Analysis: While all agree the U. S. President has the complete power t...

9y ago Jul 22, 2017 at 11:35 AM

While all agree the U. S. President has the complete power to pardon, why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us.FAKE NEWS

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-11. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

55%

This tweet marks an early, significant instance of Trump publicly asserting presidential pardon power in the context of the Russia investigation—a theme that would escalate over subsequent years. The post's psychological structure is notable: it performs a double-move of asserting absolute authority (grandiose state) while simultaneously claiming victimhood from leaks (vulnerable state), all within a single compressed message. The reaction formation is clinically interesting—the very act of raising pardons while denying any crime reveals the anxiety the legal frame is designed to contain. The projection of criminality onto leakers and media, combined with the false consensus device ("all agree"), represents characteristic reality-distortion defenses. This post is a longitudinal anchor point for tracking the escalation of pardon-related discourse and defensive legal posturing throughout the Trump presidency.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Early morning timing (7:35 AM EDT)
Missing space in 'us.FAKE NEWS'
Stream-of-consciousness mid-sentence pivot
Emotional escalation from legal framing to ALL CAPS
Characteristic rhetorical pattern

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Russia investigation / Washington Post reporting on pardon research)

Rage: Intensity 40% targeting media / leakers

Proportionality

50%

Sentiment

-0.50

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

60%

Antisocial

30%

Paranoid

50%

Sadism

10%

Defense Mechanisms:

reaction formationprojectiondenial

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

45%

Cognitive Markers:

tangentiality

Parasocial Techniques:

False consensus ('all agree')In-group solidarity ('against us')Shared victimhood framing

Danger Assessment

None

Gaslighting Detected:

Reframes active federal investigation as illegitimate ('only crime is LEAKS')
False consensus claim ('all agree') on contested legal question

Reality Distortions:

Claims universal agreement on complete pardon power—contested by legal scholars
Frames leaks as the 'only crime' despite active investigation into Russian interference and possible obstruction

Fact Checks (1)

"All agree the U.S. President has complete power to pardon"

Mostly False

Constitutional scholars debated the scope of pardon power, particularly regarding self-pardons and pardons to obstruct justice. There was no consensus that the power was 'complete' in the way implied.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Analysis: Presidential Pardon Power Tweet (July 22, 2017)

Context

This tweet arrives amid escalating Russia investigation coverage. The Washington Post had reported on Sessions' contacts with the Russian ambassador, and Trump's legal team was exploring the scope of presidential pardon power. The post is a preemptive framing exercise: asserting absolute pardon authority while simultaneously denying any need for it.

Authorship

Posted at 11:35 UTC = 7:35 AM EDT. Trump was in Norfolk, VA for the USS Gerald Ford commissioning. Early morning, stream-of-consciousness style, irregular punctuation ("us.FAKE NEWS" with no space), and the emotional pivot mid-sentence all point to authentic Trump composition.

Psychological Analysis

The post reveals a characteristic double-move: (1) assert power, (2) deny the need for it. This is a textbook reaction formation—researching pardons while claiming innocence. The phrase "only crime so far is LEAKS against us" performs several functions: reframes the investigation as persecution, positions Trump as victim, and redirects blame.

The shift from legal assertion to "FAKE NEWS" in a single unpunctuated run betrays emotional leakage—the composed legal framing collapses into reactive affect.

Rhetorical Note

"While all agree" is a false consensus device. The constitutional scope of pardon power was actively debated, not universally agreed upon. "Against us" uses first-person plural, invoking in-group solidarity and casting leaks as attacks on the collective, not just Trump.

Clinical Significance

This post is notable as an early marker of pardon-power preoccupation, which would become a recurring theme through 2020-2021. The simultaneous assertion and denial pattern is consistent with narcissistic defenses against mounting legal threat.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"All agree the U.S. President has complete power to pardon"	Mostly False	Constitutional scholars debated the scope of pardon power, particularly regarding self-pardons and pardons to obstruct justice. There was no consensus that the power was 'complete' in the way implied.

Overall Veracity: 20%