AI Analysis
Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-27. Not written by the author of the post.
This 1:25 AM endorsement from Davos carries high-confidence authentic Trump authorship and reveals acute power-motive activation triggered by Indiana State Senator Holdman's redistricting vote, which threatened Trump's congressional majority. The response is grossly disproportionate — a state procedural vote elevated to national security crisis — consistent with narcissistic injury dynamics. Classic splitting renders Holdman entirely malevolent ("America Last politician") while Fiechter receives hagiographic elevation. Paternalistic ownership framing of Indiana ("I love and have been very good to") reflects the narcissistic possession schema. Defense mechanisms include splitting, projection, and rationalization through an elaborate causal chain. The antisocial-narcissistic axis is demonstrated by deploying presidential platform to instigate a punitive primary challenge against a state legislator for a single vote. Midnight timing from international travel suggests personally-driven impulsivity rather than strategic communication. Danger level is elevated: named targeting with a mass hostile audience follows the stochastic targeting pattern without explicit violent instruction. No cognitive deviation from baseline. Consistent with established Trump behavioral profile.
- 1:25 AM local time in Davos (CET), consistent with authentic late-night posting pattern
- Parenthetical dismissal '(for whatever reason)' — characteristic Trump rhetorical tic
- Paternalistic state-ownership construction 'a State I love and have been very good to'
- Signature phrase 'Complete and Total Endorsement'
- Rallying call syntactic structure 'RUN, BLAKE, RUN!' — repeated endorsement formula
Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Defeat (Indiana State Senator Travis Holdman's vote against redistricting, perceived as territorial violation and defiance of Trump's congressional majority interests)
Rage: Intensity 60% targeting Travis Holdman
Elevated
- Named targeting of specific individual (Travis Holdman) with a large primed audience
- Grievance articulation: Holdman characterized as 'America Last,' endangering the country — framing that licenses hostile audience response
- Absence of explicit violence does not preclude harassment, threats, and intimidation by followers following targeting pattern
- Punitive endorsement mechanism documented in prior cycles to generate coordinated hostility toward named targets
- Specificity of attack (name, district, vote, label) provides sufficient targeting information for motivated actors
- Reframes Holdman's procedural legislative vote as an ideological statement of anti-Congressional sentiment
- Presents speculative electoral projections as established facts to construct betrayal narrative
- Labels political opponent 'America Last' — deliberate inversion of self-identification designed to confuse target's supporters about his allegiances
- 'For whatever reason' dismisses any legitimate motivation Holdman may have had, denying the validity of his deliberative process
- Holdman's redistricting vote characterized as Indiana 'essentially said they don't care about what happens in the United States Congress' — state procedural vote transformed into declarative statement of anti-national intent
- Claims Indiana is 'the only State in the Country' to express Congressional indifference — almost certainly false as a categorical claim
- Speculative redistricting electoral projections ('could have easily picked up two seats') presented as certain lost opportunity to amplify betrayal narrative
- State legislative vote elevated to placing 'our Country in a very dangerous position' — disproportionate threat characterization
This characterizes a single state senator's procedural vote on a redistricting map as a statewide declaration of Congressional indifference. Even granting the premise that the redistricting outcome would have affected Congressional seats, the categorical uniqueness claim ('only State') is almost certainly false and the characterization of legislative intent ('don't care') is a significant distortion of a procedural vote.
The proposed Indiana redistricting map was indeed specifically designed to flip two Democratic-held congressional seats (IN-01 held by Frank Mrvan and IN-07 held by André Carson) to Republican, converting Indiana's 7-2 R-D split into a 9-0 Republican sweep. Multiple sources confirm this was the explicit goal, and the Indiana House passed the map 57-41 before the Senate rejected it 31-19.
However, 'easily' overstates the certainty for at least one of the two seats:
IN-07 (Carson's district): Under the proposed map, Trump would have won the redrawn 7th by about 19 points (compared to Harris winning the current district by ~41 points). This represented a ~60-point swing right. Analysts described Carson as 'the more doomed of the two Democratic incumbents.' This seat would likely have been an easy Republican pickup.
IN-01 (Mrvan's district): The proposed map would have had Trump carrying the new IN-01 by 12 points (vs. losing it by less than 1 point under current lines). However, Sabato's Crystal Ball analyst noted they 'would probably have started the district as Leans Republican' — not Safe or Likely Republican. The analysis noted 'some Democratic DNA in the proposed IN-01 that, combined with a favorable Democratic electoral environment, could allow Mrvan to survive' and that the margin 'isn't totally safe.' Mrvan had already outperformed expectations in 2020 and 2024.
Additionally, CBS News reported 'there's no guarantee that the parties will win the seats they've redrawn' due to potential litigation and electoral dynamics.
Verdict rationale: The core claim — that redistricting could have produced two additional Republican seats — is well-supported by expert analysis and the map's design. One seat (IN-07) was likely a near-certain pickup. The other (IN-01) would have been competitive, rated only 'Leans Republican.' The qualifier 'easily' overstates the certainty, particularly for IN-01.
Indiana Senate District 19 encompasses all of Adams, Blackford, Jay, and Wells counties, plus a portion of Allen County (the southeast Fort Wayne area). Using county-level 2024 presidential results from Wikipedia's Indiana election article:
- Adams County: Trump 75.28%, Harris 22.73% → Trump +52.6 points
- Wells County: Trump 76.94%, Harris 22.27% → Trump +54.7 points
- Jay County: Trump 76.61%, Harris 21.53% → Trump +55.1 points
- Blackford County: Trump 74.20%, Harris 23.89% → Trump +50.3 points
- Allen County (whole county): Trump 55.17%, Harris 42.75% → Trump +12.4 points
The four fully-included rural counties show Trump margins of 50-55 points. Allen County overall shows only a +12 point Trump margin, but only a portion (covering southeast Fort Wayne and surrounding rural areas) falls within District 19. This portion likely skews more Republican than the county average since it excludes the more Democratic urban core of Fort Wayne.
Each Indiana Senate district contains roughly 136,000 people. The four rural counties total approximately 96,000 people, meaning the Allen County portion accounts for roughly 40,000 people (~10% of Allen County's ~385,000 population). A weighted calculation using county-level data and reasonable estimates for the Allen County portion's partisan lean (likely Trump +15 to +25, given its suburban/rural character) produces a district-wide Trump margin plausibly in the range of 35-45 points.
The claimed 39-point margin falls squarely within this estimated range and is consistent with the district's known geography — heavily rural Republican territory with a small slice of a more competitive urban county. The exact figure cannot be independently verified without precinct-level presidential results aggregated to the state senate district level, but it is directionally correct and plausible. Indiana statewide went for Trump by 19 points, and this district in deep-red northeastern Indiana would certainly perform well above the state average.
Some economic and policy metrics cited in the known events (e.g., deportation figures, executive orders) support a record of activity, but 'magnificent' is evaluative. The one-year record is contested across domains.
The verifiable factual components of this claim are all confirmed:
City Councilman status — CONFIRMED: Blake Fiechter won election in 2023 as an at-large member of the Bluffton Common Council. He is listed as a current elected official on the Wells County Republicans website and the City of Bluffton's official elected officials page. In the 2023 Republican primary, he received 274 votes (second place) in a four-way race for two at-large seats, advancing alongside incumbent Rick Elwell (384 votes).
Bluffton, Indiana — CONFIRMED: Fiechter is based in Bluffton, Wells County, Indiana. His campaign website describes him as a 'sixth generation Wells County resident.'
Real estate broker — CONFIRMED: Fiechter holds Indiana real estate license RB14039840 and is affiliated with the Steffen Group (joined December 2024), with 14 years of real estate experience. He previously worked at BKM Real Estate and is listed on Homes.com as a real estate agent in Bluffton.
Father of three girls — CONFIRMED: His campaign website identifies his wife as Taye (married 2014) and three daughters: Stowe (10), Oaklyn (9), and Kaehria (8).
'Highly respected' — UNVERIFIABLE SUBJECTIVE CHARACTERIZATION: No independent sources describe Fiechter as 'highly respected.' He is a first-term council member. Some contextual factors cut against the characterization: he initially dropped out of his Trump-endorsed state senate campaign citing inability to organize a campaign ahead of the primary; his campaign website was described by the Indiana Capital Chronicle as 'bare-bones' linking to 'social media accounts with no posts'; and he only re-entered the race after a White House meeting with Trump. No sources contradicting his community standing were found either.
Verdict rationale: All factual elements are confirmed true. 'Highly respected' is a subjective characterization originating solely from Trump's endorsement post, with no independent corroboration but also no contradicting evidence. The overall claim is substantially accurate on verifiable facts.
No contradictions with other posts detected yet.
Trump flew home from Davos and posted 81 times across the day, but the day split cleanly in two. The evening hours coming off the plane produced a tight burst of personal attacks — an Indiana state senator who crossed him on redistricting, Gavin Newsom for attending the same conference he'd just att...
Authorship Attribution
Local Time Determination: The post was published at 00:25:34 UTC on January 23, 2026. Based on known events, Trump was in Davos, Switzerland (CET = UTC+1) attending the World Economic Forum. Local time: 1:25 AM. This late-night/early-morning post from international travel is a strong authentic-authorship indicator.
Stylometric Analysis: The text exhibits high-density authentic Trump markers: parenthetical dismissals ("for whatever reason"), paternalistic state-ownership language ("a State I love and have been very good to"), signature superlatives ("Complete and Total Endorsement"), characteristic capitalization of ideological terms (RINO, DOMINANCE, SECURE, LAW AND ORDER), stream-of-consciousness run-on sentences, and the rallying finale "RUN, BLAKE, RUN!" — a syntactic construction he has used repeatedly in endorsements. The second paragraph's policy laundry list shows slightly more structured composition consistent with light aide contribution, but the framing, voice, and emotional tenor are unmistakably authentic.
Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five)
Dominant facets:
- Neuroticism — angry hostility (0.70): Disproportionate catastrophizing of a state senate procedural vote as placing "our Country in a very dangerous position" reflects angry hostility. The sustained attack across multiple paragraphs indicates not spontaneous irritation but a genuine grievance nursed since the vote.
- Extraversion — assertiveness (0.85): Commanding, performative, audience-directed tone. The post is not a quiet endorsement but a public mobilization event.
- Agreeableness (low, 0.10): Willingness to attack a fellow Republican in his own coalition is notable. No acknowledgment of Holdman's possible motivations; zero charitable interpretation extended.
- Conscientiousness (0.35): Goal-directed (protect House majority) but impulsive in execution — midnight endorsement from abroad in a state legislative race.
- Openness — values rigidity (0.15): Absolute ideological binary; no complexity admitted.
Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations
Agency motives (dominant, 0.90): Power and congressional control are the primary drivers. This post is fundamentally about maintaining the House majority as an extension of executive power, and punishing defection within the coalition to deter future disloyalty. The phrase "a District that I won by 39 points" is a territorial claim asserting dominance over the political geography.
Communion motives (low, 0.15): Token family references ("Proud Husband, Loving Father to three girls") appear only in the hagiographic section about Fiechter — instrumentalized for contrast, not genuinely communal.
Schemas:
- Self: Omnipotent political patron, legitimate power broker over state-level politics, guardian of the House majority
- Loyalist other (Fiechter): Deserving vassal elevated through bestowed legitimacy
- Defiant other (Holdman): Traitor whose autonomy constitutes a threat to the nation
- World: Zero-sum political combat where any deviation from alignment is sabotage
Level 3: Narrative Identity
Protagonist role: Kingmaker/enforcer — the president as both patron and punisher of state-level political figures. Trump casts himself not merely as a presidential figure but as the ultimate authority over who may participate in Republican politics at any level.
Contamination sequence: The implicit narrative arc: a good position (potential two Congressional seats from Indiana redistricting) was contaminated by Holdman's betrayal, requiring corrective action (the Fiechter primary challenge).
Identity claims:
- Electoral dominance: "I won by 39 points in this district"
- Paternal ownership: "a State I love and have been very good to"
- National guardian: sole protector of the House majority and "magnificent gains"
- Kingmaker: "has my Complete and Total Endorsement"
Contrasting other: Holdman functions as the Shadow figure — the corrupt insider who betrays the movement from within. The "RINO" label is not merely an attack; it performs expulsion from the in-group identity.
Level 4: Clinical Indicators
Malignant Narcissism (Kernberg 1984, 1992)
A. Narcissistic features (high): Entitlement is evident in the assumption that a state senator must vote in alignment with Trump's congressional interests. The paternalistic framing ("I have been very good to [Indiana]") frames the state as a client owing loyalty. The endorsement-as-punishment mechanism reflects interpersonal exploitation — Fiechter is instrumentalized as a weapon against Holdman.
B. Antisocial features (moderate): Using presidential platform to instigate a primary challenge against a state official as punishment for a procedural vote reflects contempt for the autonomy of co-equal state-level democratic processes and disregard for norms against presidential interference in state legislative races.
C. Paranoid features (moderate): Catastrophizing a state senate redistricting vote into a national security crisis ("putting our Country in a very dangerous position") reflects hypervigilant threat appraisal inconsistent with the actual stakes of a state legislative procedural matter.
D. Ego-syntonic sadism (mild-moderate): The public naming, labeling ("America Last politician"), and career-threatening endorsement against Holdman functions as political humiliation and punishment. The specificity of the attack — naming the district, the margin, the vote — is performatively cruel, displaying what Trump can do to dissenters as much as punishing this one.
Defense Mechanisms
- Splitting (immature): Fiechter = pure good; Holdman = pure evil. The post admits no complexity — the same vote that makes Holdman "America Last" is never examined on its merits.
- Projection (immature): Accusing Holdman of being "America Last" while Trump deploys anti-democratic pressure tactics against a state legislator.
- Rationalization (neurotic): The elaborate causal chain (redistricting vote → lost seats → endangered House majority → national danger) provides logical scaffolding for what is, at its core, a retaliatory motive.
- Idealization/devaluation (immature): The structural contrast between the extended devaluation of Holdman and the hagiographic elevation of Fiechter is a textbook splitting-plus-idealization/devaluation sequence.
Narcissistic Dynamics
Trigger: Primary trigger is narcissistic injury — Holdman's vote defied Trump's political interests in a district Trump won decisively, experienced as personal rejection and territorial violation ("a State I love"). Secondary trigger is supply-seeking: the post invites audience validation of his endorsement authority.
Narcissistic rage: Present. Intensity approximately 0.60 — structured and sustained rather than raw. The response is grossly disproportionate (presidential mobilization against a state senator), consistent with rage rather than calculated strategic communication. Target: Travis Holdman.
Narcissistic state: Primarily grandiose (I won by 39 points, I control the House majority, I bestow "Complete and Total Endorsement") with a contamination-threat undercurrent feeding the punitive energy.
Rhetorical Analysis
The post employs a classic attack-contrast structure: an extended devaluation passage against Holdman (paragraphs 1-2) followed by hagiographic elevation of Fiechter (paragraph 3), concluding with a rallying call that collapses the distinction between reader and movement participant ("RUN, BLAKE, RUN!").
Key techniques:
- False dichotomy: "True America First Patriot" vs "RINO" / "America Last" — a binary that forecloses all intermediate positions
- Appeal to fear: "jeopardy," "very dangerous position," "losing some of the magnificent gains" — stakes escalation from procedural vote to civilizational threat
- Ad hominem: Holdman's character and loyalty are attacked; his actual reasoning for the vote is never engaged
- Catastrophizing: State redistricting vote → national security crisis — a logical leap that bypasses deliberation
- Anaphora: The policy list deploys rhythmic syntactic parallelism for momentum and memorability
- DARVO elements: Holdman is positioned as the aggressor (endangering the country) while Trump positions as protective respondent
- Credentialing by association: Fiechter's private-life virtues (real estate, family, community) are used to construct a character endorsement that substitutes for policy qualification
Dehumanizing language: Absent. "America Last politician" is a political attack but does not reduce Holdman to a subhuman category.
Violent imagery: Absent.
Gaslighting & Reality Distortion
- Characterizing Holdman's redistricting vote as Indiana "essentially said they don't care about what happens in the United States Congress" is a significant distortion — a state senator's procedural vote on a state map is transformed into a declarative statement of anti-national intent.
- The claim that this makes Indiana "the only State in the Country" to express such indifference conflates a single vote with statewide policy and is almost certainly false as stated.
- Framing redistricting outcomes as "we could have easily picked up two seats" presents speculative electoral projections as certainties to amplify the sense of betrayal.
Cognitive Status
No notable cognitive markers. The post is syntactically complex with characteristic run-on structures consistent with Trump's established baseline. Vocabulary and thematic coherence are consistent with prior posts. No word-finding difficulties, confabulation, or temporal confusion observed. The post's complexity is typical for endorsement/attack posts (moderate: 0.40), reflecting the genre rather than cognitive change. No deviation from baseline.
Danger Assessment
Level: Elevated. While no violent imagery or eliminationist language is present, the post exhibits the stochastic targeting pattern: a named individual (Holdman), articulated grievances ("America Last," endangered majority), and a mass audience primed with hostile framing. This pattern reliably generates downstream harassment, threats, and intimidation without explicit instruction. The specificity of the attack (name, district, vote, label) provides sufficient targeting information for motivated followers. The danger is political and social rather than physical, but consistent with the documented pattern of Trump's endorsement-as-punishment mechanism generating hostile audience response to targets.
Fact Verification
| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| "Indiana is 'the only State in the Country that essentially said they don't care about what happens in the United States Congress'" | Mostly False | This characterizes a single state senator's procedural vote on a redistricting map as a statewide declaration of Congressional indifference. Even granting the premise that the redistricting outcome would have affected Congressional seats, the categorical uniqueness claim ('only State') is almost certainly false and the characterization of legislative intent ('don't care') is a significant distortion of a procedural vote. |
| "We could have easily picked up two seats in Indiana from redistricting" | Mostly True | The proposed Indiana redistricting map was indeed specifically designed to flip two Democratic-held congressional seats (IN-01 held by Frank Mrvan and IN-07 held by André Carson) to Republican, converting Indiana's 7-2 R-D split into a 9-0 Republican sweep. Multiple sources confirm this was the explicit goal, and the Indiana House passed the map 57-41 before the Senate rejected it 31-19. |
However, 'easily' overstates the certainty for at least one of the two seats:
IN-07 (Carson's district): Under the proposed map, Trump would have won the redrawn 7th by about 19 points (compared to Harris winning the current district by ~41 points). This represented a ~60-point swing right. Analysts described Carson as 'the more doomed of the two Democratic incumbents.' This seat would likely have been an easy Republican pickup.
IN-01 (Mrvan's district): The proposed map would have had Trump carrying the new IN-01 by 12 points (vs. losing it by less than 1 point under current lines). However, Sabato's Crystal Ball analyst noted they 'would probably have started the district as Leans Republican' — not Safe or Likely Republican. The analysis noted 'some Democratic DNA in the proposed IN-01 that, combined with a favorable Democratic electoral environment, could allow Mrvan to survive' and that the margin 'isn't totally safe.' Mrvan had already outperformed expectations in 2020 and 2024.
Additionally, CBS News reported 'there's no guarantee that the parties will win the seats they've redrawn' due to potential litigation and electoral dynamics.
Verdict rationale: The core claim — that redistricting could have produced two additional Republican seats — is well-supported by expert analysis and the map's design. One seat (IN-07) was likely a near-certain pickup. The other (IN-01) would have been competitive, rated only 'Leans Republican.' The qualifier 'easily' overstates the certainty, particularly for IN-01. | | "District that I won by 39 points" | Mostly True | Indiana Senate District 19 encompasses all of Adams, Blackford, Jay, and Wells counties, plus a portion of Allen County (the southeast Fort Wayne area). Using county-level 2024 presidential results from Wikipedia's Indiana election article:
- Adams County: Trump 75.28%, Harris 22.73% → Trump +52.6 points
- Wells County: Trump 76.94%, Harris 22.27% → Trump +54.7 points
- Jay County: Trump 76.61%, Harris 21.53% → Trump +55.1 points
- Blackford County: Trump 74.20%, Harris 23.89% → Trump +50.3 points
- Allen County (whole county): Trump 55.17%, Harris 42.75% → Trump +12.4 points
The four fully-included rural counties show Trump margins of 50-55 points. Allen County overall shows only a +12 point Trump margin, but only a portion (covering southeast Fort Wayne and surrounding rural areas) falls within District 19. This portion likely skews more Republican than the county average since it excludes the more Democratic urban core of Fort Wayne.
Each Indiana Senate district contains roughly 136,000 people. The four rural counties total approximately 96,000 people, meaning the Allen County portion accounts for roughly 40,000 people (~10% of Allen County's ~385,000 population). A weighted calculation using county-level data and reasonable estimates for the Allen County portion's partisan lean (likely Trump +15 to +25, given its suburban/rural character) produces a district-wide Trump margin plausibly in the range of 35-45 points.
The claimed 39-point margin falls squarely within this estimated range and is consistent with the district's known geography — heavily rural Republican territory with a small slice of a more competitive urban county. The exact figure cannot be independently verified without precinct-level presidential results aggregated to the state senate district level, but it is directionally correct and plausible. Indiana statewide went for Trump by 19 points, and this district in deep-red northeastern Indiana would certainly perform well above the state average. | | "The magnificent gains that we have made over the last year, since I assumed the Office of President" | Half True | Some economic and policy metrics cited in the known events (e.g., deportation figures, executive orders) support a record of activity, but 'magnificent' is evaluative. The one-year record is contested across domains. | | "Blake Fiechter is a highly respected Councilman in Bluffton" | Mostly True | The verifiable factual components of this claim are all confirmed:
City Councilman status — CONFIRMED: Blake Fiechter won election in 2023 as an at-large member of the Bluffton Common Council. He is listed as a current elected official on the Wells County Republicans website and the City of Bluffton's official elected officials page. In the 2023 Republican primary, he received 274 votes (second place) in a four-way race for two at-large seats, advancing alongside incumbent Rick Elwell (384 votes).
Bluffton, Indiana — CONFIRMED: Fiechter is based in Bluffton, Wells County, Indiana. His campaign website describes him as a 'sixth generation Wells County resident.'
Real estate broker — CONFIRMED: Fiechter holds Indiana real estate license RB14039840 and is affiliated with the Steffen Group (joined December 2024), with 14 years of real estate experience. He previously worked at BKM Real Estate and is listed on Homes.com as a real estate agent in Bluffton.
Father of three girls — CONFIRMED: His campaign website identifies his wife as Taye (married 2014) and three daughters: Stowe (10), Oaklyn (9), and Kaehria (8).
'Highly respected' — UNVERIFIABLE SUBJECTIVE CHARACTERIZATION: No independent sources describe Fiechter as 'highly respected.' He is a first-term council member. Some contextual factors cut against the characterization: he initially dropped out of his Trump-endorsed state senate campaign citing inability to organize a campaign ahead of the primary; his campaign website was described by the Indiana Capital Chronicle as 'bare-bones' linking to 'social media accounts with no posts'; and he only re-entered the race after a White House meeting with Trump. No sources contradicting his community standing were found either.
Verdict rationale: All factual elements are confirmed true. 'Highly respected' is a subjective characterization originating solely from Trump's endorsement post, with no independent corroboration but also no contradicting evidence. The overall claim is substantially accurate on verifiable facts. |
Overall Veracity: 62%
Summary
This 1:25 AM endorsement post from Davos carries high-confidence authentic Trump authorship and reveals acute power-motive activation triggered by Indiana State Senator Holdman's redistricting vote, which threatened Trump's congressional majority. The response is grossly disproportionate — a state procedural vote elevated to a national security crisis — consistent with narcissistic injury dynamics. Classic splitting renders Holdman entirely malevolent ("America Last politician") while Fiechter receives hagiographic elevation. Paternalistic ownership framing of Indiana ("I love and have been very good to") reflects the narcissistic possession schema. Defense mechanisms include splitting, projection, and rationalization through an elaborate causal chain. The antisocial-narcissistic axis is demonstrated by using the presidential platform to instigate a punitive primary challenge against a state legislator for a single vote. The midnight timing from international travel suggests personally-driven impulsivity rather than strategic political communication. Danger level is elevated: named targeting with a mass hostile audience follows the stochastic terrorism structural pattern absent explicit violence. No cognitive deviation from baseline. Consistent with established Trump behavioral profile.
Post from Truth Social
I am hearing that Bluffton City Councilman Blake Fiechter, a True America First Patriot, is considering a primary challenge against "RINO" State Senator Travis Holdman, in Indiana's 19th Senate District who, for whatever reason, voted against Redistricting in Indiana, in a District that I won by 39 points, which puts the United States Congress in jeopardy. Holdman and his RINO friends made Indiana, a State I love and have been very good to, the only State in the Country that essentially said they don't care about what happens in the United States Congress. We could have easily picked up two seats in Indiana, so Holdman, an America Last politician, put our Majority in the House of Representatives at risk, thereby putting our Country in a very dangerous position in losing some of the magnificent gains that we have made over the last year, since I assumed the Office of President. On the other hand, Blake Fiechter, a very successful Real Estate Broker, Proud Husband, Loving Father to three girls, and a Highly Respected Councilman in the wonderful City of Bluffton, has dedicated his life to serving the Community which he loves so much. As your next State Senator, Blake would fight tirelessly to Protect "Hoosier" Values, Promote our Amazing Farmers and Ranchers, Grow our Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Advance MADE IN THE U.S.A., Promote American Energy DOMINANCE, Keep our Border SECURE, Support our Brave Military, Veterans, and Law Enforcement, Ensure LAW AND ORDER, Safeguard our Elections, and Protect our always under siege Second Amendment. Should he decide to enter this Race, and hopefully he will, Blake Fiechter has my Complete and Total Endorsement against RINO Travis Holdman. RUN, BLAKE, RUN!