Post from Truth Social

Video transcript 0:41

Well, one of the guys that's in here is Eric Swalwell. Now, that is secondhand information from the whistleblower, but the whistleblower actually attended a meeting with Adam Schiff, a ranking member. Yeah. I stand corrected. They both hate Trump, so I kind of mix them up. Yeah, they all merge together these days. Listen, this whistleblower literally sat in a meeting, he says, he tells the FBI, where Adam Schiff authorized the leaking of classified secrets to dirty up Donald Trump and to try to build towards either a select committee in Congress or a special prosecutor.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Listen Visualize
11.1K 3.1K 299

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-09-09. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level
Elevated
Narcissistic State
Mixed
Authorship
Uncertain
Intensity
35%

This media-only repost amplifies a broadcast clip in which a commentator relays whistleblower testimony alleging Adam Schiff (briefly conflated with Eric Swalwell) authorized leaking classified information to damage Trump, potentially building toward a select committee or special prosecutor. With no original text, no stylometric or cognitive markers are assessable; authorship attribution rests solely on timing (~6:35 AM Eastern, just past the canonical late-night/early-morning window) and is capped at low confidence, reflecting who likely selected the clip rather than who wrote anything. Psychologically, the selection continues a longstanding persecution-to-vindication narrative targeting Russia-investigation-era critics, reinforced by a same-day companion post referencing a 'slam dunk' conspiracy case against 'Obama's feds.' This pairing suggests an active, coordinated grievance narrative that day rather than incidental engagement. Clinical indicators center on paranoid features (persistent grudge-holding, preoccupation with perceived persecution) and mild antisocial features (amplifying calls for prosecutorial/congressional action against named opponents based on uncorroborated secondhand claims), with splitting evident in the clip's collapsing of two distinct critics into one undifferentiated enemy. No violent or dehumanizing content is present, and rage is not directly expressed since no original words accompany the post; danger is rated elevated based on the institutional-targeting content rather than any violence indicator. No fact-check items are attributed to Trump himself, since the substantive claims originate with the clip's speaker, not with him.</summary> <parameter name="eventIds">[]

Authorship Analysis
Uncertain
Indicators:
  • No written text is present, so no stylometric evidence (typos, syntax, ALL CAPS, grammar) can inform this judgment — the attribution below concerns who selected/posted the clip, not who wrote any words
  • Posted at 2026-02-10T11:35:11.893Z; no travel event places Trump outside his standard Eastern-time base (DC/Mar-a-Lago) this week, so Eastern Time is assumed
  • 11:35:11 UTC converts to approximately 6:35 AM EST — just past the canonical late-night/early-morning authentic window (10pm-6am), but still consistent with early-morning personal scrolling/posting behavior documented elsewhere in his patterns
  • Content amplifies a personal grievance target (Schiff, Swalwell) consistent with his own long-standing preoccupations, which slightly favors personal selection over routine staff scheduling, but this is weak circumstantial evidence, not proof
  • Companion same-day posts (including a substantive link share) suggest an active posting session that morning, though sessions can include both aide-scheduled and personally selected items
Psychological Profile
▶ State
Mixed State

Trigger: Maintenance (Ongoing grievance narrative re: Schiff/Swalwell and the Russia-investigation era, reactivated by a resurfaced whistleblower claim)

Sentiment
-0.30
▶ Clinical
Malignant Narcissism:
Narcissistic
20%
Antisocial
30%
Paranoid
55%
Sadism
5%
Defense Mechanisms:
splittingrationalization
Cognitive Complexity:
Complexity
0%
Parasocial Techniques:
Amplifying third-party 'insider' testimony to lend authenticity to a persecution narrative without personally asserting the underlying claims
Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:
  • Amplifies a call for institutional action (select committee, special prosecutor) against named political opponents based on uncorroborated secondhand testimony
  • Continues a pattern of targeting specific named critics (Schiff, Swalwell) for potential legal/investigative consequences

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Daily Digest A 2:30 a.m. start, an eight-minute burst of five-year-old grievances, and total silence on the day's actual news

Trump posted 23 times, opening with a few news links just after 2:30 in the morning and closing before 7 p.m. with a rapid-fire block of seven near-identical endorsements of Florida Republicans. The middle of the day was an eight-minute burst of eleven old clips and images reposted from his own acco...

Analyzed
15
Rage Level
5%
Max Danger
Elevated
View full day analysis →