Analysis: Poll: 79 Percent of Trump Voters Believe ‘Election Was Stole...

5y ago Nov 24, 2020 at 5:33 PM

Poll: 79 Percent of Trump Voters Believe ‘Election Was Stolen‘ https://t.co/PmMBmt05AI via @BreitbartNews They are 100% correct, but we are fighting hard. Our big lawsuit, which spells out in great detail all of the ballot fraud and more, will soon be filled. RIGGED ELECTION!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-19. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

Elevated

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

79%

This post, appearing on a day when Pennsylvania and Michigan certified Biden's victory, a federal judge dismissed the Pennsylvania lawsuit with prejudice, and the GSA authorized the Biden transition, is psychologically generated by an acute cluster of narcissistic injuries. The subject responds with pathological denial and distortion, sourcing validation from a Breitbart poll of his own supporters to assert absolute certainty ("They are 100% correct") about a claim no court has upheld. The typo "filled" for "filed" in a legal context strongly suggests authentic authorship despite midday timing. The post operates as a closed epistemic loop: supporter belief is cited as proof of the belief's truth, then amplified back to supporters as validated fact. The warrior-victim narrative (fighting hard + stolen election) reflects the mixed grandiose/vulnerable narcissistic state characteristic of this post-election period. Defense mechanisms are primarily pathological — denial and distortion dominate. The unqualified "100% correct" validation functions as shared-psychosis transmission at scale, requiring no argument, only affirmation. Danger level is elevated: the post systematically amplifies a grievance that, in the following six weeks, would contribute to the January 6 Capitol attack. No explicit violence or dehumanization appears here, but the grievance-validation pattern is accumulating across the post cluster. The confabulation-adjacent legal update ("will soon be filled") does not integrate the actual state of litigation, warranting continued cognitive monitoring.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Typo 'filled' for 'filed' — orthographic/phonemic error highly consistent with authentic Trump posting pattern
ALL CAPS exclamatory close ('RIGGED ELECTION!') — signature authentic stylistic marker
Stream-of-consciousness reactive structure: poll share → validation → legal update → emotional outburst
Midday EST timing (12:33 PM, UTC-5) is atypical for authentic Trump but not disqualifying during high-stress post-election period
Breitbart sharing with personal commentary is authentic Trump behavior; aide posts tend to be announcement-format

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Defeat (Pennsylvania and Michigan certifications, Pennsylvania federal lawsuit dismissal, GSA transition authorization)

Rage: Intensity 72% targeting Election system, vote counters, 'Dominion', perceived fraud actors

Proportionality

15%

Sentiment

-0.62

Baseline Deviation: slight

Mildly Hypomanic

Elevated energy across multiple rapid posts on same day covering multiple topicsGrandiosity ('100% correct') undiminished by objective legal defeatsGoal-directed persistence toward legal strategy despite sustained failureReduced reality-testing — promises imminent vindication same day as major dismissal

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

88%

Antisocial

62%

Paranoid

74%

Sadism

22%

Defense Mechanisms:

denialdistortionrationalizationprojection

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

32%

Cognitive Markers:

phonemic paraphasia

Parasocial Techniques:

Direct validation of followers' beliefs ('They are 100% correct') — creates intimate shared reality between subject and baseCollective 'we' framing ('we are fighting hard') — positions audience as co-combatantsPromise of imminent vindication ('will soon be filled') — maintains parasocial hope and engagement loop

Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:

Unqualified validation of stolen-election belief to tens of millions of followers ('They are 100% correct') — six weeks before January 6, 2021
Grievance amplification: poll figure treated as validation rather than symptom of disinformation spread
Stochastic terrorism pattern accumulating across post cluster: target (corrupt election/certifiers) + grievance (theft, validated 100%) + ongoing mobilization ('fighting hard')
Maintenance of mobilization-ready audience: legal promise sustains hope while sustaining grievance intensity

Gaslighting Detected:

Denial of documented electoral certifications (Pennsylvania, Michigan) without acknowledgment
DARVO partial pattern: election system cast as aggressor, Trump/voters as righteous victims
Epistemic attack on legitimate electoral process ('RIGGED') without evidence while courts were rejecting fraud claims
Same-day cognitive dissonance: endorsed GSA transition protocols in companion posts while simultaneously maintaining 100% certainty election was stolen — inconsistency not acknowledged

Reality Distortions:

Claims 79% poll of Trump supporters constitutes proof the election was stolen — category error (belief prevalence ≠ factual truth)
'They are 100% correct' — absolute certainty applied to claim rejected by 60+ courts and Attorney General Barr
Describes 'big lawsuit' with detailed ballot fraud evidence — same day that lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice as having no credible evidence
Imminent vindication promise ('will soon be filled') despite systematic legal defeats across all jurisdictions

Fact Checks (4)

"79 Percent of Trump Voters Believe 'Election Was Stolen'"

Mostly True

Multiple polls from this period showed high proportions of Trump supporters doubting the election outcome. The specific Breitbart/Rasmussen figure is plausible polling data; the claim accurately represents a real polling finding about belief prevalence among a defined subgroup.

"They [Trump voters who believe election was stolen] are 100% correct"

False

No federal or state court upheld claims of widespread fraud sufficient to affect the outcome. Over 60 post-election lawsuits were dismissed or withdrawn. The Pennsylvania lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice the same day as this post. Attorney General Barr stated the DOJ found no evidence of widespread fraud sufficient to change the election result. All 50 states certified their results.

"Our big lawsuit spells out in great detail all of the ballot fraud"

Mostly False

The Pennsylvania federal lawsuit had just been dismissed with prejudice by Judge Brann, who called it a 'Frankenstein's Monster' and found it contained insufficient specific evidence of fraud. The characterization of detailed ballot fraud documentation directly contradicts the judicial finding. Other Trump lawsuits were similarly dismissed for lack of evidence.

"The lawsuit will soon be [filed]"

Half True

An appeal was filed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which was quickly dismissed. The claim of imminent, promising legal action was technically partially true (appeals were filed) but misleading about the legal posture — the suits were failing at every level.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Post x_1331214247955738600 (2020-11-24)

Context

This post appears on a day of acute accumulation of narcissistic injuries: Pennsylvania and Michigan have officially certified Biden's victory, a federal judge dismissed the Pennsylvania lawsuit with prejudice and in scathing language, and the GSA formally authorized the Biden transition — events Trump simultaneously endorsed and disavowed in companion posts that same afternoon. The subject is processing multiple simultaneous objective defeats.

Authorship Attribution

Verdict: Authentic Trump (Confidence: Medium)

Posted at 12:33 PM EST (White House, Thanksgiving week). The midday timing is atypical for authentic Trump posts, which cluster in late-night/early-morning windows. However, the post contains multiple strong authenticity markers that override the timing concern:

"filled" for "filed": This is the most significant marker. An aide writing about a legal filing would not submit the lawsuit as being "filled" — this is an orthographic/phonemic substitution consistent with Trump's documented error patterns. Phonemic proximity (fill/file) and habitual fast typing produce this class of error in authentic posts.
ALL CAPS exclamation ("RIGGED ELECTION!"): Signature authentic closer.
Emotional arc structure: poll share → absolute validation → legal update → affective outburst — this stream-of-consciousness escalation is authentic Trump cadence.
Breitbart link + personal commentary format: Aides typically post event announcements; Trump typically posts reactive Breitbart shares with personal gloss.

The high-stress post-election period also expands the authentic posting window beyond typical hours.

Personality Analysis (McAdams & Pals Three-Level Framework)

Level 1: Dispositional Traits

Neuroticism (high, dominant): Angry hostility evident in ALL CAPS terminal phrase; impulsiveness in unproofread post during high-stakes legal period.
Extraversion (high): Assertiveness, self-referential broadcast, performance of strength.
Agreeableness (very low): Zero acknowledgment of counter-evidence; zero epistemic humility; absolute certainty claim.
Openness (low): Rigid foreclosure on alternative interpretations of electoral outcome.

Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations (Motives & Schemas)

Dominant motive: Power/Status preservation — the post is fundamentally about maintaining the claim to have won, not accepting the claim of having lost.
Schema of self: Righteous fighter who cannot lose legitimately; defeat is always external and fraudulent.
Schema of world: Corrupt institutions conspiring against him and his voters.
Schema of others: Supporters are validators; adversaries are criminals.

Level 3: Narrative Identity

Protagonist role: Warrior-victim hybrid — simultaneously fighting ("we are fighting hard") and wronged ("RIGGED ELECTION!").
Contamination sequence: Dominant narrative — legitimate victory → electoral theft → ongoing struggle for restoration.
Identity claims: "We" won; "They" stole; validation from 79% confirms subjective truth.
Contrasting other: Unnamed fraudsters, "Dominion" (per companion post), "fake ballots" (per companion post).
Redemption arc attempted: "Will soon be filed" — imminent vindication promised, maintaining the hope of restoration.

Clinical Indicators

Narcissistic Dynamics

Trigger: Multiple simultaneous narcissistic injuries — court dismissal, state certifications, GSA transition authorization. The cluster represents the most acute injury set of the post-election period to this point.

Narcissistic state: Mixed. The warrior stance ("fighting hard," "big lawsuit") is grandiose; the stolen-election framing is vulnerable/persecuted. This oscillation — common in malignant narcissism under stress — is visible across the day's posts.

Rage: Present at moderate-high intensity (0.72). The ALL CAPS closer and absolute certainty framing ("100% correct") carry displaced rage toward the electoral system. The rage is disproportionate to any legitimate grievance; no court has upheld the fraud claims.

Narcissistic supply mechanism: Citing the 79% poll is a sophisticated supply loop — the subject simultaneously draws validation from supporters' belief AND amplifies that belief back to supporters, creating a closed positive feedback circuit.

Defense Mechanisms

Denial (pathological): The Pennsylvania lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice; state results were certified. The subject responds by describing an imminent, detailed legal filing that "spells out all of the ballot fraud." Reality is flatly refused.
Distortion (pathological): "They are 100% correct" reshapes a polling data point (belief among supporters) into objective confirmation of fact. The epistemic mechanism is entirely inverted.
Rationalization (neurotic): The Breitbart poll is deployed as quasi-empirical evidence, a logical-seeming wrapper around an irrational claim.
Projection (immature): Fraud attribution displaced onto election systems and administrators, deflecting from the campaign's own litigation failures.

Cognitive Status

Notable marker: "filled" for "filed" — a word-substitution error in a high-salience legal context. Single-instance errors are insufficient to claim trajectory, but this class of phonemic/orthographic substitution warrants longitudinal tracking. Baseline comparison (1990s interviews, early Twitter era) shows Trump historically made fewer of this specific error type in scripted contexts.

Complexity score: Low-moderate (0.32). Sentences are simple to compound; vocabulary is basic. Logical structure is absent — assertion substitutes for argument throughout.

Confabulation-adjacent: "Our big lawsuit... will soon be filled [filed]" — at this point, the Pennsylvania lawsuit had been dismissed and other suits were failing. The confident legal update does not integrate available legal reality. Whether this reflects motivated deception or genuine inability to process the defeats is not determinable from text alone.

Gaslighting & Reality Distortion

Denial of documented outcome: State certifications and federal court ruling are not acknowledged.
Epistemic capture: Only Breitbart, only Trump supporters' beliefs, treated as ground truth.
DARVO partial pattern: The election system is cast as the aggressor; Trump and his voters are cast as victims.
Rapid revisionism: On the same day, the subject endorsed GSA transition protocols while simultaneously maintaining the election was stolen — the two claims are not integrated.

Shared Psychosis / Epistemic Closure

Epistemic closure: YES. The post explicitly validates followers' belief as 100% factually correct. This:

Reinforces closed epistemic loop (Breitbart → Trump voters → Trump → Breitbart).
Socializes followers into treating disagreement as evidence of corruption rather than counter-evidence.
Functions as a loyalty test: accepting the stolen-election claim is the price of group membership.

The transmission vector is affirmative and unqualified — "They are 100% correct" leaves no interpretive space. This is the mechanics of shared psychosis propagation at scale.

Order/Chaos Dynamics

Positioning: Order attacker (claiming the "order" of the election result is itself corrupt/fraudulent) + Order restorer (promising legal vindication).
Asymmetric application: Legitimate democratic order is reframed as illegitimate chaos (fraud); Trump's ongoing legal challenge is reframed as the true order-restoration effort.
Grievance: Acute, at near-maximum intensity. Electoral theft as the master grievance subsuming all others.

Archetypal Analysis

Primary: Warrior + Victim (dual embodiment — both fighting and wronged).
Secondary: Hero-Savior (the lawsuit will vindicate not just himself but the 79% of his voters).
Shadow projection: Corruption, fraud, and illegitimacy projected entirely outward onto the electoral system and Democratic actors.

Danger Assessment

Level: Elevated

No explicit call to violence. No dehumanizing language in this specific post. However:

Grievance amplification at scale: Telling tens of millions of followers that 79% of them are "100% correct" that their election was stolen is not neutral — it validates and intensifies a grievance with demonstrated capacity to motivate violence (context: this is six weeks before January 6, 2021).
Stochastic terrorism pattern building: Target (corrupt election/those who certified it) + Grievance (election theft, 100% validated) + Implied action ("fighting hard") is accumulating across this post cluster. No single post completes the circuit; the pattern is the concern.
Imminent legal promise: "Will soon be filled" may sustain audience quiescence (legal route is working) but also maintains mobilization readiness if/when legal routes are exhausted.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"79 Percent of Trump Voters Believe 'Election Was Stolen'"	Mostly True	Multiple polls from this period showed high proportions of Trump supporters doubting the election outcome. The specific Breitbart/Rasmussen figure is plausible polling data; the claim accurately represents a real polling finding about belief prevalence among a defined subgroup.
"They [Trump voters who believe election was stolen] are 100% correct"	False	No federal or state court upheld claims of widespread fraud sufficient to affect the outcome. Over 60 post-election lawsuits were dismissed or withdrawn. The Pennsylvania lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice the same day as this post. Attorney General Barr stated the DOJ found no evidence of widespread fraud sufficient to change the election result. All 50 states certified their results.
"Our big lawsuit spells out in great detail all of the ballot fraud"	Mostly False	The Pennsylvania federal lawsuit had just been dismissed with prejudice by Judge Brann, who called it a 'Frankenstein's Monster' and found it contained insufficient specific evidence of fraud. The characterization of detailed ballot fraud documentation directly contradicts the judicial finding. Other Trump lawsuits were similarly dismissed for lack of evidence.
"The lawsuit will soon be [filed]"	Half True	An appeal was filed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which was quickly dismissed. The claim of imminent, promising legal action was technically partially true (appeals were filed) but misleading about the legal posture — the suits were failing at every level.

Overall Veracity: 38%