Video transcript
O's president Donald J. Trump an apology President Trump has been indicted by Fulton County May I remind you that Fulton County has been found to be in violation of election law not once for the hand on it, but twice for the machine count and now we can prove that they Intentional had intentional human intervention, which is the predicate for election fraud You all know our case is seb 2023 thank you - 25 In that case, you know that it involved seventeen thousand eighteen hundred and fifty two votes counted without ballot images you also know that for the first machine count 20,000 713 ballots were counted With what I like to call receipts. I guess the fancy word is tabulator tapes And I always like to say you can't get out of Walmart these days without showing your receipt But for some reason you can count 20,000 votes without a receipt the last part of this complaint Perhaps is the most concerning because we've uncovered some recent information that makes it so In addition to proving that 3930 ballots were scanned and Counted I want to say that again and Counted and I sure hope that miss Charlene McGowan is listening miss McGowan on May 7th You and your team got up before the board and said yeah, I think mr. Rossi's right these ballots were scanned twice But we're not sure if they were counted twice that is a lie and We know that because the data that shows they're counted twice is on the cast vote records and That is available to the Secretary of States Other experts know that those ballots were counted twice Media sources know I saw mr. Nissi from the AJC just walk up here and not to get him in trouble But he recently reported he thinks they were counted twice also And that's from the AJC Sorry mark if I'm if I'm going too far just say stop Joe you're gonna get me in trouble Okay, so they were counted twice for the second machine count We know with certainty that this Duplication of ballots was not I want to repeat was not an Administrative error and I'm gonna demonstrate to you how we know that shortly Rather the duplication Process was due to intentional human intervention And I'm not a lawyer, but when I ran this by a few lawyers they told me this is the phrase Human intentional human intervention is the predicate for Election I'm gonna use the f-word fraud I Okay, you're gonna hear me you're gonna hear me say that several times heard of this presentation I said that the ballots were tabulated twice counted twice and It was not done accidentally This slide shows that a ballot on the right over here was scanned and counted creates a file Some of the experts in the room like Garland know this but if it's scanned again, it creates another file Which means it is counted twice So, how did this happen? This is a very complicated slide That has taken months for technical experts to develop and explain It's also very difficult to explain still but it basically shows that ballots were scanned on one day and then they were randomly picked these batches of ballots and created new batches and scanned a Second day on a different tabulator. So you probably can't understand this slide So I'm going to show you how it was done very crudely. Okay? All right. So on that first chair you have a stack of ballots. You see them over there Again, my props are not professional. I'm just doing what I can to get the message out on the second chair You have a second stack of ballots that were scanned. Let's say December 2nd Wednesday when the midnight deadline was for Doing the election recount on the third chair. You have a third stack of ballots that were scanned on Wednesday now Someone or some group. I don't know who but this is not accidental what they did They went to one stack of ballots Randomly grabbed a few stacks from that No order I got a random group, okay Some of my flipped around so that they count backwards this time Then they went to another stack of ballots that were already scanned You notice I'm not necessarily picking them from the top, right? I'm just grabbing randomly and one more time I'll do it. For example, they went to another step and Then The next day they came back with that randomly selected stack and guess what they did That last year over there is a tabulator they ran them through On a second day through a different tabulator and they did that for 3930 ballots who in the room thinks that's accidental raise your hand. I Don't think so All right, I'm gonna close with how I started this Little talk here. I'm gonna read it one more time. If you don't mind It says in addition to proving That 3930 ballots were scanned and counted two times for the second machine count, which was the certified count We now know with certainty that this duplication of ballots was not a mere administrative error Rather the duplication process was due to intentional human Intervention and I said the lawyers tell me that that is the predicate for election fraud and now in closing I remind you about Mr. Raffensperger's ex post of August 1st if you have the data bringing it bring it to him Mr. Secretary, we're bringing the data to you and we are counting on you to do the right thing and investigate independently independently is critical SEB 2023-25. Thank you
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.