Analysis: Tom Steyer who, other than Mini Mike Bloomberg, spent more d...

6y ago Mar 1, 2020 at 10:30 AM

Tom Steyer who, other than Mini Mike Bloomberg, spent more dollars for NOTHING than any candidate in history, quit the race today proclaiming how thrilled he was to be a part of the the Democrat Clown Show. Go away Tom and save whatever little money you have left!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-19. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Grandiose

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

48%

This post represents a baseline grandiose-state attack on a departing rival, triggered by Tom Steyer's withdrawal from the Democratic primary. Psychologically, it is low-stakes offensive posturing — a dominance display against a target who has already surrendered, functioning primarily as base-engagement supply-seeking. The defining psychological mechanism is devaluation: Steyer is reduced to a financial punchline, his $1.6 billion fortune rhetorically compressed to near-nothing, his campaign participation recast as endorsement of absurdity. Mild ego-syntonic sadism is visible in the 'Go away Tom' construction, which carries pleasure in dismissal that exceeds any strategic purpose. Rhetorically, the post is efficient: 'Democrat Clown Show' achieves collective derogation of an entire field in three words, while the financial superlative ('more dollars for NOTHING than any candidate in history') lands with false authority. Authorship is near-certainly authentic: 5:30 AM EST posting, unedited double-word typo, and unmediated dismissive register all point to Trump composing in real time. The post sits against a backdrop of escalating COVID-19 crisis — first community transmission confirmed, CDC warnings of severe disruption — which Trump's attention entirely bypasses in favor of Democratic primary taunting. This selective attention is itself a behavioral data point, though not analyzed within the post's text. No clinical deviation from established baseline; no danger indicators present.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Posted at 05:30 AM EST (10:30 UTC) — firmly within Trump's characteristic early-morning window
Double-word typo: 'part of the the Democrat Clown Show' — classic unedited composition artifact
Stream-of-consciousness structure with parenthetical aside mid-sentence
Dismissive imperative tone ('Go away Tom') without diplomatic softening
Established nickname deployed ('Mini Mike Bloomberg') — personal Trump coinage

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Grandiose State

Trigger: Supply Seeking (Tom Steyer's withdrawal from Democratic primary)

Sentiment

-0.62

Mildly Hypomanic

Early morning posting (5:30 AM)Energized dismissiveness — punching at a target who has already concededMultiple simultaneous posts on the same morning across multiple Democratic rivals

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

75%

Antisocial

30%

Paranoid

10%

Sadism

45%

Defense Mechanisms:

devaluationsplittingrationalization

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

42%

Cognitive Markers:

perseveration

Parasocial Techniques:

Shared contempt bonding — audience invited to laugh alongside Trump at SteyerVictory-lap framing positions Trump as already-winning against a shrinking fieldIn-group/out-group reinforcement via 'Clown Show' label

Fact Checks (4)

"Tom Steyer quit the race today"

True

Steyer suspended his campaign on the night of February 29, 2020, following Biden's South Carolina primary victory. This post is March 1 morning.

"Steyer spent more dollars for NOTHING than any candidate in history (other than Bloomberg)"

Mostly False

Steyer spent approximately $253 million on his 2020 campaign — an extraordinary sum for a candidate who won zero delegates. However, 'more than any candidate in history' is factually incorrect on its face: Bloomberg was still in the race having spent over $500 million at this point, and various historical campaigns (adjusted for inflation) complicate the claim further. The 'NOTHING' characterization is editorializing, not fact.

"Steyer 'proclaiming how thrilled he was'"

Half True

Steyer's withdrawal statement was characteristically gracious — standard exit rhetoric for any candidate. Trump's framing implies hollow or absurd enthusiasm, but exit statements routinely include positive framing regardless of outcome. The ironic construction misleads about the nature of the statement without being entirely fabricated.

"Save whatever little money you have left"

False

Steyer's estimated net worth at the time was approximately $1.6 billion. His $253M campaign expenditure, while substantial, left him far from impoverished. The 'little money' framing is demonstrably false as a financial characterization.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Trump on Tom Steyer's Withdrawal (March 1, 2020)

Authorship Attribution — HIGH CONFIDENCE: Authentic Trump

Posted at 05:30 AM EST (10:30 UTC, Washington DC timezone). This falls squarely within Trump's documented early-morning posting window. The unedited double-word error — "part of the the Democrat Clown Show" — is the strongest single authentic indicator: staff-composed posts are proofread; this one wasn't. The stream-of-consciousness construction (subordinate clause → main action → ironic aside → dismissive command) mirrors Trump's unmediated syntax. Aide-written posts at this period follow business hours and produce clean copy.

Psychological State & Trigger

Trump is in an unambiguously grandiose state — offensive rather than defensive. Steyer's withdrawal presents zero threat; this post is pure opportunism. The trigger is supply-seeking: a retreating opponent provides ideal conditions for a dominance display that generates base engagement at no rhetorical risk.

No narcissistic injury is present. This is the psychological equivalent of a touchdown dance.

The financial shaming register is particularly revealing. Steyer's net worth at the time was approximately $1.6 billion; Trump's framing of him as nearly depleted ("save whatever little money you have left") is objectively false. But the psychological function is clear: rhetorical status inversion — reducing a billionaire peer to a figure of financial pity through assertion alone.

Defense Mechanisms

Mechanism	Level	Evidence
Devaluation	Immature	Steyer reduced entirely to financial failure metric; no other attributes acknowledged
Splitting	Immature	"Democrat Clown Show" — totalizing negative categorization
Rationalization	Neurotic	Mockery dressed as financial advice ("save whatever little money you have left")

The mild ego-syntonic sadism is visible in the construction "Go away Tom" — a phrase with zero political utility, present solely for the pleasure of dismissal. This is consistent with Kernberg's description of sadism as a dominance-display function rather than reactive cruelty.

Rhetorical Technique

The post is rhetorically efficient. "Democrat Clown Show" achieves collective derogation of an entire primary field in three words, simultaneously:

Reducing Steyer's participation to absurdist complicity
Pre-immunizing Trump's base against taking any Democratic candidate seriously
Requiring no specific factual engagement

The historical superlative ("more dollars for NOTHING than any candidate in history") is a rhetorical device, not a factual claim — constructed to be unfalsifiable while landing with the force of settled fact. Bloomberg had spent more at this point and was still in the race, making the claim false even on its own terms.

"Mini Mike Bloomberg" is deployed parenthetically — almost dismissively — as if Bloomberg requires no fresh contempt, merely reference. The nickname functions as a status marker already burned into the public record.

Narrative Identity (McAdams Level 3)

Trump casts himself as the dominant winner surveying a diminishing field of lesser rivals. The narrative sequence imposed on Steyer is contamination: good intentions (candidacy) → catastrophic waste (millions spent) → humiliation (zero results) → ridiculous exit ("thrilled" to have been part of a clown show). This contamination framing is applied to all Democratic candidates as a class.

The contrasting other is Steyer as archetype: the wealthy dilettante who believed money could substitute for legitimacy — a particularly pointed contrast given Trump's own background, and potentially a projection worth noting.

Cognitive Assessment

No markers of concern. Sentence structure is intact, logical sequence coherent, vocabulary within established register. The "the the" repetition is compositional haste, not a cognitive error. Consistent with 2020 baseline. Trajectory: stable.

Contextual Note

This post is composed against the backdrop of a rapidly escalating COVID-19 crisis: the first U.S. community transmission had just been confirmed, CDC Director Messonnier had issued a stark public warning, and congressional pressure over the administration's response was intensifying. Trump's attention in this post is directed entirely toward Democratic primary entertainment. This selective attention is itself a behavioral data point — though the post's text provides no surface evidence of it.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Tom Steyer quit the race today"	True	Steyer suspended his campaign on the night of February 29, 2020, following Biden's South Carolina primary victory. This post is March 1 morning.
"Steyer spent more dollars for NOTHING than any candidate in history (other than Bloomberg)"	Mostly False	Steyer spent approximately $253 million on his 2020 campaign — an extraordinary sum for a candidate who won zero delegates. However, 'more than any candidate in history' is factually incorrect on its face: Bloomberg was still in the race having spent over $500 million at this point, and various historical campaigns (adjusted for inflation) complicate the claim further. The 'NOTHING' characterization is editorializing, not fact.
"Steyer 'proclaiming how thrilled he was'"	Half True	Steyer's withdrawal statement was characteristically gracious — standard exit rhetoric for any candidate. Trump's framing implies hollow or absurd enthusiasm, but exit statements routinely include positive framing regardless of outcome. The ironic construction misleads about the nature of the statement without being entirely fabricated.
"Save whatever little money you have left"	False	Steyer's estimated net worth at the time was approximately $1.6 billion. His $253M campaign expenditure, while substantial, left him far from impoverished. The 'little money' framing is demonstrably false as a financial characterization.

Overall Veracity: 43%