clear-cut issue between candidates for a democratic nomination involving these principles or involving a clear misuse of my own name." So he goes out and he campaigns to actually help pick candidates to take on these more conservative candidates. He's wildly popular, FDR won a landslide, but in every case where he tried to knock off a more conservative or moderate Democrat, his candidate lost except one in New York. Every other case, FDR's candidate lost. And it set back his administration. The party was angry. If he had won, they wouldn't be so angry, but he lost. Every one but won. He lost Walter George, a senator in Georgia, George won. Miller Tidings in Maryland won. FDR lost. Ellison Smith in South Carolina won. FDR lost. But he won this chairman of the House Rules Committee in New York, John O'Connor. He defeated him, but that's it. He didn't defeat anybody else. I want you to compare that to Donald Trump. Again, you got a couple vote majority in the House and you got guys like Massey who represent one small congressional district who are trying to undermine the president's landslide victory. One congressman, maybe two or three, because the majority is so tight. So they're trying to take his mandate and destroy it. And the president knows, President Trump, I got to get my agenda through. And I have a few of these senators who do the same thing. I got one senator who actually voted a removal from office in the second impeachment when I already was a private citizen. And he expects me to be supporting him in a Republican primary. What Donald Trump has done is what FDR tried to do, but failed. Not only that in Donald Trump's case, it's not only Louisiana, it's not only state senators in Indiana. It's not only Massey in Kentucky. It's not only the Senate race in Georgia with this Raffensperger. It's not only Cornyn in Texas, but before that, the president got involved in all these primaries in his first term. I don't think he's lost one. Maybe it's one or two, but whatever it is, it's inconsequential. So for those people who say, you know, Donald Trump's lost a step. You know, MAGA's divided. You know, MAGA's tiny, tiny thing that just represents Mark Levin. These are fools and buffoons. MAGA is as strong as ever. In fact, the Republican Party is MAGA. And MAGA is Donald Trump's movement. And we've got the general election. Everything will be put to the test come November. But those are the facts.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Okay, we have it in our set, fire, bomb.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

America is ending the threat posed by this radical regime decimating Iran's capabilities with Operation Epic Fear is something that nobody's ever seen, anything quite like it. We have the most powerful military in the world. In the meantime, the conflict in Iran also makes it absolutely vital for the radical left Democrats in Congress to immediately end their dangerous shutdown of our Department of Homeland Security. For 42 days, they've tried to completely eliminate funding for the number one duty of government, which is keeping America safe. They want to have our borders be open again. Over the past 14 months, the Trump administration has achieved perhaps the most dramatic one-year turnaround of any nation in all of history. Our country is prospering again, our economy is booming again, and America is respected again all over the world, perhaps like never before. And in America, we don't fear the future, we invent the future.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Mike Sorelli is a retired Navy SEAL officer. All right, Mike, you just heard Chuck say that there could be a little bit of a problem between the guys doing the negotiating and the Army back home. There could be some throat slit when they get back from Pakistan. The Army could cheat on the deal. I mean, it's a little haywire. How do you see it? You're mayhem and if anyone from the IRGC is stabbed, they're not going to get any tears from myself or a lot of Americans. This is complete turmoil. Jesse, this is what I'll say. How can you not be proud of our president and to be an American right now? I mean, even this cabinet, Scott Besset was waging economic fury, Pete, epic fury, Rubio verbal fury. I mean, this has been fifth generation warfare, Trump style. The world is watching. But what's even more impressive is Trump has dismantled the financial institutions and systems that have propped up Iran for 47 years to include other belligerents. And the EU, I'm sorry, the economic I'm sorry, the European Globalist Union formerly known as the EU and even Lloyd's of London are watching the very system that they've profited off of for the last decades be destroyed. This is a great thing. And yes, there will be some back and forth on this deal and getting Iran to totally agree to the non-negotiable terms. Yeah, I mean, it's a it's a full spectrum takedown of this regime, the proxies and the banking system that propped it up. The blockade, it's pretty effective to leave it on during the negotiation because we don't have to rush, they're the ones losing billions of dollars every week and they have a gun to their head. I don't see how they don't sign where we tell them to sign. And this was right. This was not a negotiation. This was a disciplinary meeting or even worse a sentencing, you know, after after 47 years of belligerent behavior, it's on Tehran to prove through verification, not Washington to trust them. There is no such thing as Iranian goodwill or trust. That's what we refer to as a purple squirrel. It doesn't exist. So verification is going to be the key word here. And I wouldn't stop the blockade even after they sign, put a time clock, put pressure on them to transfer that uranium back over to us, ensure that they're following all the conditional terms of this this agreement and hold them to account. That's a brilliant idea. Make it conditions based. You know, you can maybe let every other Iranian tanker through until you get every single ounce of uranium. I would absolutely do the same thing when you hear the bluster. You know, I look online and it looks looks like this thing's coming to an end. And then you see these Iranian accounts pop up and it's translated from Farsi. And they're like, we just sunk your battleship and the straights still closed and the president's lying through his teeth. How do you how do you comprehend that? It's it's lunacy. I don't know what reality they're living in. This is this fanatical theology. They live in their own world and they're not in touch with reality. It's tough, tough talk or what we call saber-rabbling. And that's all it is. They're trying to save face, but they know they've lost. And the the Chinese, the president's going to be flying to Beijing in a couple of weeks after wrapping up this brief excursion, as you said, a pretty beautiful demonstration of American military prowess and technology. What kind of clout do you think he's going to descend off the steps of Air Force One with? Oh, China is isolated right now. They've lost Venezuela. They've lost Iran. They've lost all oil on the black market. And now they're going to have to pay market price. China is hurting. They need their energy, their oil production back because they can't produce. They can't manufacture. So China is not in a great negotiating leverage standpoint, either. Trump has changed the global chessboard and, you know, America. And even though the world can't recognize it, it's going to be stronger from this. And I think the Middle East, we're going to see an Abraham's Accord 2.0. And I think we may see a stable, peaceful, economically prosperous Middle East in the next five to ten years. Yeah. You know, if he brings peace to the Middle East, he still won't get the Nobel Peace for us, they're never going to give it to him, especially after this war. You can kiss that goodbye. He deserves it. But you can kiss it goodbye. You think Cuba is next? I think Cuba is, is again in a box by themselves. And Jesse, to your point, the left, the left is never going to get over their their moral superiority. You know, even if I dislike somebody, I'm going to give him credit for the things they're good at. And Trump has been more effective than any any president in our lifetime on the global stage. This is pure strategic execution. And the left will never give him the credit he deserves. America is going to be stronger for this and they can't even realize it. Well said. I mean, I don't like Gutfeld, but I laugh at his jokes when they're funny. Have a great weekend. Thank you for your service.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Screenshot of a tweet (X/Twitter post) from a user displaying the name "Della" surrounded by rose and American flag emojis, with a blue verification checkmark, handle @AdelaMo86395091, and a profile photo of a dark-haired woman wearing a brown cowboy hat. The tweet text argues that unrest is being deliberately orchestrated to damage President Trump and Republicans ahead of the midterm elections, blames "leftist agitators" for causing chaos, references "Biden's disaster for 4 years," and ends with "Enough!" The post shows a timestamp of 7:45 AM, date 3/9/26, and 167 views, with an "X.com" watermark in the top right.

Text in image: 🌹🇺🇸Della🇺🇸🌹✅ @AdelaMo86395091 X.com This is all by design to make @POTUS and Republicans look bad for the midterm elections. America needs to clean house from these leftists agitators. All they do is create havoc in America. They proved it with Biden's disaster for 4 years. Enough! 7:45 AM · 3/9/26 · 167 Views

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

For 47 years, the Iranian regime has regularly targeted and killed Americans. And while Democrats talk tough on Iran, they sought no action. In 2008, before becoming Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton said she would attack Iran if president. If Iran were to launch a nuclear attack on Israel, what would our response be? And I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran. Whatever stage of development they might be in their nuclear weapons program in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them. Of course that never happened. She lost the nomination to Barack Obama, who instead sought to make a deal with Iran. Over the years, Iran moved closer and closer to having the ability to build a nuclear weapon. President and I decided that a strong, confident America could advance our national security by engaging directly with the Iranian government. But a week after Obama said that, John Kerry admitted that the Iran nuclear deal would give money to terrorists. You believe that any of that $55 billion ends up in the hands of terrorists? I think that some of it will end up in the hands of the IRGC or of other entities, some of which are labeled terrorists. We'll fast forward to 2022, when President Biden's press secretary said Iran was accelerating its nuclear program. Iran has rapidly accelerated its nuclear program and reduced cooperation with international inspectors in nonperformance of Iran nuclear deal commitments. Their breakout period is down from about a year, which is what we knew it was during the deal, to just a few weeks or less. But all Biden said was don't, and a couple months later, Obama admitted he made mistakes with Iran by not helping activists on the ground more. And in retrospect, I think that was a mistake. Every time we see a flash, a glimmer of hope, of people longing for freedom, I think we have to point it out. We have to shine a spotlight on it. We have to express some solidarity about it. Well, now, today, it's President Trump who sought action while Iran is trying to talk tough. Are you afraid of a U.S. invasion in your country? No, we are waiting for them. You are waiting for the U.S. military to invade the ground troops? Yes, because we are confident that we can confront them, and that would be a big disaster for them. Maybe he missed President Trump taking out the ayatollah along with 49 others before out those counting votes for the next Ayatollah.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Where the hell has the Twin Cities media been? The Star Tribune is complicit. They have had this story for years, if you've just heard, and they've refused to report anything on it. In fact, they continue to try and cover up. Our Minnesota Republican colleagues have demanded answers and accountability for years, but have seen nothing from Walls, his administration, our Democrat colleagues like Tina Smith, Amy Klobuchar, Ilhan Omar, and Angie Craig, or the worthless Star Tribune. Thank God for President Donald J. Trump for finally bringing attention to this issue. Representative Rarick, I'm gonna begin with you. You've been working on this issue for years. You've spoken to the whistle blowers personally, is that correct? - That is correct. - You have an understanding that 1,000 whistle blowers running an account on X have come forward to expose fraud in Minnesota state agencies, and they have been entirely ignored by Tim Walls and have even been retaliated against. Is that accurate? - That is correct. Even this morning, I got another message. - Well, in your experience, are their claims credible or are they politically motivated against Walls? - They're completely credible, not politically motivated. - In fact, many of these are Walls administration employees, correct? - They are actually Democrats as well. - Can you quickly give us one example of the retaliation these folks have been facing? - Yes, I can. In my opening statement, I mentioned that the most severe ones was that they would be fired with cause so they couldn't have unemployment insurance, that they would be blacklisted from all state agencies, and I would bet that it's also Hennepin County and Ramsey County, as you know, those are Democrat run, and much, much more. - Based on what you've learned, representative, over the last several years, do you have any doubt that Governor Tim Walls knew about this fraud as it was occurring? - He absolutely knew that it was occurring. - Thank you. The Housing Stability Services Program was estimated to cost about 2.6 million per year, but before it was shut down last October, it was on track to run about 122 million in 2025. In fact, I think they sucked 161 million out of it from the point it started in 2020 until it was finally shut down, isn't that correct? - That is correct, and Joe Thompson believes that 90% of that was fraud. - Yeah, the Quality Leering Center, as uncovered by Nick Shirley, received almost 10 million in funding, is that accurate? - I believe it is. - There are more than 80 autism centers in Minnesota under investigation, is that true? - I believe it is, yes. - It's clear that someone is criminally complicit. You can't just let this amount of money get out of your administration over a period of seven years without knowing. There was a hearing in the state regarding the Fraudulent Housing Stabilization Program, but before that hearing, Governor Walls fired the official who was slated to testify so that they could not testify and expose what was happening under Governor Walls' watch. Has Governor Walls or Attorney General Ellison fired anyone else to your knowledge, Representative? - Not to my knowledge, and that was Eric Rumdahl, and his administration believes that he was not fired, but I say he was fired because it was too convenient. - Right, Representative Hudson, is it true that 90% of the individuals charged, regardless of what your colleague on the panel just said with his facts and figures, 90% of the individuals charged or indicted with the $250 million feeding our future COVID fraud are of Somali descent? - I believe that to be correct. - Are you aware that in a 2021 video, Mr. Ellison promised that he would obstruct his own agencies in their investigation of Somali fraud? - I am very much aware of that. - It's no wonder the criminals in the Somali community felt they were free to steal taxpayer dollars. I'm gonna ask you the same question I asked Marion. Do you have any doubt that Tim Walls knew about this fraud as it was occurring? - None whatsoever. - Walls and Ellison were protecting fraudsters instead of investigating them, and it was purposeful, and it's no coincidence that this is occurring largely in the Somali community. Walls made a sanctuary state, Minnesota's sanctuary state. He gave free healthcare, free college, and free licenses to illegals, and Walls looked the other way when Somali immigrants were stealing. Representative Robbins, do you have any doubt that Tim Walls knew about this fraud as it was occurring? - None whatsoever. - So all three of you have no doubt in your minds that Tim Walls knew about the $9 billion of fraud during his tenure as governor and did nothing about it. It looks like my time is about to expire, and I do wanna say to all of you on behalf of Minnesota, thank you for being here, and justice will be served.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Democratic Party, I'm going to say it tonight. Listen closely. So that you won't be confused is the Antichrist Party. Thank you. It is anti-family. Thank you. And I'm going to say this, you're not going to believe it, but it is anti-black folk. Thank you. You are only needed for votes. Thank you. You're only loved when it's time to get your votes. There's no real care about you. And see, we still stuck, and we got that thing ingrained in us that this is the party for the black man. It is not. The party has changed. Black people, really, to be honest with you, have never been the priority. They have only been used. Go back and look at the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We've all given Democrats credit for that, but Johnson was the one that wanted to pass it. But he couldn't get enough Democrat votes to pass it. It was the Republicans that pushed and passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Go tonight and look it up. Look at WIKI, W-I-K-I, put it in there, 1960. He couldn't even get enough Democrats to vote for it. So he had to go to Republican senators in order to help him out. They are anti-life. The party pushes stuff that's anti-life. It pushes anti-morality because most of their policies are immoral, that pushes sexual perversion. Thank you. It is the party of death. Why do you say that, Pastor? If you go back, you will see slavery started with the Democratic Party. Thank you. And we saw many slaves that died. We also saw under Jim Crow-- Jim Crow was established by Democrats. And we saw under Jim Crow how many were hung and lynched. And then we are seeing today how many babies-- African-American people are giving up their future because they won't have, in another 15, 20 years, they won't have enough people because they have cut their birth rates off and have aborted their children. This is exactly what the party wants. So it is a party of death when it comes down to it. It is a party that is against black families. Look at the history of the family.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Pennsylvania had over 1.5 million fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes. These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out, and over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine, 205,000 over votes, meaning there were 205,000 more votes than registered voters, and 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever. More than 1.5 million votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state. Georgia has a similar phenomenon that Democrats are failing to account for. 66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted. 2,500 convicted felons voted. Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote count instantaneously. 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters. These numbers show a clear pattern that a variety of types of fraud occurred in this election and that Democrats are desperately trying to cover it up. They are going to great lengths to change the narrative of the election fraud in an effort to run up the clock to January 20, 2020. In addition to President Trump's team, many independent groups have completed research on the fraud and the results are staggering. Totaling across the country, millions of votes were fraudulently covered up, changed, or deleted in favor of Joe Biden. The governors and secretaries of state have actively participated in the cover-up, removing information from their website that is normally easily accessible to the public and depriving conservatives a chance to audit or review the results are just some of their tactics. In Arizona, the final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 non-citizens voted in the state. Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden. These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the secretary of state's website before the content was removed or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

All right. Welcome back. An update now to a story that we've been following for you for weeks. The FBI executing a search warrant at the Fulton County Elections Office where ballots are stored yesterday as part of a probe in the 2020 presidential election where Joe Biden got 81 million votes. And our next guest was there filming FBI agents loading boxes into trucks and confronting Fulton County Commissioner Dana Barrett, who's now running for Secretary of State in Georgia. This means if this woman wins, she'll be in charge of all future elections. We went around Fulton County the last few weeks and we see that people are currently registered to vote in places like empty lots, homeless shelters that closed 10 years ago. What would you do if you become Secretary of State to address that? I'm not going to reply to conspiracy theories. It's not conspiracy. It's a current, you can currently go on to voter rolls, purchase them for $45 and go there with us. We will gladly take you if you want to. I appreciate what you're saying. I'm not going to respond to conspiracy theories. One of the most important counties out there in the United States. I think what you're doing is extremely dangerous. All right, the man behind those questions right there, independent journalist David Kate back with us. David, good to have you back. I want to play you one more clip of you asking that same Commissioner Barrett, another really basic question. It took me $45 to purchase the voter rolls, you can do that as well for the Fulton County. You can see that people are registered to vote from empty lots. They're registered to vote at a Marda bus station. Commissioner, if you're going to be running for Secretary of State and that involves maintaining clean voter rolls, one of the most important counties out there in the United States. I think what you're doing is extremely dangerous. Why is it dangerous? Because you're spreading conspiracy theories. It's not a conspiracy theory. Do you have $45? I'm not undermining it. I'm not saying people are voting there. Oh yeah, it's all a conspiracy theory, David. Why do you think these people are so adversarial whenever somebody asks them about elections in the state of Georgia? Why is that such a controversial issue? Thanks Rob for having me back. It's good to be back. It's a good question, honestly, and that's all we've been trying to investigate the last few weeks. I had no idea who this lady was when she arrived to the scene, but the way she sounded when she arrived to the scene seemed like she was important. And I know that there's only one Republican on that committee that oversees the states or the counties commission. And of course, right away I asked her, what are you going to do since you're running for Georgia Secretary of State Office, what are you going to do about the voter rolls? And the fact that she called me a conspiracy theorist right away is outrageous. All you have to do, as I said in that video, is purchase the voter rolls and you can do the same thing actually offered to take her and show her so she doesn't even have to spend the $45. Although I know she has it. She makes about $500 a week or a month in her elected role right there. But I have no idea why we were still trying to figure why Democrats especially act this way when you ask him such a simple question. I don't get it, especially six years after the 2020 election. Why are they so defensive? The last time you were on, you told us about the thousands of people who are allegedly registered to vote all across Georgia in abandoned homes, UPS stores, churches, parking lots, under bridges. We reached out to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and he gave us this statement, quote, as Secretary of State, I've made Georgia the best, most secure state for fair elections by using every available tool to keep our voter rolls accurate, including citizenship verification and systems that flag voters potentially registered at business addresses or mailbox stores. He's running for governor. Now, do you agree with anything he said in that statement? No, not at all. Maybe they're doing a good job making sure these people don't end up voting, although it seems through various FOIA requests of people have submitted that people do end up actually submitting election ballots, especially in the 2020 election from there. But our main issue, what we're trying to resolve here with the state, especially with the Secretary of State's office, is why is it so simple for me to go there and see for myself that obviously nobody lives there. But based on the Secretary of State's registration rolls, people are actively registered to vote from there. Why wouldn't they just simply go investigate and purge and why every time we bring this up to them, like we brought this up to the Secretary of State, why does he have to respond like this? Yeah. He went on to say that Congress must, quote, update the National Voter Registration Act, as I've repeatedly called for, so that voters can be removed immediately once they're determined to be ineligible. It doesn't take Congress to do that, does it? We know that. Why can't he do that right now as Secretary of State? It would be great if you'd come on Newsmax on your show, perhaps, and actually answer these very simple questions, right? Yeah, we've invited him on, repeatedly. We've invited him on. Yeah, absolutely. And I know that he keeps turning down all inquiries, especially after we brought this back into light. And I'm sure after the FBI raiding the Fulton County's election office yesterday, he seriously doesn't want to cover this at all or talk about this, especially as he's running for governor of Georgia. It's a very simple question, Secretary of State. Why are people actively registered to vote in places like empty lots? It's very simple to remove them, as you said, Rob. Yeah, and again, forget about conspiracy theories. It's not about that. We bring it up because it should matter. Joe Biden beat Donald Trump by what? A little more than 11,000 votes in Georgia in 2020. This is clearly a state where every vote matters. These are questions that everybody should want definitive answers to. Here's another Fulton County official reacting to the FBI asking questions about who is registered to vote in Fulton County. Take a look. This is an attempt to take your vote away. This is all about November 2026, about the primary on May 19th and then the November election. He does not want the midterm elections to take away his power. So he's trying to create chaos. So this is what he does. Chaos in Minnesota, chaos in Fulton County. We are a target. Protect your vote at all costs. I'm telling you, everybody always says your life depends on it. Oh, your life does depend on it this time. Okay. And this is getting the attention of the White House. The president reposted our last segment together. He's aware of this. He's aware of what's going on. I think he wants answers to. I think he's wanted answers for a long time. Again, do you have any sense as to why these people might be so defensive about this one single issue? That's something that we're still trying to investigate. We're figuring it out and it always revolves around money, but we don't want to make any claims, especially here that we're not fully believe in yet, but we're definitely investigating that. But for the commissioner, again, open invitation to her and everybody that's an elected official in Georgia, come around with us, see these places for yourself. We'll take you to lunch afterwards and we can discuss it. We just want you to be open minded and see it for yourself. I wasn't open minded until I saw these places. And now I'm trying to figure out why so many elected officials that have the power to do something about this are doing exactly what you constantly see them doing. David, I'm in the exact same boat. I appreciate everything you're doing. I know a lot of people at home appreciate it as well. This is about answers to questions that shouldn't be so difficult to answer, and we look forward to having you back. David Kate, thank you.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

So you're telling me I can get a foreign doctor without an American license to just check a box and I get a state mandated paid vacation to Somalia or any other country. Is that correct? That is how the law was written by Democrats in Minnesota, yes. This is going to stop and you folks are at the front of it. Minnesotans have had enough. We're hardworking people. We will not allow our tax scholars to go. Imagine this. Minnesota taxpayers funding a paid vacation to anywhere in the world for anyone who claims to be providing care for someone without ever having to prove it. No documentation, no verification, just a simple declaration. And what's more troubling? This is real. It's happening right now. The conversation started innocently enough with Representative Stauber questioning Representative Rarik about who could qualify for this paid family leave. Rarik's answer was a bombshell. It wasn't limited to close family members or dependents. It wasn't even limited to people living in the US. In fact, under the law, if you simply say you're taking care of someone, anyone, your employer is legally obligated to give you paid time off for up to 12 weeks. And here's the kicker, there's no requirement to prove any of it. No doctor's note, no check-ins, nothing. Someone could take off to Somalia, care for a friend, and get paid nearly 90% of their salary for it. Stauber's line of questioning exposed just how wide open this loophole is. Could an individual travel anywhere, even out of the country, and receive paid leave under this program? Absolutely. Could they choose any caregiver, including someone without American medical credentials? Yes. Could they get away with it without facing any consequences? You guessed it. There's nothing in place to hold anyone accountable. But then, Stauber pushed even harder. What if someone were to take their employer's word for it and not provide any proof? He asked. The response? They could. The law doesn't require proof of care, and no one would question it. The more Stauber dug, the more unsettling the truth became. People could get away with fraudulent claims that cost the taxpayers dearly, allowing them to travel the globe while still pocketing government funds. The situation became even more bizarre when the conversation turned to who could certify a person's need for care. Could it be someone outside of the US, without medical licenses? Yes, absolutely. It didn't have to be an American doctor. It could be a foreign practitioner with no professional standing in the US. The law's broad definitions leave the system open to exploitation. The fact that this could be happening under the state's watch without a shred of oversight has caused an uproar. Here's where the real tension arises. Minnesota lawmakers including

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

What Democrats are doing is vote harvesting, fraud harvesting, ballot harvesting, crime harvesting. Ask yourself, why would Fry, why would Waltz sanction such egregious violence against ICE officers? Because they understand that this scheme, this mass migration scheme is the heart of the Democratic Party's political power. It is their plan for power today and long into the future. So they know that if this administration to President Trump is successful in reversing this invasion, it will deal a generational blow to Democrat political power. Well, before I let you go.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Multiple Minnesota judges are under fire for dismissing several recent Somali fraud cases. They are Judge Sarah West, Judge Amber Brennan, and Judge Hilary Kalagiri. The Hennepin County judges, because of their decisions, have allowed millions in alleged Medicaid theft to go unpunished. For example, the Hennepin County jury unanimously convicted Somali migrant Abdufata Yousaf on six counts of aiding theft by Swindle in August after deliberating for just four hours. He stole $7.2 million from Medicaid. Jurors described the evidence as overwhelming, with the foreperson saying it was beyond a reasonable doubt based on financial records, witness testimony, and patterns of fraud diversion. However, in a reversal, Judge Sarah West arbitrarily set aside the jury's verdict and entered a judgment of acquittal on all counts. West ruled that the prosecution's evidence was circumstantial, even though they proved that Yousaf had control over the company and directly received over $1.1 million in transfers. She ruled that they failed to exclude every possible hypothesis of innocence. Judge Brennan dismissed all charges against Gul Ammar, Yousaf's wife and alleged co-conspirators, saying there was insufficient evidence before trial. This kept any evidence of documents showing her involvement in check cashing and fund transfers tied to the scheme from going public. Judge Kalaguri threw out the case against co-defendant Mohamud, who faced racketeering and theft charges for his role in a connected home healthcare operation that allegedly stole over $1.8 million in ineligible Medicaid reimbursement.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.