Analysis: The highly partisan Unselect Committee is illegally leaking ...

3y ago Dec 19, 2022 at 2:40 AM

The highly partisan Unselect Committee is illegally leaking confidential info to anyone that will listen. Adam “Shifty” Schiff is all over T.V. talking about Criminal Referrals, just like he was on the Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax, which turned out to be the con of the century. How much longer are Republicans, and American Patriots in general, going to allow this to happen. These are the Criminals who spied on my campaign, cheated on the Election, lied to FISA Court & Congress. They are SICK!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-20. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

Elevated

Narcissistic State

Vulnerable

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

82%

This post is a concentrated defensive response to the Jan. 6 Committee's unprecedented criminal referral of a former president to the DOJ. It deploys a textbook DARVO pattern: denying the committee's legitimacy ("Unselect," "illegally leaking"), attacking key figures (Schiff as "Shifty"), and reversing victim-offender roles by labeling investigators as "the Criminals" who "spied," "cheated," and "lied." The narcissistic injury is severe — criminal referral combines exposure, criticism, and existential legal threat — producing high-intensity rage disproportionate to the stated provocations. The rhetorical question "How much longer are Republicans, and American Patriots in general, going to allow this to happen" functions as an implicit mobilization call, framing passive observation while inviting action. This pattern — named targets + grievance articulation + implied call to response — meets criteria for elevated concern, particularly given the post-January 6 context. The projection is notable: every accusation maps onto documented conduct being investigated (obstruction, conspiracy, false statements). The closing dehumanization ("They are SICK!") condenses complex legal proceedings into moral disgust, reinforcing epistemic closure among followers. Cognitively, the post is coherent and structurally organized despite its emotional intensity, showing no deviation from baseline.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Late evening posting (9:40 PM ET)
Emotional reactivity and ALL CAPS
Characteristic nickname 'Shifty Schiff'
Stream-of-consciousness run-on structure
Russia Russia Russia repetition pattern

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Vulnerable State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Jan. 6 Committee criminal referral to DOJ)

Rage: Intensity 80% targeting Jan. 6 Committee, Adam Schiff, unnamed 'criminals'

Proportionality

30%

Sentiment

-0.85

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

80%

Antisocial

50%

Paranoid

70%

Sadism

30%

Defense Mechanisms:

projectiondenialsplittingdevaluation

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

55%

Cognitive Markers:

perseveration

Parasocial Techniques:

In-group solidarity appeal to Republicans and PatriotsShared victimhood narrativeMobilization through rhetorical question

Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:

Rhetorical question implying supporters should take action ('How much longer...going to allow this')
Named target (Adam Schiff) combined with criminal accusation
Labeling investigators as criminals delegitimizes legal process
Appeal to 'American Patriots' to not 'allow this to happen'

Gaslighting Detected:

Reframing criminal referral as 'illegal leaking'
Dismissing documented Russia investigation as 'con of the century'
Reversing who is criminal — investigators become the accused
Delegitimizing committee as 'Unselect'

Reality Distortions:

Criminal referral reframed as illegal leaking
Russia investigation dismissed despite 34 indictments
2020 election fraud claim contradicted by all audits and court rulings
Committee members cast as criminals rather than investigators

Rhetorical Analysis

Dehumanizing Language Present

Fact Checks (5)

"The committee is illegally leaking confidential info"

Mostly False

The committee's final report and referrals were public proceedings. Congressional committees have broad authority over their own materials.

"The Russia investigation was 'the con of the century'"

False

The Mueller investigation resulted in 34 indictments, 8 guilty pleas/convictions, and documented extensive Russian interference and campaign contacts, though it did not establish criminal conspiracy.

"They spied on my campaign"

Half True

The FBI conducted surveillance on Carter Page via FISA warrant. The Horowitz report found the investigation was properly predicated but identified significant FISA application errors.

"They cheated on the Election"

False

No evidence of systematic election fraud was found by courts, DOJ, or state officials in the 2020 election. Over 60 legal challenges were dismissed.

"They lied to FISA Court"

Mostly True

The DOJ Inspector General found 17 significant errors/omissions in FISA applications for Carter Page surveillance, including an FBI lawyer altering an email.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Post ts_109538025801155666

Context

This post directly responds to the Jan. 6 Committee's historic criminal referral of Trump to the DOJ — the first time Congress criminally referred a former president. Posted at 9:40 PM ET (Trump likely at Mar-a-Lago), this is a reactive post to a major narcissistic injury.

Authorship

Late evening timing (9:40 PM ET), emotional reactivity, ALL CAPS passages, stream-of-consciousness quality, run-on structure, and the characteristic nickname "Shifty Schiff" all point to authentic Trump authorship. The rhetorical coherence is notable — this is angry but organized rage.

Psychological Dynamics

The post is a textbook response to narcissistic injury. The Jan. 6 referral represents simultaneous criticism, exposure, and potential defeat. Trump's response deploys a dense cluster of defenses: projection (calling the committee "criminals"), DARVO (reversing victim and offender — they spied, they cheated, they are the criminals), and denial (delegitimizing the committee as "Unselect" and "illegally leaking").

The closing "They are SICK!" is characteristic narcissistic rage — disproportionate, dehumanizing, and aimed at psychological annihilation of the threat source.

Rhetorical Analysis

The "Russia, Russia, Russia" repetition is perseverative branding — reducing a complex investigation to a dismissible catchphrase. The pivot from defense to counterattack ("These are the Criminals") is classic DARVO. The rhetorical question "How much longer are Republicans...going to allow this to happen" is a mobilization call framed as passive observation.

Danger Assessment

The mobilization framing ("How much longer...going to allow this") combined with labeling investigators as criminals creates a stochastic terrorism pattern: identified targets + articulated grievance + implied call to action. This is elevated but not explicit.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"The committee is illegally leaking confidential info"	Mostly False	The committee's final report and referrals were public proceedings. Congressional committees have broad authority over their own materials.
"The Russia investigation was 'the con of the century'"	False	The Mueller investigation resulted in 34 indictments, 8 guilty pleas/convictions, and documented extensive Russian interference and campaign contacts, though it did not establish criminal conspiracy.
"They spied on my campaign"	Half True	The FBI conducted surveillance on Carter Page via FISA warrant. The Horowitz report found the investigation was properly predicated but identified significant FISA application errors.
"They cheated on the Election"	False	No evidence of systematic election fraud was found by courts, DOJ, or state officials in the 2020 election. Over 60 legal challenges were dismissed.
"They lied to FISA Court"	Mostly True	The DOJ Inspector General found 17 significant errors/omissions in FISA applications for Carter Page surveillance, including an FBI lawyer altering an email.

Overall Veracity: 30%