Analysis: RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/1...

3y ago Feb 7, 2023 at 12:46 AM

RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/109820692202847090 This is disgraceful conduct by Pomerantz, especially since, as always, I’ve done nothing wrong!According to David LaBahn, President and CEO of the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys:“The most likely implication for any lawyer disclosing publicly any materials derived from a grand jury proceeding without a written court order, including witness testimony, is a formal felony criminal charge for violating grand jury secrecy…”

Reposted Feb 7, 2023 at 12:46 AM

“…The letter goes on to say that such a work could improperly influence future prospective jurors or future judges, upend the presumption of innocence, and even lead to the dismissal of a case if the taint caused by the dissemination of such information is so pervasive that an impartial venue cannot be found.”https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2023/02/03/mark-pomerantz-could-get-disbarred-over-trump-book-association-of-prosecuting-attorneys/

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-20. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Uncertain

Intensity

50%

Authorship Analysis

Uncertain

Indicators:

Evening posting time (7:46 PM ET)
Mix of emotional outburst and structured legal quotation
Exclamation mark and personal grievance typical of Trump
Precise legal citation suggests staff preparation

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Mark Pomerantz book about grand jury investigation)

Rage: Intensity 50% targeting Mark Pomerantz

Proportionality

60%

Sentiment

-0.60

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

60%

Antisocial

30%

Paranoid

40%

Sadism

20%

Defense Mechanisms:

denialprojectionrationalization

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

50%

Parasocial Techniques:

shared grievance against legal systempositioning audience as co-victims of prosecutorial overreach

Fact Checks (2)

"I've done nothing wrong (as always)"

Unverifiable

Blanket claim of perpetual innocence across all matters; Trump was under multiple criminal investigations at this time

"Disclosing grand jury materials without court order is a formal felony"

Mostly True

Grand jury secrecy is legally protected and unauthorized disclosure can result in criminal charges, though specifics vary by jurisdiction and the applicability to a former prosecutor writing a book is legally debatable

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Trump Post ts_109820694701928095

Context

This is a repost of his own earlier Truth Social post regarding Mark Pomerantz, a former Manhattan DA prosecutor who wrote a book about the Trump grand jury investigation. Trump quotes David LaBahn of the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys warning that disclosing grand jury materials without court order constitutes a felony. A companion post (same day) continues the quote about jury tainting and potential case dismissal.

Authorship

Posted at 7:46 PM ET (Trump likely at Mar-a-Lago). Evening timing, business-adjacent hours. The post combines a personal emotional outburst ("This is disgraceful conduct... I've done nothing wrong!") with a carefully sourced legal quote — suggesting either aide assistance in assembling the legal citation or Trump reposting prepared material. The emotional interjection is authentic Trump; the structured legal quotation suggests staff preparation.

Psychological Analysis

The post follows a classic two-part defensive structure: (1) emotional denial of wrongdoing, (2) weaponization of legal authority against the accuser. The phrase "as always, I've done nothing wrong" is notable for its absolutism — not just innocent in this case but always innocent, a grandiose claim of perpetual blamelessness.

The strategy of turning prosecutorial tools against prosecutors is a sophisticated DARVO maneuver: the investigated becomes the accuser, the prosecutor becomes the criminal. By citing a professional association's warning about felony charges, Trump positions Pomerantz as the true lawbreaker.

Defense Mechanisms

Denial: Blanket assertion of innocence ("as always, I've done nothing wrong")
Projection: The person under criminal investigation frames the prosecutor as the criminal
Rationalization: Legal authority cited to legitimize counterattack

Rhetorical Techniques

The post uses appeal to authority (quoting the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys president), tu quoque (redirecting criminality onto the accuser), and absolutist language ("as always," "nothing wrong").

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"I've done nothing wrong (as always)"	Unverifiable	Blanket claim of perpetual innocence across all matters; Trump was under multiple criminal investigations at this time
"Disclosing grand jury materials without court order is a formal felony"	Mostly True	Grand jury secrecy is legally protected and unauthorized disclosure can result in criminal charges, though specifics vary by jurisdiction and the applicability to a former prosecutor writing a book is legally debatable

Overall Veracity: 65%