In Minnesota, they thought they would be spending three million dollars on children with autism. - Yes. - And they were gonna invest this three million dollars to give the kids who were there, not every child has autism, but you know, what enough do that there was gonna be a need to pay families to help these kids get through their days and manage their issues. Fine, the budget now is 400 million dollars. So, forget about the fact that it's more than 130 times more money. Who's gonna take care of the kids if all the kids are diagnosed with autism? Why does every child have autism? Because they started paying moms to lie that their children had autism, 'cause they could get paid money, and the kids who don't need services now are forced to take care of services because we're paying the service providers to take care of kids who don't have a problem. So you understand that it's a perverse process where if you don't do it, they think you're dumb. I'm paying the moms, I'm paying the providers, the kids, God bless them, have no idea this is happening, and you're just ripping money out of the system, but also diluting care for the kids who need it. This is what political patronage and dishonesty in these precious programs does. And again, the money's not the primary problem. It's hurting the people who are most vulnerable. Hubert Humphrey, whose name is on this building that I'm in right now in Washington, he said something beautiful, and he's a Democrat, by the way. He said, "It is the moral obligation of government "to take care of those at the dawn of their life, "which are our children. "We cover 53% of kids in America. "Most children are covered by Medicaid, "by our insurance or CHIP. "To take care of those at the twilight of life, "those are our seniors. "Every great society takes care of its seniors. "We're great people, we're gonna do that. "You've worked your whole life, you've contributed. "We respect you for that, we would help you." So those are the dawn of life, those are the twilight of life, and those living in the shadows, the kids and the adults and also people in the shadows. We've gotta take care of these people. Our fellow man needs our help, cowardly acts running from the challenges of dealing with corruption, of powerful forces who can influence what's going on in your life, who are uncomfortable to fight against. Nobody wants to fight the Russian mob in LA, but someone's gotta do it. I mean, my goodness, they elected you. Go do your job.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
AI Day Analysis
Machine-generated analysis of the 2026-02-05 posts below. Not written by their author.
Forty-five posts, zero anger: a template-driven endorsement day that escalated in scope, not heat, ending on nuclear supremacy and stolen elections
A busy but oddly calm day: 45 posts, none of them angry. Most of the volume was routine campaign-season work — a run of near-identical congressional endorsements, links to friendly coverage, and clips of surrogates praising the economy — much of it apparently written by staff and a large share of it him simply re-posting his own posts, sometimes the same video four times. The tone tightened as the day went on, moving from Iowa district endorsements to a threat to militarily secure a British-held island base, a sweeping claim to have personally prevented three nuclear wars, and a late declaration that American elections are "rigged, stolen, and a laughingstock." That last claim sat seven minutes after he boasted about his own record-setting South Carolina vote totals, on the same day the last US-Russia nuclear arms treaty quietly expired. Two of the day's biggest stories — that treaty lapsing, and the racist AI video of the Obamas he later deleted — never got a post at all.