34 posts from Monday, May 4, 2026
RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/116517965109663490
Video transcript
When climate change is flooding our streets, poisoning our air, driving up health care and disaster costs, how can the EPA justify abandoning that duty to protect Americans to appease polluters under the false flag of economic growth? Following the law, section 202 of the Clean Air Act, where does this say anything about fighting global climate change? Loperbrite, Supreme Court case, you're familiar with it? No, maybe others are. I'm not, but let me ask-- But that's really important, as a member of Congress, Loperbrite says that we, as an agency, don't have the authority to get creative. If section 202 of the Clean Air Act-- No, but you don't have-- excuse me. You do not have the right to say climate change does not exist, that it's a hoax, and that's where this administration is coming from. I understand you're upset that you don't know what Loperbrite is. Do you know what the major policies doctrine is? I'm upset because-- Do you know what the major policies doctrine is? You're a member of Congress. You should know. You have moved from someone who defended the environment to all of a sudden-- You're very defensive about not knowing the two biggest landmark Supreme Court cases of the last year-- And you are very-- --with regards to your question. --you are very defensive about changing your policy and your positions with regard to the environment. Now, do just tell-- Do you want me to tell you what the two biggest Supreme Court cases are of the last few years? This is what I want you to tell me. Michigan versus EPA. Whoa. West Virginia versus EPA. You're here because you need money from us. So halt for the second. And wait for the questions. And answer the question. Well, I answered your question. And you didn't like my answer because you don't know what Loperbrite is. Because you don't know what the major policies doctrine is. Because you're asking me-- you're asking about Section 202 of the Clean Air Act. And you don't read it. You don't know what it says. Listen, and what you want to do is to deny-- No, I actually read the law. I do my homework. Really? You're just somebody who likes to have the microphone on. You know what I have to do? I read the law. I read the Supreme Court cases. And I would say that-- No, we should do it for your constituents is actually read statute. My budget is at real risk. Read your Supreme Court. This is the Appropriations Committee. Oh, you're-- you're going to-- You care about science. Now you're threatening to defund it. Oh my god. No, you don't fund science. Because you don't know what Loperbrite is. Because you don't know what the major policies doctrine is. Your message to our folks at the EPA is that you wanted to fund us. I don't have to listen to this BS. The BS? You think I made up these cases? Yeah, I think you have made up a whole lot of these cases. I made up Loperbrite. I made up West Virginia versus EPA. I made up Michigan versus EPA. Woe is right. What are you doing? Why are you helping polluters?
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
Video transcript
When climate change is flooding our streets, poisoning our air, driving up health care and disaster costs, how can the EPA justify abandoning that duty to protect Americans to appease polluters under the false flag of economic growth? Following the law, section 202 of the Clean Air Act, where does this say anything about fighting global climate change? Loperbrite, Supreme Court case, you're familiar with it? No, maybe others are. I'm not, but let me ask-- But that's really important, as a member of Congress, Loperbrite says that we, as an agency, don't have the authority to get creative. If section 202 of the Clean Air Act-- No, but you don't have-- excuse me. You do not have the right to say climate change does not exist, that it's a hoax, and that's where this administration is coming from. I understand you're upset that you don't know what Loperbrite is. Do you know what the major policies doctrine is? I'm upset because-- Do you know what the major policies doctrine is? You're a member of Congress. You should know. You have moved from someone who defended the environment to all of a sudden-- You're very defensive about not knowing the two biggest landmark Supreme Court cases of the last year-- And you are very-- --with regards to your question. --you are very defensive about changing your policy and your positions with regard to the environment. Now, do just tell-- Do you want me to tell you what the two biggest Supreme Court cases are of the last few years? This is what I want you to tell me. Michigan versus EPA. Whoa. West Virginia versus EPA. You're here because you need money from us. So halt for the second. And wait for the questions. And answer the question. Well, I answered your question. And you didn't like my answer because you don't know what Loperbrite is. Because you don't know what the major policies doctrine is. Because you're asking me-- you're asking about Section 202 of the Clean Air Act. And you don't read it. You don't know what it says. Listen, and what you want to do is to deny-- No, I actually read the law. I do my homework. Really? You're just somebody who likes to have the microphone on. You know what I have to do? I read the law. I read the Supreme Court cases. And I would say that-- No, we should do it for your constituents is actually read statute. My budget is at real risk. Read your Supreme Court. This is the Appropriations Committee. Oh, you're-- you're going to-- You care about science. Now you're threatening to defund it. Oh my god. No, you don't fund science. Because you don't know what Loperbrite is. Because you don't know what the major policies doctrine is. Your message to our folks at the EPA is that you wanted to fund us. I don't have to listen to this BS. The BS? You think I made up these cases? Yeah, I think you have made up a whole lot of these cases. I made up Loperbrite. I made up West Virginia versus EPA. I made up Michigan versus EPA. Woe is right. What are you doing? Why are you helping polluters?
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/116517961880896424
Video transcript
the ballroom itself obviously has a security function which would serve not only this president but all future presidents and i know that unfortunately a democrat may be president at some point in the future here but you know what it will be theirs to use as well for them and their gifts to be kept safe that's the bedrock of our political system that we have these peaceful power arrangements that people can hold events like this and again that was supposed to be a celebration of the first amendment what was an attack on the first amendment as well. Jack Posobic great to see you in person thank you for helping the show out you are done yeoman's work for us thank you Jack appreciate it.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
Video transcript
the ballroom itself obviously has a security function which would serve not only this president but all future presidents and i know that unfortunately a democrat may be president at some point in the future here but you know what it will be theirs to use as well for them and their gifts to be kept safe that's the bedrock of our political system that we have these peaceful power arrangements that people can hold events like this and again that was supposed to be a celebration of the first amendment what was an attack on the first amendment as well. Jack Posobic great to see you in person thank you for helping the show out you are done yeoman's work for us thank you Jack appreciate it.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/116517956925573430
Video transcript
should be terminated if the Democrats ever get a shot which probably based on history sometime they will they will use it the first minute of the first hour and they will execute all of the bad things 21 justices you know they really like 21 I heard 13 but they really want 21 Supreme Court justices and they really want to have DC and Puerto Rico become states that would mean automatic four senators go into the Democrat column and there's not even a chance that they don't do it and do it immediately now with that knowledge because you could argue whether it's good or bad but not I don't think it's that much of an argument frankly but you could argue with that knowledge that they're going to do it immediately why wouldn't you do it as a Republican unless you have bad motives almost but if we did it we could pass one bill after the other we could pass laws and acts and things that we never even dreamt of passing and you know what else we wouldn't lose for 50 years you know if we pass if we terminated the filibuster we would have a 50-year run you'd stop cheating I mean look their professional cheats and they're great at it that's what they're best at because you can't get elected with their policy you can't get elected with men and women's sports with transgender mutualization of our children with open borders for jails to be dropped into our country and mental institutions and drug dealers and murderers think of it eleven thousand eight hundred eighty eight murders come into our country nobody even talks to them about it right we got a lot of them out because of you know what because of ice which they don't want to do they don't want to fund they're defunding our police when they defund ice and with border patrol and sequencer they're defunding our police the same thing as they're doing with an officer on the street corner so why the Republicans Senate doesn't just sit in there and just do it and take a negative vote and do it again and again like the Democrats do they go again and again the water
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
Video transcript
should be terminated if the Democrats ever get a shot which probably based on history sometime they will they will use it the first minute of the first hour and they will execute all of the bad things 21 justices you know they really like 21 I heard 13 but they really want 21 Supreme Court justices and they really want to have DC and Puerto Rico become states that would mean automatic four senators go into the Democrat column and there's not even a chance that they don't do it and do it immediately now with that knowledge because you could argue whether it's good or bad but not I don't think it's that much of an argument frankly but you could argue with that knowledge that they're going to do it immediately why wouldn't you do it as a Republican unless you have bad motives almost but if we did it we could pass one bill after the other we could pass laws and acts and things that we never even dreamt of passing and you know what else we wouldn't lose for 50 years you know if we pass if we terminated the filibuster we would have a 50-year run you'd stop cheating I mean look their professional cheats and they're great at it that's what they're best at because you can't get elected with their policy you can't get elected with men and women's sports with transgender mutualization of our children with open borders for jails to be dropped into our country and mental institutions and drug dealers and murderers think of it eleven thousand eight hundred eighty eight murders come into our country nobody even talks to them about it right we got a lot of them out because of you know what because of ice which they don't want to do they don't want to fund they're defunding our police when they defund ice and with border patrol and sequencer they're defunding our police the same thing as they're doing with an officer on the street corner so why the Republicans Senate doesn't just sit in there and just do it and take a negative vote and do it again and again like the Democrats do they go again and again the water
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
I made the U.S.A. 45 Billion Dollars in 8 months!
“Too Late” is a DISASTER for America! Interest Rates too high!
Kennedy Center Rep to Newsmax: Previous Management Ran Facility Into Ground: https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/roma-daravi-newsmax-trump-kennedy-center/2026/02/16/id/1246314/
Rent Check Test: How Trump's Policy Shift Is Easing Home Prices: https://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2026/02/19/rent_check_test_how_trumps_policy_shift_is_easing_home_prices_1165698.html
From Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick:
“Mr. President,
This is what I shared with you.
1. Your overall support with Republicans is 89% in Texas. With those who identify as conservatives it’s 97%.
2. I tested 21 messages of my accomplishments. All were received well.
However the #1 reason people will vote for me is YOU.
It’s the top message above any policy issue.”
Greg Abbott is the strong and highly respected Governor of Texas, a State I love and WON BIG three times, including with 6.4 Million Votes in 2024 (The most Votes in History, BY FAR)!
Thanks to Greg’s bold and effective Leadership, the wonderful people of Texas will have the opportunity to elect 5 new MAGA Republicans in the 2026 Midterm Elections with the passage of their new, fair, and much improved, Congressional Map — A BIG WIN for Republicans in The Lone Star State, and across the Country! As Governor, Greg is also fighting tirelessly to Champion Texas Values, Grow the Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Support our Amazing Farmers and Ranchers, Advance MADE IN THE U.S.A., Unleash American Energy Dominance, Promote School Choice, Keep our now very Secure Border, SECURE, Stop Migrant Crime, Murderers, and other Criminals from illegally entering our Country, Ensure LAW AND ORDER, Protect our Brave Military, Veterans, and Law Enforcement, and Defend our always under siege Second Amendment.
Greg Abbott has my Complete and Total Endorsement for Re-Election. He is an exceptional Governor and man — HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!
I am proud to once again endorse Texas Lieutenant Governor, Dan Patrick, for Re-Election.
As Texas Chair of our Presidential Campaigns in 2016, 2020, and 2024, Dan has been an incredible friend to our Movement, helping us WIN BIG in the Primaries and General Elections. In his next Term, Dan will fight tirelessly alongside of us to Secure the Border, Stop Migrant Crime, Grow the Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Champion School Choice, Support our Great Military/Vets, Restore American Energy DOMINANCE, and Strongly Protect our always under siege Second Amendment.
Dan Patrick has my Complete and Total Endorsement – He will never let you down!
Jonathan Karl, of ABC Fake News, made a statement that I called him early in the morning, the day after the assassination attempt, to ask whether or not HE was OK. No, this was a hit on ME, not HIM, and I didn’t make such a call, why would I do that? He called me, but I didn’t take his call — He just confirmed that to me when he called again. I would say that’s very dishonest reporting. He’s trying to make himself look important but, I’m not surprised, because it comes from ABC Fake News! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Iran has taken some shots at unrelated Nations with respect to the Ship Movement, PROJECT FREEDOM, including a South Korean Cargo Ship. Perhaps it’s time for South Korea to come and join the mission! We’ve shot down seven small Boats or, as they like to call them, “fast” Boats. It’s all they have left. Other than the South Korean Ship, there has been, at this moment, no damage going through the Strait. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dan Caine, will have a News Conference tomorrow morning. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Video transcript
>> Hello and welcome to another edition of Prop Carson's What in the World. I for one am quite thankful that our president and his cabinet are okay. Donald Trump returned to the White House Correspondence Dinner and a madman no king supporter who gave money to Kamala Harris campaign and rallied against Trump using the language of Democrats and attempted to storm the ballroom to kill the president. And MS Now has no clue about his motivation. >> We do not yet know what the shooter's intended target was, yes, obviously. Okay, so we don't know what the intended target was. >> This was an event that was well publicized that the president would be attending. >> And now we know the intended target. >> He has not attended this event since 2015. >> And there's a reason why there that he was the intended target. >> But it was a room of over 1,000 people, there were reporters, there were lawmakers. >> He might have been there to go after the guy who had the basket with the bread and the tongs. And then he's like, the guy didn't want pumpernickel and like, how dare you give me pumpernickel? >> Nobody likes pumpernickel. >> Business leaders, they were members of Congress. >> Could have been a bartender for all we know. I asked for Chardonnay. >> Members of the administration, and yes, of course, they were the president and first lady Melania Trump. But we do not yet know who specifically was the target. >> The alleged gunman Cole Allen wrote a manifesto where he said of the president, I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, coat my hands with his crimes. All of this verbiage has come from the mouths of Democrats over the past decade, intensifying since Trump was reelected. Democrat JB Raskin still acted clueless when asked about it by CNN's Dana Bash. >> You have, and as many of your fellow Democrats have used some heated rhetoric against the president. >> You know, like a fascist, white supremacist, racist. >> And do you think twice about that when something like this happens? >> What rhetoric do you have in mind? >> Please. >> Talking about some of the fact that he is terrible for this country and so on and so forth. I understand. >> Magafascist, enemy of democracy. >> That that's your democratic right? But overall, do you have a responsibility- >> I have no personal problem with Donald Trump at all. >> Then why do you say all of those awful, awful things about him? >> I talked about the policies of this administration, the authority- >> No, actually you don't. You also name call. >> Criterionism like we saw on display in Minneapolis, where two of our citizens were gunned down in the streets simply for exercising. >> Yeah, that isn't true. Not one little bit. It's also called a lie. >> The First Amendment rights, Renee Good, Alex Predi, and others- >> I mean, it's like you can't even try to run over an ICE agent and what happens? >> You know, died in custody- >> He is a cyborg, isn't he? Now we know. >> I'm talking about policies. I don't personalize it and I- >> Sure, it's about policy. >> Certainly they've never called the press the enemy of the people. I think the press are the people's best- >> No, but you've called the president the enemy of the people. >> Best friend and that's why it's written right there into the First Amendment. We need the press to be a vigilant watchdog against every level of government, federal, state, local, all of it. >> Yeah, that's like the big bad wolf sag. I don't know what happened to the three little pigs, straw and stick houses. I didn't see nothing. >> The morning of the White House Correspondent Center, Ken Martin, the chair of the DNC actually called Donald Trump a fascist. >> There are a lot of things that Republicans seem to be working on. >> I always forget if he's key or appeal. >> Whether they're in the judiciary or the White House or- >> Regardless, he's hilarious. >> Congress or advisors and folks on the ground that are gonna make it actually more difficult for you guys. >> Yeah, I mean, look, we are seeing a desperate man, a narcissist, a fascist in the White House who is so- >> Wow, he just called the president a fascist. See, that's not about policy there, Jamie. That's about name calling. >> Asper to hold on the power. I think over these next 191 days left until the election, we're gonna see an unprecedented assault on our elections. >> No, no, actually, we just wanna make sure there aren't any dead people or illegals voting. >> On voting rights, we've already seen that, right? >> Yeah, Democrats have been name calling and inciting people. It's called stochastic terrorism. It incites crazy people to commit acts of violence. >> In a statement that aged as well as spoiled Melch, CNN's Jake Tapper and 249 of his colleagues said before the event, they were going to forcefully demonstrate opposition to Donald Trump. Sounds like a big hug, doesn't it? Voice of America leader, Kerry Lake, told Newsmax when she saw Jake after the incident, she gave him a little what-fur. >> I will tell you, I'm sorry, but guys, I walked out and I walked out as a complete, I'm sorry, he's a fool. Walking out next to Jake Tapper and I looked- >> Wait, wait, wait, are you seeing him? >> Yeah, the guy that denied Joe Biden's cognitive decline for years until it was obvious that the debate that he hosted and then after Joe Biden left office and was defeated by Trump, he wrote a book about Joe Biden's cognitive decline is clueless. >> I said to him and I said, how dare you? You have caused so much division in this country pushing lives. I said, we're not gonna call it gas lighting anymore, you've lied to the people. How dare you do that? And I saw so many people from all of these news outlets who've just spread abject lies about President Trump over the years. >> Yeah, like the Russia collusion hoax and now the impeachment hoax and- >> They're part to blame of this and I don't mean to get dramatic tonight. >> I think you should be very dramatic because a third assassination attempt is pretty dramatic. >> But I, as an American mother and an American, I'm tired of it. And I'm tired of the fake news that has just spread nothing but lies, trying to hurt this president, trying to go against the American people. And I couldn't sit there silent and walk out next to somebody like a Jake Tapper and act like he's a good guy. >> Yeah, Jake apparently got his feelings hurt by being confronted by the truth with Carrie Lake. It's hard when rock tossers get rocks thrown back at him. >> But this crusade against Kimmel was predictable because the Trump administration's attempt to use Saturday shooting as justification to stop all critical coverage, whether journalists- >> Yeah, it's about ending all critical coverage, which by the way is CNN, 97% of the time. >> Or comedic of Donald Trump. That started even before the ballroom emptied because Carrie Lake, the election denier who's currently in charge of- >> Who, by the way, could totally kick your butt, clean up between your shoulders. >> Voice of America. She approached a CNN table after the shooting and blamed journalists for the attempted attack and personally insulted one of our correspondents as a quote midget is now being matched with social media posts and more from the White House trying to use this horrific tragedy to demonize any criticism. >> No, I'm thinking actually the demonizing of Donald Trump caused the incident, you see. >> It's calls for violence and the president has been making little calls for violence since 2015. >> No, he hasn't actually, he's been responding to vitriol and violence against him. >> I'm not even gonna go into them, you're familiar with them but- >> No, why don't you go ahead and get into them. Tell us the examples exactly, please. >> Literal calls for violence. Now, a reminder that the president's tone immediately after the attack on Saturday was praised by Democrats and Republicans. >> Which was much bigger than you guys would ever, ever consider being. >> And it was far more conciliatory. >> I ask that all Americans recommit with their hearts and resolving our differences. >> This is what being a leader is all about, Jake. >> Conference peacefully, we have to resolve our differences. >> That sentiment clearly did not last long. >> Some reporters unlike Jake Taber had a bit of a come to Jesus moment as the president showed grace and bravery in the face of his third assassination attempt. Even ABC's George Stephanopoulos appeared slack-jawed as John Carl recounted what Trump did later that night. >> John, your phone rang early this morning? >> Yeah, my phone rang shortly after 7 AM. My landline, George, actually. >> Hold on, landline, that sounds like a news story. When was the last time you were somebody who had a landline? >> See a number that few people call and it was President Trump calling. He said at first, he was calling to see if I was okay with what happened. >> Well, he's clearly a Nazi and Hitler and white supremacist. >> The last night, are you okay? And then he- >> Who wants the press murdered? >> He reiterated many of the things he said in his press conference last night, emphasizing the unity that he felt in that moment. >> Yeah, you might wanna take a dose of that unity there, Jake Taber. >> And he said absolutely, and he was quite firm about this, that dinner must be rescheduled. It must be rescheduled. >> He was kind of like returning to the campaign trail after Butler. >> He knows that I was a former president of the White House Corresponds Association and it worked with him on a dinner that never actually happened back during COVID. And he was saying, we've got to get this dinner back on, it has to happen. >> My God, what a monster Donald Trump is. Nora O'Donnell got to interview the president immediately following and she showed the grace and class of a Jerry Springer show panelist, while quoting from the attempted assassin's manifesto. And the president, of course, tossed it right back in her face. I like to call this verbal corporal punishment. >> The so called manifesto is a stunning thing to read, Mr. President. He appears to reference a motive in it. >> Yeah, let me go ahead and just read the screed from the attempted assassin who just tried to kill you. >> He writes this quote, administration officials, they are targets. And he also wrote this, I'm no longer willing to permit a pedophile rapist and traitor to coat my hands with his crime. >> Why the hell did she need to bring this up, I wonder, just right after the assassination attempt. >> What's your reaction to that? >> Well, I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would. >> And now comes the corporal punishment. >> But you're horrible people, horrible people. Yeah, he did write that. I'm not a rapist, I didn't rape anybody. >> No, you think he was referring to you? >> Excuse me, excuse me, what the what, what? >> I'm not a pedophile, you read that crap from some sick person. >> Crap, now we know what the C in CBS stands for. >> I got associated with- >> And the BS. >> All the stuff that has nothing to do with me, I was totally exonerated. Your friends on the other side of the plate are the ones that were involved with, let's say Epstein or other things. >> Boom, Mr. President.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
When a devastated (he was crying like a baby!) Van Jones of CNN came to me with a group of African American leaders, he had “DEAD” in getting Criminal Justice Reform approved in Congress. Van Jones and these Black reps had been unsuccessfully fighting to get “Reform” for many years. He was just wasting everyone’s time - Needed 5 Conservative Senators - there was no chance, or even hope, for a win. I liked some of the people he was with, agreed with what they were saying, and quickly rounded up the votes needed to get CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM approved. It was NOT easy! Nobody else, including Obama, who tried to for years, could have done this! Now I watch this guy, Van Jones, every chance he gets, calling me a “Dictator,” and far worse. He should be ashamed of himself!!! President DJT
TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, AND WIN!!! President DJT