Analysis: The Democrats policy of Child Seperation on the Border durin...

7y ago Dec 16, 2018 at 4:25 PM

The Democrats policy of Child Seperation on the Border during the Obama Administration was far worse than the way we handle it now. Remember the 2014 picture of children in cages - the Obama years. However, if you don’t separate, FAR more people will come. Smugglers use the kids!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-16. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

52%

This post exhibits a clinically significant DARVO pattern (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) in response to narcissistic injury from sustained criticism of the Trump administration's family separation policy. The subject inverts documented policy ownership — attributing a formal Trump-administration enforcement mandate to "Democrats" and the Obama administration — and asserts the inverted version was "far worse," requiring wholesale distortion of the factual record. Three simultaneous defense mechanisms operate: projection (relocating the policy to adversaries), pathological distortion (inverting documented history), and rationalization (retrofitted justification via smuggling claim). The post constitutes structured gaslighting: it demands audience acceptance of a factually reversed narrative as the condition of in-group alignment. The dehumanizing element, while subtle, is structurally functional — "Smugglers use the kids" reframes asylum families as criminal instruments, stripping their humanity. Read in context of five same-day posts (Cohen, FBI texts, SNL, Mueller, Golsteyn), December 16, 2018 represents a high-reactivity defensive cluster under multi-front pressure from Cohen's sentencing and the Butina guilty plea. Authorship is likely authentic (medium-high confidence) based on the misspelling "Seperation," ALL CAPS emphasis, and staccato dictation register. No cognitive decline markers beyond baseline are present. Danger level is rated none for direct violence, though the post's normalization of family separation via false attribution represents systemic rhetorical harm.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Misspelling 'Seperation' for 'Separation' — characteristic orthographic error unlikely to survive aide editing
ALL CAPS 'FAR' — recurring authentic Trump intensifier pattern
Staccato exclamatory closing ('Smugglers use the kids!') — dictation-register affect
Stream-of-consciousness pivot mid-post from blame attribution to rationalization
Part of a 5-post reactive cluster consistent with authentic daytime emotional posting

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Criticism (Sustained public condemnation of Trump administration family separation policy)

Rage: Intensity 35% targeting Critics of family separation policy, Democrats, Obama administration

Proportionality

15%

Sentiment

-0.48

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

72%

Antisocial

48%

Paranoid

38%

Sadism

10%

Defense Mechanisms:

projectiondistortionrationalization

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

32%

Parasocial Techniques:

Inviting audience to 'Remember' a specific image — false shared memory constructionRhetorical urgency ('Smugglers use the kids!') activating audience fear response

Danger Assessment

None

Gaslighting Detected:

Inverts documented policy ownership — 'The Democrats policy of Child Separation' when Trump's AG issued the formal mandate
DARVO structure — reverses victim (separated children/families) and offender (administration that mandated separation)
Selective partial-truth deployment — leverages genuine 2014 detention images to construct false historical equivalence
Demands audience accept factually inverted narrative as condition of in-group alignment
Attacks collective memory of who formally mandated separation

Reality Distortions:

'Democrats policy of Child Separation during the Obama Administration' — no formal separation mandate existed; Trump's AG Sessions issued zero-tolerance directive April 2018
'Far worse than the way we handle it now' — inverts documented record; zero-tolerance produced thousands of separations via explicit government mandate
Framing 2014 detention facility images as equivalent to 2018 mandated separation policy — conflates outcome similarity with causal policy equivalence

Rhetorical Analysis

Dehumanizing Language Present

Fact Checks (5)

"The Democrats policy of Child Separation on the Border during the Obama Administration"

False

Obama administration had no formal family separation mandate. Trump AG Jeff Sessions issued explicit zero-tolerance policy memo in April 2018 ordering criminal prosecution of all illegal border crossings, producing mandatory family separation as a consequence.

"Was far worse than the way we handle it now"

False

Trump's zero-tolerance policy produced thousands of family separations in concentrated period through deliberate enforcement mandate. No Obama-era equivalent formal directive exists. Inspector General and congressional investigations documented the 2018 policy as unprecedented in scale and intent.

"Remember the 2014 picture of children in cages - the Obama years"

Half True

Some 2014 CBP processing facility images showing crowded chain-link enclosures exist and circulated in 2018 debates. However, the most viral 'children in cages' images that drove 2018 controversy were from Trump's zero-tolerance implementation. The 2014 images documented a border surge crisis; the 2018 images documented a policy-mandated separation regime.

"If you don't separate, FAR more people will come"

Unverifiable

Causal deterrence claim. Academic research on immigration deterrence effects of enforcement measures shows mixed and contested findings. Claim cannot be verified or falsified from available evidence.

"Smugglers use the kids"

Half True

Documented cases of non-parental adults bringing children across the border exist. However, the claim is deployed to justify blanket separation of all families including verified parent-child units seeking asylum, which constitutes overgeneralization. DHS data showed the majority of separated children were with biological parents.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: December 16, 2018 — Border Child Separation Post

Authorship Attribution

Posted at 11:25 AM EST (Washington DC, December 2018)—solidly within business hours—which initially suggests possible aide authorship. However, several authentic-Trump stylometric markers override the timing inference: (1) the misspelling "Seperation" (for "Separation") is a characteristic orthographic error unlikely to survive aide editing; (2) ALL CAPS emphasis on "FAR" is a recurring authentic Trump intensifier; (3) the exclamatory, clipped closing sentence ("Smugglers use the kids!") has the staccato affect of unmediated dictation; and (4) the stream-of-consciousness structure—pivoting mid-post from blame attribution to rationalization—lacks the coherent arc of aide-constructed messaging. Read alongside five other posts on the same date, this belongs to a defensive, reactive posting cluster consistent with authentic daytime authorship. Confidence: Medium-High.

Psychological State and Triggers

This post is best understood as a DARVO operation (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) triggered by narcissistic injury. The proximate wound: the Trump administration's April 2018 zero-tolerance policy—explicitly mandating criminal prosecution and consequent family separation—had generated sustained domestic and international condemnation. Michael Cohen's sentencing on this very date, alongside the Butina guilty plea, placed the subject under multi-front legal and reputational pressure, generating a high-reactivity posting day (five additional tweets on collusion, FBI, Cohen, SNL, and a military case).

The trigger profile is narcissistic injury—specifically, being publicly identified as the originator of a policy widely characterized as cruel and rights-violating. The response follows a clinically predictable sequence: (1) attribute the criticized behavior to the adversary; (2) assert the adversary's version was objectively worse; (3) offer rationalization legitimizing the behavior.

Narcissistic state: Mixed. The post oscillates between grandiose positioning ("far worse than the way we handle it now," implying current superiority) and the underlying vulnerability of a purely defensive posture. The very structural need to deflect—rather than assert confidence—betrays the wounded register beneath the assertive framing.

Defense Mechanisms

Three defenses operate simultaneously:

Projection (Immature/Level 2): The family separation policy is explicitly attributed to "Democrats" and "the Obama Administration." The subject disowns an unacceptable quality—responsibility for child separation—and relocates it entirely in the adversary. The phrase "The Democrats policy" is the tell: ownership is being transferred, not debated.
Distortion (Pathological/Level 1): Reality is grossly reshaped to meet internal need. The Obama administration had no formal family-separation mandate; Trump's AG Sessions issued an explicit zero-tolerance directive in April
Claiming Obama's handling was "far worse" requires wholesale inversion of the documented record. This is not honest error but functional distortion.
Rationalization (Neurotic/Level 3): "If you don't separate, FAR more people will come. Smugglers use the kids!" provides post-hoc logical cover for a policy already generating backlash. The rationalization is reactive—deployed to justify after criticism, not as original policy reasoning. Its appearance at the end of the post, as an afterthought, marks it as retrofitted justification.

Rhetorical Analysis

Whataboutism: The entire post's structure is deflection—criticism of Trump's policy redirected to Obama/Democrats as the true culprit.
False attribution: "The Democrats policy of Child Separation" actively inverts documented policy ownership.
Appeal to fear: "FAR more people will come" invokes a threat of immigration surge to justify harsh measures.
Dehumanizing framing (subtle): Asylum-seeking families are implicitly recast as smuggling instruments; "Smugglers use the kids!" strips the children and their families of agentive humanity, reducing them to props in a criminal schema.
False equivalence: Crowded 2014 processing facilities during a documented border surge are equated with a formal 2018 separation mandate—conflating outcome similarity with policy equivalence.
Performative intensification: ALL CAPS "FAR" substitutes typographic affect for evidentiary weight.

Gaslighting and Reality Distortion

This post constitutes a structured gaslighting intervention aimed at the audience. The subject:

Inverts documented responsibility for a specific, dated policy directive (DARVO)
Deploys partial truth (some 2014 crowded detention images exist) to construct false equivalence between categorically different situations
Attacks collective memory of who formally mandated separation
Demands audience acceptance of a factually reversed narrative as the cost of in-group membership

The combination of these moves—not any single element—constitutes epistemic closure pressure. Followers who accept this post's framing must reject documented government records.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"The Democrats policy of Child Separation on the Border during the Obama Administration"	False	Obama administration had no formal family separation mandate. Trump AG Jeff Sessions issued explicit zero-tolerance policy memo in April 2018 ordering criminal prosecution of all illegal border crossings, producing mandatory family separation as a consequence.
"Was far worse than the way we handle it now"	False	Trump's zero-tolerance policy produced thousands of family separations in concentrated period through deliberate enforcement mandate. No Obama-era equivalent formal directive exists. Inspector General and congressional investigations documented the 2018 policy as unprecedented in scale and intent.
"Remember the 2014 picture of children in cages - the Obama years"	Half True	Some 2014 CBP processing facility images showing crowded chain-link enclosures exist and circulated in 2018 debates. However, the most viral 'children in cages' images that drove 2018 controversy were from Trump's zero-tolerance implementation. The 2014 images documented a border surge crisis; the 2018 images documented a policy-mandated separation regime.
"If you don't separate, FAR more people will come"	Unverifiable	Causal deterrence claim. Academic research on immigration deterrence effects of enforcement measures shows mixed and contested findings. Claim cannot be verified or falsified from available evidence.
"Smugglers use the kids"	Half True	Documented cases of non-parental adults bringing children across the border exist. However, the claim is deployed to justify blanket separation of all families including verified parent-child units seeking asylum, which constitutes overgeneralization. DHS data showed the majority of separated children were with biological parents.

Overall Veracity: 30%