Analysis: Remember, Vote for Dan Goldman in New York-10! He was in cha...

4y ago Aug 23, 2022 at 12:26 AM

Remember, Vote for Dan Goldman in New York-10! He was in charge of the Impeachment Hoax, and even though he lost big, and was devastated by this loss, he was very fair, honorable, and kind. That’s the kind of thinking we need to come out on top with Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and all of those other countries who no longer respect the United States of America!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-19. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

None

Narcissistic State

Grandiose

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

45%

Trump deploys a transparently sarcastic "endorsement" of Dan Goldman — lead Democratic counsel during his first impeachment — in the NY-10 primary. Mock-praise ("fair, honorable, and kind") and an absurd foreign policy pivot reveal passive-aggressive contempt. The distortion that Goldman "lost big" rewrites history; impeachment passed the House. This post functions primarily as displacement from acute legal stressors (Weisselberg guilty plea, Mar-a-Lago aftermath) and as a sadistic exercise in manipulating opponents' political processes. The tonal whiplash from the same-day legalistic Mar-a-Lago post to gleeful trolling suggests compartmentalized coping.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Distinctive sarcastic mock-endorsement pattern
Evening posting time (8:26 PM EDT)
Classic Trump trolling voice
Impeachment Hoax is signature framing

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Grandiose State

Trigger: Preemptive Attack — Exposure (Dan Goldman / impeachment history)

Rage: Intensity 40% targeting Dan Goldman

Proportionality

30%

Sentiment

-0.30

Mildly Hypomanic

Playful trolling amid serious legal jeopardy suggests elevated mood or manic defense

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

60%

Antisocial

50%

Paranoid

20%

Sadism

50%

Defense Mechanisms:

distortionpassive aggressionacting outdisplacement

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

60%

Parasocial Techniques:

Remember opening creates shared insider knowledgeUs-vs-them framing with foreign adversaries

Danger Assessment

None

Gaslighting Detected:

Reframes impeachment as Goldman losing big
Labels impeachment a Hoax

Reality Distortions:

Goldman lost big — impeachment passed the House
Impeachment framed as Hoax

Fact Checks (2)

"Dan Goldman was in charge of the Impeachment"

Mostly True

Goldman served as lead counsel for House Democrats during the first impeachment inquiry; 'in charge' slightly overstates his role

"He lost big"

Mostly False

The House impeached Trump; he was acquitted by the Senate. Framing this as Goldman personally losing is distortion

Receipts (1)

“Dan Goldman was in charge of the Impeachment”

vs.

“Dan Goldman was 'illegally targeting President TRUMP.'”

In 2022 Trump explicitly endorsed Goldman ('Remember, Vote for Dan Goldman!') and praised his character as 'very fair, honorable, and kind.' The 2026 source post calls Goldman 'weak and pathetic' and a 'jerk.' These are direct, opposing character assessments of the same person — from strong praise to outright condemnation — constituting a clear contradiction regardless of the strategic motivation behind the 2022 endorsement.

View contradicting post →

Psychological Analysis: Sarcastic "Endorsement" of Dan Goldman

Context

This post is a masterclass in weaponized sarcasm. Dan Goldman was lead counsel for the Democrats during Trump's first impeachment inquiry. Trump is "endorsing" him in the NY-10 Democratic primary — a transparent troll designed to cause chaos. The claim Goldman "lost big" is distortion; impeachment passed the House. The foreign policy pivot mockingly implies Goldman's supposed weakness is what America needs.

Timing & Authorship

Posted 8:26 PM EDT (Trump at Mar-a-Lago). The distinctive sarcastic mock-endorsement voice is signature Trump. Likely authentic or dictated.

Psychological Dynamics

Amid extreme legal pressure (Mar-a-Lago search, Weisselberg guilty plea), Trump channels energy into political disruption — classic displacement. The sarcastic endorsement serves as revenge against an impeachment figure, demonstrates perceived power over Democratic primaries, and provides narcissistic supply through chaos.

Defense Mechanisms

The "Hoax" framing and claim Goldman "lost big" represent distortion. Mock-praise ("fair, honorable, and kind") is passive aggression. The entire exercise is acting out and displacement from legal threats.

Rhetorical Analysis

Layered sarcasm where surface meaning inverts actual intent. "Remember" functions as a call to action. The foreign policy list amplifies mockery through patriotic framing.

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"Dan Goldman was in charge of the Impeachment"	Mostly True	Goldman served as lead counsel for House Democrats during the first impeachment inquiry; 'in charge' slightly overstates his role
"He lost big"	Mostly False	The House impeached Trump; he was acquitted by the Senate. Framing this as Goldman personally losing is distortion

Overall Veracity: 50%

Receipts (1)

major — dan-goldman-was-illegally-targeting-president-trump (4 years later)

> "Dan Goldman was in charge of the Impeachment"

vs.

> "Dan Goldman was 'illegally targeting President TRUMP.'"

[View contradicting post →](/post/ts_116802857184219655)