Analysis: Not since Watergate have we been going thru a time like this...

13y ago May 14, 2013 at 5:27 PM

Not since Watergate have we been going thru a time like this--Benghazi, IRS, wiretapping of @AP...

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-22. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Grandiose

Authorship

Uncertain

Intensity

45%

This May 2013 post represents an early, relatively calibrated instance of Trump's political brand-building voice — notable as a longitudinal baseline rather than a clinical anomaly. Posted on an exceptionally news-dense day (simultaneous Benghazi whistleblower hearing, IRS admission, AP phone records revelation), the post leverages the Watergate analogy to stake authority as a clear-eyed political observer. The narcissistic expression is grandiose but mild: self-positioning as historical commentator rather than victim or warrior. The three real, confirmed scandals provide factual scaffolding — the distortion operates at the level of degree (Watergate equivalence) rather than fabrication, a key distinction from later baseline deviations. Defense mechanisms are neurotic-tier (rationalization, displacement), the healthiest register observed in this subject. No rage, no dehumanization, no violent imagery, no danger indicators. Authorship is likely authentic Trump (informal register, trailing ellipsis, reactive timing) posted during business hours with possible light editorial involvement. The trailing ellipsis is the most psychologically telling element: it performs an open-ended grievance list, inviting followers to extend the catalogue — a parasocial technique that builds shared outrage without requiring Trump to specify claims he cannot support. The post's archetypal function is herald/prophet, seeding contamination narrative (America in crisis under corrupt incumbents) years before the formal campaign archetype crystallized. Suitable as 2013 factual-calibration baseline for longitudinal studies of later reality distortion escalation.

Authorship Analysis

Uncertain

Indicators:

Informal contraction 'going thru' consistent with authentic Trump orthography
Trailing ellipsis implying unfinished thought — characteristic Trump rhetorical signature
Em dash used as conversational pause, not structured punctuation
Posted 1:27 PM EDT — business hours slightly favors aide, but political reactivity is personal
No polished grammar or event-announcement format typical of Scavino posts

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Grandiose State

Trigger: Supply Seeking (IRS/Benghazi/AP news cycle)

Sentiment

-0.55

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

35%

Antisocial

10%

Paranoid

35%

Sadism

Defense Mechanisms:

rationalizationdisplacement

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

35%

Parasocial Techniques:

Historical authority appeal (Watergate reference signals insider seriousness)Shared outrage construction — invites audience to confirm the crisis framingEllipsis creates open-ended invitation for followers to extend the grievance list

Fact Checks (4)

"Not since Watergate have we been going thru a time like this"

Unverifiable

Comparative severity judgment between Watergate and current scandal cluster is a contested political opinion, not a falsifiable claim. Functions as rhetorical amplification.

"Benghazi [as ongoing crisis]"

True

House Oversight Committee held whistleblower hearing on this date with Thompson, Hicks, and Nordstrom testifying. The Benghazi investigation was actively ongoing.

"IRS [targeting scandal]"

True

IRS Exempt Organizations Director Lois Lerner publicly admitted inappropriate targeting of Tea Party/conservative groups at ABA conference on this exact date. Treasury IG report also released this day confirming the practice.

"Wiretapping of @AP"

Mostly True

DOJ secretly obtained two months of AP telephone records as part of a leak investigation — confirmed and reported this week. 'Wiretapping' is technically imprecise (subpoenaed historical records, not real-time interception) but captures the core privacy violation the AP itself condemned.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis — x_334359292843003904 (2013-05-14)

Authorship Attribution

Local time: UTC 17:27 → EDT (UTC−4) = 1:27 PM in New York. Other same-day posts confirm Trump was in New York (the "32° in New York — it's freezing!" post). Business-hours timing marginally favors aide involvement, but the post's stylistic fingerprints lean authentic: informal contraction ("going thru"), em dash used as a breath pause rather than structured punctuation, and a trailing ellipsis implying more left unsaid — a characteristic Trump rhetorical signature. The emotional reactivity aligns with his known pattern of rapid-response political commentary. Confidence: medium. Most likely authored by Trump directly, possibly light-touch drafted by an aide given the time of day.

Situational Context

The post lands on an extraordinarily dense news day. The House Oversight Benghazi whistleblower hearing (Thompson, Hicks, Nordstrom) was live or freshly concluded; the IRS scandal broke publicly via Lois Lerner's ABA conference admission; the AP phone records seizure had just been revealed. Trump, at 66, is a private citizen with significant political brand-building ambitions — the post functions as opportunistic alignment with conservative grievance, staking political territory without formal candidacy.

Level 1 — Dispositional Traits (Big Five)

The post is too brief for robust trait profiling but shows several salient facets:

Extraversion (high): Assertive public declaration; self-positioning as political commentator with authority.
Agreeableness (low): No hedging, no empathy for those implicated; adversarial framing.
Neuroticism — angry hostility facet (moderate-high): Reactive to political events; emotionally charged historical comparison.
Openness (low): Forecloses interpretive nuance; presents a scandal stack as self-evidently catastrophic without qualifications.
Conscientiousness: Mixed — the post is organized (enumeration) but relies on implication rather than argument.

Dominant facet: Assertiveness (extraversion), driving an unsolicited political verdict.

Level 2 — Characteristic Adaptations (Goals, Motives, Schemas)

Agency motives dominate. The post asserts status as a credible political observer — a power/authority claim with no institutional basis at this stage of Trump's career. The move is textbook status maintenance through affiliation with dominant narratives.

Schema revealed: The world is a stage for political combat in which corruption by elites is the norm, requiring bold exposers to name it. Self-cast as an insider-outsider who sees clearly what others dare not say.

Supply-seeking component: The post solicits validation from the conservative audience forming around him. The Watergate comparison amplifies urgency, making agreement feel historically consequential.

Level 3 — Narrative Identity

Protagonist role: Cassandra/clear-eyed observer. Not yet the Warrior or Savior (those come with candidacy), but the prophet who names the rot.
Contamination sequence: America was good → a cascade of government abuses (Benghazi → IRS → AP surveillance) has corrupted the present moment. The trailing ellipsis implies more is coming, amplifying the contamination arc.
Identity claim: "I am the one who recognizes historical significance when others won't." The Watergate invocation positions Trump as historically literate and morally alarmed.
Contrasting other: Obama administration (unnamed but unmistakably implied). The passive construction ("we have been going thru") diffuses agency, leaving the villain implied rather than specified — a measured rhetorical choice.

Level 4 — Clinical Indicators

Malignant narcissism elements (this post):

Narcissistic features: Mild to moderate. Grandiosity in adopting the authoritative historian's voice without any institutional credential for it.
Antisocial features: Minimal in this post — no deceit, no contempt for rules expressed.
Paranoid features: Present, though calibrated. Stacking three government-overreach scandals reflects a suspicion schema consistent with paranoid ideation, but notably these were real events confirmed that day. The pattern is more opportunistic than delusional at this point.
Sadism: Absent.

Narcissistic state: Grandiose — expansive authority claim, no victimhood.

Trigger type: Preemptive positioning/supply-seeking. Not a narcissistic injury; rather, a political opportunity to accumulate ideological capital.

Rage: Absent. Tone is more prosecutorial than enraged — a studied gravity.

Defense Mechanisms

Rationalization (neurotic): The Watergate comparison provides an intellectual-seeming framework that amplifies the political valence of the scandals beyond what the evidence strictly supports.
Displacement (neurotic): Anger at a diffuse sense of national decline is channeled into named political targets.
Denial is not operative here — interestingly, Trump accepts the reality of these events rather than denying them (the inverse of his later epistemic pattern).

Rhetorical & Propaganda Techniques

Historical analogy (Watergate): Anchors urgency and implies presidential-level criminality by association.
Stacking/enumeration: Three scandals in rapid succession overwhelms with quantity, foreclosing individual scrutiny of each. Classic RAND Firehose lite.
Ellipsis as implication: The trailing "..." performs an unfinished list, suggesting the known outrages are just the visible tip.
False gravity through vagueness: "A time like this" is undefined, allowing each reader to project their worst fears.
Dehumanizing language: Absent.
Violent imagery: Absent.
Stochastic terrorism indicators: Absent.

Gaslighting / Reality Distortion

Minimal. The factual scaffolding is largely accurate (IRS targeting admitted that day; AP records seizure confirmed; Benghazi hearings live). The distortion is in degree — the Watergate comparison is hyperbolic — rather than fabrication. This is consistent with a 2013 baseline in which Trump's factual claims, while often slanted, were not yet systematically divorced from verifiable reality.

No DARVO pattern. No denial of documented events.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Not since Watergate have we been going thru a time like this"	Unverifiable	Comparative severity judgment between Watergate and current scandal cluster is a contested political opinion, not a falsifiable claim. Functions as rhetorical amplification.
"Benghazi [as ongoing crisis]"	True	House Oversight Committee held whistleblower hearing on this date with Thompson, Hicks, and Nordstrom testifying. The Benghazi investigation was actively ongoing.
"IRS [targeting scandal]"	True	IRS Exempt Organizations Director Lois Lerner publicly admitted inappropriate targeting of Tea Party/conservative groups at ABA conference on this exact date. Treasury IG report also released this day confirming the practice.
"Wiretapping of @AP"	Mostly True	DOJ secretly obtained two months of AP telephone records as part of a leak investigation — confirmed and reported this week. 'Wiretapping' is technically imprecise (subpoenaed historical records, not real-time interception) but captures the core privacy violation the AP itself condemned.

Overall Veracity: 83%