Post from Truth Social

Crooked Hillary Clinton’s lawyer, radically deranged Mark Pomerantz, led the fake investigation into me and my business at the Manhattan D.A.’s Office and quit because D.A. Bragg, rightfully, wanted to drop the “weak” and “fatally flawed” case. Now, Pomerantz got himself a book deal, and is obsessively spreading falsehoods about me. With all of this vicious disinformation being revealed by a “prosecutor,” how can I ever be treated fairly in New York, or anywhere else? End the Witch Hunts!

0:00 0:00
Visualize
28.5K 7K 1.6K

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-20. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level
Elevated
Narcissistic State
Vulnerable
Authorship
Self-Written
Intensity
60%

This post demonstrates a textbook preemptive delegitimization strategy targeting Mark Pomerantz, a former Manhattan DA prosecutor who published a book about the Trump investigation. The psychological driver is narcissistic injury from exposure — an authoritative insider revealing prosecution details threatens Trump's narrative control. The post employs vulnerable narcissistic positioning (persecuted victim who "can never be treated fairly") while simultaneously using devaluation ("radically deranged"), guilt by association (Clinton connection), and denial ("fake investigation") to neutralize the threat. Reality distortion is notable: the claim that Bragg "wanted to drop" the case omits that Bragg ultimately indicted Trump one month later. The targeting of a specific prosecutor by name with dehumanizing labels ("radically deranged") in a post reaching millions represents an elevated danger pattern — not because it calls for violence directly, but because it establishes a named individual as an enemy of the audience. The rhetorical question framing ("how can I ever be treated fairly") serves dual purposes: it activates shared grievance with followers while laying groundwork to reject any future legal outcome as illegitimate. This fits a longitudinal pattern of systematically attacking legal institutions and individual prosecutors before proceedings, consistent with both narcissistic defense and strategic delegitimization.

Authorship Analysis
Self-Written
Indicators:
  • 9:31 PM EST evening posting time
  • Stacked pejorative nicknames
  • Signature 'End the Witch Hunts!' closing
  • Grievance-driven stream but relatively organized syntax
Psychological Profile
State
Vulnerable State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Mark Pomerantz book publication exposing prosecution details)

Rage: Intensity 55% targeting Mark Pomerantz / Manhattan DA's office / legal system

Proportionality
40%
Sentiment
-0.70
Clinical
Malignant Narcissism:
Narcissistic
70%
Antisocial
30%
Paranoid
60%
Sadism
20%
Defense Mechanisms:
devaluationprojectiondenialrationalization
Cognitive Complexity:
Complexity
60%
Parasocial Techniques:
Shared victimhood framingCall to collective action ('End the Witch Hunts!')
Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:
  • Targeting specific prosecutor by name with dehumanizing labels
  • Framing legal system as fundamentally unfair — eroding institutional legitimacy
  • Pattern of directing audience attention to specific individuals involved in prosecution
Gaslighting Detected:
  • Reframes legitimate prosecution as 'fake investigation'
  • Characterizes factual book as 'falsehoods' and 'disinformation'
  • Implies DA Bragg agreed case was meritless when Bragg ultimately proceeded with indictment
Reality Distortions:
  • Case framed as one Bragg 'wanted to drop' — Bragg ultimately indicted Trump
  • Pomerantz characterized as 'Clinton's lawyer' — oversimplification of firm-level connections
  • Book characterized as 'falsehoods' without addressing specific claims
Fact Checks (4)
"Mark Pomerantz was Clinton's lawyer"
Mostly False

Pomerantz's firm Paul Weiss had Clinton-related clients; Pomerantz personally was not Hillary Clinton's attorney

"DA Bragg wanted to drop the case"
Half True

Bragg initially paused the investigation in early 2022, prompting Pomerantz's resignation, but Bragg ultimately reconvened the grand jury and indicted Trump in March 2023

"Pomerantz quit the DA's office"
True

Pomerantz resigned in February 2022 over disagreements with Bragg about case direction

"Pomerantz got a book deal"
True

Pomerantz published 'People vs. Donald Trump' in early 2023

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Daily Digest Evening Legal Wounds Give Way to Afternoon Grandiose Counter-Narrative

Trump's day split into two distinct moods. The evening began with defensive, agitated posts attacking a 60 Minutes segment and a former Manhattan DA prosecutor by name, framing ongoing legal scrutiny as political persecution. By afternoon, the tone shifted to confident self-promotion and narrative c...

Analyzed
7
Rage Level
21%
Max Danger
Elevated
View full day analysis →