Analysis: Now we find out that Adam Schiff was spending time together ...

7y ago Feb 8, 2019 at 6:41 PM

Now we find out that Adam Schiff was spending time together in Aspen with Glenn Simpson of GPS Fusion, who wrote the fake and discredited Dossier, even though Simpson was testifying before Schiff. John Solomon of @thehill

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-17. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

Elevated

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

68%

Published on the day of Whitaker's high-stakes AG testimony, this post demonstrates Trump's characteristic pivot from defensive to offensive: having cited Burr's "no collusion" finding moments earlier, he now attacks incoming investigative threat Adam Schiff. The post contains multiple verifiable errors — the organization is "Fusion GPS" not "GPS Fusion"; Christopher Steele, not Glenn Simpson, wrote the dossier — errors consistent with authentic impulsive composition under emotional pressure at 72. Psychologically, the post is organized around paranoid-defensive projection: Schiff is accused of inappropriate contact with a witness in a move that mirrors accusations Trump faces about inappropriate contact with foreign actors. The DARVO structure is precise — the inquisitor becomes the criminal, the investigated becomes the victim. The relished quality of "Now we find out" suggests ego-syntonic pleasure in the exposure of a perceived persecutor, consistent with ego-syntonic sadism in the malignant narcissism framework. Danger rating is elevated: while containing no explicit violence, the sustained named targeting of Schiff as corrupt — distributed to tens of millions of followers — constitutes a documented precursor environment for the death threats Schiff received throughout this period. The mild cognitive marker (organizational name transposition) is worth longitudinal tracking but does not independently signal decline. The post's primary clinical significance is as a stable data point in the paranoid-defensive Russia-investigation response pattern.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

'GPS Fusion' name transposition instead of correct 'Fusion GPS' — authentic error pattern
'Now we find out that...' reactive framing characteristic of authentic Trump
Trailing journalist attribution ('John Solomon of @thehill') matches documented Trump habit
Post published 1:41 PM EST — business hours weakens authentic signal
Stream-of-consciousness clause structure without polished editing

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Adam Schiff / House Intelligence Committee investigation threat)

Rage: Intensity 65% targeting Adam Schiff

Proportionality

20%

Sentiment

-0.72

Baseline Deviation: slight

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

78%

Antisocial

55%

Paranoid

72%

Sadism

50%

Defense Mechanisms:

projectiondenialsplittingrationalization

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

32%

Cognitive Markers:

name confusion

Parasocial Techniques:

Shared outrage invitation ('Now we find out')In-group epistemic bonding around Schiff-as-corrupt frameJournalistic citation as credibility transfer

Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:

Named targeting of Adam Schiff as corrupt — Schiff received documented death threats throughout this period
Criminal-adjacent framing ('even though Simpson was testifying') implies ethical violation without due process
Distribution to millions of followers of target-identified, grievance-laden content constitutes aggregate stochastic precursor pattern
No explicit call to action, but consistent enemy-identification across post series

Gaslighting Detected:

'Fake and discredited Dossier' — characterizes nuanced intelligence document as entirely fabricated
DARVO pattern: investigator (Schiff) recast as the true criminal; investigated (Trump) as victim
Implied impropriety frame presented as self-evident without establishing what norms were violated or when contact occurred
Factual error (Simpson 'wrote' dossier; Steele wrote it) substitutes more partisan-coded name, obscuring intelligence source credibility

Reality Distortions:

Dossier characterized as 'fake and discredited' — partially corroborated, largely unverified, not comprehensively discredited
Glenn Simpson attributed as author — Christopher Steele authored the dossier; Simpson's firm commissioned it
Organization named 'GPS Fusion' — correct name is 'Fusion GPS'
Social contact in Aspen framed as self-evidently improper without establishing timeline, nature, or applicable ethical rules

Fact Checks (4)

"Adam Schiff was spending time together in Aspen with Glenn Simpson"

Half True

John Solomon reported accounts of both attending Aspen-area events. Contact may have occurred; the impropriety framing is editorial and disputed. Context and timing of any contact is not established in the post.

"Glenn Simpson of GPS Fusion"

Mostly False

The organization is correctly named 'Fusion GPS,' not 'GPS Fusion.' Glenn Simpson is a co-founder of Fusion GPS — that identification is accurate. The name transposition is an error.

"who wrote the fake and discredited Dossier"

Mostly False

The Steele Dossier was written by Christopher Steele, a former MI6 officer — not Glenn Simpson. Fusion GPS contracted Steele. The dossier has not been comprehensively discredited: some claims corroborated by subsequent reporting, many unverified, some disputed. 'Fake' is not supported by available evidence.

"even though Simpson was testifying before Schiff"

Unverifiable

Simpson testified before congressional committees. Whether Schiff personally presided over relevant Simpson testimony concurrent with alleged Aspen contact requires precise timing documentation not available from post content alone.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: February 8, 2019 — "Now we find out that Adam Schiff..."

Authorship Attribution

The post was published at 18:41 UTC, which converts to 1:41 PM EST in Washington, D.C. (Trump's location on this date — he had delivered the SOTU on Feb 5 and was in Washington during the Whitaker hearing). Business hours on a weekday leans toward aide-assisted, but several internal markers suggest authentic or minimally edited Trump:

"Now we find out that..." — characteristic reactive framing, present-tense dramatic revelation
"GPS Fusion" instead of the correct "Fusion GPS" — a name transposition error consistent with authentic Trump; aides would typically get the organization name correct
Stream-of-consciousness clause structure with embedded accusation
The pattern of citing a friendly journalist ("John Solomon of @thehill") as trailing attribution is a documented Trump habit
Emotional reactivity consistent with same-day events (Whitaker testimony, Mueller pressure)

Assessment: Likely authentic Trump with possible light editorial shaping. Confidence: medium-high.

Contextual Trigger

February 8 is a maximally charged day for the Russia investigation narrative: Acting AG Whitaker was testifying before House Judiciary for six hours about non-interference with Mueller. The Senate Intelligence Committee's "no collusion" finding (cited in the immediately prior post) gave Trump offensive ammunition. This post pivots from that defensive win to an attack on Adam Schiff — who as new House Intelligence Committee chair represented the next investigative threat. The timing is tactically coherent: pair exonerating news with an offense against the incoming investigator.

Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five)

Extraversion (high): Assertive, public accusation with no hedging
Agreeableness (very low): Openly adversarial, zero conciliation
Conscientiousness (low): The "GPS Fusion/Fusion GPS" transposition suggests impulsive composition without review
Neuroticism (elevated): Angry hostility, preoccupation with being investigated
Openness (very low): Rigid, closed epistemic frame; "fake and discredited" admits no ambiguity

Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations

Agency motives dominate: This post is about power and control — specifically neutralizing Adam Schiff before Schiff's committee can threaten Trump. The motive is not information-sharing but target-painting.

Schema revealed: The post encodes a schema in which anyone investigating Trump is themselves corrupt, and in which all roads of wrongdoing lead back to the investigators. This inverted guilt schema is the core organizing principle of Trump's Russia-narrative response across hundreds of posts.

Paranoid vigilance: "Now we find out" performs the function of constant threat-monitoring — the world is full of hidden treacheries being perpetually uncovered.

Level 3: Narrative Identity

Protagonist role: Exposed truth-teller and wronged subject; simultaneously righteous accuser
Narrative sequence: Contamination — legitimate political process (congressional oversight) revealed as secretly corrupted from the start
Identity claims: Implicitly: "I am the target of a rigged investigation run by compromised actors"
Contrasting other: Adam Schiff — cast as hypocritical inquisitor who fraternizes with the witnesses he purports to oversee

The narrative structure is the inverse persecution frame: the persecutor is secretly the criminal. This is a recurring mythological inversion throughout Trump's communication about the Russia investigation.

Level 4: Clinical Indicators

Malignant Narcissism Profile

A. Narcissistic Features: Entitlement to freedom from oversight; contempt for Schiff's authority; complete absence of self-reflection about own conduct.

B. Antisocial Features: Willingness to publicly accuse without demonstrated evidence; disregard for procedural norms around disparaging congressional witnesses.

C. Paranoid Features: (High salience) The post encodes a surveillance mentality — monitoring where Schiff goes, who he meets, treating social contact as conspiracyevidence. The leap from "they were in Aspen at the same time" to "improper collusion" reflects paranoid ideation applied to political enemies.

D. Ego-Syntonic Sadism: The pleasure in the accusation is palpable — "Now we find out" has the quality of relished exposure. Humiliation of Schiff as the purported corrupt inquisitor is the emotional payoff.

Defense Mechanisms

Projection (immature): Accusing Schiff of inappropriate contact with a witness is structurally mirroring the accusations Trump faces about inappropriate contact with foreign actors. The psychological inversion is precise.
Denial (pathological): "Fake and discredited Dossier" — the Steele Dossier is neither fully fake nor universally discredited. This is wholesale reality rejection, not nuanced disagreement.
Splitting (immature): Binary world: Schiff/Simpson/dossier are entirely corrupt; Trump/Burr finding/Solomon are entirely righteous. No gradation permitted.
Rationalization (neurotic): Citing John Solomon as the sourcing lends pseudo-journalistic legitimacy to what is an accusatory frame.

Cognitive Status

Notable marker: "GPS Fusion" for "Fusion GPS" — a transposition of the two-word name. This could represent:

Simple typing error / impulsive composition
Mild semantic/organizational memory slippage — confusion of well-established proper noun

At 72, and tracking longitudinally, this type of name/organization transposition is worth logging. It is not alarming in isolation but contributes to a pattern worth monitoring. Baseline from Trump's 1990s media appearances shows significantly higher verbal precision with proper nouns.

Syntactic complexity: Below baseline — simple declarative sentence, comma splices, dangling attribution. Consistent with authentic impulsive posting rather than cognitive decline per se.

Rhetorical & Propaganda Techniques

"Now we find out" — dramatic revelation framing; creates urgency and implies hidden conspiracy
Ad hominem: Schiff is characterized by association (corrupt company = corrupt man) rather than substantive argument
Appeal to authority: John Solomon of The Hill as sourcing — Solomon is a documented pro-Trump investigative journalist; citation performs credibility while selecting sympathetic source
Loaded language: "fake and discredited" — pre-emptive epistemic closure
Guilt by association: Schiff meeting Simpson = Schiff compromised; no causal mechanism established
Whataboutism: Implicitly: if investigators are corrupt, investigation is corrupt
RAND Firehose: This post is one of five posts on Feb 8 alone; the volume and subject-switching (SOTU praise → astronauts → Burr vindication → Schiff attack) creates epistemically overwhelming daily output

Gaslighting & Reality Distortion

"Fake and discredited Dossier": The Steele Dossier is a mixed document — some claims corroborated, many unverified, some disputed. Characterizing it as entirely fake misrepresents a nuanced intelligence document.
Implied impropriety: The post frames Schiff's alleged presence with Simpson in Aspen as self-evidently scandalous ("even though Simpson was testifying before Schiff") without establishing what norms were violated, when the contact occurred, or its nature.
DARVO pattern: Reverse Victim and Offender — the investigator is the criminal; the investigated is the victim.

Danger Assessment

Level: Elevated. No explicit violence, but the post contributes to the sustained targeting of Adam Schiff as corrupt and criminal. Schiff received credible death threats throughout this period. The cumulative effect of posts like this — identifying Schiff by name, assigning criminal-adjacent conduct, distributing to millions of followers — constitutes a stochastic terrorism precursor pattern in the aggregate, even if no single post crosses the threshold alone. Schiff is the designated target; the grievance (corrupt investigation) is articulated; no explicit call to action is present.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Adam Schiff was spending time together in Aspen with Glenn Simpson"	Half True	John Solomon reported accounts of both attending Aspen-area events. Contact may have occurred; the impropriety framing is editorial and disputed. Context and timing of any contact is not established in the post.
"Glenn Simpson of GPS Fusion"	Mostly False	The organization is correctly named 'Fusion GPS,' not 'GPS Fusion.' Glenn Simpson is a co-founder of Fusion GPS — that identification is accurate. The name transposition is an error.
"who wrote the fake and discredited Dossier"	Mostly False	The Steele Dossier was written by Christopher Steele, a former MI6 officer — not Glenn Simpson. Fusion GPS contracted Steele. The dossier has not been comprehensively discredited: some claims corroborated by subsequent reporting, many unverified, some disputed. 'Fake' is not supported by available evidence.
"even though Simpson was testifying before Schiff"	Unverifiable	Simpson testified before congressional committees. Whether Schiff personally presided over relevant Simpson testimony concurrent with alleged Aspen contact requires precise timing documentation not available from post content alone.

Overall Veracity: 35%

Summary

This post exemplifies the sustained paranoid-defensive architecture Trump deployed around the Russia investigation. Published on the same day as the Whitaker AG testimony — maximum investigative pressure — the post pivots from defensive (Burr's "no collusion") to offensive (Schiff as secretly corrupt), a strategic alternation consistent with a grandiose-paranoid oscillation pattern. The name transposition ("GPS Fusion" for "Fusion GPS") and stream-of-consciousness construction suggest authentic composition under emotional pressure. Psychologically, the post is driven by narcissistic injury (investigation as existential threat to self-narrative) and defended through projection, denial, and splitting. The targeting of Schiff — who would spend subsequent years as Trump's most consistent institutional antagonist — is consistent with early-identification-of-threat dynamics. The claim that Simpson "wrote" the dossier (Steele wrote it) is a factual error that also deflects from Steele's intelligence credibility by substituting a more partisan-coded name. The post is clinically significant as a longitudinal data point in the Russia-investigation response pattern rather than as an outlier event.