Analysis: The Crooked FoxNews Polls got the Election WRONG, I won by m...

1y ago Jun 19, 2025 at 1:02 PM

The Crooked FoxNews Polls got the Election WRONG, I won by much more than they said I would, and have been biased against me for years. They are always wrong and negative. Itâs why MAGA HATES FoxNews, even though their anchors are GREAT. This has gone on for years, but they never change the incompetent polling company that does their work. Now a new FoxNews poll comes out this morning giving me a little more than 50% at the Border, and yet the Border is miraculously perfect, NOBODY WAS ABLE TO COME IN LAST MONTH. 60,000 people came in with Sleepy Joe in the same month last year. I hate FAKE pollsters, one of the Worst, but Fox will never change their discredited pollster!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-22. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

65%

This post demonstrates a textbook narcissistic injury response to a Fox News poll showing approximately 50% approval on border policy. Despite this being a majority-approval figure, Trump perceives it as insufficient given his absolutist self-assessment ("Border is miraculously perfect"). The primary defense is splitting: Fox anchors are "GREAT" while polls are "Crooked"—the same organization divided into idealized and devalued components. Notable is the escalation from the previous day's Border Patrol Council claim of "zero releases into the interior" to the absolute "NOBODY WAS ABLE TO COME IN LAST MONTH," demonstrating how narcissistic grandiosity progressively inflates claims. The post reveals a core feature of pathological narcissism: the impossibility of satisfactory external validation. Even favorable data (50%+) triggers rage when it falls short of the subject's grandiose self-concept. The measurement itself must be delegitimized rather than the self-concept adjusted. Cognitively, the post is within baseline parameters—tangential but coherent, with characteristic perseveration on the grievance theme.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Stream-of-consciousness structure
ALL CAPS emotional emphasis
Encoding artifact (â for apostrophe)
Morning reactivity to news cycle
Run-on sentences with multiple grievances

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Criticism (Fox News poll showing ~50% border approval)

Rage: Intensity 60% targeting Fox News pollsters

Proportionality

30%

Sentiment

-0.65

Mildly Hypomanic

Pressured quality to writingGrandiose claims of perfection

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

70%

Antisocial

20%

Paranoid

50%

Sadism

10%

Defense Mechanisms:

distortionsplittingprojectiondevaluation

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

40%

Cognitive Markers:

tangentialityperseveration

Parasocial Techniques:

In-group flattery (MAGA)Shared enemy construction (Fox pollsters)Speaking for the audience ('MAGA HATES FoxNews')

Danger Assessment

None

Gaslighting Detected:

Escalates 'zero releases into interior' to 'NOBODY WAS ABLE TO COME IN' - inflating a narrow claim into absolute perfection
Attacks credibility of polling as measurement tool to reject unfavorable data

Reality Distortions:

'Border is miraculously perfect' - absolute claim unlikely to be literally true
'NOBODY WAS ABLE TO COME IN LAST MONTH' - escalation from narrower Border Patrol Council claim about releases
Framing 50%+ approval as evidence of bias rather than mixed public opinion

Fact Checks (3)

"60,000 people came in with Sleepy Joe in the same month last year"

Mostly True

His own previous day's post cited Border Patrol Council figure of 62,000 released in May 2024. The number is roughly accurate but 'came in' conflates releases into interior with total encounters.

"NOBODY WAS ABLE TO COME IN LAST MONTH"

Mostly False

The Border Patrol Council claimed zero releases into the interior in May 2025, not zero border encounters or entries. People were still encountered, detained, and processed. The absolute claim of nobody coming in is a significant escalation.

"I won by much more than they said I would"

Mostly True

Trump's 2024 victory margins exceeded most polling predictions, including Fox News polls.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Fox News Poll Attack (2025-06-19)

Overview

A classic Trump grievance post attacking Fox News polling methodology while simultaneously claiming perfect border performance. The post follows a well-established pattern: attack the measurement tool when the measurement is unfavorable, then assert reality is the opposite of what's being measured.

Authorship

Posted at 9:02 AM ET (Trump likely at Mar-a-Lago or back from G7). The post is clearly authentic: stream-of-consciousness structure, emotional reactivity, ALL CAPS emphasis, characteristic run-on sentences, and the encoding artifact "Itâs" (curly apostrophe rendering issue typical of his posting method). The content is reactive to a morning Fox News poll—real-time emotional response.

Psychological Dynamics

The trigger is narcissistic injury: a Fox News poll showing "a little more than 50%" approval on border policy, which Trump perceives as insufficient given his claimed perfect performance. The post oscillates between grandiose ("Border is miraculously perfect, NOBODY WAS ABLE TO COME IN LAST MONTH") and aggrieved/vulnerable ("biased against me for years," "I hate FAKE pollsters").

The central cognitive distortion is the absolute claim "NOBODY WAS ABLE TO COME IN LAST MONTH"—an unfalsifiable hyperbole. The previous day's post cited the Border Patrol Council claiming "ZERO illegal aliens released into the interior," which is a narrower claim (released into interior ≠ nobody came in). Trump escalates the claim from "zero releases" to "nobody came in."

Defense Mechanisms

Distortion: Transforming ~50% approval into evidence of bias rather than mixed public opinion
Splitting: Fox anchors are "GREAT" but polls are "Crooked"—black-and-white compartmentalization
Projection: Accuses pollsters of incompetence while making logically incoherent arguments
Externalization: Any unfavorable data attributed to corrupt measurement, never to actual performance

Rhetorical Techniques

The post deploys several propaganda techniques: the "rigged measurement" frame (delegitimize unfavorable data), appeal to in-group authority ("MAGA HATES FoxNews"), false precision ("60,000 people came in with Sleepy Joe"), and hyperbolic absolute claims. The splitting of Fox News (good anchors, bad polls) is a sophisticated audience management technique—maintaining the Fox viewership pipeline while attacking institutional credibility.

Cognitive Observations

Sentence structure is coherent but disorganized, with multiple grievances layered atop each other. The logical flow is: polls wrong → biased → MAGA hates Fox → polls still wrong → new poll today → but border is perfect → Biden comparison → I hate pollsters → Fox won't change. This tangential cascading is baseline Trump, not indicative of decline.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"60,000 people came in with Sleepy Joe in the same month last year"	Mostly True	His own previous day's post cited Border Patrol Council figure of 62,000 released in May 2024. The number is roughly accurate but 'came in' conflates releases into interior with total encounters.
"NOBODY WAS ABLE TO COME IN LAST MONTH"	Mostly False	The Border Patrol Council claimed zero releases into the interior in May 2025, not zero border encounters or entries. People were still encountered, detained, and processed. The absolute claim of nobody coming in is a significant escalation.
"I won by much more than they said I would"	Mostly True	Trump's 2024 victory margins exceeded most polling predictions, including Fox News polls.

Overall Veracity: 60%