Post from Truth Social

Video transcript 4:09

documents that you're referencing that I've released, declassified and released, spells out in great detail exactly what happens when you have some of the most powerful people in our country directly leading at the helm, President Obama and his senior most national security cabinet, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper and Susan Rice and others, essentially making a very intentional decision to create this manufactured politicized piece of intelligence with the objective of subverting the will of the American people who in November of 2016 delivered a historic victory to President Trump, defeating Hillary Clinton and President Obama and his team, their goal was to essentially not accept the decision of the American people and to use this manufactured politicized intelligence as a means to enact what would become essentially a years-long coup against President Trump. You have gone into great detail over these years of what the effects of this document and this decision have resulted in, obviously a years-long Mueller investigation that cost taxpayers almost $40 million to congressional impeachments, endless smears and attacks against not only President Trump but his family. He had senior members of his team who were investigated, some arrested and jailed. We had heightened and increased tensions between the United States and Russia. The list goes on and on about the consequences of President Obama and his senior cabinet members politicizing intelligence once again, and I say these words very clearly, to enact what was essentially a years-long coup subverting the will of the American people in that election in November. Now, you referenced this president's daily brief document that was drafted for President Obama in early December that reaffirmed what the intelligence community professionals, as you say, had been assessing for the previous six months leading up to the election, which was that Russia neither had the intent nor capability to essentially hack the outcome of the U.S. election. As you said, President Obama's political appointees pulled that document before it could be published, and it has not been published until we released it today. And the very next day after they pulled that document, President Obama called the National Security Council cabinet meeting to discuss how Russia interfered with the election. Again, this is the first week of December. This is December 9th, right? President Trump had already won, correct. This is the December 9th meeting. That's exactly right. The December 9th meeting, we declassified and released what they called the summary of conclusions from that meeting. Then DNI James Clapper took the lead on what President Obama wanted done, which was essentially create a document that tells us not if, but how Russia interfered with the election. President Obama delivered the conclusion that he wanted the intelligence community to reach and directed them to find and essentially create and manufacture the intelligence to support the conclusion that President Obama wanted to deliver to the American people. Once that document was drafted, the Deep State kicked into gear and did what they usually do. They started leaking this classified information out to their friends at the Washington Post and others who are working hand in glove with the Deep State to lay the groundwork for the assessment that they eventually released that served as the basis, once again, for this years-long coup with the goal of trying to subvert the American people's will and usurp President Trump from being able to deliver on the mandate that the American people gave to him when they chose to elect him as President of the United States.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-09-09. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level
Elevated
Narcissistic State
Mixed
Authorship
Uncertain
Intensity
45%

This post contains no text from the subject — only a shared video of a broadcast interview alleging that Obama-era officials (Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Rice) 'manufactured' intelligence to stage a 'years-long coup' against him. The analyzable behavior is selection and amplification, not authored speech. Coming two days after his own demand that Netflix remove Susan Rice from its board, this functions as continued reinforcement of a long-running persecution narrative rather than a fresh reactive episode. Content-level analysis shows paranoid-spectrum features (persistent grudge-holding, conspiracy attribution, persecution belief) as most salient, with grandiose narcissistic elements secondary (implicit self-positioning as the rightful 'historic' election winner whose mandate was stolen). Defensively, the amplified narrative exhibits splitting (uniformly malicious opposing cabal) and projection (accusing opponents of intelligence manipulation, a charge structurally mirroring accusations made against his own administration). No explicit incitement or violent imagery is present, though the clip names specific former officials in connection with an alleged criminal conspiracy, which combined with his recent direct targeting of one of them (Rice) modestly elevates the danger profile. Authorship attribution rests solely on weak timing evidence (~9:20 PM ET, borderline late-evening) and topical continuity with his own recent post; confidence is capped at low given the total absence of stylometric evidence. This is best characterized as low-intensity, stable grievance maintenance rather than an acute psychological event.

Authorship Analysis
Uncertain
Indicators:
  • No written text is present, so there is no stylometric evidence of authorship — the score reflects who plausibly selected and posted the clip, not who wrote or spoke its content
  • Post timestamp 2026-02-24T02:20:55 UTC converts to approximately 9:20 PM ET on 2026-02-23 assuming Mar-a-Lago/East Coast location (no confirmed travel event that week places him elsewhere) — this is evening, bordering on but not clearly within the 10pm-6am late-night window associated with authentic personal posting
  • Thematically continuous with his own post two days prior demanding Netflix fire Susan Rice, suggesting personal engagement with this grievance topic rather than routine staff scheduling content
  • Media-only posts with no caption are ambiguous between personal and staff-assisted sharing; absence of a caption removes the strongest available signal (his own phrasing) for this determination
Psychological Profile
▶ Traits
Big Five:
Extraversion
50%
Agreeableness
20%
Conscientiousness
40%
Neuroticism
55%
Openness
25%

Strongest facet: angry_hostility_via_selection

Agency
75%
Communion
15%

Primary drive: status

▶ Narrative
Role: vindicated victim / rightful winner · Arc: redemption · Contrasting: Obama, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Rice, 'the Deep State'
Legitimate, historic election winner subverted by an elite conspiracyVictim of a years-long orchestrated 'coup' now being vindicated by declassified evidence
▶ State
Mixed State

Trigger: Maintenance (Ongoing grievance campaign regarding the 2016-2017 Russia investigation, reinforced by his 2026-02-22 demand targeting Susan Rice)

Sentiment
-0.35
▶ Clinical
Malignant Narcissism:
Narcissistic
40%
Antisocial
15%
Paranoid
60%
Sadism
5%
Defense Mechanisms:
projectionsplitting
Cognitive Complexity:
Complexity
0%
Parasocial Techniques:
Platforming a third-party validator to make the persecution narrative feel externally corroborated rather than self-asserted
Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:
  • Amplifies a third-party accusation naming specific former officials (Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Obama) as having orchestrated a 'coup,' reinforcing a personal grievance narrative
  • Occurs two days after his own direct demand for professional consequences against one of the named individuals (Susan Rice)
  • No explicit call to violence, mobilization, or action beyond the informational/vindication framing is present in the clip
Reality Distortions:
  • The amplified clip characterizes a contested historical/legal matter (the Russia investigation) as a definitively proven 'coup,' a framing the subject chose to platform to his audience without qualification or counterpoint

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Daily Digest State of the Union morning passed in one all-caps line about a shutdown, with no mention of the speech

Almost all of his posting happened in one six-minute burst late the night before, and most of it wasn't his own writing: a shared interview accusing Obama-era officials of plotting against him, a supporter's tribute montage, a one-line jab at Gavin Newsom, and a demand that the Save America Act pass...

Analyzed
5
Rage Level
12%
Max Danger
Elevated
View full day analysis →