Analysis: So with the FBI being caught red handed in Twitter Files, to...

3y ago Jan 19, 2023 at 12:32 PM

So with the FBI being caught red handed in Twitter Files, totally influencing the Election, on top of all of the other fraud and irregularities, the Fake News Media is finding it harder and harder to use the term “Big Lie”anymore. It actually angers people to do very bad things. The Radical Left should be careful in its use of that ridiculous term. The Election was Rigged and Stollen, the Unselect Committee of political Hacks and Thugs refused to discuss it, and so it goes. People want answers!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-20. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

Elevated

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

65%

This post warrants clinical attention primarily for the stochastic terrorism signal embedded in otherwise routine election denial maintenance. The sentence "It actually angers people to do very bad things" is a passive-voice construction that (1) validates violence as an understandable response to political speech, (2) implicitly threatens those who use the term "Big Lie," and (3) maintains plausible deniability. Combined with the direct warning to the "Radical Left" to "be careful," this constitutes an elevated danger indicator. Psychologically, the post operates in a well-established perseverative loop — election denial, institutional persecution, media vilification — that has become a core identity maintenance function. The misspelling "Stollen" (recurring across many posts) and the derisive neologism "Unselect Committee" are baseline-consistent. The gaslighting structure is notable: attacking the label "Big Lie" while actively perpetuating the very pattern that label describes represents a sophisticated DARVO maneuver. The epistemically closed demand that followers accept "Rigged and Stollen" as axiomatic, despite overwhelming contrary evidence from courts, DOJ, and Republican officials, continues to function as a loyalty test and shared-psychosis maintenance tool.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Misspelling 'Stollen'
Early morning EST posting
Stream-of-consciousness structure
ALL CAPS emphasis patterns
Characteristic nicknames (Unselect Committee, Fake News)

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Maintenance — Exposure (FBI/Twitter Files news cycle)

Rage: Intensity 50% targeting media, Radical Left, January 6 Committee

Proportionality

30%

Sentiment

-0.70

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

70%

Antisocial

50%

Paranoid

60%

Sadism

30%

Defense Mechanisms:

distortionprojectionrationalization

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

35%

Cognitive Markers:

perseverationneologism

Parasocial Techniques:

Claiming to speak for 'People' who 'want answers'Positioning self as persecuted truth-teller

Danger Assessment

Elevated

Stochastic Terrorism Pattern Detected

Indicators:

'It actually angers people to do very bad things' — implicit validation of violence as response to political speech
Warning to 'Radical Left' to 'be careful' — veiled threat
Continued delegitimization of democratic processes and institutions

Gaslighting Detected:

Reframing FBI's routine foreign-influence flagging as election rigging
Demanding acceptance of 'Rigged and Stollen' despite overwhelming contrary evidence
Attacking the term 'Big Lie' as dangerous while engaging in the very behavior it describes

Reality Distortions:

Election was 'Rigged and Stollen'
FBI Twitter communication = election manipulation
J6 Committee 'refused to discuss' fraud

Rhetorical Analysis

Dehumanizing Language Present

Fact Checks (3)

"FBI was 'caught red handed in Twitter Files' totally influencing the Election"

Mostly False

Twitter Files showed FBI flagged accounts and content to Twitter, but no evidence of 'total influence' on election outcome. FBI communicated about potential foreign influence operations, which is part of its mandate.

"The Election was Rigged and Stolen"

False

Over 60 court cases, DOJ investigation, state audits, and Trump's own AG William Barr found no evidence of fraud sufficient to change election outcome.

"The Unselect Committee refused to discuss fraud and irregularities"

Mostly False

The January 6 Committee's mandate was to investigate the Capitol attack, not adjudicate election fraud claims. However, it did address Trump's fraud claims and found them baseless.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Truth Social Post ts_109715883350143520

Authorship Attribution

Posted 2023-01-19 at 12:32 UTC. Trump was likely at Mar-a-Lago (EST = 7:32 AM). Early morning posting, combined with the misspelling "Stollen" (German bread, for "Stolen"), stream-of-consciousness structure, emotional reactivity, and capitalization patterns all strongly indicate authentic Trump authorship.

Psychological State

This post is a textbook maintenance-mode iteration of Trump's core election denial narrative. The FBI/Twitter Files reference provides a fresh hook to re-litigate 2020. The post follows a familiar cognitive loop: grievance → evidence claim → media attack → threat → persecution narrative → demand.

Defense Mechanisms

Distortion: Framing FBI communication with Twitter as proof the election was "Rigged and Stollen"
Projection: Accusing others of doing "very bad things" while engaging in delegitimization of democratic processes
Rationalization: Using Twitter Files as post-hoc justification for pre-existing election denial

Rhetorical Analysis

The phrase "It actually angers people to do very bad things" is notably ambiguous — it could be read as a veiled threat or stochastic terrorism signal, implying that using "Big Lie" provokes violent reactions from his base. The construction provides plausible deniability while signaling danger.

Cognitive Markers

"Stollen" for "Stolen" is a perseverative error Trump has made repeatedly, suggesting it may be a learned misspelling rather than acute cognitive issue. "Unselect Committee" is a deliberate derisive neologism consistent with his baseline wordplay patterns.

Danger Assessment

The sentence "It actually angers people to do very bad things" is an elevated concern — it implicitly validates violence as a response to political speech Trump dislikes, while maintaining deniability through passive construction.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"FBI was 'caught red handed in Twitter Files' totally influencing the Election"	Mostly False	Twitter Files showed FBI flagged accounts and content to Twitter, but no evidence of 'total influence' on election outcome. FBI communicated about potential foreign influence operations, which is part of its mandate.
"The Election was Rigged and Stolen"	False	Over 60 court cases, DOJ investigation, state audits, and Trump's own AG William Barr found no evidence of fraud sufficient to change election outcome.
"The Unselect Committee refused to discuss fraud and irregularities"	Mostly False	The January 6 Committee's mandate was to investigate the Capitol attack, not adjudicate election fraud claims. However, it did address Trump's fraud claims and found them baseless.

Overall Veracity: 13%