AI Analysis
Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-08-05. Not written by the author of the post.
A long-form advocacy post urging Senate passage of the Sunshine Protection Act, notable chiefly for what it lacks: no adversary, no grievance, no rage, no reality-substitution. Affect is expansive and positive; the register is benefactor rather than combatant. The self-enhancement engine remains fully intact — "no Administration has been able to get it done, until now" is structurally identical to his grievance-mode superiority claims — but here it operates without requiring a personified enemy. Communion motives are elevated above baseline ("Republicans, Democrats, and Independents can unite behind"). Diagnostically, the most informative feature is contrastive: three days after threatening Sens. Cornyn and Tillis with revival of the Anti-Weaponization Fund over a nomination, the same obstruction pattern (GOP senators with holds) is met with courtship rather than coercion. This supports reading self-enhancement as the stable trait and aggression as state-dependent and instrumentally recruited. Defenses are neurotic-level rationalization plus idealization, with distortion confined to evidentiary claims — most significantly the attribution to "Leading Medical... Studies" of support for permanent DST, when the sleep-medicine consensus favors permanent Standard Time. One cognitive marker warrants longitudinal tracking: "Cities and States with Watchtowers" in a passage about clock-resetting costs has the profile of a semantic paraphasia (clock towers → watchtowers) rather than a typo, and survived into published text. Single instance; not diagnostic alone. Danger level: none. Authorship: authentic dictated voice with policy-staff assembly.
- Idiosyncratic mid-sentence capitalization of common nouns (Majority, Cities, Bill, Millions, Robbery, Decrease)
- Signature closing formula 'Thank you for your attention to this matter!' — established marker of dictated long-form posts
- Third-person signature block 'President DONALD J. TRUMP'
- Apparent semantic error 'Watchtowers' (for clock towers) surviving into published text
- Oral-style redundant restatement: 'In other words, leave it as it is now, and never change again'
Strongest facet: Extraversion: assertiveness and positive affect, expressed as sustained salesmanship
Primary drive: achievement
Trigger: Maintenance (Senate Republican holds blocking the Sunshine Protection Act)
Fully confirmed by the primary legislative record and by contemporaneous reporting across the political spectrum. H.R. 139, the Sunshine Protection Act of 2025, was introduced by Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-FL) on January 3, 2025 and accumulated 34 cosponsors. The House passed it on July 14, 2026 by a bipartisan vote of 308-117. The bill was received in the Senate on July 15, 2026, read twice, and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Congress.gov hosts both the engrossed House version (BILLS-119hr139eh.pdf, styled 'AN ACT') and the Senate-referred version (BILLS-119hr139rfs.pdf, styled 'IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES'), the latter being documentary proof of transmittal to the Senate. Passage was reported by CNN, NBC News, CBS News, The Hill, the Washington Post, US News and the House Energy and Commerce Committee itself, which published a release titled 'House Passes Legislation to Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent.' The characterization 'final approval' is accurate: with the House having acted, Senate passage would be the last congressional step before presidential signature. The surrounding context in the post is also corroborated — Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) introduced companion bill S. 29 on January 7, 2025, and Senate progress has been blocked by Republican objections, most prominently Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), who objected to unanimous-consent passage in October and asked Majority Leader John Thune not to bring the bill up, citing dark 9 a.m. winter sunrises and school-bus/commuter safety. This directly matches Trump's appeal for 'Republican Senators to release their holds, and allow the hotline to clear.' The first-pass rating treated this as outside the confirmable window; that was incorrect — the events are roughly three weeks old relative to the post and extensively documented. Note the historical inversion: in March 2022 the Senate passed the Sunshine Protection Act by unanimous consent and the House let it die, whereas in 2026 the chambers' roles are reversed.
Polling has consistently shown a large majority of Americans want to stop changing clocks twice a year — figures in the 60-75 percent range across Gallup, AP-NORC, Monmouth and YouGov surveys. However, among those who want change, preference splits between permanent Standard Time and permanent Daylight Saving Time, with several surveys finding permanent Standard Time favored. The premise of ending clock changes is well supported; the specific claim of majority support for permanent DST is not.
No administration has enacted lasting permanent Daylight Saving Time. A 1974 attempt under President Nixon (the Emergency Daylight Saving Time Energy Conservation Act) made DST permanent but proved unpopular and was repealed within a year. The framing also omits that the Senate did pass the Sunshine Protection Act unanimously in March 2022 before it stalled in the House.
There is reasonable evidence that the transitions themselves are harmful — studies have documented short-term increases in myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke in the days following the spring-forward shift. That supports ending the switch. But the medical literature does not support permanent Daylight Saving Time as the remedy: the American Academy of Sleep Medicine's position statement, endorsed by numerous medical organizations, explicitly recommends permanent Standard Time on circadian-alignment grounds. The post attributes to medical authority a conclusion that medical authority largely opposes.
Doleac and Sanders (2015, Review of Economics and Statistics) found robbery rates fell roughly 7 percent overall and about 27 percent in the evening hours following the spring shift to DST. The robbery finding is reasonably well established. Evidence for an effect on murder rates specifically is much weaker and is not a documented finding of that literature.
The energy-savings rationale is the weakest claim in the post. The Department of Energy's 2008 report to Congress found savings of about 0.03 percent of annual national electricity use — negligible. Kotchen and Grant's study of Indiana's 2006 statewide DST adoption found residential electricity demand actually increased by 1 to 4 percent, attributed to greater air-conditioning and heating demand offsetting lighting savings.
Total daylight in a day is set by latitude and date and is unaffected by clock conventions. DST shifts one hour of daylight from the morning to the evening; it does not create additional sunlight. The evening-hour benefit is real, but it is a redistribution with a corresponding loss of morning light — which is the basis of the sleep-medicine objection the post does not mention.
No credible cost analysis supports this claim, and the leading subject-matter expert says the issue has essentially never been raised. FactCheck.org published a dedicated fact check in June 2026 examining a near-identical earlier formulation from Trump ('Hundreds of Millions of Dollars are spent every year by people, Cities, and States, being forced to change their Clocks. Many of these Clocks are located in Towers, and the cost of renting, or using, Heavy Equipment to do this twice a year is prohibitive!'). FactCheck.org found no credible analysis of the cost of using heavy equipment to physically change municipal tower clocks. They interviewed David Prerau, author of the standard scholarly history of daylight saving time, who said that in decades of research on DST 'no one has mentioned that particular point'; he allowed such costs might exist somewhere but characterized them as 'very rare' and 'negligible in the larger scheme.' Most public clocks today synchronize automatically via GPS, radio signal, or network time, incurring no adjustment cost at all. There is a small kernel of truth in the premise that some historic tower clocks require manual adjustment: Philadelphia's City Hall requires a building services manager to climb inside the masonry tower, cut power, and hand-crank each of four 15-foot, 235-pound minute hands, and clockmakers manually reset the Gwinnett County, Georgia courthouse tower clock. But these are routine staff-labor tasks measured in hours, not crane rentals, and no municipality has published anything approaching a seven-figure cost. The genuine economic estimates in circulation measure something entirely different: Chmura Economics & Analytics' Lost-Hour Economic Index puts the cost of the DST transition at roughly $672 million annually across all U.S. metropolitan statistical areas, derived from increased heart attacks, strokes, workplace injuries in mining and construction, traffic accidents, and cyberloafing productivity losses — not clock maintenance. A separate frequently cited figure of about $2 billion is an opportunity-cost estimate of aggregate time individuals spend resetting clocks nationwide, which likewise has nothing to do with towers or hard-to-reach installations and is undercut by the prevalence of self-adjusting digital clocks. Finally, 'watchtowers' is not a category of timekeeping infrastructure; it is a malapropism for clock towers, consistent with the semantic-paraphasia flag raised in the first-pass analysis. The claim earns 'mostly false' rather than 'false' only because manual tower-clock resetting is a real, documented practice — but its scale is off by several orders of magnitude and the attribution of millions of dollars in cost to cities and states is unsupported and contradicted by expert assessment.
No contradictions with other posts detected yet.
Trump spent the day, mostly at the White House before flying west for a Los Angeles fundraiser, posting a running scoreboard: factory growth, steel output, a record stock market, a bridge with his name on it, his own club golf title, and charts claiming nearly every candidate he endorses wins. More ...
Overview
A long-form legislative advocacy post urging Senate passage of the Sunshine Protection Act (permanent Daylight Saving Time). Timestamped 22:30 UTC on 2026-08-04 — approximately 6:30 p.m. ET, consistent with Trump being in Washington/Bedminster during an early-August working period. This is an atypical post for the subject: overwhelmingly positive in valence, containing no named adversary, no grievance narrative, and an explicit bipartisan appeal. It is nonetheless psychologically informative precisely because of what it reveals when the grievance machinery is idle.
Level 1 — Dispositional Traits
Extraversion (high, ~0.80): Assertiveness and positive affect dominate. The post is a sustained enthusiasm display — cascading benefit claims, an ALL-CAPS crescendo ("EXTRA HOUR OF DAYLIGHT"), and a rallying imperative ("LET'S PASS THE SUNSHINE PROTECTION ACT, ASAP"). Excitement-seeking is channeled into salesmanship rather than combat.
Agreeableness (moderate-low, ~0.40 — elevated relative to subject's baseline): "This is an issue that Republicans, Democrats, and Independents can unite behind" is a genuine communion bid, rare in this corpus. Modesty remains absent: the framing "no Administration has been able to get it done, until now" is a comparative superiority claim inserted into what is otherwise a consensus appeal.
Conscientiousness (mixed, ~0.40): Achievement striving is high (goal-directed legislative push, specific procedural ask). Deliberation and order are low — the middle of the post degrades into an undifferentiated benefit-catalogue with no hierarchy of evidence, and one claim ("Watchtowers") appears to have entered without editorial screening.
Neuroticism (low for baseline, ~0.25): No angry hostility, no vulnerability signaling. Impulsivity is visible only in the unbounded list expansion ("(and more!)").
Openness (low-moderate, ~0.35): Values rigidity is evident in the refusal to acknowledge the competing policy option (permanent Standard Time), which is the actual position of the relevant medical consensus. The frame admits only one solution.
Level 2 — Characteristic Adaptations
Dominant motive is achievement, secondarily status. The organizing schema is the closer: a problem long left unsolved by predecessors is being solved now, by him. Note the structure of the opening sentence — the popular demand is established first, the failure of all prior administrations second, and his own agency third. This is a compact self-enhancement architecture that requires no adversary; the "contrasting other" is a depersonalized set of predecessors.
World-schema: the public is a mass of frustrated ordinary people ("People are sick and tired"), obstruction is procedural rather than malicious. Notably, the Republican senators placing holds are addressed as persuadable ("I am asking Republican Senators to release their holds") rather than attacked — a marked departure from the coercive template used four days earlier against Cornyn and Tillis over the Blanche nomination (threatening to revive the Anti-Weaponization Fund). The same behavioral situation — GOP senators blocking something he wants — produces threat in one instance and courtship in the other, suggesting the aggressive register is instrumentally deployed rather than reflexively discharged.
Level 3 — Narrative Identity
Protagonist role: Deliverer/completer. A redemption sequence in miniature: many years of failure and public frustration → resolution under the present administration. The narrative arc is entirely prospective-triumphal, with the Senate as the last remaining obstacle.
Identity claims: the one who gets it done; the tribune of majority preference; the unifier across party lines.
Archetypal reading: King/benevolent-order rather than Warrior or Trickster. He is conferring a good (daylight, safety for children walking home, family time) rather than punishing an enemy. This is the "order restorer" position on the order/chaos axis — the biannual clock change is cast as low-grade chronic chaos imposed on ordinary citizens, which he will terminate. No group is assigned chaos in this post; the asymmetric-distribution pattern typical of his rhetoric is absent.
Level 4 — Clinical Indicators
Narcissistic features (mild, ~0.40): Present but subclinical in expression — the "until now" superiority claim, the third-person signature block, the implicit positioning of a routine legislative matter as a personal deliverance. Antisocial (~0.10), paranoid (~0.05), sadism (0.0): essentially absent. This post does not support a malignant-narcissism reading; it is a maintenance post with a supply-adjacent framing.
Narcissistic state: grandiose, but low-arousal. No injury is being processed. Rage: absent.
Defenses: Primarily rationalization — a large stack of asserted benefits is marshaled to make a preference look like an evidentiary inevitability, with the causal core ("one extra hour of natural sunlight") being physically false. Mild distortion in the claim that "the vast Majority of Americans have asked to make Daylight Saving Time permanent," which conflates the well-supported majority preference for ending clock changes with the far-from-majority preference for permanent DST specifically. Idealization of the policy is total; no cost, tradeoff, or counterargument survives into the text.
Cognitive Observations
One marker warrants documentation. "For Cities and States with Watchtowers, and hard to reach places, it costs Millions of Dollars." In a passage about the labor cost of resetting clocks, "Watchtowers" is almost certainly an intended "clock towers" — a semantically adjacent but categorically wrong substitution (both are tall structures; one tells time, one is for observation). This has the profile of a semantic paraphasia rather than a typographical error, and it survived into a published, otherwise-formatted post. Rated mild-to-moderate; a single instance is not diagnostic, and the substitution is the kind that occurs in normal speech under production pressure. Flagged for longitudinal aggregation rather than standalone interpretation.
Secondary: the reasoning error "giving us one extra hour of natural sunlight in the evenings ... Save Money on Energy Bills, because everyone will be enjoying an EXTRA HOUR OF DAYLIGHT" treats a clock convention as generating daylight. This is better read as rhetorical simplification than cognitive deficit — it is a decades-stable talking point in DST advocacy — but the literal restatement in caps is notable.
Syntactic complexity is bifurcated: competent framing sentences at the open and close, with a 90-plus-word list-sentence in the middle that is held together by comma-chaining rather than grammatical structure. This "list drift" pattern is characteristic of dictated composition. Overall slight deviation from baseline; complexity is within his established range for policy-advocacy posts.
Authorship Attribution
Assessment: authentic Trump voice, staff-assisted (score 0.65, medium-high confidence).
Authentic indicators: idiosyncratic mid-sentence capitalization of common nouns (Majority, Cities, States, Millions, Bill, Decrease, Robbery); the escalating list with a parenthetical exclamation ("(especially those involving Pedestrians!)"); the "Watchtowers" error; the closing formula "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" and the "President DONALD J. TRUMP" signature block, both of which are established markers of his dictated long-form posts; the redundant restatement ("In other words, leave it as it is now, and never change again"), which reads as an oral clarification rather than written prose.
Staff indicators: the procedural specificity of "release their holds, and allow the hotline to clear on the Republican side" — Senate floor-management jargon (hotlining, holds) that is unlikely to be self-generated; the correct bill name; the evening (business-adjacent) timestamp; the organized benefit taxonomy.
Most probable production model: Trump dictating or heavily directing content, with a policy aide supplying the procedural ask and light structuring. The errors are organic and the enthusiasm register is his; the legislative mechanics are not.
Rhetorical Analysis
Devices: hyperbole ("vast Majority," "no Administration has been able"), appeal to authority via vague attribution ("Leading Medical, Crime, and Economic Studies" — no study, author, or institution named), argument by accumulation (fifteen-plus benefits stacked without weighting, so that volume substitutes for evidentiary strength), appeal to child safety, ALL-CAPS emphasis, and a direct call to action.
The appeal-to-authority pattern is the most notable technique. "Leading Medical, Crime, and Economic Studies" is precisely the vague-attribution signature described in the stylometric literature on this subject — Trump characteristically cites unnamed authorities and round categories rather than sources. The underlying evidence is genuinely mixed and, on the medical side, points the opposite direction: the American Academy of Sleep Medicine's position statement favors permanent Standard Time, not permanent DST. The rhetorical move is to convert a contested policy question into a settled scientific one.
No dehumanizing language, no violent imagery, no eliminationist framing, no target identification. Danger level: none.
Reality Distortion / Gaslighting
No DARVO, no denial of documented events, no attacks on others' perception. The distortions present are advocacy-grade overstatement (misattributed scientific consensus, conflated polling) rather than the reality-substitution pattern seen in his election or legal-jeopardy posting. Epistemic closure is not present; the post explicitly invites cross-partisan agreement rather than demanding acceptance of an in-group truth.
Interpretive Note
The analytic value of this post is largely contrastive. Placed beside the same day's White House construction post (self-aggrandizing infrastructure narrative) and the Coast Guard birthday post (institutional celebration), it shows a subject operating in a low-arousal, approval-seeking register — dispensing benefits, courting consensus, claiming credit through comparison rather than through attack. The grandiosity is structurally identical to what appears in his hostile posts ("no Administration has been able to get it done, until now" is the same engine as his grievance-mode superiority claims); only the affective coloring differs. This supports a reading in which the self-enhancement drive is the stable trait and the aggression is state-dependent, recruited when the self-enhancement is contested and set aside when it is not.
Longitudinal comparison against his 2019 and 2022 DST posts (both short, both similarly favorable to permanent DST) would help establish whether the elaboration and list-drift observed here represent a change in composition style or simply the difference between a passing comment and an active legislative push.
Fact Verification
| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| "The House of Representatives has passed the Sunshine Protection Act and it has gone to the Senate for final approval." | True | Fully confirmed by the primary legislative record and by contemporaneous reporting across the political spectrum. H.R. 139, the Sunshine Protection Act of 2025, was introduced by Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-FL) on January 3, 2025 and accumulated 34 cosponsors. The House passed it on July 14, 2026 by a bipartisan vote of 308-117. The bill was received in the Senate on July 15, 2026, read twice, and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Congress.gov hosts both the engrossed House version (BILLS-119hr139eh.pdf, styled 'AN ACT') and the Senate-referred version (BILLS-119hr139rfs.pdf, styled 'IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES'), the latter being documentary proof of transmittal to the Senate. Passage was reported by CNN, NBC News, CBS News, The Hill, the Washington Post, US News and the House Energy and Commerce Committee itself, which published a release titled 'House Passes Legislation to Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent.' The characterization 'final approval' is accurate: with the House having acted, Senate passage would be the last congressional step before presidential signature. The surrounding context in the post is also corroborated — Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) introduced companion bill S. 29 on January 7, 2025, and Senate progress has been blocked by Republican objections, most prominently Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), who objected to unanimous-consent passage in October and asked Majority Leader John Thune not to bring the bill up, citing dark 9 a.m. winter sunrises and school-bus/commuter safety. This directly matches Trump's appeal for 'Republican Senators to release their holds, and allow the hotline to clear.' The first-pass rating treated this as outside the confirmable window; that was incorrect — the events are roughly three weeks old relative to the post and extensively documented. Note the historical inversion: in March 2022 the Senate passed the Sunshine Protection Act by unanimous consent and the House let it die, whereas in 2026 the chambers' roles are reversed. |
| "The vast majority of Americans have asked to make Daylight Saving Time permanent." | Half True | Polling has consistently shown a large majority of Americans want to stop changing clocks twice a year — figures in the 60-75 percent range across Gallup, AP-NORC, Monmouth and YouGov surveys. However, among those who want change, preference splits between permanent Standard Time and permanent Daylight Saving Time, with several surveys finding permanent Standard Time favored. The premise of ending clock changes is well supported; the specific claim of majority support for permanent DST is not. |
| "No administration has been able to get this done until now." | Mostly True | No administration has enacted lasting permanent Daylight Saving Time. A 1974 attempt under President Nixon (the Emergency Daylight Saving Time Energy Conservation Act) made DST permanent but proved unpopular and was repealed within a year. The framing also omits that the Senate did pass the Sunshine Protection Act unanimously in March 2022 before it stalled in the House. |
| "Leading medical studies show that ceasing the biannual time change will lower risk for cardiac issues, stroke, and seasonal depression." | Half True | There is reasonable evidence that the transitions themselves are harmful — studies have documented short-term increases in myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke in the days following the spring-forward shift. That supports ending the switch. But the medical literature does not support permanent Daylight Saving Time as the remedy: the American Academy of Sleep Medicine's position statement, endorsed by numerous medical organizations, explicitly recommends permanent Standard Time on circadian-alignment grounds. The post attributes to medical authority a conclusion that medical authority largely opposes. |
| "Daylight Saving Time decreases robbery and murder rates." | Mostly True | Doleac and Sanders (2015, Review of Economics and Statistics) found robbery rates fell roughly 7 percent overall and about 27 percent in the evening hours following the spring shift to DST. The robbery finding is reasonably well established. Evidence for an effect on murder rates specifically is much weaker and is not a documented finding of that literature. |
| "Permanent DST will save money on energy bills." | Mostly False | The energy-savings rationale is the weakest claim in the post. The Department of Energy's 2008 report to Congress found savings of about 0.03 percent of annual national electricity use — negligible. Kotchen and Grant's study of Indiana's 2006 statewide DST adoption found residential electricity demand actually increased by 1 to 4 percent, attributed to greater air-conditioning and heating demand offsetting lighting savings. |
| "Permanent DST gives us one extra hour of natural sunlight in the evenings." | False | Total daylight in a day is set by latitude and date and is unaffected by clock conventions. DST shifts one hour of daylight from the morning to the evening; it does not create additional sunlight. The evening-hour benefit is real, but it is a redistribution with a corresponding loss of morning light — which is the basis of the sleep-medicine objection the post does not mention. |
| "For cities and states with watchtowers and hard to reach places, changing clocks costs millions of dollars." | Mostly False | No credible cost analysis supports this claim, and the leading subject-matter expert says the issue has essentially never been raised. FactCheck.org published a dedicated fact check in June 2026 examining a near-identical earlier formulation from Trump ('Hundreds of Millions of Dollars are spent every year by people, Cities, and States, being forced to change their Clocks. Many of these Clocks are located in Towers, and the cost of renting, or using, Heavy Equipment to do this twice a year is prohibitive!'). FactCheck.org found no credible analysis of the cost of using heavy equipment to physically change municipal tower clocks. They interviewed David Prerau, author of the standard scholarly history of daylight saving time, who said that in decades of research on DST 'no one has mentioned that particular point'; he allowed such costs might exist somewhere but characterized them as 'very rare' and 'negligible in the larger scheme.' Most public clocks today synchronize automatically via GPS, radio signal, or network time, incurring no adjustment cost at all. There is a small kernel of truth in the premise that some historic tower clocks require manual adjustment: Philadelphia's City Hall requires a building services manager to climb inside the masonry tower, cut power, and hand-crank each of four 15-foot, 235-pound minute hands, and clockmakers manually reset the Gwinnett County, Georgia courthouse tower clock. But these are routine staff-labor tasks measured in hours, not crane rentals, and no municipality has published anything approaching a seven-figure cost. The genuine economic estimates in circulation measure something entirely different: Chmura Economics & Analytics' Lost-Hour Economic Index puts the cost of the DST transition at roughly $672 million annually across all U.S. metropolitan statistical areas, derived from increased heart attacks, strokes, workplace injuries in mining and construction, traffic accidents, and cyberloafing productivity losses — not clock maintenance. A separate frequently cited figure of about $2 billion is an opportunity-cost estimate of aggregate time individuals spend resetting clocks nationwide, which likewise has nothing to do with towers or hard-to-reach installations and is undercut by the prevalence of self-adjusting digital clocks. Finally, 'watchtowers' is not a category of timekeeping infrastructure; it is a malapropism for clock towers, consistent with the semantic-paraphasia flag raised in the first-pass analysis. The claim earns 'mostly false' rather than 'false' only because manual tower-clock resetting is a real, documented practice — but its scale is off by several orders of magnitude and the attribution of millions of dollars in cost to cities and states is unsupported and contradicted by expert assessment. |
Overall Veracity: 50%
Post from Truth Social
For many years, the vast Majority of Americans have asked to make Daylight Saving Time permanent, but no Administration has been able to get it done, until now. I am proud to announce that the House of Representatives has passed the Bill, and it has now gone to the Senate for final approval. People are sick and tired of having to change their clocks twice a year. It is foolish, inconvenient and, in some cases, very costly. For Cities and States with Watchtowers, and hard to reach places, it costs Millions of Dollars. A recent case was made that it is also bad for your health in the anxiety it creates. Leading Medical, Crime, and Economic Studies have shown that ceasing the biannual time change, giving us one extra hour of natural sunlight in the evenings, will help Decrease Robbery and Murder Rates, Reduce Car Accidents (especially those involving Pedestrians!), Lower Risk for Cardiac Issues, Stroke, and Seasonal Depression, Make It Safer for Children to Walk Home from School, Increase Time with your Family, Strongly Support Extracurricular Activities, Boost the Sports, Fitness, Tourism, Retail, and Restaurant Industries (and more!), and Save Money on Energy Bills, because everyone will be enjoying an EXTRA HOUR OF DAYLIGHT. In other words, leave it as it is now, and never change again. This is an issue that Republicans, Democrats, and Independents can unite behind. I am asking Republican Senators to release their holds, and allow the hotline to clear on the Republican side. LET’S PASS THE SUNSHINE PROTECTION ACT, ASAP. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP