Analysis: Sounds like Hillary’s Lawyer Pomerantz wanted to make money ...

3y ago Feb 7, 2023 at 12:48 AM

Sounds like Hillary’s Lawyer Pomerantz wanted to make money with a Book, but has put himself in great legal jeopardy. I have done nothing wrong!What Mark Pomerantz did, according to the highly respected J. Anthony Jordan, President of the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York:“By writing and releasing a book in the midst of an ongoing case, the author is upending the norms and ethics of prosecutorial conduct and is potentially in violation of New York criminal law.”

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-20. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Vulnerable

Authorship

Uncertain

Intensity

50%

Authorship Analysis

Uncertain

Indicators:

Late evening posting (7:48 PM ET, likely at Mar-a-Lago)
Mix of personal reactive language ('I have done nothing wrong!') and structured quotation
Nickname 'Hillary's Lawyer' is characteristic Trump framing
The quotation block is well-formatted suggesting some aide assistance with sourcing

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Vulnerable State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Mark Pomerantz book about Trump prosecution)

Rage: Intensity 50% targeting Mark Pomerantz

Proportionality

60%

Sentiment

-0.50

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

60%

Antisocial

30%

Paranoid

50%

Sadism

20%

Defense Mechanisms:

projectionrationalizationdenial

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

55%

Parasocial Techniques:

Appeal to authority (DA Association president)Victimhood framing — the accused becomes the accuser

Fact Checks (3)

"Pomerantz represented Hillary Clinton"

Mostly True

Pomerantz's firm had Clinton-related clients, though characterizing him as 'Hillary's Lawyer' is reductive

"J. Anthony Jordan is President of the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York"

True

Jordan held this position and did make statements critical of Pomerantz's book

"Pomerantz is in 'great legal jeopardy'"

Mostly False

While ethical concerns were raised, characterizing it as 'great legal jeopardy' is hyperbolic. No criminal charges resulted.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Post ts_109820701380748562

Context

This is one of several posts in a sustained thread attacking Mark Pomerantz over his book about the Manhattan DA's Trump investigation. The post combines personal reactive language with carefully sourced legal authority quotations.

Personality Framework

Level 1 (Traits): Low agreeableness (combative, accusatory), moderate neuroticism (angry hostility, vulnerability to perceived attack), low openness (rigid self-concept).

Level 2 (Motives): Dominantly agency-driven — the goal is to neutralize a legal threat by delegitimizing the accuser. The appeal to J. Anthony Jordan serves instrumental status protection.

Level 3 (Narrative): Trump casts himself as the wrongly persecuted protagonist and Pomerantz as a corrupt, money-hungry antagonist linked to "Hillary." The redemption arc implied: Trump endures witch hunts but truth vindicates him.

Clinical Observations

The DARVO pattern is textbook: deny ("I have done nothing wrong!"), attack (Pomerantz is in "great legal jeopardy"), reverse victim/offender (the prosecutor is the real criminal). This is consistent across all posts in the thread.

Cognitive Markers

No significant cognitive concerns. The post is coherent and logically structured, albeit in service of a one-sided argument. The "Hillary's Lawyer" attribution appears to be a factual claim worth noting — Pomerantz did represent Clinton interests in prior matters.

Archetypal Pattern

Victim archetype dominant, with Warrior undertones — the persecuted fighter who turns his accusers' weapons against them.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Pomerantz represented Hillary Clinton"	Mostly True	Pomerantz's firm had Clinton-related clients, though characterizing him as 'Hillary's Lawyer' is reductive
"J. Anthony Jordan is President of the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York"	True	Jordan held this position and did make statements critical of Pomerantz's book
"Pomerantz is in 'great legal jeopardy'"	Mostly False	While ethical concerns were raised, characterizing it as 'great legal jeopardy' is hyperbolic. No criminal charges resulted.

Overall Veracity: 67%