Analysis: ....work that way. I have a better idea. Look at the Obama B...

7y ago Sep 16, 2019 at 3:03 PM

....work that way. I have a better idea. Look at the Obama Book Deal, or the ridiculous Netflix deal. Then look at all the deals made by the Dems in Congress, the “Congressional Slush Fund,” and lastly the IG Reports. Take a look at them. Those investigations would be over FAST!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-18. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

46%

This September 2019 post - a thread continuation occurring eight days before the first impeachment inquiry announcement - exemplifies the subject's standard investigative-threat response architecture. The leading ellipsis confirms reactive personal phone use; ALL CAPS, scare quotes, and unpolished list structure confirm authentic authorship. The post's central mechanism is whataboutism organized around projection: attributing investigable conduct to Obama and Congressional Democrats while under active investigative pressure himself. The narcissistic state oscillates within a single post from vulnerable (reactive opening) to grandiose counterattack (I have a better idea). Defense mechanisms are layered: projection (they are the real wrongdoers), displacement (redirect audience gaze), and rationalization (those investigations would be over FAST - a causally incoherent but self-serving claim). Paranoid features are salient (0.65): the underlying schema requires belief in a deliberately asymmetric prosecutorial system targeting Trump while protecting Democrats. No cognitive deviation from baseline. No dehumanizing language. Danger level: none. Clinically, this post is notable as a clear-text illustration of the projective-displacement-rationalization defense cluster that characterizes the subject's standard response to perceived legal exposure - a pattern that would intensify significantly in the weeks following the impeachment inquiry announcement.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Leading ellipsis '....' signals thread continuation - characteristic authentic Trump formatting pattern
ALL CAPS 'FAST!' as terminal emphasis is a signature authentic marker
Scare quotes around 'Congressional Slush Fund' reflect Trump's idiosyncratic quotation style
Stream-of-consciousness list structure with no editorial polish
Impulsive reactive whataboutism without policy substance is stylistically authentic

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (ongoing congressional/DOJ investigations into Trump)

Rage: Intensity 52% targeting congressional investigators, Obama, Democrats broadly

Proportionality

30%

Sentiment

-0.42

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

62%

Antisocial

32%

Paranoid

65%

Sadism

15%

Defense Mechanisms:

projectiondisplacementrationalizationdenial

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

38%

Parasocial Techniques:

Invites audience into investigative fantasy (Take a look at them) creating shared grievance communityPositions himself as the one with superior knowledge (I have a better idea) flattering followers who accept his framingUses imperative commands (Look at, Take a look) to direct audience attention as a group activity

Danger Assessment

None

Gaslighting Detected:

False equivalence framing - book/Netflix deals presented as morally and legally comparable to federal criminal investigations
Inflammatory label Congressional Slush Fund applied to a minor real fund to manufacture false scale of Democratic wrongdoing
Implicit claim that investigations of Trump would end if Democrats were investigated - requiring audience to accept a causal fiction as political reality

Reality Distortions:

Those investigations would be over FAST - asserts a causal relationship between investigating Democrats and ending Trump investigations with no logical or legal basis
Positions book deals and Netflix contracts as equivalent in gravity to ongoing federal investigations - category collapse
Congressional Slush Fund framing inflates a minor settlement mechanism into a scandal of comparable scale to impeachment-level inquiries

Fact Checks (4)

"Obama Book Deal"

Mostly True

Barack and Michelle Obama reportedly received an advance estimated at approximately $65 million for their post-presidency memoirs. The deal is real; the implied scandal framing is unsupported as no illegality was alleged or found.

"Obama Netflix deal"

True

The Obama family signed a multi-year production deal with Netflix in 2018. The deal is accurately described; the implication that it constitutes wrongdoing equivalent to criminal investigation has no basis.

"Congressional Slush Fund"

Half True

Refers to the Congressional Office of Compliance, which administered a fund to settle workplace harassment and other employment claims against Congress members. The fund was real but minor in scale; the slush fund label is inflammatory and misleading as to its nature and purpose.

"Those investigations would be over FAST"

False

No legal, procedural, or logical mechanism exists by which investigations of Democrats would terminate investigations of Trump. This is a causally incoherent claim presented as self-evident strategic insight.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Trump Tweet — September 16, 2019

Contextual Frame

This post is a thread continuation — the leading ....work that way indicates it follows a prior tweet (not included in the dataset) that established the investigative context it reacts to. The September 2019 posting date is critical: the Ukraine whistleblower complaint was being actively suppressed and would trigger the first impeachment inquiry announcement on September 24, 2019 — eight days after this post. This is thus a pre-impeachment pressure window, and the post's whataboutist architecture reflects acute investigative anxiety.

Authorship Attribution (Confidence: High — Authentic Trump)

Multiple stylistic markers converge on authentic authorship:

Thread continuation ellipsis (....work that way) — a characteristic authentic Trump formatting signature, indicating reactive phone use mid-scroll
ALL CAPS terminal emphasis (FAST!) — consistent with authentic posts, absent in aide-written content
Scare quotes around "Congressional Slush Fund" — idiosyncratic Trump rhetorical style
Absence of grammatical polish or logistical content
Corroborating same-day tweet: "One my way to New Mexico" (typo: "One" for "On") confirms personal phone use this day

Local time: UTC 15:03 = approximately 9:03 AM MDT / 11:03 AM EDT. While not the late-night authenticity window, the stylistic evidence overrides the timing concern.

Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five)

Trait	Salient Facet	Evidence
Neuroticism (high, 0.68)	Angry hostility (N-2)	Reactive, combative framing throughout
Extraversion (high, 0.78)	Assertiveness	Imperative mood, confident pronouncements
Agreeableness (low, 0.12)	Antagonism	No collaborative framing; purely adversarial
Conscientiousness (low, 0.28)	Low deliberation	Unpolished, impulsive list structure
Openness (low, 0.19)	Values rigidity	Black-and-white framing, no acknowledgment of complexity

Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations — Motives and Schemas

Dominant motive: Power/Agency (0.82)

The post is organized around re-establishing control of the investigative narrative. The subject positions himself as the one with superior insight ("I have a better idea") — a grandiose self-casting that converts defensive retreat into an offensive maneuver.

World schema on display: Zero-sum. Investigations are weapons, not truth-seeking instruments. The implicit model: if Democrats are exposed, Trump is protected — as if legal scrutiny operates like a finite resource that can be redirected.

Self schema: Uniquely persecuted but also uniquely perceptive. The vulnerability of the opening (....work that way) is immediately overwritten by superiority (I have a better idea).

Level 3: Narrative Identity

Protagonist role: Persecuted truth-teller with superior strategic intelligence

Narrative sequence: Contamination — the sequence implies that legitimate governance (or at minimum, political equality) has been corrupted by asymmetric prosecutorial targeting

Contrasting other: Obama (book deal, Netflix deal), Democrats broadly, Congress

Identity claim: "I see the real corruption others refuse to look at"

Level 4: Clinical Indicators

Narcissistic Dynamics

Trigger: Narcissistic injury from ongoing investigative exposure (pre-impeachment pressure, September 2019)

Narcissistic state: Mixed — initially vulnerable (responding to investigation pressure), transitions to grandiose (counterattack, I have a better idea)

Defense Mechanisms

Projection (immature) — Attributing investigable wrongdoing to adversaries (Obama, Democrats) while subject is under investigation himself
Displacement (immature) — Redirecting audience attention from Trump-related investigations toward Obama/Netflix/Congress as safer targets
Rationalization (neurotic) — "Those investigations would be over FAST!" — a self-serving causal claim with no logical foundation
Denial (pathological) — Implicit throughout: ongoing investigations framed as inherently illegitimate

Paranoid Features (0.65)

The underlying schema is conspiratorial: investigations of Trump persist while Democratic wrongdoing goes unpunished — a persecution framework that requires believing in deliberate, coordinated asymmetric application of law.

Rhetorical and Propaganda Analysis

Primary technique: Whataboutism — the central organizing principle. Every clause redirects scrutiny.

Secondary techniques:

Anaphora: "Look at...Take a look at" — rhythmic imperative sequence simulating rally cadence
Grievance stacking: Obama book deal, Netflix deal, Congressional Slush Fund, IG Reports — rapid accumulation designed to overwhelm
False equivalence: book deals framed as equivalent to criminal investigations
Scare quotes: "Congressional Slush Fund" performs ideological naming while allowing deniability
RAND Firehose signature: Volume of unsubstantiated accusations delivered as established fact

Gaslighting Assessment

Present but mild. The post constructs a false equivalence framework requiring audiences to accept that book deals are morally and legally comparable to federal criminal investigations. The "Congressional Slush Fund" framing inflates a minor fund using inflammatory language.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Obama Book Deal"	Mostly True	Barack and Michelle Obama reportedly received an advance estimated at approximately $65 million for their post-presidency memoirs. The deal is real; the implied scandal framing is unsupported as no illegality was alleged or found.
"Obama Netflix deal"	True	The Obama family signed a multi-year production deal with Netflix in 2018. The deal is accurately described; the implication that it constitutes wrongdoing equivalent to criminal investigation has no basis.
"Congressional Slush Fund"	Half True	Refers to the Congressional Office of Compliance, which administered a fund to settle workplace harassment and other employment claims against Congress members. The fund was real but minor in scale; the slush fund label is inflammatory and misleading as to its nature and purpose.
"Those investigations would be over FAST"	False	No legal, procedural, or logical mechanism exists by which investigations of Democrats would terminate investigations of Trump. This is a causally incoherent claim presented as self-evident strategic insight.

Overall Veracity: 57%