Analysis: This Crazy Pomerantz guy, Hillary Clinton’s lawyer, who left...

3y ago Feb 9, 2023 at 10:04 PM

This Crazy Pomerantz guy, Hillary Clinton’s lawyer, who left his Democrat only Law Firm to join (get this!) the Manhattan D.A.’s Office in order to prosecute “Trump,” while at the same time writing a book about his exploits, including everything that happened in a secret Grand Jury. This guy is deranged and should be charged approximately. Nothing like this has ever happened before. As prosecutor he actually wrote a book in the midst of an ongoing case. It’s stone cold prosecutorial misconduct!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-24. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

Elevated

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

78%

Posted at 5:04 PM EST (Mar-a-Lago), this authentic Trump post responds to the February 7, 2023 publication of Mark Pomerantz's book 'People vs. Donald Trump.' The publication constitutes a narcissistic injury trigger: an institutional adversary is not only prosecuting Trump but publicly documenting the effort, compounding perceived humiliation. The post's signature move — constructing a step-by-step partisan conspiracy (Clinton → Paul Weiss → Manhattan DA → book deal) — reflects paranoid elaboration under threat rather than factual sequence. Foundational claims are demonstrably false or misleading: Paul Weiss is not a 'Democrat only' firm, and the Clinton lawyer characterization lacks documented basis. The demand that Pomerantz 'be charged approximately [appropriately]' contains a notable semantic substitution — 'approximately' for 'appropriately' — consistent with Trump's documented baseline of unedited language errors but worth longitudinal tracking. Defense mechanisms include projection ('deranged'), splitting (partisan binary contamination of all legal actors), and rationalization (elaborate causal conspiracy). Danger level is elevated: a named individual with large followership is publicly labeled criminal and subjected to a retaliatory prosecution demand. The post is clinically significant primarily for its paranoid ideation pattern — the same-day cluster (Koch network post, this post) shows escalating persecution framing across multiple perceived adversary groups, consistent with a stress-period consolidation of paranoid schemas.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Parenthetical asides '(get this!)' are authentic Trump verbal tic
Scare quotes around 'Trump' — signature self-referential irony
Run-on sentence structure with coordinating conjunctions stringing multiple clauses
Notable semantic substitution: 'charged approximately' (clearly meant 'appropriately') — hallmark of unedited Trump prose
Stream-of-consciousness accumulation of grievances without logical paragraph structure

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Mark Pomerantz / Manhattan DA prosecution)

Rage: Intensity 75% targeting Mark Pomerantz

Proportionality

20%

Sentiment

-0.82

Baseline Deviation: slight

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

82%

Antisocial

45%

Paranoid

78%

Sadism

30%

Defense Mechanisms:

projectionsplittingrationalizationdenial

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

42%

Cognitive Markers:

semantic paraphasia

Parasocial Techniques:

Direct address style pulls followers into conspiratorial revelation ('get this!')Presents himself as uniquely victimized to generate sympathetic identificationDeploys rhetorical verdict ('stone cold prosecutorial misconduct') as if delivering official judgment

Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:

Specific named individual targeted ('This Crazy Pomerantz guy') with pejorative label and criminal demand
Call for prosecution of perceived adversary ('should be charged') — using legal system as retaliatory instrument
Pattern: Trump's naming + labeling + criminal demand for legal opponents constitutes a documented harassment and intimidation vector
Public figure with large follower base targeting private-citizen-turned-prosecutor amplifies personal threat environment

Gaslighting Detected:

Frames legitimate legal proceedings as coordinated persecution, asking followers to disbelieve institutional reality
Delivers legal verdict ('stone cold prosecutorial misconduct') as established fact, foreclosing independent evaluation
'Democrat only Law Firm' — asserts false characterization as foundational premise of entire argument

Reality Distortions:

Paul Weiss described as 'Democrat only Law Firm' — factually false
Pomerantz characterized as 'Hillary Clinton's lawyer' without documented basis
Legal publication during active investigation declared 'prosecutorial misconduct' without judicial determination
Conspiracy narrative imposed on sequence of events (left firm → joined DA → to prosecute Trump) that have independent, non-conspiratorial explanations

Fact Checks (5)

"Pomerantz is 'Hillary Clinton's lawyer'"

Mostly False

Pomerantz was a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison — a major, nominally bipartisan firm. While Paul Weiss has represented Democratic clients, Pomerantz's personal client list as a white-collar criminal defense attorney does not establish a documented attorney-client relationship with Hillary Clinton. The characterization conflates firm reputation with personal representation.

"He left a 'Democrat only Law Firm'"

False

Paul, Weiss is one of the largest corporate law firms in the United States with clients across the political and corporate spectrum. It has a liberal-leaning reputation among partners but is not a partisan-only firm by any professional or legal definition.

"Pomerantz wrote a book about the case including grand jury material while it was ongoing"

Mostly True

'People vs. Donald Trump' was published February 7, 2023 — while the Manhattan DA investigation remained active. The book did reference grand jury proceedings. Alvin Bragg's office reviewed the manuscript; legal debate over whether publication constituted grand jury leakage was genuine and contested.

"'Nothing like this has ever happened before'"

Mostly False

Prosecutors have historically written books during or shortly after notable cases. The claim of absolute historical uniqueness is hyperbolic and unsupported. While publishing during an active, high-profile case is unusual, it is not without precedent in prosecutorial memoir literature.

"It is 'stone cold prosecutorial misconduct'"

Mostly False

Whether Pomerantz's book constitutes prosecutorial misconduct is a contested legal question, not a settled fact. Legal scholars were divided; Bragg's office reviewed and did not block publication. No court has ruled it misconduct. Trump's declaration presents legal opinion as established fact.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Truth Social Post — 2023-02-09T22:04:22Z

Authorship Attribution

Score: 0.88 (highly likely authentic Trump) | Confidence: High

UTC 22:04 = 5:04 PM EST at Mar-a-Lago (Trump's established winter residence, February 2023). This falls in late business hours rather than the canonical 2–6 AM authentic window — a slight ambiguity. However, the stylistic fingerprint overrides timing concerns:

Parenthetical exclamation (get this!) is a Trump verbal signature absent from aide-composed posts
Self-referential scare quotes around "Trump" — performed irony unique to authentic posts
Critical indicator: "charged approximately" clearly means appropriately — a semantic substitution no aide would publish
Stream-of-consciousness accumulation without paragraph logic
Run-on sentence architecture via coordinating conjunctions (his standard syntax)

Verdict: Authentic Trump, likely typed directly without editorial review.

Trigger and Psychological State

The immediate trigger is the February 7, 2023 publication of Pomerantz's book People vs. Donald Trump, released two days prior. This constitutes a narcissistic injury via exposure: an institutional adversary is not merely prosecuting Trump but publicly narrating the prosecution effort, transforming a legal threat into a reputational spectacle. The injury is compounded — defeat (prosecution) plus humiliation (book) plus loss of narrative control.

State: Mixed narcissistic — oscillating within a single post:

Grandiose: "Nothing like this has ever happened before" (I am so significant the system bends to target me)
Vulnerable/Persecuted: Prosecution framed as coordinated partisan conspiracy

This oscillation is characteristic of threatened grandiosity responding to narcissistic injury.

Conspiracy Scaffolding (Paranoid Elaboration)

Trump constructs a causal chain:

> Paul Weiss (framed as Clinton's firm) → Pomerantz → Manhattan DA → prosecute Trump → simultaneously write book

Each link in the chain is either false or misleading, but the chain itself performs a paranoid function: converting random institutional actors into a unified conspiratorial network directed personally at Trump. This is paranoid elaboration under threat — a defensive cognitive operation that restores a sense of meaningful persecution over random legal exposure.

Cognitive Markers

Marker	Instance	Severity
Semantic paraphasia	"charged approximately" (→ appropriately)	Mild

The substitution of approximately for appropriately is the sole notable marker. Both words share phonological similarity and appear in formal-register contexts. This is within Trump's documented baseline of unedited language errors (consistent with no editorial layer) but should be logged for longitudinal tracking. No temporal confusion, confabulation, or perseveration beyond his characteristic legal-persecution thematic loop.

Defense Mechanisms

Mechanism	Level	Evidence
Projection	Immature	"Deranged" applied to Pomerantz — the affective intensity of Trump's reaction displaced onto target
Splitting	Immature	"Democrat only Law Firm" — collapses bipartisan institution into all-bad partisan category
Rationalization	Neurotic	Elaborate causal conspiracy theory provides logical scaffolding for persecution narrative
Denial	Pathological	Characterizes legitimate (if contested) legal activity as definitively criminal

Rhetorical Analysis

The post mimics legal argumentation structurally while meeting no evidentiary standard:

Ad hominem labeling → "Crazy Pomerantz guy" (dismissal before evidence)
Partisan genealogy → links to Clinton (guilt by association)
Hypocrisy performance → book-writing during prosecution (genuine legal debate weaponized)
Hyperbolic historical claim → "Nothing like this has ever happened before" (false but unfalsifiable to casual reader)
Authoritative verdict → "stone cold prosecutorial misconduct" (legal conclusion asserted without adjudication)

The parenthetical (get this!) performs conspiratorial intimacy — positioning the reader as co-discoverer of shocking revelations, a parasocial inclusion technique that converts audience into co-conspirators in the persecution narrative.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Pomerantz is 'Hillary Clinton's lawyer'"	Mostly False	Pomerantz was a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison — a major, nominally bipartisan firm. While Paul Weiss has represented Democratic clients, Pomerantz's personal client list as a white-collar criminal defense attorney does not establish a documented attorney-client relationship with Hillary Clinton. The characterization conflates firm reputation with personal representation.
"He left a 'Democrat only Law Firm'"	False	Paul, Weiss is one of the largest corporate law firms in the United States with clients across the political and corporate spectrum. It has a liberal-leaning reputation among partners but is not a partisan-only firm by any professional or legal definition.
"Pomerantz wrote a book about the case including grand jury material while it was ongoing"	Mostly True	'People vs. Donald Trump' was published February 7, 2023 — while the Manhattan DA investigation remained active. The book did reference grand jury proceedings. Alvin Bragg's office reviewed the manuscript; legal debate over whether publication constituted grand jury leakage was genuine and contested.
"'Nothing like this has ever happened before'"	Mostly False	Prosecutors have historically written books during or shortly after notable cases. The claim of absolute historical uniqueness is hyperbolic and unsupported. While publishing during an active, high-profile case is unusual, it is not without precedent in prosecutorial memoir literature.
"It is 'stone cold prosecutorial misconduct'"	Mostly False	Whether Pomerantz's book constitutes prosecutorial misconduct is a contested legal question, not a settled fact. Legal scholars were divided; Bragg's office reviewed and did not block publication. No court has ruled it misconduct. Trump's declaration presents legal opinion as established fact.

Overall Veracity: 28%

Danger Assessment: Elevated

Named private individual (Pomerantz) publicly labeled "crazy" and "deranged"
Explicit demand for criminal prosecution of perceived adversary
Posted to an audience of millions, creating documented harassment vector
Pattern consistent with Trump's named-adversary → criminal-demand → follower mobilization sequence
Not stochastic terrorism (no eliminationist language, no implied physical action), but institutional retaliation demand with harassment amplification potential

Narrative Identity (Level 3)

Protagonist role: Uniquely persecuted fighter against historically unprecedented institutional corruption

Narrative sequence: Contamination — legitimate legal system → weaponized partisan instrument → targeting Trump specifically

Contrasting other: The Clinton network / partisan legal apparatus (Pomerantz as avatar)

Identity claim: I am so dangerous to the corrupt establishment that they bend historical norms to silence me — persecution as evidence of significance, a grandiose inversion of victimhood.

Archetypal Analysis

Primary archetype: Persecuted King / Warrior The post frames Trump as a rightful authority whose legitimacy is threatened by a corrupt and partisan usurper (Pomerantz as the Trickster serving the Shadow). The characterization of legal proceedings as historically unprecedented persecution invokes the martyred-king motif — illegitimate power suppressing the rightful order. The demand for counter-prosecution is a Warrior's response: not submission but counter-attack.

Shadow projection: "Deranged" — the quality of obsessive, rule-breaking fixation on an adversary that Trump himself displays is projected onto the prosecutor.

Longitudinal Context

The same-day post cluster (Koch network post + this post) reveals a consistent persecution consolidation pattern across unrelated adversaries — both the Koch donor network and Pomerantz are processed through the same paranoid schema: they were always against me, they act out of partisan malice, I am their primary target. This thematic consistency across multiple same-day posts suggests an elevated-stress period in which the paranoid schema is applied broadly rather than selectively.