Gregg Jarrett: “Where is the crime? It’s no where…this is a trial in search of an imaginary crime…”
Video transcript0:43
I think much depends on the closing argument. The element of the alleged crimes were never proven in this case. Business records were not false. They were accurate. Trump had no involvement. There's no evidence. He willfully violated election laws, and no laws were even broken. Plus it's factually impossible to influence an election after it's over yet. That's how the indictment reads. Even if Trump knew about the Stormy Daniels NDA, so what? That's not unlawful, so I come to the basic question, Pete, where is the crime? It's nowhere. This is what I call a Bigfoot case. It's a trial in search of an imaginary crime.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
Post from Truth Social
Gregg Jarrett: “Where is the crime? It’s no where…this is a trial in search of an imaginary crime…”
Video transcript 0:43
I think much depends on the closing argument. The element of the alleged crimes were never proven in this case. Business records were not false. They were accurate. Trump had no involvement. There's no evidence. He willfully violated election laws, and no laws were even broken. Plus it's factually impossible to influence an election after it's over yet. That's how the indictment reads. Even if Trump knew about the Stormy Daniels NDA, so what? That's not unlawful, so I come to the basic question, Pete, where is the crime? It's nowhere. This is what I call a Bigfoot case. It's a trial in search of an imaginary crime.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.