AI Analysis
Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-09-01. Not written by the author of the post.
Sixth near-verbatim endorsement in a single-day Florida batch (FL-7, 9, 11, 14, 19, 22), posted 15:32 EDT. The five sibling posts in context establish this as a slot-filled template: identical opening, identical NO TAX ON TIPS/OVERTIME/SOCIAL SECURITY attack block, identical policy catalogue, identical closing. Only candidate name, biography tag, district number, and district adjective vary. Authorship is predominantly aide-composed within a Trump-authorized form (~0.15). Clinically low-information as a state measure. Every scoreable marker — grandiosity, splitting, superlative saturation — is a property of the reusable template, and therefore indexes a durable characteristic adaptation (endorsement as transferable personal currency; portable good/bad partition applied to six different people in one afternoon) rather than an acute condition. No narcissistic injury, no rage, flat promotional affect. Trigger is maintenance, plausibly amplified by pre-midterm vulnerability (~59% disapproval, same-day Dallas convention announcement). Two items merit flagging. First, "Transgender Mutilization of your Children" attributes intent to physically harm the audience's children to a named private opponent — the basis for an elevated danger rating despite absent call to action. Second, "Mutilization" is a frozen token recurring across Trump-branded endorsement letters, not a live word-finding failure; scoring it as a cognitive marker would produce spurious decline signal. Recommend flagging this and its five siblings as a template cluster and excluding them from cognitive-trajectory computation. They are better used as baseline control specimens against which spontaneous posts are measured.
- Posted 15:32 EDT — mid-afternoon business hours, typical staff posting window
- Sixth near-verbatim iteration of the same template in a single day (FL-7, FL-9, FL-11, FL-14, FL-19, FL-22)
- Fixed slot-filled structure: identical opening clause, identical NO TAX ON TIPS/OVERTIME/SOCIAL SECURITY attack block, identical policy enumeration, identical closing endorsement formula
- Only variables change between posts: candidate name, one-line biography, district number, district-resident adjective (tremendous/wonderful/fantastic/incredible)
- Clean parallel syntax, no self-interruption, no mid-post drift into personal grievance
Strongest facet: low agreeableness — modesty and tender-mindedness
Primary drive: power
Trigger: Maintenance (Pre-midterm endorsement batch; same-day Dallas 'Trumpapalooza' convention announcement; polling showing ~59% disapproval)
Elevated
- Attributes intent to physically harm children to a named private individual ('Transgender Mutilization of your Children') — accusation-of-child-harm is a historically recurrent pre-mobilization rhetorical structure
- Names a specific individual and labels her 'Dangerous' to a mass audience
- Escalating fear series moving from tax policy to bodily harm to the reader's own children
- Replicated at scale — the same threat block was published against at least six named opponents in a single day
- Recasts contested adolescent gender-medicine policy as 'Transgender Mutilization of your Children' — an attributed intent to physically harm the reader's children
- Attributes a specific set of tax positions to a non-incumbent opponent with no legislative record; template's sibling posts use 'voted against' for incumbents and silently downgrade to 'is opposed to' here, preserving the accusation while removing its evidentiary basis
- 'Open Borders' as an attributed policy position rather than a described one
- Absolute prediction of future conduct ('HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!') presented as guarantee
- 'our always under siege Second Amendment' — permanent-threat framing presented as settled fact
Violent Imagery Present
No evidence supports this attribution, and some evidence contradicts it. Dandiya is a first-time candidate for elected office who won the FL-22 Democratic primary in August 2026 with 68.6% of the vote against attorney Kaysia Earley. She has never held office, so there is no voting record on which an 'is opposed to' claim could rest. Her campaign website (piaforcongress.com and its /about page, both fetched directly) states no position whatsoever on taxation of tips, overtime, or Social Security benefits. Her stated priorities are the affordability crisis, congressional corruption, lowering healthcare costs, reinstating reproductive rights, and protecting 'Social Security, Medicaid and support for our veterans.' The Hy-Lo News FL-22 voter guide independently lists her as supporting 'protecting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and veterans benefits' — closer to the opposite of the attributed position. Her New Politics endorsement profile lists the same four issues. Decisively, the identical sentence appears verbatim in a same-day sibling endorsement (trumpstruth.org status 41450) attacking a different Democrat, Bale Dalton in FL-7: 'a Radical Left Democrat who is opposed to NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, and NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY.' The accusation is slot-filled template text, not a finding about Dandiya. The broader premise is also weak: the standalone No Tax on Tips Act (S.129) passed the Senate 100-0 by unanimous consent in May 2025, cosponsored by Democrats Jacky Rosen and Catherine Cortez Masto, with Rosen herself making the unanimous-consent request; Rep. Steven Horsford has repeatedly introduced the TIPS Act to make no-tax-on-tips permanent at a $112,500 cap. The only genuine hook is that every congressional Democrat voted against the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a package, which contained these provisions alongside Medicaid cuts. Additionally, the third item describes a policy that does not exist: OBBBA did not eliminate taxation of Social Security benefits. Rated mostly false rather than false because a blanket negative about every statement a candidate has made cannot be fully proven, and the party-line OBBBA vote is a thin but real basis.
Both halves are substantiated by documentary evidence. Military service: Askar's Marine Corps record was the subject of a significant 2020 controversy during his FL-19 primary run. Florida Politics obtained a Department of the Navy letter stating officials could not confirm that Kousay Askar — his legal name — served in the Marine Corps or Marine Reserves, and his campaign did not produce DD-214 discharge papers for more than 90 days. The discrepancy was traced to a misspelling: boot camp graduation materials bore the name 'Casey Asker,' and the Marine Corps subsequently confirmed to Florida Politics that a 'Casey Asker' enlisted in 1989, consistent with those materials. Military records later obtained via FOIA and provided to Florida Politics verified service in the Marine Reserves from Dec. 4, 1987 to Nov. 27, 1988, then active duty from Nov. 28, 1988 to Aug. 17, 1992 — four years active duty, discharged at the rank of Private. Business record: Askar is chairman and CEO of Askar Brands and the Askar Family Office. Trade publication Franchising.com documents a $200 million multi-brand quick-service and fast-casual portfolio built with his brother Sam, including 75 Dunkin' locations and 42 Church's Texas Chicken locations, plus franchisor interests in Papa Romano's, Blackjack Pizza, Papa's Pizza To Go, and Breadeaux Pizza; they acquired Papa Romano's in 2006, a multi-state Church's group in 2019, and 47 southeast Florida Dunkin' locations in 2020. Holdings also span commercial real estate, energy, and construction across roughly two dozen states. He raised $3.5 million and spent $3.66 million in the 2020 cycle, largely self-funded. Context not bearing on this claim but relevant to his biographical self-presentation: a separate 2020 complaint filed with the State Attorney's Office alleged he presented a Harvard Owner/President Management executive program — which confers no degree — as graduating from Harvard Business School; his campaign confirmed to the Naples Daily News that he completed the OPM program.
This is a prediction and therefore not strictly verifiable at the time of posting, but its factual premises are checkable and several are wrong. First, 'no tax on Social Security' does not exist and so cannot be terminated. PolitiFact rated Trump's identical claim Mostly False: the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed July 4, 2025, did not repeal taxation of Social Security benefits. It created a temporary additional $6,000 deduction for filers aged 65 and older, phasing out above $75,000 MAGI (single) and $150,000 (joint), and excluding beneficiaries aged 62-64, survivors, and disabled workers under 65. The Joint Committee on Taxation found 24 million Americans would still pay some tax on their benefits. Second, the tips and overtime provisions are capped federal income-tax deductions — up to $25,000 in qualified tips and $12,500 in overtime ($25,000 joint) — not exemptions; Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes still apply to both. Third, and most directly contradicting the claim, all three provisions sunset on Dec. 31, 2028 by the express terms of the Republican-drafted law itself. Their expiration is the default outcome of the enacted statute, not something a future Democratic majority would have to act to cause. Fourth, Democrats have actively worked to extend and expand these provisions rather than terminate them: the standalone No Tax on Tips Act (S.129) passed the Senate 100-0 by unanimous consent in May 2025 with Democratic cosponsors Rosen and Cortez Masto; Rep. Horsford introduced the TIPS Act and the TIP Improvement Act of 2026 to make the exemption permanent at a $112,500 cap while ending the subminimum wage; Rep. Gabriel Vasquez has called for permanent implementation. Tax Foundation analysis notes both parties have an interest in extending sunsetting provisions. The claim's one true kernel is that every congressional Democrat voted against OBBBA and the earlier budget resolution — but that was opposition to a reconciliation package containing Medicaid cuts and other provisions, not to these specific tax items.
This is false both as an attribution to Dandiya and as a description of any real policy position. On attribution: the sentence containing it appears word-for-word in a same-day sibling endorsement (trumpstruth.org status 41450) attacking a different Democrat, Bale Dalton in FL-7 — 'He wants massive Tax Increases, Open Borders, Men playing in Women's Sports, and Transgender Mutilization of your Children.' Only the pronoun changes between the two posts. It is reusable template text, not a claim derived from anything Dandiya has said. Dandiya's campaign website, fetched directly, contains no mention of transgender issues, gender-affirming care, or LGBTQ policy; the Hy-Lo News FL-22 voter guide describes her only as backing 'LGBTQ+ equality,' a generic formulation that is not equivalent to the attributed position. On framing: no mainstream candidate advocates mutilating children. The phrase is Trump's standing rhetorical characterization of gender-affirming medical care for minors, formalized in Executive Order 14187 of Jan. 28, 2025, titled 'Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation.' The underlying factual picture contradicts the imagery: gender-affirming surgery on minors is exceptionally rare, the World Professional Association for Transgender Health requires patients to reach the age of majority for genital surgery, and parental consent is required in the United States for non-surgical interventions such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy per American Academy of Pediatrics and WPATH standards. CNN fact-checked Trump's related claim that schools secretly send children for gender-affirming surgeries and rated it false; when asked for any supporting evidence, his campaign could produce none. FactCheck.org separately documented a pattern of Trump misstatements on transgender issues. Note also that 'Mutilization' is a recurring frozen token in Trump-branded endorsement letters and in his spoken remarks, not a one-off construction.
No contradictions with other posts detected yet.
Trump posted 38 times, starting late the night before and waking to post again before four in the morning. Most of the day was political housekeeping: fourteen candidate endorsements pushed out in about a quarter of an hour, then a run of disaster-aid announcements covering seven states and roughly ...
Overview
This is the sixth in a same-day series of near-identical congressional endorsement posts (FL-7, FL-9, FL-11, FL-14, FL-19, FL-22). The comparative evidence is unusually strong here: five prior posts in the provided context share the same opening clause ("It is my Great Honor to endorse America First Patriot, [Name], who is running to represent the [tremendous/wonderful/fantastic/incredible] people of Florida's Nth Congressional District!"), the same middle attack block ("opposed to NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, and NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY and, if [he/she] and the Dumocrats ever got in, all of these things will be terminated"), the same policy list ("Grow our Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Unleash American Energy DOMINANCE, Promote MADE IN THE U.S.A."), and the same closing formula ("Complete and Total Endorsement... HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!"). Only the slot-filled variables change: candidate name, biography tag, district number, and the adjective applied to the district's residents.
This is best understood not as a psychological utterance but as a template artifact — a communications product manufactured at industrial cadence. Analytic caution is warranted: nearly every marker one would normally code (grandiosity, splitting, superlatives, capitalization) is a property of the template rather than of the author's state at 19:32 UTC on this date.
Authorship
Time: 19:32 UTC = 15:32 EDT. Trump's likely location in early September 2026 is the Northeast/Washington corridor or Bedminster; either way this is mid-afternoon, squarely within staff business hours. Endorsement batches of this kind are produced by the political operation (Save America / MAGA Inc. endorsement shop) and posted in sequence.
Aide indicators: correct spelling throughout except the fixed template token "Mutilization"; complete, parallel sentence structures; no self-interruption, no mid-post drift into personal grievance; precise proper nouns (district numbers, opponent names, service branch); policy list rendered as a clean enumerated series; identical structure to five sibling posts. Nothing in the post is reactive to real-time stimulus.
"Mutilization" is worth flagging carefully. In isolation it would read as a phonemic/morphological error (a blend of "mutilation" and "utilization"/"sterilization"). But it recurs verbatim across Trump-branded endorsement letters, meaning it is a frozen lexical item in the house style, not a live word-finding failure. It should not be scored as a cognitive marker for this post. This is exactly the kind of item that generates false positives in longitudinal cognitive tracking if template-derived text is not segregated from spontaneous text.
Trump-voice conventions present but not diagnostic: idiosyncratic mid-sentence capitalization, "Dumocrats," "Complete and Total Endorsement." These are the ghostwriter's imitation of a known register — the register is the product, and it is reproducible by staff.
Estimate: ~0.15 (predominantly aide-composed within a Trump-authorized template). Confidence: high.
Psychological Content
Because the text is templated, the psychologically informative layer is not the sentence-level content but the system the template encodes. Three things are legible:
1. Endorsement as currency. The formula "my Complete and Total Endorsement" treats the speaker's approval as a transferable good with fixed denominations. The candidate's qualifications are subordinate to the transfer: Askar's biography occupies one clause, the endorsement framing occupies the opening and closing. The post is structurally about the endorser. This is a characteristic adaptation — a stable strategy for converting personal status into political obligation — rather than a momentary state.
2. Total splitting, industrialized. The rhetorical architecture is strictly binary and is applied identically to six different human beings in a single afternoon. Askar is "Brave," "successful," "Proven Record," "a WINNER!"; Dandiya is "Reckless, Radical, and Dangerous." No feature of either individual is examined. The template's function is to make the good/bad partition portable — a person's name is dropped into a slot and the valence attaches automatically. That the same paragraph condemns five different opponents with the same three adjectives is diagnostic of the schema, not of any assessment of the individuals.
3. Loyalty pledge. "HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!" is nominally directed at voters but functions as a public bond of fealty to the endorser; the implied inverse (letting me down) is the enforcement mechanism visible throughout Trump's endorsement history.
There is no evidence of narcissistic injury or rage in this post. Affect is flat-to-promotional. The trigger classification is maintenance/supply-maintenance: this is routine institutional activity in the pre-midterm period, consistent with the same-day announcement of the Dallas "Trumpapalooza" convention and with polling showing ~59% disapproval. If anything, the volume of the endorsement batch is a response to electoral vulnerability — an attempt to demonstrate continued kingmaker capacity as Republican control of Congress is reported at risk. That contextual read is medium confidence.
Rhetorical & Propaganda Analysis
- Nominal name-calling: "Dumocrats" — a schoolyard portmanteau, now a fixed template token.
- Fear appeal, escalating series: "massive Tax Increases, Open Borders, Men playing in Women's Sports, and Transgender Mutilization of your Children." Note the sequence's construction: it begins with a policy dispute and terminates in child bodily harm, with the possessive "your Children" inserted at the final position to convert an abstraction into a personal threat.
- Loaded framing: "Transgender Mutilization of your Children" is the most consequential phrase in the post. It attributes to a named private opponent an intent to physically harm the audience's children. Accusation-of-child-harm is a historically recurrent pre-mobilization rhetorical structure; whatever the policy dispute over adolescent medical care, this framing does not describe a policy position, it describes a predatory intent.
- Superlative saturation: "Great Honor," "tremendous," "Proven Record," "WINNER," "Incredible," "DOMINANCE," "Complete and Total."
- False dichotomy: signaled explicitly by the pivot "On the other hand."
- Siege framing: "our always under siege Second Amendment."
- Bandwagon/prophecy: "He is a WINNER!"
Dehumanizing language: absent in the strict sense (no vermin/animal/infestation imagery). Violent imagery: the "Mutilization" line invokes bodily harm but attributes it to the opponent rather than proposing it. Stochastic terrorism: the pattern is partially present — a specifically named target (Pia Dandiya), an articulated grievance (harm to children), but no implied action; the post channels the audience toward an electoral remedy. I do not score this as stochastic terrorism. The child-harm attribution against a named individual nonetheless justifies an elevated danger rating rather than none.
Fact Verification
| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| "Pia Dandiya is opposed to eliminating taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security benefits." | Mostly False | No evidence supports this attribution, and some evidence contradicts it. Dandiya is a first-time candidate for elected office who won the FL-22 Democratic primary in August 2026 with 68.6% of the vote against attorney Kaysia Earley. She has never held office, so there is no voting record on which an 'is opposed to' claim could rest. Her campaign website (piaforcongress.com and its /about page, both fetched directly) states no position whatsoever on taxation of tips, overtime, or Social Security benefits. Her stated priorities are the affordability crisis, congressional corruption, lowering healthcare costs, reinstating reproductive rights, and protecting 'Social Security, Medicaid and support for our veterans.' The Hy-Lo News FL-22 voter guide independently lists her as supporting 'protecting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and veterans benefits' — closer to the opposite of the attributed position. Her New Politics endorsement profile lists the same four issues. Decisively, the identical sentence appears verbatim in a same-day sibling endorsement (trumpstruth.org status 41450) attacking a different Democrat, Bale Dalton in FL-7: 'a Radical Left Democrat who is opposed to NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, and NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY.' The accusation is slot-filled template text, not a finding about Dandiya. The broader premise is also weak: the standalone No Tax on Tips Act (S.129) passed the Senate 100-0 by unanimous consent in May 2025, cosponsored by Democrats Jacky Rosen and Catherine Cortez Masto, with Rosen herself making the unanimous-consent request; Rep. Steven Horsford has repeatedly introduced the TIPS Act to make no-tax-on-tips permanent at a $112,500 cap. The only genuine hook is that every congressional Democrat voted against the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a package, which contained these provisions alongside Medicaid cuts. Additionally, the third item describes a policy that does not exist: OBBBA did not eliminate taxation of Social Security benefits. Rated mostly false rather than false because a blanket negative about every statement a candidate has made cannot be fully proven, and the party-line OBBBA vote is a thin but real basis. |
| "Casey Askar is a U.S. Marine Corps veteran and successful businessman." | True | Both halves are substantiated by documentary evidence. Military service: Askar's Marine Corps record was the subject of a significant 2020 controversy during his FL-19 primary run. Florida Politics obtained a Department of the Navy letter stating officials could not confirm that Kousay Askar — his legal name — served in the Marine Corps or Marine Reserves, and his campaign did not produce DD-214 discharge papers for more than 90 days. The discrepancy was traced to a misspelling: boot camp graduation materials bore the name 'Casey Asker,' and the Marine Corps subsequently confirmed to Florida Politics that a 'Casey Asker' enlisted in 1989, consistent with those materials. Military records later obtained via FOIA and provided to Florida Politics verified service in the Marine Reserves from Dec. 4, 1987 to Nov. 27, 1988, then active duty from Nov. 28, 1988 to Aug. 17, 1992 — four years active duty, discharged at the rank of Private. Business record: Askar is chairman and CEO of Askar Brands and the Askar Family Office. Trade publication Franchising.com documents a $200 million multi-brand quick-service and fast-casual portfolio built with his brother Sam, including 75 Dunkin' locations and 42 Church's Texas Chicken locations, plus franchisor interests in Papa Romano's, Blackjack Pizza, Papa's Pizza To Go, and Breadeaux Pizza; they acquired Papa Romano's in 2006, a multi-state Church's group in 2019, and 47 southeast Florida Dunkin' locations in 2020. Holdings also span commercial real estate, energy, and construction across roughly two dozen states. He raised $3.5 million and spent $3.66 million in the 2020 cycle, largely self-funded. Context not bearing on this claim but relevant to his biographical self-presentation: a separate 2020 complaint filed with the State Attorney's Office alleged he presented a Harvard Owner/President Management executive program — which confers no degree — as graduating from Harvard Business School; his campaign confirmed to the Naples Daily News that he completed the OPM program. |
| "If Democrats gained power, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on Social Security would all be 'terminated.'" | Mostly False | This is a prediction and therefore not strictly verifiable at the time of posting, but its factual premises are checkable and several are wrong. First, 'no tax on Social Security' does not exist and so cannot be terminated. PolitiFact rated Trump's identical claim Mostly False: the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed July 4, 2025, did not repeal taxation of Social Security benefits. It created a temporary additional $6,000 deduction for filers aged 65 and older, phasing out above $75,000 MAGI (single) and $150,000 (joint), and excluding beneficiaries aged 62-64, survivors, and disabled workers under 65. The Joint Committee on Taxation found 24 million Americans would still pay some tax on their benefits. Second, the tips and overtime provisions are capped federal income-tax deductions — up to $25,000 in qualified tips and $12,500 in overtime ($25,000 joint) — not exemptions; Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes still apply to both. Third, and most directly contradicting the claim, all three provisions sunset on Dec. 31, 2028 by the express terms of the Republican-drafted law itself. Their expiration is the default outcome of the enacted statute, not something a future Democratic majority would have to act to cause. Fourth, Democrats have actively worked to extend and expand these provisions rather than terminate them: the standalone No Tax on Tips Act (S.129) passed the Senate 100-0 by unanimous consent in May 2025 with Democratic cosponsors Rosen and Cortez Masto; Rep. Horsford introduced the TIPS Act and the TIP Improvement Act of 2026 to make the exemption permanent at a $112,500 cap while ending the subminimum wage; Rep. Gabriel Vasquez has called for permanent implementation. Tax Foundation analysis notes both parties have an interest in extending sunsetting provisions. The claim's one true kernel is that every congressional Democrat voted against OBBBA and the earlier budget resolution — but that was opposition to a reconciliation package containing Medicaid cuts and other provisions, not to these specific tax items. |
| "The opponent supports 'Transgender Mutilization of your Children.'" | False | This is false both as an attribution to Dandiya and as a description of any real policy position. On attribution: the sentence containing it appears word-for-word in a same-day sibling endorsement (trumpstruth.org status 41450) attacking a different Democrat, Bale Dalton in FL-7 — 'He wants massive Tax Increases, Open Borders, Men playing in Women's Sports, and Transgender Mutilization of your Children.' Only the pronoun changes between the two posts. It is reusable template text, not a claim derived from anything Dandiya has said. Dandiya's campaign website, fetched directly, contains no mention of transgender issues, gender-affirming care, or LGBTQ policy; the Hy-Lo News FL-22 voter guide describes her only as backing 'LGBTQ+ equality,' a generic formulation that is not equivalent to the attributed position. On framing: no mainstream candidate advocates mutilating children. The phrase is Trump's standing rhetorical characterization of gender-affirming medical care for minors, formalized in Executive Order 14187 of Jan. 28, 2025, titled 'Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation.' The underlying factual picture contradicts the imagery: gender-affirming surgery on minors is exceptionally rare, the World Professional Association for Transgender Health requires patients to reach the age of majority for genital surgery, and parental consent is required in the United States for non-surgical interventions such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy per American Academy of Pediatrics and WPATH standards. CNN fact-checked Trump's related claim that schools secretly send children for gender-affirming surgeries and rated it false; when asked for any supporting evidence, his campaign could produce none. FactCheck.org separately documented a pattern of Trump misstatements on transgender issues. Note also that 'Mutilization' is a recurring frozen token in Trump-branded endorsement letters and in his spoken remarks, not a one-off construction. |
Overall Veracity: 35%
Assessment
Clinically, this post is low-information. It is a manufactured artifact whose every scoreable feature is a property of a reusable form. Its value to a longitudinal record is as a baseline template specimen — the control condition against which spontaneous, late-night, error-bearing posts should be measured. Coding template posts and spontaneous posts on the same scale will systematically inflate apparent grandiosity and, in the case of tokens like "Mutilization," produce spurious cognitive-decline signal. Recommend flagging this and its five same-day siblings as a template cluster and excluding them from cognitive-trajectory computation.
Post from Truth Social
It is my Great Honor to endorse America First Patriot, Casey Askar, who is running to represent the tremendous people of Florida’s 22nd Congressional District!
A Brave U.S. Marine Corps Veteran, and now, as a successful Businessman, Casey has a Proven Record of Success — He is a WINNER! His opponent, Pia Dandiya, is a Radical Left Democrat who is opposed to NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, and NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY and, if she and the Dumocrats ever got in, all of these things will be terminated. She wants massive Tax Increases, Open Borders, Men playing in Women’s Sports, and Transgender Mutilization of your Children. Pia Dandiya is Reckless, Radical, and Dangerous!
On the other hand, as your next Congressman, Casey will work tirelessly to Grow our Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Unleash American Energy DOMINANCE, Promote MADE IN THE U.S.A., Strengthen our Incredible Military/Veterans, Keep our Border SECURE, Advance Election Integrity, and Defend our always under siege Second Amendment.
Casey Askar has my Complete and Total Endorsement to be the next Representative from Florida’s 22nd Congressional District — HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!