Post from Truth Social

Reposted from Tom Fitton@TomFitton
Anti-@realDonaldTrump bias is ruining the judicial system. Great @JudicialWatch interview with Charles Payne
Video transcript reposted clip ยท 4:19

I want to begin with the major development that we just saw earlier today. New York appeals court reducing that $464 million judgment to $175 million has given President Trump 10 additional days to post bond. Your thoughts on that? Well, it's well past due that it happened. It's a major blow to Latisha James and the other Democrat politician, Judge Angoran, who had a nearly half billion dollar levy, they wanted him to have to pay up in order just to appeal this unprecedented decision to try to seize his assets and destroy his company. Frankly, I think $175 million is too much, but obviously Trump can handle it. But it's an indication that even the machine in New York can be checked if you have an honest judge or two. Let's see how much further they go. I mean, on the other hand, you have proceeding this sham prosecution by the Soros-backed prosecutor Alvin Bragg, another Democratic politician. The challenge in New York is it's not just the prosecutors who are elected. A lot of the judges are elected or selected most directly by the Democratic machine up there. And of course, in my view, they're all dancing to the tune of the Biden administration. Whether it be Fulton County or here in DC or up in New York City, I've never seen anything like this in American history. We should be concerned when a presidential candidate is being abused by like this. This, to me, is like a human rights violation, the way Trump has been abused over the last several years by both first the deep state and now the Biden administration and their Democratic allies. It really is amazing that someone can actually run for office and say, "I'm running for office to actually go after this particular individual who I don't have any proof of breaking any laws, but we're going to go after him." Trump also tweeting on Truth Social about Judge Ingeron refusing to obey the decision by the Appellate Division relative to the statute of limitations. I've seen President Biden sort of ignore the Supreme Court as much as he can on the student loan thing. You've got this tweet about the ignoring the Appellate Division. I'm concerned about this, the pillar, one of the greatest pillars of strength in our nation and that's our judicial system. I mean, this law fair is not just law fair, but it's even taking down or ignoring certain truths like the Supreme Court that we've had in place forever. Yeah, and there's this anti-Trump animist that's kind of ruining the courts. It's ruining respect for the courts and in the case of Biden, he's the catch me if you can approach to governance. He'll do what he can and if the Supreme Court steps in, he'll stop, then he'll push again. It's all politics to too many politicians when it comes to the rule of law. And up in New York, I was thinking about what might the business community be thinking here? Is it just limited to Trump? You remember the governor was trying to say, "Oh no, this is all just about Trump," confirming it was an anti-Trump operation. But then Latisha James just sued the largest meat maker or meat producer in the country pursuing some crazed theory of emissions tied to the company. So it's all about politics up there and there's anti-Trump animists and you can be sure Latisha James is raising a lot of money because of this anti-Trump activity. She obviously has her eyes set on higher office and I word other attorney generals are going to start just engaged in political prosecutions in ways that we've never seen before in this country. It just feels like what you can't get the public to vote for now, you'll force through this sort of law fair or heavy handedness. I just wanted to point out to the audience that there's $464 million. In the last two years, you got Wells Fargo that's fined $2 billion for abusing 16 million people. $464 million with something with no victims, with no one complained, seems a lot. And we've had these firms, all these Wall Street firms, $120 million for mistreating the women who work for them, $140 million for mistreating their customers. I mean, these are actual victims who've had smaller fines. It just feels egregious to your point. And it feels like it's going to, I hope it backfires because this is not what America was built on. Tom, thank you very much. Appreciate it. You're welcome, Charles.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.