Analysis: When Soros backed Alvin Bragg attained the office of Manhatt...

3y ago Feb 1, 2023 at 11:52 AM

When Soros backed Alvin Bragg attained the office of Manhattan District Attorney, he received great praise from large circles of people for dropping some of the most ridiculous Witch Hunt type cases ever looked at by that office. Now some Radical Left crazies, coupled with “ratings crushed” and failing Fake News, are trying to get him to go the Prosecutorial Misconduct route, and take on certain very weak cases which are dead anyway based on the Statute of Limitations. FIGHT VIOLENT CRIME!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-20. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

Elevated

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

60%

This post constitutes a defensive response to the Manhattan grand jury convening to investigate Trump's hush money payments. The subject deploys a five-layered defensive architecture: (1) delegitimize the prosecutor through Soros conspiracy framing, (2) claim prior vindication, (3) externalize blame to radical forces and media, (4) dismiss cases on legal merits, and (5) redirect via "FIGHT VIOLENT CRIME!" The mixed narcissistic state oscillates between grandiose dismissal (cases are weak/dead) and vulnerable persecution (targeted by radical left). The Soros reference is clinically notable as it activates an antisemitic conspiracy framework to delegitimize a Black prosecutor — combining paranoid features with strategic audience manipulation. The splitting defense is textbook: Bragg was "good" when dropping cases, "bad" when pursuing them, with the shift attributed entirely to external corruption rather than evidence. The closing imperative creates a false dichotomy between prosecuting Trump and fighting violent crime, serving both as displacement and implicit accusation of prosecutorial misprioritization. Danger level is elevated due to naming a specific prosecutor within a conspiracy framework during active legal proceedings, though rhetoric remains within Trump's established baseline range.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Early morning posting (6:52 AM ET)
Stream-of-consciousness structure
Characteristic epithets and capitalization patterns
Emotional reactivity to legal threat
ALL CAPS closing imperative

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Manhattan grand jury investigation into hush money payments)

Rage: Intensity 50% targeting Alvin Bragg, media, 'Radical Left'

Proportionality

40%

Sentiment

-0.65

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

60%

Antisocial

30%

Paranoid

50%

Sadism

20%

Defense Mechanisms:

splittingprojectiondisplacementdenialrationalization

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

55%

Parasocial Techniques:

Framing audience as fellow victims of corrupt systemImperative call to action creating shared mission

Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:

Naming specific prosecutor while connecting to antisemitic conspiracy framework (Soros)
Delegitimizing active legal proceedings
Framing prosecution as political persecution to mobilize base

Gaslighting Detected:

Claims Bragg received 'great praise' for dropping cases — reframing prosecutorial discretion as validation of Trump's innocence
Characterizes active grand jury investigation as 'dead' cases
Frames legitimate prosecution as 'Prosecutorial Misconduct'

Reality Distortions:

Characterizing active grand jury proceedings as legally dead cases
Framing prosecution as driven by media pressure rather than evidence
Implying Bragg was praised for dropping Trump cases when it was actually controversial

Fact Checks (3)

"Bragg received great praise for dropping some cases"

Half True

Bragg's office did decline to pursue some Trump Organization charges initially, but this drew criticism not praise from many quarters, including from prosecutors who resigned in protest.

"Cases are dead based on the Statute of Limitations"

Mostly False

The hush money case ultimately proceeded to trial and conviction. Prosecutors argued the statute of limitations had been tolled during COVID and by Trump's absence from New York.

"Bragg is Soros backed"

Half True

Soros donated $1M to Color of Change PAC which supported Bragg's campaign. Bragg was not directly funded by Soros, but the connection exists through PAC spending.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Post ts_109789336061207811

Context

This post responds to the Manhattan grand jury investigation into Trump's hush money payments. The post attempts to reframe DA Alvin Bragg's investigation as politically motivated, deploying multiple defensive strategies simultaneously.

Authorship

Posted at 11:52 UTC = 6:52 AM EST. Trump was likely at Mar-a-Lago (Palm Beach) in early 2024 campaign mode. This is early morning — consistent with authentic Trump posting patterns. The stream-of-consciousness structure, characteristic rhetorical devices, and emotional intensity all point to authentic authorship.

Psychological Analysis

The post reveals a clear narcissistic injury response to the grand jury convening. The defensive architecture is layered: (1) delegitimize the prosecutor via Soros association, (2) claim initial vindication ("great praise" for dropping cases), (3) attribute current prosecution to external pressure from "Radical Left crazies" and media, (4) dismiss cases on legal merits ("Statute of Limitations"), and (5) redirect with "FIGHT VIOLENT CRIME!" — a classic displacement.

The narrative construction is notable: Bragg is cast as someone who was reasonable (when dropping cases against Trump) but is now being corrupted by outside forces. This splitting pattern — Bragg was good when serving Trump's interests, bad when threatening them — is characteristic.

Rhetorical Techniques

Heavy use of loaded epithets ("Soros backed," "Radical Left crazies," "ratings crushed," "Fake News"), delegitimization of legal process ("Witch Hunt"), and the closing imperative ("FIGHT VIOLENT CRIME!") serves as both deflection and implicit contrast — suggesting Bragg should pursue "real" crime rather than Trump.

Danger Assessment

The Soros reference activates antisemitic conspiracy frameworks. Naming Bragg specifically while connecting him to unpopular forces could function as target-painting, though the rhetoric stays within Trump's baseline range.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Bragg received great praise for dropping some cases"	Half True	Bragg's office did decline to pursue some Trump Organization charges initially, but this drew criticism not praise from many quarters, including from prosecutors who resigned in protest.
"Cases are dead based on the Statute of Limitations"	Mostly False	The hush money case ultimately proceeded to trial and conviction. Prosecutors argued the statute of limitations had been tolled during COVID and by Trump's absence from New York.
"Bragg is Soros backed"	Half True	Soros donated $1M to Color of Change PAC which supported Bragg's campaign. Bragg was not directly funded by Soros, but the connection exists through PAC spending.

Overall Veracity: 40%