Post from Truth Social

- What if I told you there is a new global alignment? And I want you to hear me out, okay? Just hear me out first. Let's do the Greenland component. Greenland has been asking Denmark for help securing itself against Russia and China for over 20 years. They haven't done anything, nor has anyone from any side of the EU on the NATO side. So case in point, Germany only sent like 14, I think it was literally 14 people when Trump threatened to invade. So you see the commitment from the EU. America though has had a treaty post World War II to put bases basically anywhere they want, but we're not gonna overly invest if it's not US soil. But what if we were to acquire it? This would increase American soil by over 20% and enter what we would then call NORCOM, or Northern Command, where our radar could actually detect an ICBM from Russia or China 20 minutes earlier than it does now because the path would be over the North Pole. This has also serious global impacts to our foes. We'll do China first. China owns 80 to 85% of the global EV battery industry and produces items for our EVs here in America at a ratio of six to one that we do internally. If America had access to Greenland, we could break that dependency within a year. We also would be able to produce most of our own chips too, just from the rare earth minerals that are in Greenland. This would de-incentivize China from taking Taiwan because that's really the only reason they want it for the semiconductor market, which would hinder America if China controlled that, all right? Stay with me here. Also, our acquisition that could break China's Northern Silk Road and secure a Northern shipping channel, cutting off trade routes for China and Russia, but also giving us more secure options that could be taxed for other nations, i.e. making our shipping expenses go down dramatically. This would essentially turn Greenland into America's 12th carrier battle group as well. You can't sink it either. And then in its current proposal, as the annex proposal stands, Trump offered every person in Greenland 100 grand. That would cost us only 57,000 people. It costs us $5.7 billion. Compare that to the over $8 billion price tag for a new aircraft carrier. Don't even get me started on the rest of the fleet. See, Trump's not shooting from the hip here. This would allow America to launch a fighter jet from American soil that could touch Beijing and Moscow, which Moscow along with China has been looking to take Greenland for a while now for the same reasons, 'cause there's 50 billion barrels of oil just in offshore shallow water wells in and around Greenland, which if America took control of, we could theoretically change the impact of OPEC globally. Now, if we didn't need China for anything, and Russia needed to come to the U.S. for oil, 'cause we were out producing OPEC, or needed to beg us for access to the Northern shipping routes, suddenly, would we all become friends? They need us. Is Trump rebalancing global power with his Greenland move? Look, NATO was originally based on the opposition to fascism and communism. Now, the U.K. puts people in jail for Facebook posts. They have socialist governments and have imported enough people to make them anti-American. We don't share the EU's values anymore. What if I told you that America and Russia had more in common than America and the EU? And before you freak out and say that I'm pro-Putin, listen to me, okay, shut up. Putin is the worst, okay? I'm talking about the Russian people, same demographic, generally same religious base, and given the opportunity, would probably side with American influence over Putin's de facto dictatorship. Remember, they were our ally against Nazi Germany not too long ago. But if Putin knew he couldn't survive our influence, I'd be willing to bet he would buckle. Europe and Brazil, after they just saw us kidnap their neighbor's leader, Saudi Arabia would come to heel if we didn't need their oil from OPEC. China would be forced to go along with it after losing their northern mobility and shipping routes, and we wouldn't need their batteries. They'd be ostracized on a global trade route, 'cause remember, Trump has exerted our power on the Panama Canal, so they basically can't get into any other ocean. And Europe, they gave up all their power plants on the Green New Deal aspirations. They imported foreigners, bankrupted themselves with social programs, and have been crushing their farms to the point that they can't even grow their own food anymore. So why do we need them anyway? They contribute basically nothing. 14 troops to it? Thanks, Germany. America's essentially 70% of NATO anyway. Democrats think Trump is just like randomly doing stuff 'cause he's crazy. No, he's actually like 17 steps ahead, and by the time the rest of the world realize it, they're too far behind to do anything about it.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.