Post from Truth Social

One template, six Ohio districts

This is one of at least six Ohio House endorsements posted on 31 October. The earlier five cover districts 5 through 9 (Latta, Rulli, Max Miller, Davidson, Merrin), and this one adds Jim Jordan in the 4th. The posts share whole blocks of text. "Grow our Economy, Cut Taxes and Regulations, Promote MADE IN THE U.S.A., Champion American Energy DOMINANCE, Keep our now very Secure Border, SECURE, Stop Migrant Crime" appears almost word for word in the Rulli and Latta posts. The attack paragraph, which says Jordan's opponent is "opposed to NO TAX ON TIPS" and the other two branded tax breaks and warns that "if he and the Dumocrats ever got in, all of these things will be terminated", is the Merrin post with "she" changed to "he". The parts that change from post to post are the name, the district number, a biography sentence and the opponent's name. Jordan's biography is a single clause, "As Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee", which suggests the drafter thought he needed no introduction.

Authorship. It went up at 2:26 PM Eastern on a Saturday (daylight time was still in effect, since it ended 1 November). That is the middle of the working day, in the middle of a batch of templated posts. It is signed in the third person, "President DONALD J. TRUMP", and links to a campaign turnout site. The text holds its line from the opening praise to the closing "GET OUT AND VOTE FOR JIM" without once drifting off it, and that steadiness is what rules out live typing by the subject, whose own posts tend to wander into personal grievance partway through. The Trump-sounding parts ("Dumocrat," "Complete and Total Endorsement," the capitalized slogans) are a house style that staff have been reproducing since the 2022 cycle. The most likely picture is that staff wrote it and he approved it. The one personal touch, "a very good friend, fighter, and WINNER", is itself a stock closing line from these endorsements.

The split between candidate and opponent. All the psychological content sits in the contrast between the two men. Jordan is all good: "America First Patriot," "true MAGA Warrior," "fighting tirelessly," "relentlessly focused," "HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN." Kolasinski is all bad: "Radical Left Dumocrat," "Reckless, Radical, and Dangerous!" Nothing sits between those poles. The idealizing and devaluing come from a fixed template, so they show a campaign genre that runs on splitting. They don't show a reaction by the subject to anything Kolasinski did. The same list of positions ("massive Tax Increases, Open Borders, Men playing in Women's Sports, and Transgender Mutilization of your Children") is pinned on every opponent. For a challenger with no congressional voting record, "opposed to" cannot be based on any vote he cast.

The bloc of enemies, "the Marxists, Socialists, and Communists on the Radical Left", casts the opposing party as an ideological threat that the country needs "Protect[ing]" from. That fits the Warrior archetype the post names outright ("MAGA Warrior"). In order/chaos terms the post defends order: the border is described as "now very Secure", and the Second Amendment as "always under siege." That pairing is the usual one for a sitting administration. Its own order is presented as won, and the threat is that the other side would take it away.

What the post wants. The post is built around an agency motive: winning seats, with "WINNER" capitalized as the top compliment. The signature makes the endorsement a transfer of personal authority, and Jordan's value is framed partly as loyalty ("very good friend"). There is no narcissistic injury and no wish for admiration behind it. This is routine campaign upkeep three days before the election, sent out in bulk.

Language. "Mutilization" is not a word (the intended word is "mutilation"), and "Dumocrat" is a deliberate coinage of the 2025–26 period. The first looks like a template error rather than a slip in live production, since it sits in copied text and tells us nothing about the subject's own word retrieval. Syntax is otherwise intact, and the slogan list is long but correctly punctuated.

Danger. The harshest phrases, "Transgender Mutilization of your Children" and the communist label, are aimed at a party faction and at one candidate's supposed positions. The only action the post asks for is electoral: "GET OUT AND VOTE FOR JIM." No one is named as a target for anything beyond defeat at the ballot box. The language about children is the most inflammatory element, and it is boilerplate repeated across the batch.

Facts. The checkable claims about Jordan are accurate. The policy claims are where the post stretches. "NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY" describes as existing law something that is a temporary senior deduction, and the warning that Democrats would "terminate" the tips and overtime breaks leaves out that the 2025 law already ends them after 2028.

Fact Verification

1. The provisions already end under the law Republicans wrote. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (signed July 4, 2025) created temporary deductions for tax years 2025 through 2028: up to $25,000 of qualified tips, up to $12,500 ($25,000 joint) of the overtime premium, and an extra $6,000 deduction for people 65 and older. All three expire after 2028 (IRS FS-2025-03, Ogletree, Bankrate, FactCheck.org). Gray DC reported in April 2026 that Republicans call the law permanent while the tips and overtime breaks expire in
2. I found no 2026 law extending them. So they end on schedule unless Congress acts, whoever wins in November.
3. Democrats couldn't end them before then anyway. Trump holds the veto until January 2029, and the deductions lapse after the 2028 tax year, so even a Democratic House and Senate elected in 2026 couldn't repeal them early over his veto. One House member from Ohio's 4th has no way to do it.
4. Democrats have mostly backed these breaks, not attacked them. The standalone No Tax on Tips Act passed the Senate by unanimous consent in May 2025, brought to the floor by Democrat Jacky Rosen and praised by Chuck Schumer. Sen. Ruben Gallego introduced a bill to make it permanent and called the OBBBA version 'shamefully short term.' Democrats' 'You Earned It, You Keep It Act' would permanently end federal tax on Social Security benefits. FactCheck.org (Oct 8, 2026) rated this family of GOP attacks misleading: Democrats voted against the OBBBA as a whole, mostly over Medicaid and SNAP cuts, and many Democratic candidates say they support the tips, overtime and senior provisions. I found no Democratic pledge to repeal them.
5. 'No tax on Social Security' isn't what the law does. It created a phased-out $6,000 senior deduction, not an exemption for benefits. The Tax Policy Center says it helps fewer than half of older adults.

Kolasinski himself has said nothing about repealing any of these. His campaign site says 'full-time work deserves economic stability' and calls to 'prioritize workers over shareholders.' Rated mostly false, not false, only because it's a forecast: a future Democratic Congress and president could in theory let the breaks lapse after 2028 instead of extending them. That would be the Republican law's own sunset taking effect, not Democrats 'terminating' anything. | | "Kolasinski opposes no tax on tips/overtime and wants massive tax increases, open borders, men in women's sports, and 'Transgender Mutilization' of children" | False | Joshua Kolasinski is a Delaware, Ohio small business owner (medical equipment installation and repair) and the 2026 Democratic nominee in OH-4. He has never held federal office, so he cast no vote on the OBBBA or anything else. I checked his campaign site (joshuaforohio.com) and race coverage from the Dayton Daily News / Springfield News-Sun, Lima News, Richland Source, Morrow County Sentinel / Urbana Daily Citizen, Hoodline, Marion County Now, smarter.vote, The Ballot Brief and the FEC. None record any of the positions in this claim.

• Open borders: directly contradicted. The Dayton Daily News / Springfield News-Sun reported that Kolasinski 'does not support open borders' and said his views 'are not radical in the ways that Jordan describes Democrats.' He also said ICE and law enforcement should follow the law and respect constitutional rights. His only immigration platform item is 'Oversight & Transparency in Immigration Enforcement.'
• Tips and overtime: no statement of opposition anywhere. His site says 'Full-time work deserves economic stability' and 'Prioritize workers over shareholders.' Smarter.vote and every news profile list no position on tips, overtime or Social Security taxes.
• Massive tax increases: he hasn't proposed any. His only tax language is that federal taxes should 'be used in our communities and not in more wars, or corporate welfare.' The one possible hook is his support for single-payer or 'universal basic healthcare,' which would need financing, but he hasn't proposed a tax increase to pay for it.
• Transgender athletes and gender care for minors: no statement on either in his platform or any coverage. His platform covers campaign finance (repealing Citizens United), stock-trading bans, term limits, healthcare costs, Medicare drug-price negotiation, a farm bill, data centers, opposing school vouchers and for-profit prisons, vaccine-injury compensation reform, and ending 'wars of choice.' He calls himself a Christian who has voted for both parties.

The same list of positions shows up nearly word for word in Trump's other Ohio endorsements posted that day, against different opponents, so it's stock text rather than a description of this candidate. FactCheck.org (Oct 8, 2026) found the same pattern in GOP ads against other Democratic challengers who never served in Congress, such as Bob Brooks in PA-7, whose campaigns actually back no tax on tips and overtime. One component is directly refuted and the rest have no support in anything Kolasinski has said, so the claim is false. |

Overall Veracity: 53%