Analysis: These are the "ladies" that are weaponizing our Elections an...

2y ago Jul 5, 2024 at 2:28 PM

These are the "ladies" that are weaponizing our Elections and dividing our Country. They must be stopped. https://amgreatness.com/2022/08/30/obama-era-sisters-circle-trump/

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-24. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

Elevated

Narcissistic State

Vulnerable

Authorship

Uncertain

Intensity

55%

This post exhibits a stochastic terrorism pattern warranting documentation: specific named targets (Susan Rice, Avril Haines, Lisa Monaco) + articulated grievance ("weaponizing Elections and dividing our Country") + imperative call to action ("They must be stopped"). The gendered dismissal via scare quotes around "ladies" adds a contemptuous, dehumanizing layer. Notably, this post shares a two-year-old article (August 2022) as though it describes a current threat, suggesting either deliberate narrative maintenance or indifference to temporal accuracy. The timing is psychologically significant: Trump had just received two major legal victories (Supreme Court immunity ruling, sentencing postponement) yet continues the persecution narrative unabated, consistent with a self-sustaining paranoid schema that does not modulate in response to favorable developments. The projection is striking - accusing three government officials of "dividing our Country" while singling them out by gender and demanding they "be stopped." The vulnerable narcissistic state (persecuted, besieged) coexists with aggressive counter-attack, characteristic of the paranoid features within malignant narcissism. The danger rating is elevated due to the combination of named targets, grievance framing, and imperative language that could mobilize followers against specific individuals.

Authorship Analysis

Uncertain

Indicators:

Scare quotes around 'ladies' - characteristic Trump mockery
Short punchy post with emotional charge
Shares article with editorial framing
10:28 AM ET from Bedminster - business hours but Trump-style content
Imperative 'They must be stopped' - Trump's voice

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Vulnerable State

Trigger: Maintenance — Exposure (Ongoing legal persecution narrative)

Rage: Intensity 50% targeting Susan Rice, Avril Haines, Lisa Monaco / Obama-era female officials

Proportionality

30%

Sentiment

-0.70

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

50%

Antisocial

30%

Paranoid

70%

Sadism

30%

Defense Mechanisms:

projectionsplittingdevaluation

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

30%

Parasocial Techniques:

shared enemy identificationus-vs-them framingcall to collective action

Danger Assessment

Elevated

Stochastic Terrorism Pattern Detected

Indicators:

'They must be stopped' - imperative eliminationist-adjacent language directed at named individuals
Specific target identification (three named women) combined with grievance framing
Stochastic terrorism pattern: identified targets + articulated grievance + implied need for action

Gaslighting Detected:

Frames legal accountability as 'weaponizing Elections' - reframing lawful prosecution as persecution
Accuses targets of 'dividing our Country' while engaging in divisive targeting

Reality Distortions:

Frames lawful investigations as 'weaponizing Elections'
Presents three government officials as singular conspiratorial threat to democracy

Fact Checks (1)

"These women are weaponizing elections and dividing the country"

Mostly False

The article references Susan Rice, Avril Haines, and Lisa Monaco in their government roles. While they hold positions relevant to national security and law enforcement, characterizing their work as 'weaponizing elections' is a partisan interpretive claim without factual basis.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Post ts_112734352978621803

Overview

Trump shares a two-year-old American Greatness article targeting three Obama-era female officials (Susan Rice, Avril Haines, Lisa Monaco), framing them as threats to democracy who "must be stopped."

Authorship Attribution

Posted at 10:28 AM ET from Bedminster. Business hours but emotionally charged content with characteristic Trump scare quotes and combative framing. Mixed indicators - scored 0.7 toward authentic Trump.

Psychological State

The post sustains a persecution narrative despite two recent legal victories (Supreme Court immunity ruling, sentencing postponement). This is consistent with a paranoid schema that operates independently of external reality - favorable developments do not reduce the perceived threat level.

The scare quotes around "ladies" serve as gendered contempt, diminishing the targets while identifying them for the audience. The imperative "must be stopped" crosses from commentary into mobilization language.

Defense Mechanisms

Projection: Accuses others of "weaponizing Elections" and "dividing our Country" while engaging in precisely those behaviors
Splitting: Black-and-white framing of these women as existential threats
Devaluation: Scare-quoted "ladies" diminishes targets

Danger Assessment: ELEVATED

The post follows a stochastic terrorism pattern: named targets + grievance + imperative action language. While "must be stopped" is not explicitly violent, it signals to followers that these individuals are enemies requiring neutralization. Combined with the gendered dismissal, this creates conditions where followers may feel justified in harassing or threatening these individuals.

Notable: Temporal Anomaly

Sharing a 2022 article in 2024 without noting its age suggests either strategic narrative maintenance or careless content curation.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"These women are weaponizing elections and dividing the country"	Mostly False	The article references Susan Rice, Avril Haines, and Lisa Monaco in their government roles. While they hold positions relevant to national security and law enforcement, characterizing their work as 'weaponizing elections' is a partisan interpretive claim without factual basis.

Overall Veracity: 20%