Post from Truth Social

{ "content": "No caption accompanies this post; what he chose to publish is a partisan-coded infographic titled \"BLUE STATES DRIVE HIGH ELECTRICITY PRICES,\" posted at 10:11am Eastern on a weekday. The chart pairs a red-to-blue price gradient with a headline that converts a correlation (California at 32.2 cents/kWh, Connecticut at 30.3, against Wyoming's 13.3 and North Dakota's 11.8) into a causal claim about party control. That framing folds out real confounds — California's wildfire-liability surcharges, New England's lack of cheap in-state generation, population density, deregulated vs. regulated markets — into a single red/blue label, which is the chart's whole argumentative move and the reason its selection is worth reading rather than the raw figures, which are broadly consistent with published utility-rate data.

Publishing it extends the same in-group/out-group ledger running through the week's other posts: NATO cast as \"COWARDS,\" the border crisis pinned on \"Sleepy Joe Biden\" and Kamala Harris (\"she never even went to the Border!\"), a Black Lives Matter leader's indictment amplified, a BLM-adjacent police critic's daycare funding flagged. This image slots into that pattern as an economic-grievance entry: red-state governance rendered numerically favorable, blue-state governance rendered numerically costly, no individual named or blamed. That absence of a named target keeps this well short of any eliminationist or stochastic-terrorism reading: the target is a color on a map.

Nothing in the surrounding week points to a specific electricity-policy trigger, so this reads as routine reinforcement of a standing narrative rather than a reaction to criticism or a setback. The chart's causal-from-correlation move is a mild instance of splitting (costs attributed wholly to political color, with no accounting for the confounds above), but it is a shared partisan talking point built on real, if selectively framed, price data.

With no written text, there is no prose to attribute stylistically. The business-hours Eastern timing and the polished, statistic-dense design read as more consistent with staff curation than an impulsive share, but that only speaks to who selected the image — confidence on that point stays low given the total absence of stylometric evidence." }