Post from Truth Social

The NYC Pied-a-Terre Tax is costing New York City and State a fortune in that the money, eventually to be gotten, is very little compared to to the TAXES PAID by the tens of thousands of people who are fleeing the City, never to return. Florida, Texas, and numerous other States, are making an absolute fortune! This dangerous political “experiment” in New York will destroy what was once a great City and State. It is pure Amateur Hour, and it’s hard, as President of the United States of America, to sit back and watch it happen, especially to a place I once loved. Financial, and then Social, RUIN, is a 100% certainty - And then the Radical Left Jihadists charge Congestion Pricing on top of everything else. This doesn’t work in America, and must be stopped, NOW! I am looking to see if the Federal Government has any legal right to avert this disaster, before it is too late, for the millions of people who cherish New York and want to see it thrive, as opposed to becoming a filthy, crime ridden, decrepit place of mockery and scorn. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! President DJT

0:00 0:00
Visualize
29K 7K 3.3K

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-08-12. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level
Elevated
Narcissistic State
Mixed
Authorship
Self-Written
Intensity
74%

A characteristically Trump-authored grievance post (authorship confidence high) applying a contamination narrative to New York City. The structural center is "it's hard, as President of the United States of America, to sit back and watch it happen, especially to a place I once loved" — a construction that simultaneously asserts supreme office and claims impotence, harvesting the status of ruler and the sympathy of bystander-victim. Narcissistic state is mixed: grandiose prophecy ("Financial, and then Social, RUIN, is a 100% certainty") fused with a vulnerable-nostalgic seam rare in his municipal-attack corpus. Defenses are splitting (Florida/Texas "absolute fortune" vs. New York "filthy, crime ridden, decrepit"), devaluation ("Amateur Hour"), distortion (a real-estate surtax projected as certain civilizational collapse; congestion pricing, a 2019 state statute, misattributed to current municipal leadership), and probable projection — "mockery and scorn" reads as a displaced status-humiliation fear. The clinically and forensically significant feature is "Radical Left Jihadists," a terrorism-coded religious epithet applied to domestic officials. No violent imagery or call to mobilization appears, and the stated remedy is explicitly legal ("any legal right"), which channels rather than releases. Danger is therefore rated elevated, not high; the pattern to track is whether the epithet persists once the legal avenue is foreclosed. Cognitive markers are mild and within recent baseline: one doubled function word ("compared to to"), heavy clause-chaining, and imprecise agency attribution across city/state jurisdictions. Syntactic complexity exceeds his recent median for this format.

Authorship Analysis
Self-Written
Indicators:
  • Doubled function word: 'compared to to' — organic typing error, not decorative
  • Mid-post first-person emotional aside: 'hard... to sit back and watch it happen, especially to a place I once loved' — staffers do not insert autobiographical mourning
  • 'Radical Left Jihadists' — a legally and reputationally exposed epithet aides routinely remove
  • Erratic emphatic capitalization drift (TAXES PAID, RUIN, NOW!) mixed with idiosyncratic mid-sentence capitals (City, State, President)
  • Scare-quoted 'experiment' as delegitimation device — recurring personal tic
Psychological Profile
Traits
Big Five:
Extraversion
78%
Agreeableness
10%
Conscientiousness
30%
Neuroticism
72%
Openness
25%

Strongest facet: angry hostility (N2), with assertiveness (E3) secondary

Agency
85%
Communion
22%

Primary drive: power

Narrative
Role: Reluctant sovereign — a Savior/King composite who asserts supreme office while claiming pained impotence ('it's hard... to sit back and watch it happen') · Arc: contamination · Contrasting: New York City and State left-wing political leadership, condensed into the epithet 'Radical Left Jihadists' and characterized as amateurs running a 'dangerous political experiment'
President of the United States of America (invoked by full title mid-sentence)Native son with proprietary emotional standing over New York ('a place I once loved')The sole realist among amateurs — the one who sees the certain outcome others cannotConstrained guardian: willing to act, restrained only by the question of legal authorityRestorer of national greatness ('MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!')
State
Mixed State

Trigger: Maintenance — Defeat (New York municipal tax and congestion-pricing policy; no discrete same-day precipitant appears in the researched event set — the post sits within a five-post same-day burst spanning unrelated topics)

Rage: Intensity 55% targeting New York City and State left-wing political leadership, condensed into 'Radical Left Jihadists'

Proportionality
30%
Sentiment
-0.72
Baseline Deviation: slight
Mildly Hypomanic
Fifth post in a same-day burst spanning five unrelated subjects (Alito, CAP/Soros, two Russia-hoax links, Lindell campaign, NYC taxation)Escalating emphatic capitalization within a single post (TAXES PAID, RUIN, NOW!, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)Expansive grandiosity in remedy scope — contemplating federal preemption of municipal fiscal policyAbsolute certainty about complex future outcomes ('100% certainty')Note: output volume and register are within his established 2025-2026 baseline; this is elevated activation, not a marked state change
Clinical
Malignant Narcissism:
Narcissistic
70%
Antisocial
35%
Paranoid
55%
Sadism
30%
Defense Mechanisms:
splittingdistortiondevaluationprojectionrationalizationdisplacement
Cognitive Complexity:
Complexity
45%
Cognitive Markers:
word finding difficultysemantic paraphasiacircumstantiality
Parasocial Techniques:
Positioning himself as the sole figure who both sees the disaster and cares enough to stop itInvoking a shared in-group of 'the millions of people who cherish New York' to convert a personal grievance into collective injuryNostalgic bonding through shared loss ('what was once a great City')Urgency framing ('NOW!', 'before it is too late') that recruits audience alarmConfiding an inner emotional state ('it's hard... to sit back and watch') to simulate intimacy with followers
Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:
  • Religious-terrorism epithet ('Radical Left Jihadists') applied to domestic elected officials — dehumanizing out-group construction by association with foreign religious violence
  • Confessional coding permits target identification without naming, extending reach beyond the officials themselves
  • Catastrophic inevitability framing ('RUIN, is a 100% certainty') that forecloses political remedy and raises perceived stakes
  • Urgency and elimination-adjacent phrasing ('must be stopped, NOW!', 'before it is too late')
  • Degradation vocabulary applied to a place and by extension its residents ('filthy, crime ridden, decrepit')
  • Mitigating factor: the stated remedy is explicitly institutional and legal ('any legal right'), with no call to mobilization, no violent imagery, and no named individual target
Gaslighting Detected:
  • Attribution of congestion pricing — a 2019 New York State statute implemented by the MTA in January 2025 — to current left-wing municipal leadership, collapsing distinct authorities into one villain
  • Assertion of a future outcome as established present fact ('RUIN, is a 100% certainty')
  • Unattributed mass claim ('tens of thousands of people who are fleeing the City, never to return') presented as settled datum
  • Delegitimation by scare quote ('experiment') substituting for engagement with the policy's actual design
Reality Distortions:
  • A pied-a-terre surtax is projected to produce certain 'Financial, and then Social, RUIN' — a causal leap unsupported by any fiscal analysis
  • Congestion pricing misattributed in both authorship and timing to current municipal leadership
  • Net migration presented as a unidirectional, permanent exodus ('never to return') rather than a measured net-flow statistic
  • Interstate tax competition framed as zero-sum, with Florida and Texas 'making an absolute fortune' directly from New York's loss

Dehumanizing Language Present

Fact Checks (6)
"A NYC pied-a-terre tax is in effect and is costing New York City and State significant net revenue by driving out taxpayers."
Mostly False

The premise is true but the operative assertion is unsupported and contradicted by the available data.

The tax exists. The New York State Legislature passed a NYC pied-à-terre surcharge on May 26–27, 2026 as part of the FY2026-27 state budget; Gov. Hochul signed it May 28, 2026. It took effect July 1, 2026 and sunsets June 30, 2031. Phase 1 (July 1, 2026–June 30, 2028) applies 0.8%–1.3% to one-to-three-family homes with DOF market value of $5 million or more, and 4.0%–6.5% to condos and co-ops valued at $1 million or more, where the owner's primary residence is outside the five boroughs. Roughly 10,000–13,000 properties are estimated to qualify; about 17,000 owners received notices in July 2026. The first-pass note that the tax had never been enacted is out of date.

No revenue effect could yet exist. As of the August 11, 2026 post, the surcharge had been in force about six weeks and had collected nothing. Bills are expected to be issued in November 2026 and are due January 1, 2027; the exemption application deadline is September 18, 2026. Separately, Staten Island Judge Wayne Ozzi issued a temporary restraining order on August 10, 2026 in a suit filed August 7 by three homeowners (represented by former Deputy Mayor Randy Mastro), halting the rollout; the city appealed within hours, which automatically stayed the order, with a hearing set for August 31. There is therefore no measured net fiscal outcome to describe, in either direction.

No fiscal analysis projects a net loss. The two authoritative estimates both project net revenue gains: the governor's and city's figure of roughly $500 million a year, and NYC Comptroller Mark Levine's independent Fiscal Note 2-2026 (April 30, 2026), which lands at $340–$380 million after applying market-value corrections, rental adjustments, and a 10% behavioral haircut modeled on Vancouver's Empty Homes Tax. Levine's report explicitly models behavioral responses such as renting, restructuring, and selling — and still finds a substantial net positive. It does not model out-migration losses, and no published analysis found anywhere estimates the offsetting revenue loss Trump asserts. For scale, even the high estimate is about 0.4% of NYC's $125.84 billion FY2027 adopted budget.

Actual collections ran the opposite way. NYC FY2026 tax collections through June reached $85.4 billion, up 7.3% over FY2025, with personal income and pass-through entity taxes up 13.4% to $20.8 billion and business income taxes up 9.5% to $10.9 billion; June 2026 PIT/PTET collections beat expectations by more than $200 million. At the state level, Comptroller DiNapoli reported SFY 2025-26 collections of $127.5 billion — $2.3 billion above Division of the Budget estimates and roughly $10 billion above the prior year — and first-quarter collections of $37.2 billion, $2.4 billion above projections and $4 billion above the same period a year earlier. Local sales tax collections totaled $12.7 billion in the first half of 2026, up 6.8%. In June 2026 the City Council forecast nearly $2 billion more in FY2026–27 revenue than the Mayor's OMB projected.

The kernel of truth is real but predates the tax. NYC does have sustained net domestic out-migration (-113,718 in the twelve months to July 2025, offset by 65,824 net international arrivals, for a net loss of 12,196 residents). IRS Statistics of Income data show New York State lost about $9.9 billion in adjusted gross income to out-migration, with Manhattan down roughly $922 million between filing years 2022 and 2023, while Florida gained $20.6 billion and Texas $5.5 billion. Those flows are entirely pre-2026 and cannot have been caused by a tax that took effect July 1, 2026.

Early market signals are mixed, not decisive. One week after the tax took effect (July 6–12, 2026), only one Manhattan property entered contract above $10 million versus a typical three to five — though appraiser Jonathan Miller cautioned against reading a single summer week. Meanwhile Compass's Q2 2026 report showed signings above $20 million up 25% year over year and the $10–20 million segment up 38.6%, with Compass concluding the tax "appears to have had only a limited impact, with some buyers opting to purchase primary residences instead of second homes." Citadel's Ken Griffin threatened to shift jobs out of the city, but no actual departures have been documented.

The research literature also cuts against the mechanism. Young, Varner, Lurie and Prisinzano estimate a migration elasticity near 0.1 — a 1% tax increase produces roughly 0.1% out-migration. Fiscal Policy Institute research finds wealthy New Yorkers are the least mobile income group in the city: millionaires relocate at about 2.4% annually versus 4.5% for low-wage workers, only about 0.3% move annually for tax reasons, and among millionaire movers 47% go to lower-tax states versus 32% to higher-tax ones. Contemporaneous coverage from CNBC, Forbes and Yahoo reporting on this specific post noted Trump offered no evidence and that the outflow claim lacks empirical support.

"Tens of thousands of people are fleeing New York City, never to return, taking their tax payments with them."
Half True

New York City and State have recorded sustained net domestic outmigration since roughly 2020, with IRS migration data showing meaningful adjusted-gross-income transfer to Florida and Texas in particular. The directional claim is well supported. The characterizations 'fleeing' and 'never to return' overstate the data, which measure net annual flows and do not track permanence; New York also records substantial offsetting international inmigration. Attribution of the outflow specifically to a pied-a-terre tax is asserted, not demonstrated.

"Florida, Texas, and numerous other States are making an absolute fortune from this migration."
Half True

Florida and Texas have been the largest net recipients of domestic migration and associated adjusted gross income for several consecutive years, so the direction is accurate. 'An absolute fortune' is hyperbolic framing rather than a quantified claim, and neither state levies a personal income tax, which limits the direct revenue capture the statement implies.

"The 'Radical Left Jihadists' charge Congestion Pricing."
False

Congestion pricing in Manhattan was authorized by the New York State legislature under the 2019 Traffic Mobility Act, administered by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (a state authority), and took effect on January 5, 2025 under Governor Kathy Hochul. It is not a New York City municipal program and was not created by the officials the post targets. The epithet itself is a characterization, not a factual claim.

"Financial, and then Social, RUIN is a 100% certainty for New York."
Mostly False

This is a forecast rather than a statement of present fact, so it cannot be conclusively falsified today. But the assertion of 100% certainty is itself assessable, and it fails: no forecaster — governmental, ratings-agency, or private — projects anything resembling financial or social ruin for New York, and the direction of the most recent data runs opposite to the prediction on both dimensions.

On the financial side, the NYC Comptroller projects real GDP growth of 2.2% in 2026 slowing to 1.7% in 2027 — deceleration, not contraction. No published forecast projects a recession for New York City in 2027. The City Council's June 2026 forecast expects tax revenue to grow at an average 4.3% annually through FY2030. FY2026 city tax collections reached $85.4 billion, up 7.3%. New York City private-sector employment rose 15,280 in May 2026 with cumulative gains of 40,330 over the year; the employment-population ratio held at a record-high 59.2% in May 2026; and there are now more securities-sector jobs in New York City than at any point in its recorded history. Wall Street profits hit $65 billion, the highest on record, with $21.1 billion in Q1 2026 alone — up 37.1% year over year. Both major ratings agencies keep the city in the high-investment-grade tier: Moody's at Aa2 and S&P at AA.

On the social side, the specific imagery in the post is contradicted by the crime data available at the time of writing. NYPD reported the fewest shooting incidents (381), shooting victims (462), and murders (149) in recorded history for the first seven months of 2026 — beating the prior record low of 174 murders set in 2017. Overall major crime fell 12.7% in July 2026 year over year, with declines in all seven major categories and in every borough; Brooklyn recorded its longest homicide-free streak on record at 29 consecutive days. The exceptions are narrow: transit crime rose 1% year to date (10.9% in July) and confirmed hate crimes rose 9.4%.

The claim is not baseless, which is why it is rated mostly false rather than false. Genuine fiscal strain is documented: Moody's cut New York City's outlook to negative in 2026 (while affirming Aa2), citing larger multi-year budget gaps and persistent structural imbalance under still-favorable revenue conditions. State Comptroller DiNapoli puts the city's out-year gaps at a combined $20.5 billion across FY2028–FY2030. The $125.84 billion FY2027 adopted budget relies on $1.96 billion in prepayments from FY2026 and carries budgeted reserves of just $450 million against a typical $1.45 billion cushion, implying expenditures exceeding revenues by roughly $1.83 billion. Net domestic out-migration remains the city's central demographic challenge at -113,718 over twelve months, and rents sit roughly 35% above pre-pandemic levels. These are real risks — but structural budget gaps under a negative outlook, in a city with record employment and record-low homicides, are a documented management problem, not certain financial and social ruin. No analyst assigns anything approaching the certainty asserted.

"The speaker is President of the United States."
True

Donald Trump was inaugurated for a second term on January 20, 2025 and was serving as President on August 11, 2026.

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Daily Digest A patronage day broken by two stimulus-locked flares — and a 32-minute pivot from "Radical Left Jihadists" to warm benefaction.

Trump spent most of the day in promoter mode — praising a golf legend, warning FIFA not to replace its president, cheering a Supreme Court justice's decision to stay on, urging Minnesotans to vote for Mike Lindell, and plugging a flattering new book about himself. Two flashes of real anger broke thr...

Analyzed
11
Rage Level
18%
Max Danger
Elevated
View full day analysis →