Video transcript
All right. Another bombshell revelation today shows just how weaponized the DOJ was under Joe Biden. Now, shocking new memos turned over to Congress today. Well, revealed that the FBI warned the DOJ repeatedly. They did not have probable cause for that raid at Mar-a-Lago. But under pressure from Biden's weaponized DOJ, they conducted the raid anyway. Among the shocking revelations, including one email revealing the FBI field office did not believe and articulated this to the DOJ. They had quote, established probable cause for the search warrant for classified records of Mar-a-Lago. Despite this, another agent wrote, quote, DOJ has opined that they do have probable cause requesting a wide scope, including residence office storage space. One official even warned that the information they had was just from a single source, not corroborated, and may have even been dated early today on a post on X. FBI director Cash Patel did confirm the documents writing in part, quote, we just turned over documents to Capitol Hill to be made public showing that the FBI told DOJ that they did not have probable cause for raiding president Trump's home at Mar-a-Lago, but DOJ didn't give a damn. They did it anyway. Here at the very latest, just the news.com founder editor in chief and chief investigative reporter John Solomon. And remember, John, the FBI had access that was given to them, uh, by president Trump and his team, open access to the Mar-a-Lago after they left, they called and said, by the way, would you put another lock on one particular storage room? They complied. Nothing would have prevented them from coming back anytime they wanted, but no probable cause. Yeah. Well, that's what these emails show. First, they show that the Trump administration or the Trump, a team and his lawyer were cooperating. And in fact, the FBI wanted to leverage that cooperation and, uh, and create a rent or a makeable solution that didn't involve a raid. The justice department said they weren't interested in making accommodations like that. Then the FBI told the justice department, the Biden justice department that it didn't have probable cause that the information they had was outdated, single source, couldn't be corroborated. Uh, they didn't have true evidence that president Trump himself may have been the source of a crime. Uh, and the justice department said, we disagree. We're going to go ahead with it. The FBI continued to fight back saying, we don't think there's probable cause. You certainly can't go to president Trump's office or you certainly can't go to his bedroom and do it. And the, and the justice department response was, you know what? We're going to expand the search. What you see here is a potential fourth amendment violation of president Trump's civil liberties. And this is significant, not just from a historical standpoint. A couple of weeks ago, Sean, I interviewed, uh, the assistant attorney general for civil, uh, rights. And that's Harvey Dylan. And she said she is looking at the possibility of bringing criminal charges from anyone who tried to deny president Trump or one of president Trump supporters their civil rights. That means this evidence, which by the way, still in the statute of five years, uh, could potentially be a prosecutor board. Certainly go to the question of whether there should be a prosecution separately. And president Trump has shown he's not afraid to sue. I just asked the BBC who found out that this week again, uh, president Trump might have a very good suit. According to the legal experts, I talked that his civil liberties were infringed by the justice department. So this, uh, revelation is not just a historical political revelation. It could have legal consequences. No probable cause. If that's not a dual justice system, considering Hillary and Joe Biden, I don't know what is. And you know, I remember reading something and learning something called unreasonable search and seizure. John Solomon, great reporting. Thank you.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.