Analysis: Incredible how dishonest the Fake News Media is.The Failing ...

3y ago Nov 10, 2022 at 6:44 AM

Incredible how dishonest the Fake News Media is.The Failing New York Times has gone crazy. So many of the people I Endorsed went on to victory on Tuesday Night, nobody was even close, and they literally make up a story refusing to write the facts, and only quoting enemies and losers. Almost all of the people I endorsed WON, yet if you read the story from two Trump hating writers (who only do as they are told!), you would not even recognize the truth. They truly are, THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE!!!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-20. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

Elevated

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

82%

This 1:44 AM post reveals acute narcissistic injury triggered by NYT coverage exposing the gap between Trump's claimed endorsement success and competitive-race reality. Longitudinal analysis shows escalating reality distortion: win counts inflated across four posts in 24 hours (115→174→219→"almost all") as the subject constructed an increasingly distorted counter-narrative. The defense structure combines pathological distortion (reshaping endorsement record), projection (accusing journalists of fabrication while distorting facts), and splitting (binary enemies-vs-winners framing). The culminating "ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE" constitutes stochastic terrorism patterning — identifying a target (NYT and specific writers), articulating a grievance (dishonest coverage), applying a dehumanizing label, and implying existential threat. This phrase has historically preceded violence against journalists. The mixed narcissistic state oscillates between grandiose self-assessment ("nobody was even close") and persecutory vulnerability, consistent with the Kernberg model of narcissistic rage as response to ego threat. Gaslighting is present: accurate reporting is reframed as fabrication, demanding followers reject observable reality. The post exemplifies epistemic closure dynamics — accepting Trump's version becomes a loyalty test. Clinically, the disproportionality of rage to stimulus, the late-night timing, and the escalating distortion pattern warrant continued monitoring.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

1:44 AM local time
emotional reactivity
stream-of-consciousness style
ALL CAPS passage
no professional formatting

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (New York Times coverage of midterm endorsement record)

Rage: Intensity 80% targeting New York Times / media

Proportionality

30%

Sentiment

-0.75

Mildly Hypomanic

1:44 AM posting timePressured, run-on writingGrandiose claims alongside hostile reactivity

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

80%

Antisocial

50%

Paranoid

70%

Sadism

30%

Defense Mechanisms:

distortionprojectionsplitting

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

45%

Cognitive Markers:

perseveration

Parasocial Techniques:

shared grievance against medialoyalty framing — accept my numbers or you're with the enemy

Danger Assessment

Elevated

Stochastic Terrorism Pattern Detected

Indicators:

'ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE' directed at named outlet and implied specific journalists
Stochastic terrorism pattern: target (NYT writers) + grievance (dishonest coverage) + dehumanizing frame (enemy)
Historical pattern: this language has preceded violence against journalists

Gaslighting Detected:

Attacks media perception: 'Fake News,' 'gone crazy,' 'refuse to write the facts'
Demands acceptance of inflated win record as litmus test
Labels accurate reporting as fabrication ('literally make up a story')

Reality Distortions:

Endorsement record presented as overwhelmingly successful when competitive races showed significant losses
Win counts escalated across posts (115→174→219→'almost all') without methodological explanation
Accurate journalism reframed as fabricated enemy propaganda

Rhetorical Analysis

Dehumanizing Language Present

Fact Checks (2)

"Almost all of the people I endorsed WON"

Half True

True if counting all endorsements including safe-seat incumbents. In competitive races, Trump-backed candidates lost key Senate races in PA, AZ, NV, NH, and GA runoff. His overall record included many uncontested or safe races that inflate the numbers.

"NYT 'literally make up a story refusing to write the facts'"

False

NYT coverage accurately reflected that Trump-endorsed candidates underperformed in competitive races, which is documented by election results.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Post ts_109318153501562995

Context

Posted at 1:44 AM EST (likely Mar-a-Lago), two days after the 2022 midterms where Trump-endorsed candidates significantly underperformed in competitive races. The post attacks NYT coverage of his endorsement record.

Authorship

The 1:44 AM local time, emotional reactivity, stream-of-consciousness structure, ALL CAPS finale, and lack of polish all point strongly to authentic Trump authorship. This is a classic late-night grievance post.

Psychological State

This post is driven by narcissistic injury from media coverage exposing the gap between his claimed endorsement success and reality. The longitudinal context is revealing: over 24 hours, his win count shifts from "115 and 5" to "174 wins and 9 losses" to "219 WINS and 16 Losses" — numbers that inflate with each iteration while remaining unverifiable. Now he claims "Almost all of the people I endorsed WON" while attacking journalists who present contrary evidence.

Defense Mechanisms

The primary defense is distortion — grossly reshaping the endorsement record by counting safe-seat incumbents alongside competitive races. Projection is evident in accusing journalists of "literally making up a story" and "refusing to write the facts" when the subject is the one distorting facts. Splitting divides the world into loyal allies and "enemies and losers."

Rhetorical Analysis

The closing "THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE" is eliminationist rhetoric with historical resonance (Volksfeind). The post employs: ad hominem ("Trump hating writers"), delegitimization of press ("Fake News"), conspiracy framing ("they only do as they are told"), and the firehose technique of asserting victory so forcefully that the claim itself becomes the story.

Reality Distortion

The claim "Almost all of the people I endorsed WON" is technically true only if one includes endorsements in safe Republican districts. In competitive races, Trump-backed candidates lost key Senate seats in PA, AZ, NV, NH, and GA (runoff). The post exemplifies epistemic closure — demanding followers accept a curated version of reality as a loyalty test.

Danger Assessment

"ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE" directed at specific journalists and outlets constitutes stochastic terrorism patterning: identified target (NYT, named writers) + grievance (dishonest coverage) + dehumanizing label (enemy). This language has historically preceded violence against journalists.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Almost all of the people I endorsed WON"	Half True	True if counting all endorsements including safe-seat incumbents. In competitive races, Trump-backed candidates lost key Senate races in PA, AZ, NV, NH, and GA runoff. His overall record included many uncontested or safe races that inflate the numbers.
"NYT 'literally make up a story refusing to write the facts'"	False	NYT coverage accurately reflected that Trump-endorsed candidates underperformed in competitive races, which is documented by election results.

Overall Veracity: 25%