Post from Truth Social

Thank you very much. I'm here, instead of campaigning. As you know, I was supposed to be in a very different state this morning, and the judge actually decided to call it early. And yet, it looks like we're going to have a very big gap between days, and it's going to be determined right now on the court. But we're here about an hour early today. I was supposed to be making the speech for political purposes. I'm not allowed to have anything to do with politics, because I'm sitting in a very freezing cold courtroom for the last four weeks. It's very unfair. They have no case. They have no crime. It's been determined by everybody, every legal scholar, New York Post editorial board today. When a Trump prosecution wind down, it's always been a witch hunt. With a prosecution winding down at Donald Trump's Manhattan case, we have to ask, in the mortal words of Peggy Lee, "Is that all there is?" As the New York Post editorial board has become utterly apparent, if that wasn't seen already, that the key elements to any prosecution is missing. The key element is missing, and it says, "What's missing? A crime. There's no crime." You know, they go through all this stuff, and there was nothing done wrong. NDAs are perfect. And by the way, legal expenses. You know, we've made a legal expense. You know what a spark down in the book says? A legal expense. Again, it's not marked down as construction. It's not marked down as sheetrock and cinder block. It's marked down as legal expense. You have a lawyer. You pay him a legal expense, and it's covered in the book as legal expense. I had nothing to do with it. The bookkeeper put it down as a legal expense. This is why I'm here, because we called it a legal expense, a payment to a lawyer. Jonathan Turley, even liberal experts, have continued to express doubt over "Where's the crime?" Andy McCarthy, let's stick with the relevant undisputed facts of the case. Merciach should dismiss this case. He should dismiss this case immediately. Bregg's evidence is woefully inadequate. This case should be dismissed. It should have never been brought, and the judge is highly conflicted. He's a corrupt judge. He's highly conflicted. He's totally corrupt, and he's interfering with an election. Greg Jarrett, there is no credible evidence of a crime. Bregg's case against the accused is beyond the neemit. It is an audacious corruption of the legal process, and a very dangerous one. No fair or competent judge dedicated to upholding justice would have ever allowed such a case. It's a train wreck, and he goes on and on and on. No judge except this one would allow this case to continue. He's corrupt. Alan Dershowitz, who I think is standing right behind me, we have many people from Congress, senators, congressmen, we've had him here all week. And I say, don't come. And by the way, outside looks like he's supposed to be 4,000. There are more police that have ever seen anywhere, because they don't want to have anybody come down. There's not a civilian within three blocks of the courthouse, but at Columbia University you can set up a tent and burn down the doors right opposite the front entrance. It's a disgrace. Alan Dershowitz, Trump trial, is a stupendous legal catastrophe. All Americans, regardless of political affiliation, should be appalled at this selective prosecution. Today, this is a, it's a great term. I should use it now, I will. Selective prosecution. This all comes from the White House, and all comes from the DOJ in the White House. Take a look who's in the room. This all comes from the DOJ in the White House. It's an attack on Biden, who's mentally unfit. He's mentally unfit to be the president of this country. It's an attack on his political opponent. That's all it is. All of the things you see that you saw over the last four weeks, most of it should have never even been brought up. And then on top of that, there's no crime. And we go on day after day, and I tell Iowa, I'm sorry, I won't be able to make it. I tell New Hampshire, sorry, I won't be able to make it. I'm sitting in a nice box all day. Today, this is Alan Dershowitz. Today the target is Trump. Tomorrow it may be a Democrat. After that, you and me, who knows, the criminal justice system is on trial in New York. It's making New York state. I love this state. I love the people of this state. I'm running hard in New York. I think we're going to win New York, but it's making New York our judicial system. And then I had Judge Kaplan, who's horrible, the most biased people, and they gave me three judges. And Goran, he didn't know. He doesn't know the first thing about finance. It's supposed to be a trial in front of the complex divisions, the complex situations. He had no idea. It said Mar-a-Lago's worth $18 million. When it's worth a billion to a billion-five, it's worth a hundred times the amount, fifty to a hundred times. All corrupt, and it's all coordinated. You see, Mark Levin, John Adams said liberty without virtue is tyranny. We have tyranny right now. We have tyranny right now, and we're disgracing our New York court system. And we're really disgracing our country, because all over the world they're watching. Bill O'Reilly, Donald Trump and his family do not deserve this blatant miscarriage of justice. Don't applaud the destruction of justice, because you may be on the receiving end some day. That's Bill O'Reilly, and hundreds of others. I don't think there's one person that says that this trial is legitimate, and everybody's talking about the judge. The judge should be doing this trial. He's totally conflicted. He's the most conflicted judge probably in the history of the court system, and everyone knows what I'm talking about. Thank you very much.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.