Analysis: ...they are costly, inefficient, bird killing, community des...

13y ago Nov 13, 2012 at 4:11 PM

...they are costly, inefficient, bird killing, community destroying machines. They are obsolete! @maddow

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-22. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Grandiose

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

50%

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Direct tagging of adversarial media figure
Emotional intensity and staccato style
Escalating negative descriptors
Picking fights characteristic of authentic Trump

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Grandiose State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Defeat (Obama re-election)

Rage: Intensity 40% targeting Wind energy / Rachel Maddow / Obama energy policy

Proportionality

30%

Sentiment

-0.70

Mildly Hypomanic

Picking fights with media figuresRapid-fire posting across multiple topics

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

40%

Antisocial

10%

Paranoid

10%

Sadism

20%

Defense Mechanisms:

displacementdevaluation

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

30%

Parasocial Techniques:

direct provocation of media figurepositioning as truth-teller against establishment consensus

Fact Checks (2)

"Wind turbines are obsolete"

False

Wind energy was growing rapidly in 2012 and continues to expand globally. US wind capacity grew 28% in 2012 alone.

"Wind turbines are bird killing"

Half True

Wind turbines do kill birds (estimated 140,000-500,000 per year in US at the time) but far fewer than cats, buildings, or fossil fuel pollution.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Analysis: Anti-Wind Turbine Tweet @Maddow (2012-11-13)

This is a continuation of a thread (begins with "...they are") attacking wind turbines, directed at Rachel Maddow. The ellipsis opening indicates this is a multi-part tweet, with the first part likely making the initial claim about wind energy.

Authorship

Posted at 16:11 UTC = 11:11 AM EST. Trump was likely in New York. Business hours, but the emotional intensity, lack of polish, and direct tagging of a media figure he disagrees with suggest authentic Trump. The staccato declarative style and escalating adjective chains are characteristic.

Psychological Analysis

This post targets both wind energy and Maddow (liberal media figure). The chain of negative descriptors ("costly, inefficient, bird killing, community destroying") builds rhetorically to the dismissive "They are obsolete!" — a classic devaluation pattern. Tagging Maddow serves as a dominance display, picking a fight with a prominent liberal commentator days after Obama's re-election victory.

Context

Coming just days after Obama's re-election (a narcissistic injury), Trump's aggression toward liberal targets and clean energy policy is consistent with displaced frustration. His deleted election-night tweetstorm shows the injury was acute; this post channels residual anger into policy grievance.

Rhetorical Devices

The list structure creates an illusion of comprehensive evidence. "Bird killing" and "community destroying" are emotionally loaded compound modifiers designed to reframe environmental technology as environmentally destructive — an ironic reversal.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Wind turbines are obsolete"	False	Wind energy was growing rapidly in 2012 and continues to expand globally. US wind capacity grew 28% in 2012 alone.
"Wind turbines are bird killing"	Half True	Wind turbines do kill birds (estimated 140,000-500,000 per year in US at the time) but far fewer than cats, buildings, or fossil fuel pollution.

Overall Veracity: 25%