Search Posts

This is a massive Obama scandal, massive. What took place here is disgusting and it's outrageous. Now, December 9, 2016, President Trump is elected. He's not sworn in yet. Obama asks for a new intelligence reassessment report showing how Russia influenced the 2016 election. So now they want to rewrite history with their media and create the idea that this was an illegitimate election. December 9, 2016, thank you Tulsi Gabbard for pointing this out. January 6, 2017, new assessment released. They get it done in less than a month. That contradicts the previous assessment that said, well there may have been Russian involvement but it didn't have any great impact whatsoever. It's based mostly on Hillary's dossier. So there's that and there's actually much more. Here I have the dorm report. There's one analyst out there that says we didn't learn anything new. We have the dorm report and so I reread this damn thing and it is thorough and he condemns what took place in the administration. It was called crossfire hurricane. Facts and circumstances that were inconsistent with the premise that Trump and/or persons associated with the Trump campaign were involved in a collusive or conspiratorial relationship with the Russian government were ignored or simply assessed away. He says they were false, flatly false and he goes through the report and he lists it all very very thorough. But who's not questioned? Obama. Who doesn't have to provide any documents? Obama. Obama has been able to hide under the radar this entire time even though way back eight and a half years ago I suggested he was to Sven Gali. Tulsi Gabbard has now demonstrated through evidence in the possession of the government that he was in fact involved and heavily so. Here's what she said the other night on Fox. Russia did not have the intended capability to try and impact the outcome of the US election leading up to Election Day. Now people can quibble over that. That's not my focus. The same assessment was made after Donald Trump was elected by the American people as president in 2016. She said defeating Hillary Clinton and it wasn't until after that president's daily brief document that the principal's committee was called in the National Security Council. President Obama then directed his DNI James Clapper to lead the effort to create this new intelligence community assessment. That's right and that's what they did and Obama wanted it. Why? To undermine the Trump presidency. To raise serious questions about the election. Then we have part of the cover-up. Here we have Susan Rice in this email that was discovered basically by the Senate on January 5 following a briefing by IC leadership on Russia hacking during the 2016 presidential election. President Obama had a brief follow-up conversation with FBI Director Jim Comey, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in the Oval Office, Vice President Biden and I were also present right Susan Rice. President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the intelligence and law enforcement communities by the book. They knew the Trump people were coming in. They didn't know if they were able to cover up enough of it. They knew at some point somebody would find out something. Tulsi Gabbard in this case six months later. The president stressed that he's not asking about initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book. But they didn't. Did they? Now we get these legal analysts out there. They're all like sheep. We have an immunity decision almost exactly a year ago when it comes to the President of the United States and they say well even if you do an investigation you can't really prosecute him. What's happened to these lawyers? Have they become illiterate? Do they not know how to read a Supreme Court decision? Let me help them out which I always feel an obligation to do. This decision says a federal grand jury indicted former President Donald Trump on four counts for conduct that occurred during the presidency following the November 2020 election. The indictment alleged that after losing the election Trump conspired to overturn it by spreading knowingly false claims of election fraud to obstruct the collecting, counting, and certification of election results. Trump moved to dismiss the indictment based on presidential immunity arguing that a president has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions performed within the outer perimeter of his official responsibilities and that the indictments allegations fell within the core of those official duties and the court agreed with him. But the court explained under our constitutional structure of separation of powers the nature of presidential power entitles a former president to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution ready for actions taken within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority and he's entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts. Wow so that takes you to this issue of presumptive immunity because what Barack Obama didn't what he did was it within his official acts what he did was he he moved from his official acts and he asked the CIA and the others to do something that was corrupt not part of his official act part of his official acts would be as if Obama ordered taking out a terrorist in Yemen which he did and it turns out that he takes out the terrorists but also kills his 15 year old son who's a US citizen. Obama can't be prosecuted for that that's part of its official acts that's fine but when a President of the United States says I need a new assessment effectively telling the agencies and the rest I need to get Trump that's not within your official action so what would happen in court if they brought some charges you would have this presumptive immunity allegation and then you would have to overcome the presumption so that people say there's absolute immunity when it comes to what this is alleging what Toby Gabbard has released there's not absolute immunity there's presumptive immunity that can be overcome so I explained this now what else they say well what crime was committed and what about the statute of limitation now this is pretty funny coming from the people who went after Donald Trump for two years in the second massive Obama Biden scandal and that's this you conduct an investigation you don't need probable cause you just need some reasonableness to think that some crimes have been committed by Obama maybe a surrogates maybe a staff and so forth and you open your investigation which is what the Department of Justice has done we have these things that we call process crimes right potential obstruction false statements destruction of records and that sort of thing during the course of the investigation so there's always that there's no statute of limitations on that and furthermore there may be criminal activity that we're not aware of that specifically addresses what Obama did we don't know you know why we don't know nobody's ever asked them nobody's ever questioned him nobody's ever gotten his records not the FBI not prosecutors at DOJ not Congress nobody has ever questioned investigated gotten documents from Barack Obama why not why not he was the mob boss and the president in investigating Donald Trump there's no need anymore to withhold an investigation to stop an investigation to prevent an investigation he's a private citizen you don't even have to charge him with anything maybe he has information relevant to other people you might want to charge or maybe not but you need to conduct your investigation Barack Obama needs to be investigated he needs to be thoroughly investigated there need to be document requests that includes emails text everything else same with his cabinet the people involved who are named same with them to get to the bottom of this this is a real scandal it is massive congratulations to Tulsi Gabbard who is focused on the fact that it was Obama who was the ringmaster and the fact that as I'm pointing out now he's never been questioned under oath he's never been forced to provide any information nothing that needs to end tonight

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.