Post from Truth Social

“DEMS DUST OFF THE RUSSIA PLAYBOOK”

Video transcript 4:02

I'm Stack columnist Michael Schellenberger joins us now. So we've seen this, we've seen it for years. The media is complicit. Ken Delanian or whatever his name is, the biggest spook on MSNBC, said that this has got the hallmarks of another Russia propaganda election interference plot. Are they really that ignorant that they think this is gonna work? - That's a great question. I mean, you know, you look at the, if you actually believe everything in the indictment, and I read every word of it just now, this is really small ball stuff. There's no evidence that any Russian money changed anybody's opinion. They say in the indictment that two of the influencers that were targeted did not know that it was Russian money. There's no evidence that like really, there was any serious amount of media coverage to influence anything measurable in terms of opinion. You know, all that being said, I mean, the main issue here is that we have this continued, we have this record of the Department of Justice running Russian disinformation hoaxes twice, not once. The first time claiming that the Russians favored Trump when we now know that they favored Clinton. And then the second time, the Hunter Biden laptop, where we now know that the FBI ran a disinformation effort to make people think that it was about the Russians. So there's, I mean, nobody should trust blindly the Department of Justice when it says anything about Russia. - So now we have the United States government interfering in three elections in a row, 16, 20, and 24, on behalf of Democrat candidates, weak Democrat candidates, Hillary, Biden, and Harris. What does it say about the Harris campaign that they need to do this right now? - Yeah, I mean, look, I think it's, this is the best they've got. And I think that says something, that they're having to do this. And like you said, it's like, it's all of the discredited characters with all of the discredited messages from the past. So it's not gonna, I mean, it's clearly not gonna have much impact at all. It's, you know, I think there is some reason for concern, which is it does feel like it's another effort to program people, if we're gonna be, use the crude word, brainwash people, and get them to stop thinking about these issues. And so we should always be concerned when we see situations where there may be the weaponization of the government going on in order to, in this case, because it's always projection, influence the elections. I mean, the timing alone is curious. - You can't have the FBI, and this is probably CIA laundered, and the Department of Justice spilling this out through press conferences and through leaks to mainstream media reporters on the even of election. And then you're gonna have a 24 hour, maybe 48 hour news cycle on CNN, on MSNBC, and it's just gonna wash over the people, even the casual viewers that are just clicking around. That does have an impact. That's more election skullduggery than what the Russians are doing. - Yeah, and I would say too, I think it's important for people to understand why they keep focusing on Russia. It's clearly an effort to undermine the nationalist and populist appeal of Trump, and the MAGA Republicans. They're trying to say that they're not authentically supported in the United States. They're not about America first. They're secretly, secretly, I mean, it's a conspiracy theory, Jesse. The idea that Trump and MAGA Republicans are controlled by Russia is the craziest conspiracy theory of them all, but apparently it works with some people, or it's the best they got. - And you have Harris's number two, literally under investigation for his ties to China. - And the Biden family also under investigation for all the money that poured in from China. It's crazy. - Of course. - You gotta pay attention. You gotta focus. That's what we're doing here. Thank you so much, Mike Shellenberger. Check out his sub-stack.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

0:00 0:00
Visualize
14.6K 5.1K 1.3K

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-26. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level
Elevated
Narcissistic State
Grandiose
Authorship
Self-Written
Intensity
55%

Post functions as a preemptive narrative inoculation against the FBI's announcement that Iranian hackers targeted Trump's own campaign. Rather than engaging the national security substance — which would require acknowledging his campaign as a hacking victim — Trump deflects by reframing the entire story as a Democratic "playbook" borrowed from 2016 Russia accusations. This is a high-efficiency rhetorical move: six words activate a pre-loaded dismissal schema, converting an FBI-sourced finding into apparent partisan manipulation. The DARVO pattern (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) is structurally present: the FBI finding is denied substantive weight, Democrats are attacked as cynical actors, and the factual victimhood (Iranian hackers targeted Trump) is eclipsed by a counter-narrative in which Trump is victim of Democratic manipulation rather than foreign hacking. Defense mechanisms include projection (attributing calculated political strategy to opponents while deploying same), denial (collapsing a factually distinct Iran event into the pre-dismissed "Russia hoax" category), and rationalization. Narcissistic state is grandiose — ego-dystonic victim status is avoided entirely by repositioning as the exposer of the con. Post is stylistically consistent with authentic Trump voice. No cognitive deviation from baseline. Danger level: elevated only in the aggregate sense that repeated delegitimization of intelligence findings erodes epistemic infrastructure.

Authorship Analysis
Self-Written
Indicators:
  • ALL CAPS formatting is a strong authentic Trump stylistic marker
  • Clipped headline-style syntax consistent with impulsive posting
  • Posted at 20:48 EDT (UTC-4, Trump in Pennsylvania for Hannity town hall) — evening hours are borderline but not inconsistent with authentic Trump
  • Absence of typos or grammatical errors slightly weakens authenticity signal, but brevity makes this less diagnostic
  • Video attachment suggests possible aide involvement in media packaging, though text reads as authentic Trump voice
Psychological Profile
State
Grandiose State

Trigger: Preemptive Attack — Exposure (FBI announcement that Iranian hackers targeted Trump campaign and sent stolen materials to Biden associates)

Sentiment
-0.52
Clinical
Malignant Narcissism:
Narcissistic
65%
Antisocial
40%
Paranoid
55%
Sadism
10%
Defense Mechanisms:
projectiondenialrationalization
Cognitive Complexity:
Complexity
18%
Parasocial Techniques:
Invites followers into shared interpretive frame ('DEMS' as perpetual antagonist class)Rhetorical shorthand activates pre-existing in-group schema, requiring no elaboration
Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:
  • Repeated delegitimization of FBI and U.S. intelligence findings as partisan Democratic tools erodes institutional trust and citizens' ability to assess genuine national security threats
  • Pattern-level danger: this is one instance in a sustained campaign to pre-discredit any foreign interference finding — cumulative effect degrades epistemic infrastructure for democratic security discourse
Gaslighting Detected:
  • Converts an FBI-sourced national security finding into an implied Democratic political fabrication, attacking the credibility of an institutional (non-partisan) source
  • Rapid revisionism: collapses a factually distinct Iranian hacking operation into the pre-dismissed 'Russia hoax' category, retroactively delegitimizing without argument
  • Attacks on epistemic infrastructure ('playbook' framing implies all foreign interference claims are inherently suspect Democratic political tools)
Reality Distortions:
  • FBI-announced Iranian hacking finding reframed as Democratic political manufacture
  • 2024 Iranian operation conflated with 2016 Russian operation as though they are instances of a repeating Democratic hoax pattern rather than factually distinct events
  • Source of the Iran hacking claim (FBI/Intelligence Community) erased; 'DEMS' substituted as originating actor
Fact Checks (1)
"Democrats are deploying a cynical 'Russia Playbook' in response to the Iran hacking story"
Mostly False

The Iranian hacking finding was announced by the FBI and U.S. intelligence agencies — not originated by Democratic political operatives. Democratic commentary on the event responded to an FBI-confirmed national security finding, not a manufactured partisan narrative. The comparison to 2016 also elides that the Russia investigation produced multiple criminal convictions and bipartisan Senate confirmation of interference. The 'playbook' framing falsely implies Democrats are the source and bad-faith actors behind the interference claim.

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Daily Digest Campaign Day Fractured by Russia Narrative Revival and Legal Persecution Barrage

Trump split his day between active campaigning — a Hannity Town Hall in Pennsylvania and a speech at the New York Economic Club — and mounting grievance over the DOJ's renewed Russia election interference findings and his ongoing Manhattan conviction. The day's most alarming moment came at midday wh...

Analyzed
20
Rage Level
38%
Max Danger
High
View full day analysis →