Post from Truth Social

Senate from Kentucky. What we've got here is a failure to understand what's going on. We've been at it for 18 hours. There is no weaponization fund in this bill. Let me repeat. There is no weaponization fund in this bill. Ironically, the author of this amendment is the one creating a weaponization fund and directing it to pay his chosen group of people. This amendment is nothing more than a poison pill that would prevent us from doing what is at hand and that is securing our border, enforcing our immigration laws. Democrats and some others refuse to vote for one dollar for the border. Republicans have stepped up to do the job Democrats refuse to do. We cannot let them hijack this bill at the last moment with an unrelated issue. Mr. President. Senator Louisiana. Mr. President, this is your main to the bill. It's in the judiciary section and by the way it does not detract from our ability and there is a fund out there that could be funded to use as an anti-weaponization fund. We should make the same ability, the same access to redress to the officers who protected us. I urge passage. Senator Kentucky. This amendment would kill the bill. The budgetary effects of the pending amendment are merely incidental to the non-budgetary components of the amendment. Therefore, I raise a point of order under section 313(b)(1)(d) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.