Analysis: Thank you to Amy Kremer, Women for Trump Co-Founder, for doi...

7y ago Jan 18, 2019 at 6:36 AM

Thank you to Amy Kremer, Women for Trump Co-Founder, for doing such a great interview with Martha MacCallum...and by the way, women have the lowest unemployment numbers in many decades - at the highest pay ever. Proud of that!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-16. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Grandiose

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

22%

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

UTC 06:36:01 = 1:36 AM EST — solidly in late-night authentic window
Ellipsis mid-sentence ('...and by the way') is signature Trump stream-of-consciousness pivot
Informal 'Proud of that!' sentence fragment as a standalone closer
Absence of polished event-announcement structure — no links, no schedule info
Name-dropping a mid-tier supporter rather than a formal organizational statement

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Grandiose State

Trigger: Supply Seeking (Women for Trump supporter media appearance)

Sentiment

+0.72

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

35%

Antisocial

Paranoid

Sadism

Defense Mechanisms:

rationalizationidealization

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

32%

Parasocial Techniques:

Name validation loop: publicly praising supporter who is publicly praising him, cementing mutual loyaltyEconomic metric as personal identity marker — women's employment = Trump's achievement

Fact Checks (2)

"Women have the lowest unemployment numbers in many decades"

Mostly True

Women's unemployment in late 2018 reached approximately 3.6%, the lowest since the early 1950s. This is factually well-supported. The 'many decades' framing is accurate, though the trend was a continuation of the recovery trajectory that began under the Obama administration in 2010.

"Women are at the highest pay ever"

Half True

In nominal dollar terms this is trivially true (nominal wages rise over time with inflation). In real (inflation-adjusted) terms, wage growth for women in 2018-2019 was positive but not historically exceptional. The claim is technically accurate but misleading without the inflation-adjustment caveat.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Post Analysis: 2019-01-18 | x_1086074701313536000

Authorship

Verdict: Authentic Trump (high confidence)

UTC 06:36 converts to 1:36 AM EST in Washington D.C. where Trump was based during the shutdown. This falls squarely in the late-night authentic window. The mid-sentence ellipsis pivot ("...and by the way") is a signature Trump rhetorical move — redirecting from acknowledgment of another person to self-congratulatory content. The terminal sentence fragment "Proud of that!" is stylistically consistent with his authenticated posting pattern.

Psychological State

The post is in the grandiose register and is low in clinical intensity. It represents routine narcissistic maintenance/supply-seeking: Trump amplifies a loyalist's media appearance (Women for Trump Co-Founder Amy Kremer on Fox News), which in turn generates reflected admiration back toward himself. The loop is self-sealing — he praises her for praising him.

The "by the way" pivot is the psychologically interesting element. The post begins in a communal register (thanking someone) but cannot sustain that register; it quickly colonizes the gratitude frame to deliver an agentic achievement claim. This reflects the characteristic low agreeableness / high agency motive profile: even expressions of thanks serve the self.

Trigger: Supply-seeking / maintenance. No narcissistic injury is detectable. This contrasts notably with both the January 17 posts, which show reactive splitting and contempt ("totally unhinged," "groveling Schumer"). The affective shift from hostile to positive within 24 hours is consistent with the oscillation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic states observed longitudinally.

Strategic Context

The post functions as a reality pivot. The week's dominant news included the damaging Washington Post story (January 12–13) alleging Trump concealed his Putin conversation details — a story with national security implications that framed him as potentially compromised. The government shutdown (Day 28) was generating negative coverage. By redirecting to women's employment metrics and a loyal surrogate, this post:

Changes the subject to favorable economic ground
Reinforces the Women for Trump constituency heading into 2020 cycle
Claims personal credit for macroeconomic trends regardless of causal link

Narrative Identity

Trump casts himself here as the Achiever/Deliverer: a leader who produces concrete, measurable, record-breaking results for a specific constituency (women). The implicit contrasting other is prior administrations who did not achieve these figures. The narrative sequence has a mild redemptive quality — the shutdown chaos context makes any "record" claim feel like a counter-narrative.

Rhetorical Analysis

The post is structurally a gratitude-vehicle for self-promotion: the thanks to Kremer is genuine but also instrumental. Superlatives ("lowest... in many decades," "highest pay ever") follow Trump's established pattern of converting any favorable statistic into a historical record. The "ever" qualifier on pay is technically true in nominal terms but misleading without inflation adjustment — a habitual rhetorical move.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Women have the lowest unemployment numbers in many decades"	Mostly True	Women's unemployment in late 2018 reached approximately 3.6%, the lowest since the early 1950s. This is factually well-supported. The 'many decades' framing is accurate, though the trend was a continuation of the recovery trajectory that began under the Obama administration in 2010.
"Women are at the highest pay ever"	Half True	In nominal dollar terms this is trivially true (nominal wages rise over time with inflation). In real (inflation-adjusted) terms, wage growth for women in 2018-2019 was positive but not historically exceptional. The claim is technically accurate but misleading without the inflation-adjustment caveat.

Overall Veracity: 65%

Clinical Summary

Below threshold for clinical significance. This is a low-intensity, positive-affect maintenance post. No paranoid features, no rage, no dehumanizing language. Cognitive markers are consistent with baseline. The post's primary clinical interest is as a data point in the grandiose/vulnerable oscillation cycle — it serves as a positive-register counterpoint to the reactive splitting posts of January 17.