Analysis: While he has totally discredited any case against me, people...

3y ago Feb 7, 2023 at 12:47 AM

While he has totally discredited any case against me, people still don’t write the fact that Mark Pomerantz represented Crooked Hillary Clinton, and then left his office “without pay in order to investigate a particular man rather than any particular crime” (National Review).It shows from the beginning, as were many other events, it was nothing more than a political Witch Hunt! https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/manhattan-prosecutor-called-out-for-mortgaging-his-ethics-to-get-trump/

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-20. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Uncertain

Intensity

45%

Authorship Analysis

Uncertain

Indicators:

'Crooked Hillary Clinton' epithet
Witch Hunt! exclamation
slightly awkward syntax ('as were many other events')
evening posting time
emotional investment in topic

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Manhattan DA investigation / Pomerantz book)

Sentiment

-0.50

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

50%

Antisocial

20%

Paranoid

60%

Sadism

10%

Defense Mechanisms:

rationalizationdenialprojection

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

55%

Parasocial Techniques:

sharing 'insider' legal knowledge to create sense of shared struggleframing audience as truth-knowers vs media who 'don't write the fact'

Danger Assessment

None

Gaslighting Detected:

'totally discredited any case against me' - assertion without evidence that case is invalid
Framing media as suppressing known facts

Reality Distortions:

Claim that Pomerantz has 'totally discredited any case' is assertion, not established fact

Fact Checks (2)

"Mark Pomerantz represented Hillary Clinton"

True

Pomerantz was a partner at Paul Weiss who had represented Clinton in legal matters before joining the Manhattan DA's office

"Pomerantz left his office 'without pay in order to investigate a particular man rather than any particular crime'"

Mostly True

Pomerantz took a leave from his law firm to join the DA's office as a special assistant DA. The quoted characterization is from the National Review article and reflects a critical framing of his motivation.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Truth Social Post ts_109820697759350906

Context

This post concerns Mark Pomerantz, a prosecutor who joined the Manhattan DA's office to investigate Trump and later wrote a book about it. Trump links to a National Review article critical of Pomerantz, highlighting that Pomerantz previously represented Hillary Clinton. This is part of a multi-post barrage on the same topic (see adjacent posts about Pomerantz's potential disbarment).

Authorship

Posted at 7:47 PM EST (Trump likely at Mar-a-Lago in February). Evening hours, plausible for either Trump or aide. The structure—a coherent argument citing a specific publication with a direct quote—suggests moderate polish. However, the characteristic "Crooked Hillary Clinton" epithet, the "Witch Hunt!" exclamation, and the slightly awkward syntax ("as were many other events") suggest authentic Trump composition, possibly with light editing. The emotional investment in the topic and the connective logic (Pomerantz → Clinton → bias → witch hunt) reflect Trump's characteristic reasoning chains.

Psychological Dynamics

The post reveals a persecution schema combined with triumphalism. "While he has totally discredited any case against me" asserts victory while simultaneously maintaining victimhood. The logical structure is: prosecutor is biased (represented Clinton) → investigation was politically motivated → therefore a "Witch Hunt." This is classic motivated reasoning wrapped in legal-sounding argumentation.

Defense Mechanisms

Projection: Attributing political motivation to prosecutors while engaging in political framing
Rationalization: Using Pomerantz's prior representation of Clinton as logical proof of bias
Denial: "totally discredited any case against me" dismisses the substance of investigation entirely

Rhetorical Analysis

The post employs several techniques: guilt by association (Pomerantz → Clinton), appeal to authority (National Review quote), the recurring "Witch Hunt" branding, and the derisive nickname "Crooked Hillary." The parenthetical attribution to National Review is strategic—citing a conservative outlet lends credibility within his base while framing the criticism as bipartisan.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Mark Pomerantz represented Hillary Clinton"	True	Pomerantz was a partner at Paul Weiss who had represented Clinton in legal matters before joining the Manhattan DA's office
"Pomerantz left his office 'without pay in order to investigate a particular man rather than any particular crime'"	Mostly True	Pomerantz took a leave from his law firm to join the DA's office as a special assistant DA. The quoted characterization is from the National Review article and reflects a critical framing of his motivation.

Overall Veracity: 90%