Thank you to the Great Dana White, UFC, and Amazing Patriots—in Miami, Florida!
Video transcript
[MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC]
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
0:00
0:00
20 posts from Friday, March 15, 2024
Day AnalysisThe Fani Willis lover, Mr. Nathan Wade Esq., has just resigned in disgrace, as per his and her reading of the Judge’s Order today. Nathan was the “Special,” in more ways than one, Prosecutor “engaged” by Fani (pronounced Fauni!) Willis, to persecute TRUMP for Crooked Joe Biden and his Department of Injustice, for purposes of Election Interference and living the life of the Rich & Famous. This is the equivalent of Deranged Jack Smith getting “canned,” BIG STUFF, something which should happen in the not too distant future!!!
0:00
0:00
https://dcenquirer.com/reed-cooper-trump-is-more-fit-and-healthy-than-ever-before-despite-media-lies
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/mar/14/trumps-electoral-map-and-coalition-are-expanding/
https://www.bigdatapoll.com/blog/florida-swings-hard-to-trump-in-sunshine-state-poll-for-march-2024/
https://nypost.com/2024/03/14/opinion/why-this-democratic-nikki-haley-backer-is-endorsing-trump-for-president/
Please watch this. Thank you. MAGA!!!
Video transcript
From all over the world they came. Millions of illegal border crosses have entered the country unlawfully. They're coming by the thousands. Nobody could afford this and even morally it's so wrong. We're not smart enough to know who I am, but soon you're going to know who I am. We will secure our borders and we will restore our sovereignty. They recognize the fact that Joe Biden is more favorable president for immigrants. Proper Biden. Biden, of course.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
0:00
0:00
David Schoen and James Trusty join Laura Ingraham, a must watch!
Video transcript
Joining me now to unpack all of this — I'm sorry, Fonny, Fonny, Fonny, I keep saying the wrong thing, sorry about that — is David Schoen, former lead counsel in Trump's impeachment case, and Jim Trusty, another former Trump attorney. Both are intimately familiar with the cases against the former president. We're going to get to Georgia in a second, gentlemen, but I wanted to get Jim's take first on what took place in Miami today in the classified docs case. Judge Eileen Cannon has denied Trump's motion to dismiss, Jim. She said, essentially, that the various phrases that were being contested as too vague, phrases like "entitled to receive" or "related to the national defense," "authorized persons," that there were too many outstanding legal questions for her to grant the motion to dismiss. Do you agree with her ultimate finding there? Well, I do somewhat, and that might be surprising, but the reason why, she's taking a very incremental approach towards everything, towards scheduling, towards resolution of discovery issues. And that's what we're used to in federal courts. That's what we actually want from our judges, is to decide the issues that are ripe at the time they need to be decided. So what she did is she dismissed this without prejudice, saying we can circle back when we're dealing with jury instructions and decide if there's really a constitutional problem with the charges for vagueness. That's a very difficult standard to meet in general. But the key thing, I think, today wasn't that. It was that she keeps talking and asking questions about selective prosecution. You know, you mentioned weaponization. That's the real—I mean, that's an uphill battle normally, but here, the way DOJ has treated President Trump when it comes to Mar-a-Lago, that's a ripe issue that's going to land in her wheelhouse at some point, and it could be a big one. So I don't think it was a bad day for President Trump just to temporarily lose one kind of nuanced, difficult constitutional issue for the time being. Yeah. And it's pretty funny to watch, David, the reaction from some of the Trump critics. They act like they won the case today. I mean, a first-year law student knows how difficult it is to have a motion to dismiss granted when there's a dispute as to some of the underlying facts, and she essentially wrote that resolution of the overall question presented depends too greatly on contested instructional questions about still fluctuating definitions of statutory terms and phrases as charged, et cetera. I just think this was a very conservative ruling on her part. I mean, a lot of people want this to go away. I mean, I think it should go away, but I think this is actually quite smart of this judge in this case. I don't think this is a loss at all for President Trump, and I think Jim is right that she handled it in the proper way. He has, in this case, unlike many other cases, some really serious arguments for dismissal. They're going to have to confront the mens rea element here, the mindset willfully in the context of the Presidential Records Act. You know, a lot of the commentators want to say, "Presidential Records Act has nothing to do with this case," and so on. They're just wrong. If you look at the 2012 decision from Amy Berman Jackson in D.C., a real Trump hater on which she said, "The statute is silent as to who has the right to designate, except insofar as it names the executive as the only person with the right to designate personal versus Presidential Records while that person's in office." That goes, if nothing else, to the mens rea as to whether President Trump willfully violated the law, and willfully means doing something of reasonable belief was criminal. He had people telling him, people who should know, telling him that he had the right to designate these as personal records. So that issue, I think the Evan Corcoran issue, his records, the Judge Howell in D.C. ordered turned over in virtually wholesale fashion despite the attorney-client privilege. I think that ought to lead to a dismissal. I think the grand jury was tainted by that evidence. So there are many issues in this case. This wasn't a loss for President Trump. Now, it's just hilarious to watch, especially non-lawyers, and obviously we're all lawyers, but it's not that complicated, really. When you boil it down to the facts, I just want to play one sound bite for you, Jim, because this made me scream laughing. This was the media in mourning when they realized that some of the charges against Trump were dropped in that Georgia case, and then it ultimately kind of is foreboding for the future of Fonny Willis watch. I just wonder if he would go there, if he would dismiss charges if he's planning to throw out the case or remove it from Fonny Willis to try to look on the bright side. In many ways, this potentially could streamline the case. We're having this conversation against the backdrop of her potential disqualification. This could be sort of death by a thousand cuts. I mean, Jim, they are just trying to find any little thread to kind of try to give some credibility, which is obviously a disaster of a case that was brought by Ms. Willis and her paramour. Yeah, I mean, they may be watching the last few bubbles escape the Titanic on the way down when it comes to Georgia. I mean, I think that this judge did a very, very cerebral job of addressing a challenging motion and he had an elected district attorney perjuring herself in court, disrespectfully doing so. He kept this calm. He waded through the facts. He's wading through the legal issues. And the beauty of this one from President Trump's perspective is if it's dismissed without prejudice, which is usually almost a Pyrrhic victory for the defense because they go back to the grand jury and they recharge it. But if he dismisses it without prejudice and the disqualification kicks in of the entire office, which is what Georgia law says happens under the circumstances, nobody is going to pick this thing up if they have any sense at all. No other DA is going to say, Oh, let me jump into that, you know, morass and handle the same case. David, you agree it's a dead cat bounce at that point? I think so. I really don't know. It depends on who they select and who does the selecting at the end of the day. But I'm going to tell you, this judge is onto something with the charges that he dismissed. His problem with them was one can't really know how to defend against them because they're not specific enough. That's a real issue in the New York case. The New York case is a cockamamie felony by charging a misdemeanor to commit a target act. The grand jury never specified what that target act is. Is it to affect the election? Was it for tax purposes? That can't be cured by a bill of particulars. I think that's fatally defective to the New York case. I hope the lawyers will latch on to that. Oh, that's fascinating. The bootstrapping isn't going to work for them. David and Jim, thanks so much.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
0:00
0:00
Senator Eric Schmitt: “If you’re voting your pocketbook—2024 is a no brainer: Time to ditch Joe Biden and bring back Donald Trump.”
Video transcript
Everything at the grocery store is essentially 20 percent more expensive because inflation is cumulative, right? It takes place over time. People are feeling it every time at the grocery store. Energy costs are about 30 percent higher. What does that mean in real time? It's going up and up. It's much higher over the last three or four weeks. Yeah, real wages are down by five percent. They were up ten percent under President Trump. That's a big spread. What does that mean? That's about a thousand dollars a month taken out of people's pockets. So what's Joe Biden's solution? Think about this. To spend more money we don't have, declare war on domestic energy production, reducing supply, and then also having nine million people here illegally, which of course drives down wages for American workers. So his answer to the problem he created is going to make things worse, which I think is going to make people nostalgic for the Trump era, which is going to come back.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
0:00
0:00
Video transcript
-Thank you, everyone. -I did not share classified information. I did not share it with my ghostwriter. I did not. Guarantee you did not. -We also identified other recorded conversations during which Mr. Biden read classified information allowed to his ghostwriter.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
Rep. Byron Donalds: “This politicized (J6) committee was a media farce to get Trump.”
Video transcript
We're finding out that a the January 6th committee deleted information they got rid of information they collected. You're finding out now that Cassidy Hutcheson was spun up by Liz Cheney and others to deliver a phony story that was debunked. We already knew that the whole J6 production was just a media sham in the farce for the radical left. We already knew that but now you know that they were meeting with Fannie Willis and her team trying to give back channel information to the Fulton County District Attorney who by the way is having all kind of problems herself. They were back channeling information to her. This demonstrates very clearly that you had congressional Democrats and some useful Republicans. Unfortunately they did the wrong thing and it was terrible. That's why they're no longer in Congress. Speaking of Liz Cheney specifically, working with radical Democrats, working with some of these prosecutors, the entire purpose has been to get Trump. It is wrong. This is fascism at its finances. This is what we're seeing right now. It's destructive of our institutions so this stuff can't be tolerated.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
0:00
0:00
“TWO TIERS OF JUSTICE”
Video transcript
Pride and profit, you got motive. The misconduct's plain as day. And there was an attempt to cover it up. The same month Biden opens an investigation into Trump's handling of classified documents, he dispatches his team to gather all of the classified documents that he'd been stashing. Then Biden's team waits a year and a half to announce they'd found classified documents at the Penn Biden Center. An 18-month mop-up job at your house while you raid your opponent's house. That's not cooperating with investigators. In fact, the second they heard a special counsel had been appointed, Biden's ghostwriter deleted evidence. -Ghostwriter has recordings of Biden making admissions of crimes. He then learns that you've been appointed. He then deletes the information that is the evidence and you don't charge him. -That is reflected in the report. One of the things that Mr. Zwanitzer did not delete was transcripts of the recordings that he had created that included inculpatory evidence relating to Mr. Biden. -Oh, so if you destroy some evidence but not other evidence, that somehow absolves you of the evidence you destroy? Like, here's what I see. Zwanitzer should have been charged, wasn't. Biden and Trump should have been treated equally. They weren't, and that is the double standard that I think a lot of Americans are concerned about. -In the last three elections, three candidates have been accused of mishandling documents. Hillary Biden and Trump. And only one's been charged. The only one who was president with declassification authority. The other two risked national security for pride and profit, got caught, destroyed evidence, and then lost their memories. But is Biden playing dumb or just dumb? -I would not be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury that that intent element had been -- -Right, but the reason you have that doubt is the senile-cooperator theory, the fact that Joe Biden is so inept in responding that you can't prove the intent, which, again, I don't quibble with that conclusion, but it's frustrating to be like, "Oh, well, this guy's not getting treated the same way as Trump 'cause the elevator's not going to the top floor, so we can't prove intent," while at the same time Biden goes out there at the White House and says, "Well, you know, he just blatantly lies." And what I'm trying to figure out is whether or not Biden's lying because he's still so senile, he hasn't read your report, or whether it's a little craftier and a little more devious and perhaps a little more intentional than we might otherwise think. -So, prosecutors are claiming Biden's to forgetful to be prosecuted, but Trump's sharp enough to stand trial. That's not how the law works. -We have a former vice president who will not suffer any consequences for all of these actions, all because we say, "Well, he's a well-meaning, forgetful old man." You know, if you were kind of a well-meaning, forgetful old man that was driving a car and you forgot what you were doing a little bit and you hit somebody and killed him, I believe you'd be responsible. The law must apply. Now, the real reason Herr didn't charge Biden is because he didn't think he'd get a conviction, but it's not why, it's where. Herr didn't think he could get Biden convicted in D.C., and that's where the jury would be. Outside of D.C., fair jury, sure. But Biden's poor mental state let him escape justice, which is forcing the media to argue that Biden's competent enough to be president but not competent enough to stand trial. -You have this image of this poor guy sitting on a park bench, you know, feeding the birds. That's not who Joe Biden is. -He really wasn't carrying their water. I think he's shown the work on the old man sitting on a bench feeding the pigeons. -It comes after Joe Biden just had a very successful, effective State of the Union address, so nobody who saw him on that night is gonna think of him as glorious at a kindly old man sitting on a park bench feeding the pigeons. -The president sitting on a park bench feeding the pigeons is what saved Democrats from nominating Kamala.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
0:00
0:00
Video transcript
Jesse, think about how much of a contrast this presents between the Trump economy and the Biden economy. If you go back to the Trump economy, you had American jobs going to American workers. You had wages rising under the Biden economy. You have those American workers getting fired and replaced with foreign labor. This is not an exaggeration. All net job creation, Jesse, you heard me right, 100% of net job creation under the Biden administration has gone to the foreign-born. So we are taking an economy that produced prosperity for American citizens and turning it into a economy that produces prosperity for people who probably shouldn't be here in the first place. And I bet you know what Tyson isn't doing, Jesse? I bet they're not drug testing the illegal immigrants who are coming in. I bet they're not asking whether they're bringing fentanyl or drugs into that small town with them. This is the end of the American dream. If we let this stuff happen, we've got to reelect Donald Trump and we've got to get congressional Republicans with some spine to push back against this stuff.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
Senator Tim Scott: “Why are African Americans, Hispanics, Asians...all looking at Donald Trump with new eyes? It is simple: we were better off under Trump. Economically, the lowest unemployment rates for all demographics and a 70-year low for women.”
Video transcript
Why are African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, Republicans, men, women, all looking at Donald Trump with new eyes? It is simple. We were better off under Trump, economically the lowest unemployment rates for all racial demographics and a 70-year low for women, crime. We had law and order. African Americans in Minneapolis voted to refund the police and overturn their own city council who wanted to defund the police. Here's what we know about Americans, Americans want a fair level playing field and there's only one candidate and one party that represents that and that's Donald Trump.
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
0:00
0:00
Video transcript
♪♪♪ ♪ Don't you ever be sad ♪ ♪ Treat on me in time to bang ♪ ♪ When the day comes and you look down ♪ ♪ And I'm in a bubble and I'm back to surround ♪ ♪ Just roll on ♪ ♪ 'Cause I'm coming home ♪ ♪ 'Cause I'm coming home ♪ ♪ I'm on my way, sure I'm coming ♪ ♪ If you get cold, yeah, I will be your lover ♪ ♪ Don't have to worry ♪ ♪ 'Cause I'm here ♪ ♪ Don't need to stop, baby ♪ ♪ 'Cause I'm here ♪ ♪ Just roll on ♪ ♪ I'm coming home ♪ ♪ Oh, no ♪ ♪ I'm coming ♪ ♪ Oh, no ♪ ♪ I'm coming ♪ ♪ Oh, no ♪ ♪ I'm coming ♪ I love you, yeah! ♪ Reach out to me ♪ ♪ For satisfaction, yeah ♪ Look at here, babe. That's all she got to do. ♪ Oh, my name, yeah ♪ ♪ But with reaction, yeah, yeah, yeah ♪ ♪ Yeah ♪ (upbeat music) ♪ Now don't you ever be sad ♪ ♪ You mean on me ♪ ♪ When the time will be ♪ ♪ When the day comes ♪ ♪ I look down, baby ♪ ♪ The river drops ♪ ♪ And I've got to turn out ♪ ♪ Oh, no ♪ ♪ Now I'm coming ♪ ♪ Oh, no ♪ ♪ I love you ♪ ♪ Oh, no ♪ ♪ 'Cause every time comes ♪ ♪ Here we come ♪ ♪ Oh, no ♪ ♪ Girl, I'm not afraid of you, yeah ♪ ♪ Oh, no ♪ ♪ 'Cause every time comes ♪ ♪ I love you ♪ ♪ Oh, no ♪ ♪ 'Cause every time comes ♪ (audience cheering)
Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.
John Barrasso is a fantastic Senator for the incredible people of Wyoming.He is running to be the next Republican Whip for the Senate Republican Conference, a very important job, to ensure we pass and enact Strong Legislation that puts America First. I know John very well — he will never let you down. John Barrasso has my Complete and Total Endorsement!
0:00
0:00
AI Day Analysis
Machine-generated analysis of the 2024-03-15 posts below. Not written by their author.
Post-Nomination Triumphalism Peaks as Nathan Wade Resignation Becomes Victory Lap Centerpiece
Trump spent March 15th in a confident, expansive mood — three days after clinching the Republican nomination and with a major legal development breaking in his favor. The morning opened with a rapid burst of endorsement posts quoting Republican allies, punctuated by a brief flash of anger about a "two-tier justice system." The day's main event was the resignation of Nathan Wade from the Georgia prosecution team, which Trump seized on with visible relish, mocking the prosecutors by name and calling for Jack Smith to be fired next. He closed the evening at a UFC event in Miami with Dana White, capping a day that felt more like a victory tour than a campaign schedule.