Analysis: You can be an @nfl player with murder charges and not be sus...

11y ago May 13, 2015 at 7:55 PM

You can be an @nfl player with murder charges and not be suspended. Yet with NO EVIDENCE, @nfl targeted Tom Brady. B.S.!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-07. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Grandiose

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

40%

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Business hours but emotionally charged
Informal 'B.S.!' exclamation
Opinion-driven sports commentary
No polished formatting

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Grandiose State

Trigger: Maintenance (NFL Deflategate controversy)

Sentiment

-0.40

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

20%

Antisocial

Paranoid

10%

Sadism

Defense Mechanisms:

splitting

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

40%

Parasocial Techniques:

alignment with popular figureshared outrage

Fact Checks (2)

"NFL player with murder charges was not suspended"

Mostly False

Aaron Hernandez was immediately released by the Patriots and placed on the Commissioner's Exempt List. He was effectively removed from the league, though technically the NFL did not issue a formal 'suspension' since the team cut him first.

"No evidence against Tom Brady"

Mostly False

The Wells Report found it 'more probable than not' that Brady was generally aware of ball deflation and that he failed to cooperate fully with the investigation. Whether this constitutes sufficient evidence is debatable, but 'NO EVIDENCE' is an overstatement.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Tom Brady / NFL Post (2015-05-13)

This post references the NFL's Deflategate suspension of Tom Brady, comparing it to the league's handling of players facing murder charges (likely referencing Aaron Hernandez). Trump positions himself as a defender of fairness for Brady.

Authorship

Posted at 3:55 PM ET (Trump was in New York area, preparing for New Hampshire trip the next day). Business hours, but the emotional tone, "B.S.!" exclamation, and opinion-driven content suggest authentic Trump rather than aide-written. The informal register and moral outrage are characteristic.

Personality Analysis

Trump uses a sports controversy to perform a familiar role: the truth-teller who calls out institutional unfairness. This is a low-stakes version of his broader anti-establishment narrative. He sides with a popular winner (Brady) against a powerful institution (NFL), rehearsing the template he would later use in political contexts.

Psychological State

This is a maintenance/supply-seeking post. No personal narcissistic injury is present. Trump is engaging with a popular cultural controversy to signal his values (fairness, loyalty to winners) and build audience connection. The outrage is performative rather than deeply felt.

Defense Mechanisms

Splitting is mildly present: the NFL is cast as unjust, Brady as wronged. This is a simple good/bad framework but within normal rhetorical bounds for social media commentary.

Rhetorical Techniques

False equivalence (murder charges vs. equipment violations)
Appeal to outrage
Institutional critique
Strategic alignment with popular figure

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"NFL player with murder charges was not suspended"	Mostly False	Aaron Hernandez was immediately released by the Patriots and placed on the Commissioner's Exempt List. He was effectively removed from the league, though technically the NFL did not issue a formal 'suspension' since the team cut him first.
"No evidence against Tom Brady"	Mostly False	The Wells Report found it 'more probable than not' that Brady was generally aware of ball deflation and that he failed to cooperate fully with the investigation. Whether this constitutes sufficient evidence is debatable, but 'NO EVIDENCE' is an overstatement.

Overall Veracity: 20%